7Artisans AF 85mm F1.8 STM Review | High Quality Budget Option Under $300?

0:00
Hi, I'm Dustin Abbott
0:11
Several months ago I did a review of the first autofocusing lens from the company 7Artisans
0:16
That was the 7Artisans AF 50mm f1.8. Since that point I've done a subsequent review of an APS-C specific lens, 27mm f2.8
0:28
But I am back with the next lens in the more premium series, full frame, larger aperture
0:34
lenses and that is the autofocusing 85mm f1.8 STM. Now this lens is priced a little bit higher, it's $299 vs $229 US dollars, but it is also
0:47
improved in all areas as we're going to see as a part of this review
0:52
And even at the price point a little bit higher of around $300 US dollars, it is still cheaper
0:57
than just about all of the autofocusing 85mm options available on Sony E-mount, which is
1:02
what I'm reviewing today. And it offers up a very impressive optical performance
1:08
So is it worth buying? Well that's what we're going to explore as a part of today's review, right after a word
1:13
from our sponsor. Today's episode is brought to you by Phantom Wallet, the minimalist modern wallet that
1:19
is now even better with the new Phantom X that is crafted from aluminum right here in Canada
1:25
The wallet is 22% smaller and 35% lighter, while still making it easy to access your
1:31
cards and money when you need them, thanks to their unique fanning mechanism
1:34
You could even customize your wallet due to its modular design, with accessories like
1:39
a money clip, cash holder, ID display and even Chipolo and AirTag tracking integration
1:45
Visit store.phantomwallet.com to check out their unique sizes, styles and finishes that
1:51
span from aluminum to wood to carbon fiber. And use code Dustin15 for 15% off when you're ready to check out
2:02
So as noted I am reviewing this lens in Sony E-mount. I will note with the 50mm lens it also released initially only in Sony E-mount
2:10
They have followed up with a Nikon Z-mount version. Since that point I suspect we'll see the same for the 85mm lens
2:18
As noted the $300 price point, the only lens that is cheaper is the Mike AF 85mm f1.8 which
2:26
comes in at $200 but it is terrible by comparison. It's a lens that I wouldn't recommend unless you have an absolutely tight budget but I
2:35
would 100% recommend you save up a little bit more and purchase this lens instead of
2:39
that Mike lens. It falls anywhere between with the other kind of cheap alternatives it falls about $100
2:47
cheaper than most of them. For example the probably the most notable comparison would be the Viltrox AF 85mm f1.8
2:55
Mark II. It's about $100 more and so on the value proposition this lens stacks up I would say
3:00
fairly well. Now when it comes to the size it is not all that different than what the 50mm lens was
3:07
but while the 50mm felt kind of large for a 50mm lens with just a maximum aperture of
3:13
f1.8 this lens not so much. It's actually the same diameter 72mm or 2.83 inches but it's a little bit shorter
3:23
This lens is only 96mm versus 104mm right around 4 inches in length and so it is definitely
3:32
a little bit more compact though when it comes to the weight the weight is a hair heavier
3:36
it's at 412 grams or right under 15 ounces in terms of the weight
3:42
The build quality here though is very substantial all metals in the barrel it feels like a actual
3:49
feels quite premium in the hand in many ways in fact it reminds me of the Sony's Iceplane
3:54
R 50mm f1.4 in terms of the build quality which in my mind is a very complimentary thing
4:00
It's got that same anodized metal look to it kind of a satin finish you know metal focus
4:06
ring metal aperture ring everything here feels you know fairly top-notch which is pretty
4:11
surprising at this price point. As noted the manual focus ring itself is all in metal now I will note that the damping
4:18
is a little bit on the firm side however it feels really really precise it's maybe not
4:23
you know I just did some Voigtlander reviews and they have amazing manual focus rings and
4:28
this is maybe a little bit on the heavy side when it comes to the damping but what it feels
4:32
like to me is again very much like the Sony's Iceplane R that I owned for years where it's
4:39
it feels pretty close to a true manual focus experience and so it's it's actually quite
4:44
a premium feel in my mind. As far as the feature set we've actually got some further improvement here we have a pretty
4:52
decent amount of specifications or features we've got an AF-MF switch as we did on the
4:58
