0:00
Hi, I'm Dustin Abbott and I'm here today to give you a look at a brand new lens from a
0:15
brand new lens maker. The company Typoc is a new lens maker that is targeting the Leica M mount rangefinder
0:23
crowd with their new Samara lineup of manual lenses. Now the initial releases are a 28mm and a 35mm f1.4 lenses and they do only come in
0:35
Leica M mount. The names Typoc which is a combination of two old English words and then Samara which
0:42
is a Greek word, they focus on individuality and living in the moment
0:47
Now obviously that's completely marketing but it does reflect the fact that Typoc is
0:52
going after that Leica vibe and trying to capture both the kind of the aesthetic and
0:58
the lifestyle and then the overall feel of the lenses in the release of the Samara lineup
1:03
So the question is as we look at the Samara 28mm f1.4 as the focus of today's review
1:10
have they nailed that Leica feel as a part of their design and the optical performance
1:16
Well let's dive in and find out right after a word from our sponsor
1:21
Today's episode is brought to you by Phantom Wallet, the minimalist modern wallet that
1:25
is now even better with the new Phantom X that is crafted from aluminum right here in Canada
1:31
It is 22% smaller and 35% lighter while still making it easy to access your cards and money
1:37
when you need them thanks to their unique fanning mechanism. You could even customize your wallet due to its modular design with accessories like a
1:45
money clip, cash holder, ID display and even Chipolo and AirTag tracking integration
1:51
Visit store.phantomwallet.com to check out their unique sizes, styles and finishes that
1:57
span from aluminum to wood to carbon fiber and use code Dustin15 for 15% off when you're
2:03
ready to check out. So as you can see I'm looking at the silver version of the Samara 28mm f1.4 but both the
2:13
28mm and 35mm do come in both black and silver editions. The MSRP for these lenses is $699 and if that seems expensive to you for a manual focus
2:27
compact lens like this, bear in mind that the Leica Summilux M 28mm f1.4 retails for
2:33
$7800 and so this lens is literally more than 11 times cheaper than what that lens is
2:42
But you wouldn't know it from the build quality. Everything is all metal here which includes by the way the caps and the hood which are
2:50
frankly the rear cap is maybe one of the nicest that I've ever seen
2:54
But everything here does have a lot of attention to detail. Now as noted the lens hood is all made of metal
3:01
It is kind of the rectangular style that you do see on a lot of Leica lenses kind of following
3:05
that old rangefinder aesthetic. But I will note that there is a limitation that comes as a part of that in that the front
3:12
cap is a slip over style and so if you are using the front cap it's either that or the
3:19
lens hood because you can't use both at the same time. So the aesthetic may look cool but there is a price to pay for in this case I think that
3:28
style is trumping over functionality. Now the lens is very very compact here
3:34
It is 54mm in diameter that's 2.1 inches and it has a very compact 49mm front filter
3:42
thread which seems to be a pretty common one amongst Leica M mount 28mm lenses
3:48
Now the lens is 55mm just 1mm longer in its overall length that's 2.2 inches and it weighs
3:55
in at 330 grams or 11.6 ounces. So that's about 110 grams less than the aforementioned Leica Summilux lens and so obviously if you
4:06
are looking to travel light getting the f1.4 aperture and an all metal build while also
4:11
staying fairly lightweight is an added bonus here. Now this is a manual everything lens which is pretty common on Leica and the rangefinder
4:20
bodies but everything is nicely executed here. The manual focus ring has really nice, it's all in metal of course, and it has really
4:28
nice knurled sections that each have individualized grip so very easy to grip
4:34
The focus ring moves very very smoothly and there is a couple of unique features here
4:40
There is a little bit of additional drag that is at 0.7m, minimum focus distance is 0.4m
4:46
but at 0.7m there is some additional drag and the intent of that is that on rangefinder
4:51
bodies that's as close as they will actually focus and so beyond that you have to switch
4:56
to live view if you want to get accurate focus up close. So it's designed to just kind of let you know you are entering into that territory
5:02
On the other end of the approximately 100-110 degrees of focus rotation there is actually
5:09
an infinity lock there. I'm not convinced that it's entirely necessary but it is a cool looking feature
5:16
You do have to, once it's in that lock position you have to just depress this little tension
5:22
knob here and so it will release to allow you to rotate back out of there
5:26
This is an internally focusing lens which does actually set it apart as superior in
5:31
fact to some of the Leica counterparts. The lens has a nicely executed aperture ring near the front of the lens and so you have
5:39
a couple of different options. Surprisingly you actually have a click-declip click option on this lens and so you can choose
5:47
to click it and you will have 1 third stop to tenths that are really nicely defined all
5:52
the way through F8. After F8 you have single stop to tenths for F11 and F16
5:59
Now if you're in the declick mode obviously you can smoothly rack through that entire
6:05
aperture iris range and as you can see here the other bonus here is there is a beautiful
