Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 G2 Z-mount Review | Smaller, Lighter, and Cheaper

0:00
[Music]
0:10
Hi, I'm Dustin Abbott and I'm here today
0:12
to give you my review of the Nikon
0:15
Zmount version of Tamron 70 to 180
0:18
millimeter f2.8 VC G2 lens. Now, what's
0:22
interesting is that this now completes
0:24
the trinity of fast f2.8 zooms here on
0:29
Nikon. All of these lenses have been
0:30
available on Sony E-mount before, but
0:32
they have been trickling over to Nikon
0:34
Zmount, and the 70 to 180 mm is the last
0:37
of them to arrive. I've been taking a
0:40
look at all three of the lenses, I won't
0:42
be giving them all an individual review.
0:44
I will give them an overview, but since
0:46
this is the latest to arrive, I will
0:48
give you a review of this as kind of
0:50
kind of a representative of how these
0:52
lenses have translated onto Zmount. Now,
0:55
of course, the first generation of
0:57
Tamron zooms arrived at a time when uh
1:01
Nikon Zmount was closed to thirdparty
1:02
development. However, it's pretty
1:04
obvious that there was some kind of
1:05
agreement between Tamron and Nikon that
1:08
resulted in all three of those lenses,
1:10
the 17 to 28, 28 to 75, and 70 to 180
1:14
millimeter f2.8 zooms being released as
1:17
Nicor branded lenses. Now, of course,
1:20
the platform has opened up and we have
1:22
openly Tamron lenses being released. The
1:25
question is, is are they worth buying?
1:27
Well, one thing is obvious. The G2 lens
1:30
has a lot of additional features. It has
1:32
image stabilization, optical
1:34
stabilization built into the lens,
1:35
faster autofocus motor, and of course,
1:38
it comes at a price point that still
1:40
undercuts the Nicore branded 70 to 180
1:43
mm lens and definitely undercuts the
1:48
$2,900
1:50
S-line 70 to 200 millimeter lens from
1:53
Nicor. So, at the end of the day, this
1:55
obviously is going to serve as an
1:57
excellent value. And today we're going
1:58
to dive in to see if it also is an
2:00
excellent lens. So before we dive into
2:03
it, I will give you a quick uh caveat
2:05
disclaimer. This lens was loan to me by
2:08
uh Tamron USA along with the 16 to 30mm
2:11
and 28 to 75mm f2.8 G2 lenses and uh
2:16
however they have had no input on this
2:18
review process. My findings are my own
2:21
as always. All right, let's talk about
2:23
the build and handling of the 70 to 180
2:25
G2. Uh quick breakdown on prices. 11.49
2:29
is the MSRP for the 70 to 180 G2. The
2:33
Nicor 70 to180 which is the Tamron G1.
2:36
You know, essentially is 1,400 for the
2:39
MSRP, though it's more likely to be on
2:41
sale for less. But so far, I've never
2:43
seen it as low a price as the 1149 that
2:47
this lens is selling for. And then of
2:49
course, if you're looking at the S-line
2:50
lens, the 70 to 200 Sline, it is $2,900
2:54
ouch US. And so obviously a huge
2:57
difference in price there. Now in terms
2:59
of the size here, this is another area
3:01
where Tamron has had an advantage. It
3:03
continues to have an advantage relative
3:04
to the full 70 to 200 f/2.8 zooms. This
3:08
lens is 83 mm in diameter or 3.26 in
3:12
158.7
3:14
mm in length. So just a couple of
3:16
millimeters longer in Zmount version.
3:19
And uh and then it or that's that's 6.2
3:22
in. and it weighs in at 865 gram or 30.5
3:26
oz. So to give you a little bit of
3:28
perspective on size, the Sline 70 to 200
3:31
is 61 mm longer and weighs in at 495
3:36
g heavier. And so if you are someone
3:38
that's wanting to shoot weddings and you
3:40
can't imagine carrying around the bulk
3:42
of the S-line all all day, this is a
3:45
really really nice alternative because
3:47
it's very moderate in terms of the size
3:49
and weight. And it manages to retain the
3:52
67mm front filter thread that is shared
3:54
across all three of these uh lenses
3:57
here, these zooms, plus pretty much all
4:00
with just a couple of exceptions of
4:02
Tamron's other releases on mirrorless
4:05
space. And so really great job on that
4:07
point, Tamron, keeping that commonality
4:10