50mm lens however the feel of this switch is definitely improved the other the other
5:03
switch felt a little indefinite when it came to you know where whether you were actually
5:07
locked into the mode there's a more definite click here so that feels better there's the
5:12
addition of a function button or focus hold button and and so that can be programmed to
5:17
a variety of functions from within the camera body and again the button itself feels precise
5:22
there's a nice click to it it's not rubbery feeling at all
5:27
Then we have an aperture ring here the aperture is declicked as was the case before though
5:32
there are markings at the one third stop to tense all throughout the aperture ring
5:37
remains I'm not blown away by it in a few ways the the actual weight of it feels good
5:44
so you could do the racking I feel like I have to be really precise at lining up with
5:50
those markings to get the correct aperture value and so it's it's a little bit odd in
5:55
that regard but the other thing that I will note is this there's there's a few quirks
6:00
that have remained that I don't quite understand for example between f1.8 and f2 we have one
6:05
third stop markings as if there are you know three stops between f1.8 and f2.8 and if you
6:11
know aperture values you know that there's only one third stop between f1.8 and f2 and
6:17
so we have two absolutely unnecessary markings here just eliminate that it's for those that
6:22
care about photography and know photography you look at that and that seems misguided
6:28
likewise after f16 which is the minimum aperture there are two detent marks between f16 and
6:34
then the a marking for switching into an automatic mode I would again I would prefer that to
6:40
be removed or replaced maybe with a horizontal line showing a mark in between that and maybe
6:46
a little bit more of a definite detent blocking you going into the a mode because if you're
6:51
doing an aperture rack right now it's not difficult at all to go right past f16 into
6:56
automatic mode which you're not going to want to do so again very solvable problems but I would
7:01
like to offer up the recommendations that those problems get solved now when it comes to the the
7:07
action of the aperture itself the aperture itself is beautiful it's 11 bladed so a nice high aperture
7:11
blade nicely circular looking shape I will note an unfortunate thing is that there is a fair amount
7:18
of noise as you control the aperture so even if you're doing an aperture rack it's very possible
7:24
that that sound could be picked up by the in-camera microphone because it is fairly noisy and so
7:29
that's actually the most noisy process of the whole focus process really doesn't have to do
7:34
with focus but it is the sound of that aperture iris blades opening and closing a little bit noisy
7:39
outside of that however you know function is fine here it does have a USB C port in the lens mount
7:47
much like the Viltrox lenses and like the Viltrox lenses the updating firmware updating
7:53
process is very similar I mean it's a drag-and-drop situation into the folder when you've connected
7:59
this to your computer it's quite easy to do and can be done in a matter of seconds so I appreciate
8:04
that unfortunately we still have no weather sealing on the lens itself so at the Brio you'll
8:09
have the electronics but you don't have any kind of gasket I will note a little bit of an improvement
8:14
to the included lens hood however I noted with the previous lens that the lens hood itself it was
8:19
very matte it wasn't a good texture match to the rest of the lens wasn't a great finish match in
8:25
this case I feel like they've done a better job it's a little less matte a little bit more satin
8:29
so it looks like it belongs more it also feels more precise to me it bayonets on a little more
8:35
precisely it locks into its final place more precisely progress in the right direction minimum
8:41
focus distance here is 80 centimeters it's about average for an 85 millimeter lens and while they
8:46
don't list the magnification when I compare it to some of the other options that I have a known
8:51
figure for I'm an estimated to being around 0.13 times which is a about the middle of the pack
8:57
about average for an 85 millimeter lens so nothing really to complain about there as far as the
9:04
handling goes in general although there are a few quirks with the Aputure ring that I've detailed
9:08
I do see signs of maturation throughout and that there's a little bit more refinement in the way
9:13
that these you know the switch and in this case the button feels the lens hood some of those