6:10
14-bladed aperture iris that stays really beautifully round as you open and close it
6:16
And so that is a very, very nice addition. Kind of another cool, I almost call it an Easter egg here, that I didn't initially notice
6:24
but only noticed after using it for a while and that is that rather than having a traditional
6:28
hyperfocus scale, instead what you have is you have these little red dots that start
6:34
to fill in as you stop the lens down. And so each one of those corresponds to the position where you can put the infinity symbol
6:43
if you're wanting to achieve proper hyperfocal distance. And so just kind of a unique bespoke touch there that I found very, very cool
6:52
Now as noted previously the minimum focus distance is 0.4 meters or 40 centimeters
6:58
That is not particularly close for a 28mm lens though in many cases close focus doesn't
7:04
seem to be a priority with a lot of the Leica lenses
7:08
But in this case you have roughly a 0.09x magnification which as you can see is not
7:14
particularly high. The build quality however is actually really, really nice. Everything is very beautifully executed here and there's a really fine attention to detail
7:23
which I appreciate. For those that appreciate lenses that are also kind of engineered pieces of art, this
7:30
is something that will probably delight you both in the tactile sense but also in the
7:34
overall aesthetic look. They're great looking lenses and they handle very nicely
7:39
Now image quality here comes via an optical formula of 11 elements in 7 groups
7:45
Now that includes an ED element, an aspherical element and 3 HR or high refractive index
7:52
elements as a part of the design. Another welcome surprise as a part of the optical design is a floating element that
7:58
allows you to get better performance up close. And again it's that attention to detail that has impressed me as a part of this brand new
8:05
lensmaker and their design. So we'll give you a quick breakdown of overall performance here
8:12
You can see from the MTF chart that we've got a good performance in the center of the
8:17
frame, a pretty good performance mid-frame and then weaker corner performance and a little
8:23
bit of improvement across the board as you stop it down. We're going to break all the optical performance down in detail at the end of the review so
8:29
stay tuned for that if you're interested in the kind of nitty gritty of the details
8:33
If you just want the overview I'll give you just a quick rundown of optical performance
8:38
in my experience. So the first positive note is there's basically no distortion here
8:42
I could do a tiny correction of maybe a minus one but frankly you probably wouldn't even
8:47
notice in any kind of real world conditions. Vignette on the other hand is heavier
8:51
We've got about three stops of vignette in the corners. It improves a little bit as you stop down but it never goes away altogether
8:59
Again positive is there is very good control of aberrations on the 28mm which by the way
9:04
is better in this than the 35mm. So I saw almost no longitudinal chromatic aberrations, very very minimal fringing before
9:11
and after the plane of focus. I also saw basically no lateral chromatic aberrations near the corners of the frame
9:18
so that's a very strong performance when it comes to that. If we look at the overall sharpness and contrast we find breaking it down and this is at 200
9:27
magnification so yes, torture test and I reviewed on 61 megapixels of resolution actually used
9:33
both a manual adapter and then the TechArt LM-EA9 adapter which gives you a little bit
9:39
of auto focus. It gives you M-mount lenses on Sony E-mount. I don't own a Leica body and so I was testing on a 61 megapixel Sony A7R Mark V for these
9:50
tests just so you know and so I found that there was good center performance, there was
9:54
okay mid performance and there was fairly weak corner performance. Now I did find that real world results looked a little bit better mostly because you're
10:02
not composing the extreme corners at f1.4 in real world shots typically but also because
10:08
the lens has such nice rendering that I just like the overall results and so it gave me
10:13
a more positive feel. The center will become very crisp by f2, the mid frame very crisp by f4 and the corners
10:22
very crisp by f5.6 so you can if you wanted to use this lens as a landscape lens you could
10:28
do so after you stop it down. I found kind of peak consistent performance across the frame at f8 and there is after
10:37
that diffraction will start to slightly soften the image but even by f16 which is minimum
10:42
aperture I really didn't find that the images looked too bad. The bokeh from this lens is actually really nice so looking at it on the technical side
10:50
first there is of the geometry there's a little bit of cat eye you know deformation near the
10:57
corners of the frame with specular highlights in some cases that will give you a little
11:01
bit of that swirl effect you'll either like or dislike that depending on your taste
11:06
By f2 it's almost perfectly round all across the frame and because remember there's that
11:11
14 bladed aperture iris after that point if you can create specular highlights or bokeh
11:16
balls you will find that they tend to be really nice and circular because that aperture blades
11:21
is so nice and circular. In situations where you don't have specular highlights and it's more just about a creamy
11:27