and so you can share filters across all
4:12
of these lenses, which is great. Now,
4:14
part of the G2 upgrades include
4:17
essentially a function button and a USBC
4:19
port. And then on the 70 to 180, we have
4:22
a custom switch that gives you three
4:24
different functions that you can uh
4:26
employ using that button there. And so
4:29
the way that you program this is you
4:31
attach via the weather sealed USBC port
4:34
to a computer or an app. And there you
4:38
have the ability to go in and to
4:40
customize the behavior of the lens uh
4:42
through something called Tamron's lens
4:44
utility software. And then the lens
4:46
utility you can assign from a number of
4:48
values to each one of these three custom
4:50
positions. And so and then when you
4:53
activate the button and you have even
4:55
options on how you're going to do that.
4:56
Is it going to be just a touch or is it
4:58
going to be holding it down? So, you
5:00
have some options on how that that is
5:02
going to play out. Now, of course, here
5:03
on Tamron, the manual focus ring is
5:07
functions as a customizable control
5:09
ring. So, one of the the functions I
5:11
like to set up is I actually like to in
5:12
camera set up the customizable control
5:15
ring for aperture control or in video
5:18
for power aperture and then to set up
5:20
AFMF to one of these custom buttons. And
5:23
so I can have aperture control here and
5:25
then just click a button and go into
5:27
manual focus if I want to manually
5:29
focus. And so it gives me kind of an
5:31
aperture ring even though there isn't
5:33
technically an aperture ring. Gives me
5:34
the option of doing that. You've got
5:36
other things. You can do focus limiter.
5:37
You can set AB focus. You can set a
5:40
focus towards infinity for astro.
5:42
There's a variety of different things
5:43
that you can program into that. And then
5:45
on top of that, you also can program the
5:47
way that the the actual focus ring the
5:50
ring is going to behave. whether it is
5:53
linear or nonlinear, how far the throw
5:55
is, even what direction you want it to
5:56
move in. So, you can really tweak the
5:58
lens to to your preferences. Now, at the
6:01
end of the day, I prefer a more
6:03
traditional control scheme. I would just
6:05
like to have an AFMF switch. I'd like to
6:07
have a focus limiter switch. I'd like to
6:08
have an aperture ring. However, this is
6:11
a serious upgrade from either Tamron G1
6:15
70 to 180, but then also the more
6:17
expensive Nicor 70 to 180, which had
6:19
none of that functionality. So, all of
6:21
that is good. And because I can set this
6:23
as a power aperture ring, I can do
6:25
aperture racks. They're not the absolute
6:28
smoothest I've seen. It's not I I would
6:30
say Nyore lens quality, but it's close.
6:34
And then so I appreciate that to be able
6:36
to do that. We've got nine aperture
6:38
blades. And as you can see in the
6:39
aperture rack, we'll look at it again.
6:41
That does a good job of maintaining a
6:43
circular shape as you stop it down.
6:45
Build quality here is definitely nicer
6:48
than the first generation lens. There's
6:50
more sculpting to the design. Just the
6:52
the textures and everything feels a
6:55
little bit better. It's still engineered
6:56
plastics in the body, but it does feel
6:58
more upscale than what we have seen
7:00
before. We do have a very thorough
7:02
weather sealing here. There are 11
7:04
different seal points as you can see in
7:06
this diagram, plus a flooring coating up
7:08
front. All of that very appreciated. And
7:11
then we have a varied minimum focus
7:13
distance. So, you're going to get your
7:14
highest magnification on the 70 mm end.
7:17
You can focus as closely as 30 cm. and
7:19
get a 0.38 times level of magnification
7:23
which is really really quite high
7:24
obviously though you can see that it's
7:26
not a very flat plane of focus if you're
7:28
I'm shooting something like a test chart
7:30
at that distance uh I can get better
7:32
results here you can see me holding the
7:34
leave at the minimum focus distance and
7:36
