Kase AF 85mm F1.4 FE Review | Next Level Filter Integration

0:00
[Music]
0:10
hi I'm Dustin Abbott case has long been known as a filter maker and that filter
0:16
expertise comes in very handy as we take a look at what is their first lens the
0:22
surprisingly excellent AF85mm f1.4 i'm reviewing it on Sony FE
0:28
though I suspect other mounts will be coming now obviously on Sony the market
0:33
for 85mm f1.4 lenses has been somewhat flooded in the past year in the last
0:39
year alone we've seen the Sony 85mm GM Mark II the Sri Aurora 85mm the Mike
0:46
85mm f1.4 and most recently the Viltrox Pro AF 85mm f1.4 these of course join
0:54
already existing options from Sigma Samyang and Sony themselves so is there
1:00
room for case in there well if your work includes using filters then you may want
1:07
to consider the case lens which really brings some very unique approaches to
1:12
implementing filters as a part of the workflow and you probably should consider this lens we'll explore why in
1:18
today's review right after a word from our sponsor today's episode is sponsored by the all-new Phantom Tracker 2.0
1:25
phantom has not only seriously upgraded the visual look of the card but now we have a superior build quality made with
1:31
tempered glass and metal alloys this credit card size tracker can be locally tracked via a 90 decel beeping noise but
1:38
also on a global level via Apple's Find My Network and its map the addition of NFC means that you can also use the card
1:45
to trigger an automation just tap it the tracker fits perfectly in any wallet or bag and assures you won't lose your
1:51
valuables it has a built-in rechargeable battery that can be easily charged via any wireless charger and a single charge
1:58
can last up to 6 months the Phantom Tracker 2.0 makes for a seriously cool gift so visit
2:05
store.fanomwallet.com and use code dustin20 at checkout for 20% off that's
2:11
store.fanomwallet.com and use code dustin20 for 20% off now before we dive
2:16
in I do want to give you my disclosure this lens was sent to me uh from Case for review they have had no input in my
2:23
review they will not preview this video before it's released to you the public my findings are my own so let's dive in
2:31
and take a look at the build and handling of the lens first the price the price is
2:36
$738 that's about midpack that's close to the price of the Samyang it's a bit
2:42
more than the Viltrox Mike or Siri lenses and it's considerably less than the Sigma or Sony option so somewhere
2:50
there in the middle this really actually has a beautiful build quality and I would say that of the existing lenses I
2:57
would say it reminds me most of the Sigma Art series it's got some of the similar ribbed textures a combination of
3:05
some glossy sections along with some lightly flocked it's a actually a really
3:10
nice looking lens and they've managed to keep it quite compact and so I appreciate that the design here is it's
3:18
beautifully implemented and it does include weather sealing they call it uh dust and um moisture seal and so I can
3:27
see the gasket at the lens mount but I'm sure that there are other gaskets throughout the body itself as noted it
3:33
is nicely compact it's about the same size as the Samyang it is much smaller than a lens like the Viltrox Pro AF it's
3:41
It's a tiny bit longer than what the Sigma is but it's also narrower in diameter and so I think it hits kind of
3:47
a sweet spot of maintaining a nicely compact size and a reasonable weight while also having a very high grade of
3:54
of build here the lens is 82 mm in diameter that's 3.2 uh 2 in and it is 99
4:02
mm or 3.89 in in overall length it weighs in at 580 g which is 20.4 oz so
4:12
to give you a little bit of perspective the Sigma weighs 625 g the uh GM Mark II
4:18
weighs 642 g but on the lighter side you've got the Siri which is 540 g or 40
4:24
g less i would say however that that is a very reasonable weight for a lens that
4:30
really has got a lot going on and is using metal alloys in the build itself
4:35
so it's it's tough it's durable and still reasonably lightweight so well done on that that point up front we have
4:41
a 72mm front filter thread but here's where things start to get interesting
4:46
because Case obviously has a lot of experience with filters and not just ordinary screw-in filters but also with
4:53
their magnetic design filters and so what we have got here is similar to their Revolution series for example
5:00
we've actually got that what they call the magnetic inlaid ring that is a part
5:05
of the design here near the front element and so that means it's already set up for use with magnetic filters and
5:12
they include a protection/ UV filter you know I'm not a huge fan of these type
5:17
filters however it's going to be fully compatible with variable ND filters um
5:22
with circular polarizing filters so on and so forth and actually found that while the magnetic isn't quite as good i
5:29
reviewed a Freewell magnetic filter series a while back and my circular
5:36
polarizer it will work on there the magnetic pull isn't quite as good however it is able to go on there and it
5:43
is able to freely rotate as it should and the reason why it can rotate as it should is that this inlaid ring is
5:48
actually it will rotate itself and so that allows you to use slimmer filters because the actual rotating portion is
5:56
actually incorporated into the lens itself very very cool and in recognition
6:01
of the use of magnetic filters like this you've actually got two options in included when it comes to the lens caps