9:18
improvements there they're getting better and frankly for 300 bucks this is a really really
9:24
nice lens in terms of its build quality and its overall functionality so let's talk autofocus
9:30
once again we have a stepping focus motor stepping focus motors STM motors are pretty ubiquitous on
9:36
kind of non-premium lenses typically when you go to a more premium lens you're going to switch to a
9:41
linear style focus motor even multiple linear motors and so this is probably it's good enough
9:47
to get the job done but there is certainly room for improvement as you can see here focus speed
9:52
is not bad it's about average I would say there were a few situations where it felt a little bit
9:58
deliberate but as I looked at the overall focus and used it in general it got the job done you
10:03
know speedily enough that I didn't think about it very much your typical focus changes are nice
10:08
and quick not instant like the best lenses but very very good if you go back just a few years
10:14
back to the you know DSLR days I would have been really really pleased with the focus speed here
10:20
and so overall not bad at all focus sound also not bad you can hear very very light whirring
10:26
and clicking but you know it's very very insignificant overall I would say one shot
10:32
or you know non burst accuracy was very very good one thing that I did notice that was an issue with
10:39
the 50 millimeter that they have solved with the 85 millimeter and that is that if you're shooting
10:43
a burst of a subject that's staying still a portrait subject for example and I use myself
10:48
as an example with my wife taking the pictures for both the 50 millimeter and 85 millimeter
10:53
with the 50 millimeter you could see the first shot was well focused and then the focus would
10:57
go all over the place and the rest of that burst that's not the case now with the 85 millimeter
11:02
lens it stayed consistently focused on my eye and it did not drift so that's great news there I did
11:08
use it in a wedding situation for a friend that did a civil ceremony and I shot some photos in
11:15
their ceremony and then of them afterward and it just it nailed focus no problem at all in that
11:20
kind of setting both the speed and accuracy I was very very pleased with the end results again for
11:25
such an inexpensive lens and I use this lens exclusively for that where it still isn't good is
11:31
when it comes to trying to keep up with a moving target I feel like from what I see that autofocus
11:36
basically does not operate during a burst with movement forward and so what I found is that my
11:44
first shot and maybe second shot and a burst were focused just fine but it seems like the focus
11:49
point never moved forward so as Nala moved towards the camera where that original focus point was
11:54
remain the focus point without it moving forward so this is still not a good option if you need to
11:59
shoot action and so that's certainly something to consider now video autofocus was generally fine
12:06
focus changes for my focus pools were smooth and quick I did see some settling and micro pulsing
12:12
with the 50 millimeter lens I don't see that now so again some further refinement when it comes to
12:17
that I found that my hand tests also did find good transitions from the hand to the eye and vice
12:24
versa you can see some focus breathing there and so if that's an issue for you you might want to
12:29
consider that overall in terms of the focus transitions out in real-world shots not really a
12:35
whole lot to complain about it was basically not it's not not to say that it was like overly cinematic
12:41
or anything but it was about what I would expect it was about average for a lens like this you know
12:47
any kind of lens in this particular class and so overall I think it was just fine so if you're
12:53
thinking about a lens for tracking your toddler or young children this is probably not the choice
12:58
for you but for most people in most situations it'll do just fine so how about the image quality
13:04
I'll give you an overview here and then if you want the deeper dive into the performance including
13:08
a few comparisons to other lenses that will come at the end of the video and our deep dive optical
13:13
breakdown optical formula here is 10 elements in 7 groups that includes some ED or extra low
13:19
dispersion elements and some HRI or high refractive index elements a few exotic elements
13:25
there and it certainly pays off this is a really really good lens optically for the price in fact
13:30