background I found that up close you could get a really nice and creamy background and
11:32
even at more medium distances I found that the kind of what I call the transition zone
11:38
was actually handled fairly well. So bokeh quality from the lens and the overall look and rendering I think is quite nice
11:45
The lens also exhibited surprisingly good flare resistance wide open with like light
11:51
coming through the windows I found that what bit of kind of veiling was there was actually
11:56
quite artistic kind of gave a warm glow to images and then directly facing into the sun
12:01
even when stopping down I saw just a basically one kind of ghosting artifact that wasn't
12:06
too big and not too destructive so positive there. I did test for coma though in using the tech art it's a little bit tough sometimes to nail
12:14
infinity focus in that kind of setting the movement of the actual adapter could kind
12:20
of work against you so my results are not perfectly focused however what I did find
12:25
is that there is a little bit of coma smear in the corners it's not terrible but this
12:31
lens wouldn't be what I would call a top astrophotography pick either
12:36
In general I really liked the look of the images that I got from the Typoc Samara 28mm
12:42
f1.4 and so in summation I think that Typoc has really done a pretty good job here of
12:48
nailing a lot of the Leica aesthetic and the lens design but also a lot of the Leica aesthetic
12:54
when it comes to the image quality and obviously at a much much lower price point
12:58
I enjoyed using the Samara 28mm f1.4 I will confess I do have a little bit of a weakness
13:04
for nicely executed manual focus lenses and in this case I think that that's what they've
13:09
done so I enjoyed using the lens I think the question remains of how the market is going
13:14
to receive this. The Leica brand is unique amongst most modern photography brands and those who have bought
13:21
into the Leica system I don't know for sure whether they're open to a non-established
13:27
brand like this. Maybe they are and obviously there's always going to be some disparity of opinion across
13:35
any kind of group of photographers but I guess the market will determine whether or not people
13:41
are looking for an off-brand lens like this new Typoc lens for their Leica body
13:49
But if you happen to be open to a far less expensive alternative for your Leica body
13:54
take a look at the Typoc Samara 28mm f1.4 if you like 28mm this is a pretty nice one
14:01
Now if you want to go into a deeper dive of the optical performance stay tuned we're going to jump into that right after this
14:15
Okay let's take a deeper dive into the image quality performance starting with the vignette
14:19
and distortion. You can see that this the uncorrected image on the left that there is basically almost
14:25
nothing to correct there as far as the distortion very very minimal I do use a minus one here
14:30
on the right but you really can't hardly tell a difference. Vignette is much more obvious
14:35
I used a plus 73 to correct for the vignette and the corners and move the midpoint most
14:40
of the way over. You can see that gave us a nice clean up that's about three stops
14:46
Now many wide aperture lenses like this do suffer from longitudinal chromatic aberrations
14:50
but that's really not much of an issue here as you can see there is just a tiny bit of
14:55
friending fringing before and after the plane of focus it is not very pronounced at all
14:59
and if I take a look at something like this with shiny and reflective surfaces I can see
15:05
yes just the tiniest bits of fringing but as we go towards the bokeh highlights very
15:10
minimal there and as we move out of focus I see only just the slightest bit of fringing
15:16
but not enough that you're really going to notice it on the whole image at all
15:21
Lateral chromatic aberrations are even if anything are less pronounced and you can see
15:25
in these transitions from black to white near the edge of the frame that everything is really
15:29
really nice and clean. So as noted previously I'm doing this test on a 61 megapixel Sony a7r mark 5 so very
15:38
high resolution level. I'm showing you these results at 200% so we can see that wide open contrast isn't perfect
15:45
but there is a lot of detail there in the center of the frame looking really quite good
15:49
I'm going to go to the left here and we can see that the mid-frame looks again its contrast
15:56
is not fantastic but there is a good amount of detail that's being captured there and
16:00
down here on the left side we can see that you know there's still some work to do in
16:05
the corners but there is it's not like there's no image quality here either
16:09
As noted in my summary I kind of liked my real world results even better than what that suggests
16:15
For one thing if you're looking just at a hundred percent magnification level that really
16:19
looks quite good. There's no issues there with the detail that I'm seeing and moreover just the overall look
16:26
and rendering of the image looks quite good here in my sauna and so you can see it's handling
16:31
the light coming through the window there quite well and if we look here obviously it's
16:37
going to be a fairly narrow depth of field you can see it's not pen sharp but there's
16:42
plenty there to make this image look credible and thus overall I really like the look of
16:48
the image. One final here and I can't remember if this was f1.4 or f1.8 but you can see here I wanted