6:08
and or front cap you've got the traditional pinch design that also has the center pinch that can go on like
6:14
that and by the way if you're using a hood that remains the most logical one
6:20
to use because you can pinch in the middle to remove it however if you're just working with filters and you don't want to mess with that they also have
6:26
included a magnetic uh front lens cap and so that works very
6:32
nicely as well and so you can incorporate all of that and the nice thing about this too is that if you wanted to work without the filter you
6:39
just pinch a little bit further you can grab both the filter and the magnetic cap and pull that off and by the way yes
6:44
the magnetic cap works with no filter in place very very cool implementation on all of that also for Sony shooters they
6:52
have included what they call their magic filter which is a little drop in filter that goes actually in front of the
6:59
sensor itself it's actually a really cool design they even include a little what looks like a guitar pick for
7:04
cleanly getting it free so you don't get your fingers in there to get fingers on anything and so uh really cool design
7:10
and so what they include is it's somewhere like an ND ND2 ND4 just a you
7:16
know a stop or two in terms of what's included but obviously you can also get other filters in that as well so really
7:23
really cool execution of that design as noted the lens hood is included and I do appreciate relative to for example a
7:30
lens like the Sigma Sigma has a huge uh hood this actually has quite a compact
7:35
hood which shows some confidence in the actual flare resistance but uh it's a
7:40
nicely made hood and a nice part of the package as well now the lens also has
7:46
some other features outside of filters we do have what is now becoming somewhat ubiquitous in the better lenses where we
7:52
have both a clicked and then a decllicked option when it comes to the aperture ring my only complaint on this
7:59
is that in the d-click mode there is it removes even the click in between f-16
8:05
and automatic and so if you're not careful you can rack all the way into automatic mode which kind of defeat the
8:11
purpose as you can see here I was able to do reasonably good uh aperture racks
8:16
but you can see a little bit of a of stepping process through that and I'll also note that while there are 13
8:22
aperture blades I typically love high aperture blade counts it doesn't keep a very circular shape when you stop it
8:29
down and I do note that when you've got it stopped way down as this photo shows that at least in the copy I'm testing
8:35
the aperture isn't fully centered and so it's it's just a little bit deformed and
8:40
that might contribute some to some of that odd geometry that we see and so maybe an area for improvement there we
8:47
do not have an iris lock and as noted because of that losing that detent
8:52
between uh f-16 and automatic an iris lock would actually be really really nice because that would solve that
8:58
problem but anyway that's the one feature that I would say that we don't have relative to a lens like the Sigma
9:04
or the Sony GM lens we do have an AFMF switch which
9:09
works nicely uh has good feel to it good precision and we've got actually two
9:15
function buttons and a cool design here the top function button or our FN1 that
9:21
function button works just like a focus hold button so whatever you've got programmed within the camera you click
9:26
that and it's going to achieve that assigned purpose the function two button however has dual purpose to it so the
9:34
default purpose is that it will automatically bring focus back to minimum focus that can be very useful
9:40
because sometimes you don't know exactly where minimum focus is and so if you're trying to get as much magnification as
9:46
possible clicking that will get will shift focus over to that closest point and then you can kind of visually see
9:51
where you should be in relation to your subject so that's cool but the second thing that it will do is that if you
9:58
have another focus distance you want to program you can hold that down and it will actually use use that as a preset
10:04
and so it will preset that focus distance you can click that and instantly return to that focus position
10:10
now I did note that when um when I turned the camera off briefly that programmed position stayed there if I
10:17
removed the lens it actually would reset to the minimum focus distance and so that's the way that it seems to work
10:23
here at the moment they have incorporated a USB C port into the lens mount and so that will allow you to uh
10:30
easily do firmware updates and by the way I I did need a firmware update for
10:35
my uh A7R5 it every now and then I would get just where autofocus wouldn't work and
10:43
so uh that needed to be updated it worked fine from the beginning on my Alpha 1 but the fact that you can easily
10:48
do firmware updates allowed them to fix something like that the focus ring itself uh has nice rim it actually has a
10:55
really nice damping it moves beautifully so it's a great focus simulation however
11:00
it um it's not linear and so if you're looking to do repeatable focus pulls you
11:06
need to be moving at the same kind of speed and doing that because if you go faster or slower the focus position will
11:13
change and so it is is it is speed sensitive when it comes to that there is
11:18
no built-in image stabilization nor is there in any of the competing lenses so just know that what you can do also here
11:26