you know it's filling the frame pretty
7:38
well more useful there at the telephoto
7:41
end I can focus as closely just as 85 cm
7:45
with a 0.21 two one times level of
7:47
magnification, but a little bit flatter
7:49
plane of focus. The lens does not
7:51
include a a tripod collar, and while you
7:55
probably can get something third party,
7:56
it's really not designed around that.
7:58
And frankly, I haven't had any issues
8:00
with that. I felt like the lens balanced
8:02
nicely um when I was doing my test
8:04
charts and so I didn't really have any
8:06
issues with that. Another key
8:07
improvement over the first generation
8:09
lens is the inclusion of Tamron's VC or
8:11
vibration compensation. And so that is
8:14
going to work in conjunction with if you
8:17
have VR in your camera body. And so I
8:19
found nice good stability for my work. I
8:22
didn't really notice any shots affected
8:24
by, you know, motion blur from camera
8:26
shake. Though obviously uh no amount of
8:28
VR is going to stop action. And so if
8:31
your subject is moving, you're still
8:32
going to get some motion blur based on
8:34
that. There's only one real negative
8:37
that I can point to relative to the
8:39
Nicor branded 70 to 180 and that is that
8:42
that lens did support Nikon's
8:44
teleconverters whereas here we have no
8:47
teleconverter support and so that is one
8:49
area of loss and that could be a
8:52
probably the prevailing factor of why
8:54
you might consider sticking with the
8:56
original Nicor 70 to 180 millimeter in
8:59
general. However, this is a really nice
9:01
lens. It's smaller, it's lighter, and
9:03
it's a whole lot cheaper. And it now has
9:05
some decent functionality to it, though
9:08
not in a necessarily conventional
9:10
control type scheme. So, let's talk
9:12
autofocus. These, all three of these G2
9:15
zooms come with Tamron's VXD focus
9:18
motor. That stands for voice coil
9:20
extreme torque linear drive. And so it
9:23
is their voice coil style linear motor
9:26
which is obviously faster than the RXD
9:29
stepping type motor that was in the
9:31
first generation of lenses. That means
9:33
that we do have more thrust available
9:36
here and it's also a smoother, quieter
9:38
focus motor. I'm still not entirely sure
9:40
what the relationship between Tamron and
9:42
Nikon is at this point. Obviously we're
9:44
getting full-frame Tamron zooms and not
9:48
primes but zooms but we're not getting
9:50
any of Sigma's fullframe lenses. And so
9:52
there's obviously some kind of
9:53
arrangement that has allowed Tamron in
9:56
and it does feel like these lenses get
9:58
really really good support. It feels
10:00
very much like using a native lens and
10:02
so I was able to track birds in flight
10:05
without any kind of real issue other
10:07
than one set for where for some reason
10:09
autofocus didn't pick up and never
10:11
picked up throughout the burst for
10:13
whatever reason. But in general
10:14
autofocus was really quite good in that
10:16
kind of setting tracking with good
10:18
accuracy. What's more, you can see here
10:20
there is really really good thrust in
10:22
terms of and speed going from close to
10:24
distant subjects. It's pretty close to
10:26
instantaneous. And so I had no issues
10:28
with anything like that. I found it fine
10:30
to use for event type settings uh at
10:33
church and things like that. And so in
10:36
general, I found that autofocus is going
10:38
to be fast enough to keep up with
10:39
whatever really you want to do.
10:41
Autofocus is also extremely quiet. It's
10:43
smooth. there's uh none of that
10:45
sometimes double clutch action or
10:47
pulsing that I'll sometimes see on Nikon
10:50
but and it just feels like it's
10:51
confident and again feels like it is a
10:54
nicor lens in terms of the performance
10:56
and so all of that is good so in general
10:58
I have no reservations when it comes to
11:01
uh autofocus for stills other than I do
11:04
find that kind of just in general I will
11:06
get a periodic miss not necessarily a
11:09
major miss but just you know a little
11:11
