0:00
Hi, I'm Dustin Abbott, and I'm here today to give you my definitive review of the brand new Lowa 35 millimeter F0.95 lens
0:22
and it is under their new Argus kind of premium brand here
0:26
Obviously, any lens with an aperture of F0.95 is a rarity. Even more of a rarity, however, is such a lens designed for full frame
0:36
We have seen over the last few years a trend where there have been quite a number of very large
0:41
maximum aperture lenses released for platforms like APSC, where the engineering is easier to achieve
0:49
When you move up to a larger sensor, like the full frame sensor, there are a lot of additional
0:54
engineering challenges that come to produce a credible option at these huge maximum apertures
1:01
So has Lawa managed to pull it off? Well, that's what we're here to discover in today's review
1:06
But first, a word from our sponsor. Today's episode is brought to you by Phantom Wallet, the minimalist, modern wallet, that sets you free from a bulky traditional wallet
1:16
while also making it easy to access your cards and money when you need them
1:21
thanks to their unique fanning mechanism. Visit phantom wallet.com to check out their unique sizes, styles, and finishes that span
1:30
from aluminum to wood to carbon fiber. You can even customize your wallet with new accessories like a money clip, cash holder, ID display
1:39
and even the Jopolo tracking integration if you're the kind of person who loses their wallet
1:47
Use code Dustin 15 for 15% off when you're ready to. to check out. I'm one of the, I think, probably few modern reviewers that has a chance to give a
1:56
modern review of Canon's kind of legendary EF 50mm F1.0 L-USM lens. And that lens, I was able to spend
2:08
some time with it. It was alone to me by a colleague, and I was able to spend time, kind of run
2:13
through its paces. And at the end of the day, I found it for myself a little bit more of a
2:17
novelty than a real optical instrument in that it wasn't really all that accessible. And at no point
2:25
was it as sharp even as a very inexpensive 50mm F1.8. And so you really had to be intentional in the way
2:32
that you use the lens to get the best out of it. It had low contrast. It never really developed a lot
2:37
of peak sharpness. And so, and even the bouquet quality tended to be, in my mind, to be a little
2:44
bit very busy and distinctive in a negative kind of way. But what it was was a showcase for
2:50
Canon to show what they were capable of doing. And from that offshoot, they were able to produce
2:56
more practical lenses like the EF 50mm F1.2L and even more so, kind of the direct inheritor of that
3:04
body and design was the original EF 85 millimeter F1.2L. And so, you know, it was I think a platform
3:14
that can use to advance their technology and to show what they were capable of doing
3:19
In some ways, I think that's applicable here of Lawa, though it's a little bit of different reality for the Argus 35
3:24
in that this is a fully manual everything lens. So it does remove a few of those constraints
3:30
but there's the reality involved in engineering a lens that has a maximum aperture
3:35
that is about one and a quarter stops faster than F1.4, which is the conventional, you know, kind of large maximum aperture for a 35 millimeter lens
3:48
And so this has a huge maximum aperture, and it means that there are certain challenges that are
3:53
incumbent to designing such a lens. But this is an intriguing lens that I think will really be even more so intriguing to certain
4:01
people that shoot a certain kind of photography. And I hope to detail who I believe the target audience for the lens is
4:07
First of all, let's dive in and let's take a closer look at the build and the handbook
4:11
of the lens here. So the Lawa Argus 35 millimeter is like all Lawa lenses is really a beautifully made
4:19
lens all meddling glass and in many ways reminds me of a classic Zice lens in terms of the
4:25
quality of construction. That includes all metal everything that is here and a beautiful damping on
4:31
things like the manual focus ring. The manual focus ring is actually really exceptional here
4:36
It is buttery, smooth in operation, perfectly damped but also with a long enough focus for
4:41
to give you a lot of precision. You'll see here there are some distance markings
4:45
to help you with hyperfocus, and then also just markings in general
4:50
Everything is etched in here into this kind of black satin, anodized finish
4:55
Then you have a manual aperture ring that gives you a dual approach to controlling aperture
5:01
and so you can have detents. They're not heavy detents, but you can feel them at the various stops
5:06
throughout the range. You can also choose, however, to declick the aperture
5:10
and just smoothly rack through the aperture itself. So before we talk about more positives, let's talk about some negative
5:18
and that is that there are no electronic contacts here. There is also no kind of weather ceiling
5:22
and so you're not going to get any kind of electronic information transmitted, and obviously you're not going to get weather sealing like you might with some other lens
5:31
The lens hood itself is, as you can see, it is very shallow. It can be removed
5:36
It bayonets into place, and so it gives you just a standard profile
5:40