is focus down closer than any of the competing 85mm lenses on Sony most of
11:31
them you can focus only as closely as around 85 mill centimeters some of them
11:38
you know maybe down to 80 centimeters here you can focus down to 70 cm however giving you a higher 0.14 times level of
11:46
magnification and so you can see relative to a lens like the Sigma for example it can give you noticeably
11:52
higher magnification however it is lower contrast at f1.4 so not as good as as a
11:57
Sigma up close stop it down to f2 and you can see here that that does improve the contrast and give you a little bit
12:04
uh better result also included is a little basic lens pouch not as nice as
12:09
the zippered case that the siri the Sony or the Sigma include overall however
12:15
this is a beautifully built lens it has a lot of great filters or excuse me features filters as maybe the good
12:21
fidian slip there it also has that great execution when it comes to filters and so I I think it's it's huge if you're
12:28
someone who likes to use filters as a part of your workflow this is easily the easiest way the best way to do it that I
12:34
have seen moving on to autofocus autofocus is is good not great and so they've got the
12:42
STM focus motor which is pretty common amongst the you know the lower to mid-tier lenses however you've got some
12:49
lenses like the Sony GM obviously that are exceptional when it comes to autofocus and even the recent Viltrox
12:55
Pro AF instead of using STM has their hyper VCM VO voice coil motor which is
13:01
faster and smoother and all of those things so if you're looking for top tier autofocus performance this isn't going
13:07
to be it not that autofocus is bad autofocus is quiet and it's confident but as you can see here the big focus
13:14
changes they're more deliberate you can see focus moving from point A to point B rather than it just kind of instantly
13:20
happening like that and so even relative to the SDM equipped Sigma for example it doesn't focus as quickly as that that
13:28
being said it's not like some lenses that I've seen where they also just lack focus confidence and so if you have a
13:34
moving subject they can't really lock this lens could pick up on a you know slow to medium moving subject and could
13:41
lock focus just fine and deliver really really nice results and so accuracy in
13:46
general was good i found that I could do had no problem in shooting portraits even when backlit uh got very
13:53
consistently focused results nicel looking results i also found when shooting just in the house with my new
13:59
little nephew that I could nail focus no problem and and really get well focused
14:05
results now obviously with any of these third party lenses burst rate is going to be limited to 15 frames per second
14:12
and uh if you're going to have autofocus but that's probably less of a case here than if you're using a more
14:18
sportsoriented lens on the video side of thing I actually found that the slightly
14:24
slower focus that I saw for stills is really not a factor when it comes to video focus pools are smooth and there's
14:31
no pulsing or settling and so I actually really liked the confidence of these focus pulls however the um the fly in
14:38
the ointment is that focus breathing is quite obvious and so you get this real sense of of movement from one point to
14:45
another and so it's not particularly cinematic my hand test it went fine uh
14:50
with good transitions and good confidence of going from my hand to my eye and and back and forth i also found
14:57
that real world autofocus was good for static shots you can see in this little clip it stayed locked on even at f1.4
15:04
not moving around however in some other shots where there's going to be obvious focus changes that focus breathing uh
15:11
makes those focus changes a little more abrupt and obvious and less cinematic
15:17
than if there was lower focus breathing in the lens so and unfortunately again as a third party lens Sony does have
15:23
focus breathing compensation in a lot of their newer cameras but it only works with Sony lenses and so whereas we could
15:30
have eliminated some of that through software that's not the case because of being a third party how about image
15:36
quality i'll give you an overview here with the deep dive to follow this is an optical design of 13 elements in 10
15:41
groups five of those are extra low dispersion two of them are high refractive index elements uh the MTF
15:48
looks really really good and one of the reasons why I said yes was on the merits of the MTF chart and so it's good in the
15:55
center good in the mid-frame you know a little bit of a dip back up in the corners there's a little bit of a drop
16:00
off and so comparing the MTF to the recent Viltrox lens which is is you know
16:06
Viltrox is pretty top top tier when it comes to optics as has become their brand that but I found when comparing in
16:14
the real world whereas it looked like a little bit of an advantage for the Viltrox in the center of the frame Vtrox
16:20
has you know a little bit more contrast so it's a little bit better there the midframe they're about equal and that's
16:25
about what the MTF dart chart says however the difference in the corners is uh is goes different from what I would
16:33
see from the MTF chart the Vtrox at least in the two copies I compared was noticeably better in the corners and and
16:39
also that it kind of retain that advantage even as you stop the lenses down however if I look at a kind of a
16:46
less superior lens like the Siri Aurora 85mm f1.4 I found that the case lens has
16:54