forward or back focus just not quite as
11:14
much precision as what I saw on Sony.
11:16
That's probably an algorithm thing at
11:18
this point. And I'm hoping that a
11:20
firmware update in the future will help
11:22
us to get all the way up to really top
11:24
tier performance as I saw with the same
11:26
lens on Sony Emount. All right, how
11:28
about autofocus for video? Obviously,
11:30
this is an absolutely cruddy day
11:32
outside. It's been raining. It's cool.
11:34
We're heading into the gray time of
11:36
year, which I don't enjoy. However,
11:38
autofocus for video in general has been
11:41
fairly good on this lens with just at
11:42
least one caveat that I will mention.
11:45
When it comes to doing things like focus
11:47
pulls, focus pulls, touch to focus on
11:50
Nikon, you don't have any control over
11:52
it, how it works. And so, it's not as
11:54
smooth as what it should be. None of
11:56
your settings that you input uh for
11:58
controlling how video autofocus works in
12:00
video, none of those apply to touch to
12:02
focus. And so, I find that this this
12:04
test to be a little bit of a mess on
12:05
this platform. However, you can see that
12:07
there's definitely some pulsing, a bit
12:09
of focus breathing, but it's very, very
12:11
minor. It's actually quite well
12:12
controlled. And in fact, when I went to
12:14
my hand test, that went much better
12:16
because now my settings are showing up.
12:19
And you can see that the transition from
12:20
my hand to my eye is good. And also,
12:23
focus breathing is so minimal. You don't
12:25
see any of that jarring effect of going
12:27
back and forth. It just transitions from
12:28
one subject to the other. The one caveat
12:31
that I did mention is that I found
12:34
autofocus was a little bit slow to pick
12:36
me up at times. And so I've had to be
12:38
very careful while filming outdoors. I'm
12:40
filming all of these outdoor segments
12:41
with the lens on my Nikon Z8. I've had
12:44
to be very careful to make sure that it
12:46
gets focused on me. And of course, the
12:47
fact that I can't monitor it from the
12:50
front on the Z8 because it's just a tilt
12:51
screen makes it a little bit harder. It
12:53
doesn't always immediately pick me up.
12:55
And so it's not always reactive. As I
12:57
approached the camera and I ducked out
12:58
of frame, you can see that basically it
13:00
just kind of cheated. It never went to
13:02
the background. And so when I came back
13:04
in in frame, I was basically in focus,
13:06
but because focus hadn't shifted at all.
13:08
And I have found that I have to be
13:10
careful to give it time to pick me up
13:12
and to not do anything that's too
13:13
reactive or requires too much reaction
13:16
because it's just a little bit slow to
13:18
react in that setting. At the same time,
13:20
I shot this shot of a seagull swimming
13:24
around and focus was nice and stable all
13:26
throughout the clip. So, really no major
13:29
concerns there. Just that one caveat
13:31
that again, I feel like I a firmware
13:33
update could probably help to tweak that
13:35
to where it just reacts a little bit
13:38
more um appropriately to more sudden
13:42
movements or something entering or
13:44
exiting the frame. All things
13:46
considered, however, I didn't really
13:48
have any issues with autofocus. And as
13:50
you've been able to see in these outdoor
13:51
segments, focus is really nice and
13:53
stable on myself without any kind of
13:55
hunting or pulsing or jumping around.
13:58
All right. Well, let's talk about the
13:59
optics here. We have 20 elements in 15
14:02
groups and that includes molded glass
14:04
aspherical, hybrid spherical, low
14:07
dispersion, and extra low dispersion
14:09
elements as a part of that design. You
14:11
can see that the MTF chart on both the
14:13
wide and telephoto ends looks really,
14:16
really impressive. Extremely sharp in
14:19
the center. I mean, basically almost at
14:21
100% in the center and then very strong
14:23
in the mid-frame and really not all that
14:25
big of a drop there into the corners.