I was extremely impressed with the real-world performance it's very sharp even on my high
13:35
resolution 61 megapixel Sony a7r mark 5 which a $300 lens on a such a high resolution lens
13:42
our camera the fact that it keeps up just fine very very impressive it has minimal amounts of
13:49
distortion just a tiny bit of pincushion distortion a minus 2 to correct and a minimal amount of
13:54
vignette as well just a plus 35 or about a stop of vignette to correct no issues there I didn't
14:01
really see any kind of real longitudinal chromatic aberration or fringing issues before or after the
14:07
plane of focus so positive results there there is a little bit of lateral chromatic aberrations
14:12
near the edge of the frame nothing significant or deal-breaking there however when it comes to the
14:18
sharpness and contrast it's very impressively good not just in the center of the frame but all
14:23
across the frame right into the corners in fact and as I did comparison over the last all the
14:28
e-mount 85 millimeter autofocus lenses that I've tested over the last five years or so I went back
14:33
and did some comparisons and I found that the only lens that I would consider to be sharper is
14:38
actually the Sigma art 85 millimeter f 1.4 DN lens and even there this lens is actually a little bit
14:46
better in the corners than what the Sigma is though the Sigma is a little bit stronger elsewhere but
14:50
again you're talking about a lens that cost between three and four times as much and so I'm
14:56
in comparison with the lenses that are actually in this class this lens is impressively sharp very
15:02
very good sharpness is basically top tier across the frame by f 2.8 it'll stay consistently extremely
15:10
good all the way through f11 you will see diffraction start to set in by f11 and then a
15:15
little bit more pronounced by f16 which is common on a high-resolution body the bokeh quality is
15:21
surprisingly good for such a budget lens and again and again I was really really pleased with the
15:27
overall look of images images feel a lot more expensive than what the price tag of the lens
15:32
suggests the bokeh quality is good and even in the shot of the doom you look at the geometry it's not
15:37
like perfect circular shapes at f1.8 but the nature of those is quite good and the overall effect is
15:44
very pleasing and in many other situations I found the bokeh quality to be to be really creamy and
15:49
very very nice it's a definite strength for the lens flare resistance was fairly poor on the 50
15:56
millimeter lens I feel like it's a little bit better here but what you will still see is a bit
16:01
of a flashing effect if the Sun is right outside of the frame and so again not a flawless performance
16:07
there use the included lens hood and in most situations you'll probably be just fine my
16:13
conclusion is this this has both the build quality and the overall optical performance of I would say
16:20
a much more expensive lens and autofocus has improved to the case to where I think in again
16:26
for most people in most situations it's going to be absolutely fine for them and really deliver
16:31
well focus results just don't buy it for action and I think for if you're all the other applications
16:37
you should be okay I'm not sure that you're going to find better I'm pretty sure that you won't find
16:43
better image quality from an 85 millimeter lens at a price point even under $400 maybe even under
16:51
$500 and so the fact that you're getting this at a $300 price point is very very impressive you know
16:57
I would say the next lens that I would consider a major upgrade from this would be that Sigma 85
17:02
millimeter f1.4 art but you're talking about a much more expensive bigger heavier lens that you know
17:08
is incredible optically but you know that's that's basically we're gonna have to pay to get better
17:13
image quality than this at 85 millimeters now I would say that the Sony 85 millimeter f1.8 is
17:18
still a good option if you need higher-end autofocus but outside of that this lens is
17:24
pretty great I'm Dustin Abbott if you want more information you can check out the full text review
17:30
that's linked in the description down below you can also look there and find an image gallery and
17:36
some buying links if you want more detail you can stay with me right now as we dive into our
17:41
detailed image quality breakdown so let's start our breakdown by taking a look at vignette and
17:46
distortion if you look here with the uncorrected result you can see a little bit of a pin cushion
17:50
distortion on the right side this is a manual correction very linear no problem a minus two