much better sharpness and higher contrast it's slightly better than a lens like the Samyang so it's really
16:59
positioned in a pretty good spot I would say in terms of sharpness and contrast particularly when we get to the
17:04
rendering which we'll get to in just a moment now there is a little bit of ping cushion distortion much less than the
17:11
Sigma for example but a little more than a lens like the Samyang or the Viltrox
17:16
so a minus4 to correct that vignette however is the lowest that I've seen out of any of these 85mm lenses i only
17:23
needed a plus 31 to correct for it pretty impressive considering it's got a relatively small you know front element
17:30
there so great job on that also exceptional job in containing longitudinal style chromatic aberrations
17:37
i don't really see any fringing before or after the plane of focus on my test chart and in this shot of the SLR that I
17:44
use as a secondary test it's clean nothing there and so great job there i saw a tiny bit of lateral style
17:50
chromatic aberration in the corners on my test chart but it's low enough that in the real world at lower levels of
17:56
magnification you know like 100% i didn't really see it so I don't consider that to be a problem at f1.4 wide open
18:04
as we've already seen it's sharp in the center and in the mid-frame very good there the corners are obviously softer i
18:11
found that the contrast improves at f2 and as a general observation I found
18:18
that the closer I was to the subject the lower the contrast was and so contrast seems to improve once you get out to a
18:24
many medium range let's say uh 3 m plus around 10 ft or more you'll start to see
18:32
uh just improved contrast in general and at those ranges I mean it's it's great like nice sharpness there's nothing that
18:38
I'd really complain about i would say in general that real world sharpness was was fine it's not like amazingly sharp
18:47
like the GM Mark II however as we're going to see I actually like the rendering of this lens easily better
18:53
than the GM Mark II uh the corners remain soft till about f5.6 on my chart test out in the real
19:01
world I felt like the corners looked better and so it could be a bit of a field curvature thing at the closer
19:06
distances to my test chart and again I don't feel like this lens is optimized for those close distances anyway you're
19:13
going to see the typical pattern of defraction starting at f11 and then more pronounced at f-16 which is the minimum
19:20
aperture where this lens really stands out is in the bokeh quality and the
19:25
overall rendering i I think it's actually produces really gorgeous looking images i really really like the
19:31
overall rendering from this lens really my only complaint about the bokeh is is what we've already seen when it comes to
19:37
those specular highlights if you're looking for perfectly round bokeh balls across it uh that's not its strength
19:44
however it's great with transition zone rendering which is the key to images
19:50
looking great in my opinion and then as you get to the the fully defocused background very soft very creamy and I I
19:58
tried to look for a bad bokeh image where I thought like the bokeh looked a little bit busy and frankly outside of
20:05
those specular highlights I have nothing to complain about and so this lens does a really good job of of combining
20:11
sharpness and softness probably more on the softness than the sharpness there are sharper 85mm lenses but I don't know
20:19
of any of them on the current market that have nicer bokeh rendering than this i also found that the colors looked
20:25
really good their long experience with optical glass has paid off here as I do
20:30
feel like the optical glass is good definitely a cut above a lens like the siri or the mike 85 millimeter uh this
20:38
is nice optical glass i would probably take it over pretty much everything
20:43
until you get into the you know the Viltrox Sigma GM levels i mean it's it's
20:48
pretty close to that class of the optical glass as far as flare resistance overall it was quite good i did notice
20:55
here a bit of a light leak in the corner um it was not a persistent problem and I
21:00
saw it more at large or or small apertures i think f11 for this shot but
21:06
I mean not really a big deal and and overall I didn't notice any issues with flare in general I would say optically
21:14
this is a very mature first first effort a lot of good things going on and that
21:19
leads to my conclusion which that is kind of my consensus on the lens for being a first lens this is a shockingly
21:26
mature lens i mean I think it vaults right into consideration with a number of the better 85 millimeter lenses on
21:33
Sony and considering how many we have and how good many of them are that's pretty impressive frankly I love the
21:41
unique thought when it comes to the filter integration because I think it's it gives this lens something to set it
21:47
apart from the many other alternatives that are available even an 85mm f1.4 four lenses you've got probably at least
21:54
eight to choose from on Sony all autofocusing all decent lenses and so
21:59
this filter integration and the fact that they do throw in uh at least a filter with the lens so you're going to
22:05
get the uh the UV type filter there and along with the magic filter if you're buying the Sony version but of course
22:12
there is a full range of filter options available that are going to be that fully magnetic and allow you to use it
22:18
like that i think that's really cool and then of course the fact that the rendering and the bokeh is so lovely out