14:28
What I found in testing for various
14:31
things here on Nikon using a 45
14:34
megapixel Z8 is that I found no
14:37
longitudinal style chromatic aberrations
14:38
either on my test chart or when shooting
14:41
my dad's old SLR. Everything is really,
14:43
really clean there. So, that's great. No
14:45
lateral style chromatic aberrations in
14:47
the corners. All of that is good. We do
14:50
see some pin cushion distortion
14:52
throughout the zoom range. And so, on
14:54
the 70 mm end, I needed a minus four to
14:57
correct. corrected in a nice linear
14:59
fashion. No big deal there. And is
15:01
typical on Zmount versus Sony E-mount, I
15:04
found that it did have a little bit more
15:06
vignette. In this case, I needed a plus
15:08
74 to correct, whereas I was more around
15:10
a plus 50 on E-mount. On the telephoto
15:14
end, there's a little bit more pin
15:15
cushion distortion. I needed a minus 7
15:17
to correct for it. Again, nice and
15:19
linear. No big deal. And vignette is
15:21
also a little bit heavier. It is now up
15:23
to a plus 85. In this case, however, I
15:26
saw a fairly similar result on Sony
15:28
E-mount. I needed a plus 75 to correct
15:31
for the vignette there. And so, not a
15:33
radical difference between the two. All
15:35
of these things are pretty easily
15:37
correctable. And fortunately, these
15:39
Tamron G2 lenses do get full profile
15:43
support in camera here on Nikon for
15:45
video and then also for JPEGs as well.
15:48
So, all of that is great. Starting on
15:51
the wide end at 70 millimeters, looking
15:54
at 200% levels of magnification, I found
15:56
that crops, even at f2.8, looked really
15:59
good all across the frame. They looked
16:01
good in the center. They looked strong
16:02
in the mid-frame and the corners were
16:05
really not all that degraded. The
16:07
biggest difference I found when stopping
16:08
down the lens is less in the center.
16:10
There's a little bit of there was some
16:12
contrast improvement in the center, but
16:13
you can see here in this comparison on
16:15
the edge of the frame for a real world
16:17
shot that there's just more contrast,
16:19
more detail there in the textures. Looks
16:22
really, really good. However, I mean,
16:24
even in the corners, if I'm looking on
16:25
back at the test chart at f5.6 and f8,
16:28
it looks fantastically sharp even in the
16:31
corners. So, really, really impressive
16:32
there. By f11, you're going to start to
16:35
see a little bit of effects of
16:36
defraction. And at the minimum aperture
16:38
of f-22, that becomes more pronounced.
16:41
So, not as bad as what you'll see on
16:42
Sony because of the higher resolution uh
16:45
point at 61 megapixels on my A7R5. So, I
16:48
saw a little bit less defraction on this
16:50
lower resolution point here on Nikon. As
16:52
we go throughout the zoom range, I found
16:54
that actually 100 millm is stronger
16:56
still than 70 mm. Basically, all across
16:59
frame, just a little bit more pop
17:01
contrast. It looks fantastic. Really,
17:04
really strong results at 100 millime. At
17:07
135 mm, there's a little bit of a dip,
17:09
though it's still good. It's just not as
17:11
exceptionally good as we have seen to
17:13
this point. But we see at 180 mm, we see
17:16
a rebound to where it is again
17:18
fantastically sharp really all across
17:20
the frame. And so really, really strong
17:23
and consistent optical performance
17:25
throughout as far as resolution,
17:27
contrast. You're not going to be
17:28
disappointed in what this lens is able
17:30
to produce. The bokeh quality is good,
17:33
but it's zoom good, not high-end prime
17:36
good. And so I found that in most
17:38
situations, it looks good. Obviously,
17:40
you have the ability to really defocus a
17:42
background if you're close to your
17:43
subject and shooting at 180 mm and f2.8.
17:47
It's more in the transition areas where
17:50
you're not so close to your subject
17:52
where the bokeh is can get a little bit
17:54
of a nervous quality to it, but in
17:57
general, I felt like the bokeh looks
17:58