17:56
to correct for that you could see some vignette largely concentrated towards the extreme corners
18:01
but again not significant I added a plus 35 and as you can see that cleared everything up perfectly
18:07
I didn't really notice any kind of significant issue with longitudinal chromatic aberrations
18:12
fringing before after the plane of focus either in my chart test as you can see here just a very
18:18
mild amount of fringing before and after and then out in the real world I didn't really notice any
18:22
kind of issue either now you do see a little bit more when it comes to lateral chromatic aberrations
18:28
that show up typically at smaller apertures towards the edges of the frame definitely here
18:32
there's kind of a blue fringing that shows up and that a bit of a yellow on this side and so that is
18:38
the strongest thing that I saw though to be fair in real-world shots I didn't see much of it so
18:44
let's take a look at resolution in contrast so frame of reference this is a 61 megapixel a7r
18:50
mark 5 results shown here at 200% that's a challenging thing for any expensive lens but
18:56
no problem here you can see contrast in detail is really nice and high as we pan over here towards
19:02
the mid-frame mid-frame looks great come on down here we can see that we've got consistent
19:08
performance from the left side down to the right side and as we move down into the corners you can
19:12
see right into the corners contrast and detail looks good there's a little bit of that fringing
19:16
that we saw but really that's the only thing you can critique it's great detail right off to the
19:21
very edge of the frame so let's compare this to some competitors so I've got the original Viltrox
19:27
AF 85 millimeter f1.8 on the right now I will point out that that Viltrox was shot on a much
19:33
lower resolution a7r mark 3 so 42 versus 61 megapixels so it's not really an apples to
19:41
apples comparison but you can see that the two lenses are comparable in the mid-frame if you
19:47
pop into the corners they're close though I would give the edge when it comes to the rendering of
19:52
the fine details to the 7 artisans lens you can also see that there's a little more of the fringing
19:59
showing up even at this lower resolution point on the Viltrox than what we see elsewhere we look
20:06
down here at this zone here you can see that the 7 artisans looks much much better and up here into
20:13
the left corner you can see some give-and-take I would give maybe the edge to the Viltrox but
20:18
overall I would say that the 7 artisans is consistently better so next we'll jump to a
20:24
comparison with the Viltrox 85 millimeter mark 2 now it to be fair that is pretty much the same
20:30
lens optically so we shouldn't expect to see any kind of great improvement and if anything I would
20:34
say in the two copies that I tested that actually the first generation lens of the Viltrox performed
20:40
a little bit better in my test than what this second generation copy did and so I see a pretty
20:45
easy win for the 7 artisans here in the various places that I check out and so just seems that
20:53
the 7 artisans is the more consistent performer here look at the difference in this text right
20:58
here versus the text here just much better even when you're using the advantage of the lower
21:03
resolution for the Viltrox now we can do more of an apples to apples tests with the Sigma 85
21:10
millimeter f1.4 though it's still not quite the same you it's the 50 megapixel of the alpha 1
21:18
here rather than the 61 of the a7r mark 5 still a little bit closer so you can see that the Sigma
21:23
is the winner in terms of contrast in the center of the frame it's fantastic likewise mid-frame I
21:29
favor the Sigma there we look in the corner however the Sigma is definitely weaker than what
21:35
the Viltrox, excuse me, the 7 artisans lens is look over here on this side and the Sigma is very
21:42
slightly better but not really significantly so now if we compare to the only less expensive
21:48
option here the mic 85 millimeter f1.8 well here's where things start to get a little ridiculous and
21:54
so as you can see here the 7 artisans lens is night and day better in the center of the frame
22:00
in the mid frame and in the corners it's just not even close and so a much much stronger result for
22:08
the 7 artisans lens so to put all that into perspective here's a look at real world 100
22:15
magnification f1.8 you can see great amounts of detail in this shot here likewise here the shot
22:22