22:23
of it uh makes it a really interesting lens to me now this isn't the cheapest
22:28
lens uh in the group if you're if cheap is your your top um consideration you've
22:34
got lenses like the CRI or the mic i would take this any day of the week over either one of them i and I think that
22:41
really for me this would come down to you know in this price zone i think I
22:46
would be looking probably between the Viltrox and this case lens in this this zone so it's a little more expensive
22:51
than the Viltrox $729 however it is considerably smaller
22:56
and lighter so that might be a consideration for you so it's far from being the most expensive it's not the
23:03
cheapest but because of its clever design it is well worth considering even this if even if this is a brand new lens
23:10
company they do give you a three-year warranty so a little bit of peace of mind there and so I think it's well
23:16
worth consideration now if you want a deeper dive into the optical performance stay tuned with me right now let's dive
23:21
in let's take a look all right we'll start by taking a look at vignette and distortion you can see a very mild
23:27
amount of pin cushion distortion by the way pin cush cushion distortion is often quite flattering for um portraits makes
23:35
the subject look a little bit slimmer which many people don't seem to mind however you can easily correct that i
23:42
used a minus4 it's a very linear correction no problem there vignette is
23:47
very low for this type of lens and just right over 30 to correct for that so
23:53
that's only just a hair over a stop in the corners the great news here is that you could leave both of these things
23:59
uncorrected which is important in a new lens like this as I don't know what kind of inc camera support they'll have there
24:05
is very little longitudinal style chromatic aberration a tiny bit before the plane of focus very little afterward
24:11
that's nice and clean likewise in this which real world shot really shows off
24:17
and I'm going to show you at 200% so we're really really looking you can see a tiny bit again of fringing before the
24:22
plane of focus but after the plane of focus ah there's basically nothing very very neutral very clean around the
24:29
specular highlights specular highlights themselves are very clean though the geometry isn't amazing as we've already
24:35
seen i do see a little bit of lateral style chromatic aberration you can see
24:40
here and here it's not particularly strong in this zone but there is a little bit of it there this is at a very
24:46
high level of magnification however and out in the real world I really didn't notice it so I don't think it's a big
24:52
deal so how about resolution and contrast this is f1.4 on a Sony A7R Mark
24:57
I so 61 megapixels and this is 200% magnification center looks very good uh
25:03
contrast not off the charts but strong good great detail a lot of good
25:08
information there as we move towards the mid-frame mid-frame looks excellent uh no concerns there as I scroll down
25:16
looking here it's pretty close you can see it's just getting a ever so bit lower contrast here in the lower right
25:22
corner however as we pan down towards the far corner we see there is definitely some softening there we see a
25:29
pretty consistent performance in terms of centering with you know roughly equal
25:35
amounts of softening everywhere uh overall a not a bad performance at all
25:40
so how does this compare to some of the top competitors well as we look at the Viltrox here on the right we can see
25:47
that the Viltrox is very slightly sharper very slightly higher contrast
25:53
and it delivers a little bit brighter an image uh at f1.4 but there's not a radical amount of
26:00
difference here in the mid-frame you can see that there's a little bit better contrast on the Viltrox you can see it
26:05
in some of the textures here and you can see it's a the contrast isn't quite as strong on the case so the Viltrox is a
26:12
little bit better there and most obviously it is a little bit better in the corners and you can see here that it
26:20
just looks crisper and up into this left corner a more obvious win there in the
26:26
middle of the frame the Sigma wins for having higher contrast the detail is close but there's definitely more
26:33
contrast on the Sigma lens as we pan towards the mid-frame it is equally true
26:38
there and down into the corner the Sigma is you know it's better it's not
26:44
radically better but it is slightly better in the corner uh less as strong
26:49
relative to like the Viltrox viltrox is really really good up in this corner sigma is very slightly less good but
26:57
also very very good now if we compare it to a cheaper option like this siri we can see that it's kind of night and day
27:04
this is the case is much stronger in terms of detail and contrast in the
27:09
center of the frame you can see already that it's much better in the mid-frame
27:15
and looking at the edges you know it's it's definitely got better contrast in the corners and also a little bit finer
27:23
detail looking up into this corner where it's the weakest it's pretty close but the Sarrii is showing some really strong
27:29
lateral style chromatic aberration and so I mean again looks stronger here and I'm almost positive yes it's going to
27:36
look stronger up in this corner so overall it's clearly sharper so it gives you a little bit of perspective now
27:42
what's interesting is that here's a real world image at f1.4 and so in the center
27:47