looks good from the lens. And and I
18:00
would say that images generally, as you
18:02
can see here, look really nice. I also
18:04
found that the colors are nice from the
18:07
lens. I felt like flare resistance
18:09
overall is good. It's got Tamron's Bbar
18:12
um generation 2 coatings and those tend
18:15
to do a really good job with that. So,
18:17
in general, we have a very strong
18:18
optical performance here, particularly
18:20
when you consider the price point of
18:22
this zoom lens relative to the
18:24
competitors. So, my conclusion is that
18:27
all three of these lenses in my test
18:30
have really converted over to Nikon
18:32
Zmount really, really well. There are
18:35
definitely some there's some give and
18:36
take on the way that all of these lenses
18:38
perform on Nikon relative to Sony. I
18:42
find that autofocus is still a little
18:43
bit more sophisticated on Sony, which I
18:45
feel like it is in general, but I also
18:48
find that the inbody stabilization on a
18:51
camera like my Z8 is still better than
18:53
anything that I'm seeing on my Sony
18:55
cameras. And also, of course, here on
18:57
Nikon, you have none of the third-party
18:59
restrictions, things like burst rate. I
19:01
can shoot up to the full burst rate of
19:03
my Nikon Z8 without any kind of
19:05
limitation there. However, what we have
19:08
lost relative to the Nicor uh 70 to 180
19:11
was the ability to use Nikon's own
19:15
teleconverters. And so that obviously is
19:17
a loss that I miss and that some of you
19:20
are going to miss. And so that that
19:21
would be in my mind the only compelling
19:23
reason to stick with the Nicor branded
19:26
lens as opposed to this new G2 version
19:28
which is basically better in every other
19:31
category that I can think of. The final
19:33
major consideration here of course is
19:35
cost. And it even though this G2 version
19:38
is updated and improved in a number of
19:40
ways, it does undercut the Nicor branded
19:42
70 to 180 f2.8. And of course, if you're
19:45
comparing to the premium 70 to 200
19:48
millimeter uh S-line lens, you're
19:51
talking about a difference between
19:53
$2,900 and uh essentially under $1,200.
19:59
And so it's it's just a a it's a huge
20:01
difference. In fact, when I did the math
20:02
and I added up the cost of the 16-30, 28
20:06
to75, and 70 to 200 millimeter Tamron
20:08
zooms, G2 zooms, I found that their
20:11
total was only $30 more expensive than
20:14
the uh S-line 70 to 200 millimeter. And
20:18
so, if you're looking at filling out
20:19
your bag with zooms, this certainly is a
20:22
really, really great value way to
20:24
accomplish that. And so I'm certainly
20:26
very happy to have Tamron's own lenses
20:28
here on the market and particularly this
20:30
trinity of fast f2.8 zooms. They really
20:33
provide really really solid alternatives
20:35
for those of you on a tighter budget
20:37
that can't afford to go all the way up
20:38
to the premium Nikon equivalents. So at
20:41
the end of the day, that is a very
20:43
welcome addition here. Now, if you want
20:44
more information, I do have a full text
20:46
review on this particular lens that is
20:48
linked in the description down below on
20:50
the newly redesigned dustinbott.net. Go
20:52
check that out. Also, if you want a deep
20:55
dive into the optical performance, hey,
20:57
you're in the right place. Stay tuned.
20:58
We're going to jump into that together
21:00
right now. So, we'll start by taking a
21:02
look at the zoom range here. So,
21:03
obviously 70 to 180 mm isn't quite as
21:06
good as 70 to 200 millimeters, but you
21:08
can see as I zoom in and out, gives you
21:10
a lot of different framing options
21:12
there. As far as optical
21:14
characteristics, we'll start by taking a
21:16
look at vignette and distortion. You can
21:18
see at 70 mm, we have some pin cushion
21:22
distortion. You can see it corrects in a
21:23
nice linear fashion, even if I'm
21:25
manually correcting. Definitely some
21:27
pretty heavy vignette in the corners.
21:29
And that clears up with a plus 74