of Nala if we punch in to a pixel level you can see that the detail and contrast there is just
22:28
really really beautiful it's a great lens optically now the mild step down to f2 doesn't
22:36
a huge difference here there's a little bit more contrast as you can see you could see that a bit
22:40
more in the mid frame though not significantly down here in the corner everything looks a little
22:45
bit brighter so it's mostly contrast that's impacted not so much sharpness but again if
22:51
you take that into the real world here's f2 and so I wanted to focus on the green so you can see
22:56
the foreground blurred out and then if we look there and by the way look at my t-shot is that
23:01
awesome almost had a hole-in-one there anyway you can see as we pan across the frame here again
23:08
high-resolution at just f2 there's good detail they're all across the frame now the big leap
23:14
in terms of improvement is going to be found at f 2.8 and so you can see at f 2.8 the contrast
23:20
and detail looks well it looks a lot like that Sigma did which is exceptionally good that's true
23:24
here also in the mid frame the corners look excellent they're bright there's lots of detail
23:30
I mean this lens is looking really really strong that's true in landscape images as well here at
23:36
5 f 5.6 you can see that as we look into the various details in this frame there's just lots
23:42
of information great contrast there you know we can see detail right off into the distance and
23:48
all handled really really well so you can expect that strong results all the way through f8 at f11
23:55
diffraction starts to soften things a little but you can still see it looks really good f16 here
24:00
on the right is just a little bit softer but not terrible like I think that most people would be
24:05
happy with real-world images shot at f16 they would hold up fine now while magnification is
24:12
not off the charts you can see here that we actually have you know good strong results
24:17
in terms of contrast and detail at minimum focus flat plane of focus so you know it's
24:23
very consistently good everywhere that I look in the frame this shot is basically at minimum focus
24:29
and you can see that the detail is held up really well some images are some lenses kind of fall
24:34
apart when you shoot them up close that's certainly not the case here and overall I actually felt like
24:40
colors was more nice good saturation overall I like the look of the images and you can see that
24:47
the background transitions all look really nice the blur on this image looks great if we punch in
24:53
look at these unripe blackberries they look beautifully detail by the way they have since
24:59
ripened and most of them have been eaten and they were fantastic this coming back to this shot for
25:04
a moment you can see that yes there is some lemon or cat eye shape near the edges of the frame but
25:09
overall I would say that the specular highlights are looking pretty good you can see looking in
25:14
the middle of them a little bit of outlining but overall pretty clean not a lot of fringing in them
25:19
contrast looks great here I'm pretty impressed now the final thing that I'll look at is the fact
25:25
that there is a little bit of some veiling issues flashing if the Sun is right out of the frame now
25:31
in this case I would say that the effect works for the shot but just be aware that that is something
25:36
you have to be aware of and to compose accordingly so thanks for sticking around to the very end I
25:42
hope that this deep dive is giving you all the information you need to make an informed buying
25:48
decision as to whether or not the 7Artisans AF 85mm f1.8 STM is the lens for you
25:54
thanks for watching have a great day and let the light in

7Artisans AF 85mm F1.8 STM Review | High Quality Budget Option Under $300?

dustinabbott.net

Fujifilm X-Half Review | All about the Vibes

Sigma 17-40mm F1.8 DC | ART (APS-C Review) The New Cult Classic?

Schneider-KREUZNACH x LK Samyang 14-24mm F2.8 FE Review | Impressive!

Exploring the Fascinating World of Error Coins

EyeQue VisionCheck Demo and Review

The Truth About Eyelash Extensions

How To Find Profitable Niches On Etsy (For Digital Products)

Design Original Illustrations with AI - StockIMG.ai

Perimeter and area Grade 7 Mathematics

Python 3 Face Detection Script in Live Webcam Video Feed & Save as PNG Image Frames Files

10" Digital Microscope 1200X Review

ProsourceFit Multi-Grip Chin-Up and Pull-Up Review

Up next in 10

7Artisans AF 85mm F1.8 STM Review | High Quality Budget Option Under $300?

dustinabbott.net