of the frame you know it looks nice and crisp however if I pan right over here to the edge it still actually looks
27:53
really good right off to the corner in the area of focus so that weak corner
27:58
performance may be more of an issue when it comes to depth of field and some field curvature here i mean this left
28:05
corner it's out of focus and so it's uh because of the depth of field and so it's it's less relevant but up here we
28:12
can see that it's delivering a nice performance there uh here in terms of real world contrast this at this is at
28:19
that medium distance f1.4 looks great i mean you really couldn't ask for more detail and contrast there again at about
28:26
10 or 11 ft I think that the detail and contrast looks really good it's really only up close that you see a reduction
28:33
in contrast now we find that this contrast starts to improve even by f1.8
28:38
and you can see here now that the the center is looking really fantastic mid-frame is looking really fantastic
28:45
there's a bit more improvement as you stop down from f1.8 on the left to f2 on
28:50
the right and more as you stop down from f2 to f2.8 if we go down to the corners
28:57
however we can see that that improvement hasn't affected them to the same degree for portrait work however here at f2.8
29:04
frankly I don't know that you would want any higher detail and contrast than that i mean that is a great amount of detail
29:11
corners are looking better by f5.6 and f8 we can see here um looks
29:18
really really crisp there most of these kind of edge type performances are looking really good if you're looking at
29:24
kind of this zone which is frankly it's more more relevant place to evaluate for most landscape style images so no
29:31
problem there we're getting good good amounts of uh information and detail there defraction starts to soften the
29:38
image a bit by f11 and then by f-16 you'll see it's a bit softer still now
29:43
as we noted previously the uplose contrast isn't off the chart it's not
29:48
bad as you can see but there definitely is room for some improvement i found in real world shots that if I stopped down
29:55
to f2 and shot at minimum focus distance you can see that contrast is improved there and of course depth of field is
30:03
still so tiny that it's stopping down is probably a wise thing anyway now the bokeh is really fantastic as I mentioned
30:10
previously you can see here at close focus distances that you know there's almost no transition and so it just
30:16
immediately goes to completely creamy background uh an image like this even though we've got some hard edges some
30:22
you know bare branches in there the overall effect is just really really soft and creamy and you know sufficient
30:29
detail and contrast to make the subject look nice but then the background is just fantastic if I intentionally
30:36
defocus here even at f5.6 you can see just how soft the rendering is even
30:41
though that puts a little bit into transition it's really really nice and even if I then focus further down the
30:48
path and so you know here's more to focus here's putting more of it into transition it still looks really really
30:55
nice i also found that I I felt like the three-dimensional cutout was actually pretty decent here this is f1.4 so you
31:02
can see that the subject stands out pretty nicely with a good three-dimensional type pop and so overall a nice performance there in this
31:10
case I mean beautiful looking contrast on the subject and just look how soft and creamy that background is looks
31:17
really nice here you're getting a little bit of that you know bubble bouquet effect with all of these drops but what
31:24
I noticed is as we transition towards defocus just how smooth that transition
31:29
is and you can see it just falls off to where it's utterly creamy i really really like that the only thing I don't
31:35
love is is some of the geometry when it comes to specular highlights so here at f2 you can see that it's just it's it's
31:42
a little lopsided and we saw the reason for that when we had a look at the actual aperture iris hopefully that's
31:49
just specific to the copy I'm testing and it's not a general observation uh here's another image with a lot that
31:55
could be in the transition zone but yet I think it's just really nicely handled and here where it's a little more
32:02
pleasing it just all the defocus looks really fantastic colors are also really
32:08
nice nice looking optical glass here i I really found with people type shots that skin tones looked really nice and clean
32:16
this image in general that's kind of the impact that I get is just the colors are really clean it doesn't seem to have any
32:22
kind of casting towards being overly red or overly yellow this is an uncorrected
32:27
raw image and so you can just see it comes out of camera really nice and clean the final thing to observe is that
32:33
when it comes to flare resistance you can see there's a little bit of localized this is at a smaller aperture
32:38
a little bit of of localized impact very little loss of contrast it's just this
32:44
kind of light leak in the corner i don't think that it's really much of a deal breaker overall this is a pretty nicely
32:50
balanced optical performance so at the end of the day I think you can agree that this is a pretty intriguing lens
32:56
it's a great package in general and hopefully the deep dive into the optics has helped you to decide if this is a
33:02
lens that you personally should be interested in as always thanks for watching have a great day and let the
33:07
light in