21:32
dialing in at 70 mm. That pin cushion
21:34
distortion persists and grows as you go
21:37
throughout the zoom range by 180 mm.
21:39
We're up to needing a minus 7 to
21:41
correct. You can see it remains nice and
21:43
linear. No problems there. Also,
21:45
vignette is a little bit heavier and go
21:47
comes a little bit further into the
21:48
frame, I will note as well. and I needed
21:51
a plus 85 to correct for it here. Again,
21:54
there is a correction profile support.
21:56
So, if you're not manually correcting,
21:57
like I'm turning profiles off and so I
22:00
can show you what's going on optically,
22:02
but this will correct in camera for you.
22:05
Longitudinal style chromatic aberrations
22:07
are really not a problem. You can see
22:08
it's nice and neutral before and after
22:10
the plane of focus. Likewise, if I go
22:12
into a more hardcore real world
22:16
situation with lots of shiny bits here,
22:18
you can see it's very good contrast in
22:20
the imprints here and then no frring
22:23
showing up here. Likewise around the
22:25
specular highlights, no frringing.
22:27
However, as we're looking at those
22:28
specular highlights, you'll notice that
22:30
there is some inner lining and a little
22:32
bit of busyiness inside. They're not
22:34
entirely smooth. There's a little bit of
22:36
clipping towards the edge. Stopping down
22:39
here to f4. You can see they're largely
22:41
circular by f5.6. You can see all
22:44
circular and the uh nine rounded
22:47
aperture blades are doing a pretty good
22:49
job of keeping a circular aperture
22:51
shape. Lal style chromatic aberrations
22:54
also very well controlled. No evidence
22:56
of any kind of fringing here at the edge
22:58
of the frame. So we'll take a look at
23:00
resolution and contrast. This again is
23:02
on a 45 meg megapixel Nikon Z8 and we're
23:06
looking at 200% magnification. Center of
23:09
the frame looks awesome. Great detail,
23:11
great contrast. Mid-frame is looking
23:14
really, really strong. If I pan down
23:16
here, we can see a little bit of a fade
23:18
there to the lower right corner. You can
23:20
just see it's a little bit uh kind the
23:23
texture is just a little bit more
23:24
smeared compared to the upper uh left
23:26
corner there. and down into the corner
23:28
itself. Really, we're holding off really
23:31
quite well right into the corners. No
23:32
major issues there. What I found in this
23:36
real world shot that if we have f2.8 and
23:38
then f5.6,
23:40
you can see looking in the center of the
23:42
frame, it is a little sharper and more
23:44
contrasty, but not radically different.
23:46
Just more contrast levels have deepened.
23:48
If we pan off to the side here, however,
23:51
we can see that textures are just a
23:53
slight bit muddier here on the at f2.8,
23:56
8. But at f5.6, they're staying really
23:59
consistent right off to the very edge
24:01
there. At f5.6 and f8, we can see if we
24:04
look right up here into the corner, it
24:05
looks fantastically sharp right up into
24:08
the very, very corner, right up near the
24:10
edge. No problems. They are very, very
24:12
sharp at smaller apertures. Now, if we
24:15
stop on down to f11, you'll see f11
24:17
still looking good. By f-22, however, it
24:20
is softened somewhat due to defraction.
24:22
You can just see that the contrast is
24:24
gone. You see all these wavy lines of
24:26
texture in here? Those are almost not
24:28
visible because of so much contrast that
24:30
has been lost there at smaller
24:32
apertures. If we move on in the zoom
24:34
range to 100 mm, you can see it looks
24:37
amazing in the center of the frame. And
24:38
if you stop it down to f4, it looks
24:41
better still. Mid-frame looks awesome,
24:43
particularly by uh f4 there. And up into
24:46
the corners, the corner looks really
24:48
strong. And by f4, it looks
24:50
fantastically strong. At 135 mm, there's
24:53
a little bit of a dip. You can see it's
24:55
just not quite as popping off the page.
24:58
Even at f4, still good, but not what I
25:01
would call exceptionally good. Mid-frame