16:55
to use a shallow depth field and use the contrast of this old abandoned barn with the kind of
17:02
the whiteout around it of the fresh snow and if we punch in there to a pixel level you
17:07
can see again it's not what I would call pen sharp but you can see there's a perfectly
17:12
usable amount of detail and I like the look of the image overall
17:16
Now stopping down to f1.8 does give us more contrast in the center of the frame over in
17:23
the mid frame the results again there's a little bit more contrast there and you can
17:27
see that the brighter areas are brighter to the corners it's not enough to really improve
17:32
the resolution much but again you can see that contrast is improved some with some brighter
17:38
looking edges. Now f1.8 to f2 makes a more marked improvement in the contrast in the center of the frame
17:45
with the center looking what I would consider pretty much pen sharp at this point the mid
17:49
frame is also improving and looking better not a hundred percent there yet and the corners
17:55
not a huge leap ahead yet there. By f2.8 to f4 you know even at f2.8 here we can see that the details looking really really
18:04
good contrast is looking excellent and if I pop down here once again and I look towards
18:09
the edge you can see it is starting to improve and it's going to be better still if we stop
18:14
down to f4 and then to f5.6 where the corners are looking really fantastic now
18:21
So for landscape type shots where you're looking for detail all across the frame you know if
18:26
you stop it down in this case I wouldn't call the corners looking as good on 61 megapixels
18:32
but overall the image looks nice and crisp I mean it's an image you would be perfectly
18:37
happy with. Here's another shot here that even if we look into the foreground everything looks really
18:42
nice and then as we look on towards infinity everything is captured looking really nicely
18:48
right off to the edge of the frame and so here's an image that I feel like really held
18:53
up well and shows off what the lens is capable of. So after f8 diffraction will start in a little bit at f11 though you can see it still looks
19:01
really good and then minimum aperture of f16 you can see by comparison that it is softer
19:07
but it's not unusable either and you can see even down into the corners that there still
19:12
is a useful amount of information so I wouldn't be against using that even at f16
19:18
Now as noted previously our minimum focus distance is only 40 centimeters and so magnification
19:24
isn't super high. Detail doesn't look too bad here up close however it's still what I would consider usable
19:31
for sure. A quick closer look at that bokeh geometry you can see that we're definitely getting
19:36
some of that lemon shape towards the corners of the frame if I stop down to f2 it's not
19:41
completely circular but you can see it looks acceptably circular by f2.8 everything is
19:47
looking better and of course you're going to continue to have really nice results due
19:51
to having that really circular aperture. We can also see because of low chromatic aberrations and a good amount of contrast that there's
19:59
a great amount of detail that's there even on some of these shiny and reflective surfaces
20:04
Now of course the lens doesn't focus particularly close I was able to get a little bit closer
20:09
due to using the tech art adapter that is one advantage of that but you can see that
20:14
the detail is good there but I mean this is obviously a really creamy type of background
20:19
here in this case at f1.4 where I'm back a little bit further you can see a little
20:24
bit of that swirl effect due to the specular highlights there so whether you like or dislike
20:29
that it's there. Now flare resistance was again quite good I really liked how it handled shots like this
20:36
which is important because this is the kind of shot that I would like to take with a lens
20:41
like this. So you've got some bright light coming through a window source and you can see that it's
20:46
everything's got a little bit of a warm glow but there's no kind of damage to the image
20:51
and this shot here once again backlit and so the sun's coming through fairly intensely
20:56
there but we can see at large aperture here that there's just a bit of a glow but there's
21:00
no big ghosting artifacts. As you stop down a bit you do get a little bit more of these kind of blobs but nothing
21:07
too severe and so I wasn't put off by that performance at all
21:12
And as noted with the caveat of not being able to focus perfectly for this we can see
21:17
that as we move off towards the edge of the frame you can see that the star points are
21:21
deforming a little bit and so they're becoming not quite like full-on flying birds but almost
21:27
a little triangular in shape and so that is the evidence of coma going on there and so
21:33
it's not a terrible performance but neither is it a good one either when it comes to coma
21:39
Overall however though I think that this lens really does pull off a very nice looking
21:43
optical performance. So thanks for watching to the end I hope that this has helped you to get a better understanding
21:50
of this lens and also this new brand. If you want more information you can check the link below in the description to my full
21:57
written review also there are buying links there if you'd like to pick one of these up
22:01
for yourself. As always thanks for watching have a great day and let the light in