Kase AF 85mm F1.4 FE Review | Next Level Filter Integration

Dustin Abbott

Tamron 16-50mm F2.8 A Review | Your New APS-C Zoom

TTArtisan AF 24mm F3.8 VCM Review | Full Frame $99 Pancake Treat

Sigma 50-120mm F2.8 DC OS Review | It Just Makes Sense!

SongRaw vs Viltrox Pro | 85mm Z-Mount Showdown

Laowa AF 35mm F2.8 APO Macro - A Flawed Macro Gem

7Artisans AF 18mm F2 | An APS C Pancake for $169!

The Best (Affordable) Way to Reach 600mm and 800mm on Sony

SongRaw 85mm F1.2 MS Review | Huge Lens, Huge Performance

Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS Review | 600mm in Under a Kilo!

Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS Review | Lightweight Perfection!

Bluetti Elite 100 Mini Review | 1000Wh in a Small Package

Peak Design Roller Pro | A Perfect Bag at an Imperfect Price

Sigma 20-60mm F2.8-4 C Review | Your New Favorite Tiny Zoom Has Arrived

Sigma 85mm F1.2 ART Review | My New Favorite 85mm F1.2

7Artisans AF 10mm F25 MAX Fisheye Review - A Better Fisheye?

Up next in 10

Kase AF 85mm F1.4 FE Review | Next Level Filter Integration

Dustin Abbott