25:03
in some ways looks almost better than
25:04
the center. And the corners, uh, it's a
25:07
pretty consistent performance. The
25:08
corners still feel very, very sharp
25:10
relative to the center. So, overall,
25:12
still a good performance even at its
25:14
weakest. Then at 180 millimeters, you
25:17
can see it rebounds to just incredible
25:20
sharpness and contrast in the center of
25:21
the frame. You can see it's just
25:23
popping. F4 looks great. Mid-frame
25:26
looking really, really strong,
25:28
particularly by f4. And right up into
25:31
the corners looking awesome. So really
25:33
strong performance at the end of the
25:35
telephoto range, which is arguably maybe
25:37
the most important point. So here's a
25:40
couple of real world examples here at
25:42
200 millimeters. You can see even at
25:43
f2.8, date. Lots of detail all around
25:46
the plane of focus and very accurate um
25:49
focus there. All of that is great. Here
25:52
is minimum focus distance at 180 mm. You
25:55
can see the plane of focus is still not
25:57
perfectly flat, but you know, good
25:59
contrast and detail there in the middle
26:01
of the frame. You can get a higher level
26:03
of magnification at 70 mm. It's that
26:05
same not really flat plane of focus.
26:08
However, detail and contrast looks, you
26:10
know, quite good here. And so a very
26:12
usable amount of magnification and
26:15
performance up close.
26:17
This gives you a look at some flare
26:20
resistance here. So you can see at 70 mm
26:22
we've got a little bit of ghosting
26:25
coming in, but overall contrast stays
26:27
good. Uh with the tighter framing here,
26:30
that sun is right out of frame. And you
26:32
can see just a little bit of a veiling
26:35
effect up here, but overall we've got
26:36
nothing penetrating down into the frame
26:38
to mess things up. So, not bad at all.
26:41
Also, a look here at, you know, the nice
26:43
amount of defocus you can get. At its
26:46
best, the, you know, when you're
26:47
completely defocusing the background,
26:49
it's gorgeous. Detail looks really good.
26:52
Backgrounds blurred out nicely. Uh, this
26:54
image on a frosty late autumn morning
26:58
looks amazing. And again, you know, the
27:00
frost kind of helps to soften edges a
27:03
bit and so it all just blends together
27:05
really beautifully. Likewise here at
27:07
very up close, good detail and contrast
27:09
as you can see. And then a nicely
27:11
blurred background. Now here at 70 mm,
27:14
I'm relatively close, but you can see
27:15
there's definitely some of that
27:16
outlining we saw on specular highlights.
27:19
Not completely smooth, but you know, you
27:21
can also zoom in here and then smooth
27:24
everything out just via compression. And
27:26
so it really is relative to where you're
27:28
set up. Overall, however, you can see
27:31
though, um, it's a really, really nice
27:32
optical performance.
27:35
All right, so thanks for watching until
27:36
the very end, and I hope that the deep
27:38
dive into the optics has helped you to
27:40
determine whether or not the 70 to 180
27:43
millimeter G2 is going to be your new
27:45
zoom lens. As always, thanks for
27:47
watching. Have a great day and let the
27:49
light in.
27:51
[Music]

Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 G2 Z-mount Review | Smaller, Lighter, and Cheaper

dustinabbott.net

Tamron 25-200mm F2.8-5.6 VXD Review: The Superzoom to Buy!

XGIMI Horizon 20 Pro Review | A Home Theater Giant!

Viltrox EVO 85mm F2 FE Review | All This for $275?

AI Glasses: Instantly Reveal People's Info! #shorts

AI Tries to Hack Replit! What Happened Next is SHOCKING!

Beware: AI Scam Alert from the FBI! 🚨🤖

A FREE, Open-Source Agentic AI for GIS! How good is it?

Smart Tech Gifts for New or Expecting Parents

Extended A-10 Thunderbolt II Cockpit Video

C-5M Super Galaxy Can Back Up • Who Knew?

The Every Camera Smartphone

I Tried the Samsung Galaxy XR: The Headset That Could Rival Apple's Vision Pro

Up next in 10

Tamron 70-180mm F2.8 G2 Z-mount Review | Smaller, Lighter, and Cheaper

dustinabbott.net