file without it attached. However, it is metal, but it is lightweight, and frankly, because it's not
5:46
particularly deep in many situations, there's not a lot of reasons to remove it, other than if you
5:51
were to take it off for storage, and obviously that will allow you to store the lens a little more
5:57
flatly. Though I will note that it doesn't bayonet as precisely into place here. It seems to be fine
6:04
and so you could store it like this, if you so desired, upside down. However, the
6:10
Just the precision of the lens hood itself, it does feel a little bit flimsier than the lens itself, even though it is made of metal
6:16
And also it much more precise bayoneting into place in the upright or fixed position One of these standout things here is that there is 15 aperture blades and the aperture is truly lovely in both operation and also in keeping retaining a circular shape as you can see
6:34
So obviously that's going to make a very positive impact when you're stopping the lens down
6:39
in order to get circular bouquet highlights. Now the lens is right under 77 millimeters in diameter which gives you a 72 millimeter front
6:48
filter thread. It's 103 millimeters in overall length, and so it is just a little bit smaller than, say, the Canon 35 millimeter F1.4 L.2
6:59
And so just slightly smaller in both of those dimensions, it weighs in at about 755 grams
7:06
And again, that's about 5 grams lighter than what the Canon lens is
7:11
And so even though you have very dense, all-metal construction, the lens does feel very substantial
7:16
It feels very much like a Zeiss lens in hand, and that's due to all that metal and glass as a part of the construction
7:23
It fuels very quality. There's nothing to complain about when it comes to what is here
7:27
Any complaints I might have are more about what's missing here. And, you know, that would include any kind of electronics
7:33
I understand that they're doing manual focus lens, but having some electronics certainly can make life simpler for a number of reasons
7:39
One final thing worth noting that it's not a strength for the lens, and that is that the minimum focus distance is 50 centimeters, which is fairly long
7:46
for a 35 millimeter lens and it gives you a very low 0.10 times magnification. And so unfortunately
7:54
one of my favorite things to do with a 35 millimeter lens in terms of getting close and giving a
7:58
different perspective, this lens isn't as good for because of that high minimum focus distance
8:03
number. So as you can see, like other Lawa lenses, this is a beautifully made lens. It's, you know
8:10
it's more about, the complaints are more about what's not here, but not really about anything
8:14
that is here. What is here is really. beautifully made. I do think it's time for Lawa to move up to at least having some basic electronic
8:22
communication as a part of their lenses that would make them a little bit more accessible. But at
8:27
the same time, I do appreciate the fact that they are doing what they do very, very well. And
8:32
frankly, this lens focuses as nicely as any of the Zeiss classic lenses that are kind of the gold
8:37
standard to me for doing manual focus right. And so that manual focus ring is going to really make
8:44
this an appealing lens for those that shoot video and are intrigued by being able to get the very
8:50
large maximum aperture shots, you know, that are possible and those kind of creative
8:55
artsy type looks that are allowed by, you know, such a large maximum aperture. In the same fashion
9:01
I do really like the movement of the manual aperture ring and, of course, the ability to
9:06
declick it. Again, makes it, you know, kind of doubly accessible and interesting to those
9:12
that shoot video. So the big question, though, with any kind of large maximum aperture like this
9:18
lens like this, is did they pull off the engineering to produce an optical performance
9:23
that's actually useful rather than just a gimmick? Well, we're going to dive in and see if we can answer that question for you
9:29
So there are some certain realities when you create an extreme optical instrument
9:34
that's kind of outside of the spectrum of normal, which this lens is obviously with this large maximum aperture
9:40
which is a little over a standard. stop larger than an F1.4 lens, which means you actually get a stop in about a sixth of additional
9:50
light, more than twice as much light compared to an F1.4 aperture. But that does come with
9:56
some optical challenges. And we're going to see some of those exhibit as we do this breakdown
10:01
First of all, we do see that there is a bit of a pin cushion distortion here, which is a little bit
10:07
different than what I often see with a 35 millimeter lens, more often barrel than pin. And
10:12
cushion but we've got a bit of pin cushion here and a strong vignette as you can see
10:17
so the distortion no big deal with a minus four I got a nice linear correction
10:22
you know not perfect but pretty close to so no major issue there but vignette you
10:28
see that I basically am almost off the charts I had to maximize up to a plus
10:33
100 as far as I could move the slider and then slide the midpoint over you know I
10:38
could pretty much go pretty close to all the way I tick off a little bit just
10:42
just try to get a little bit more linear a result. And so at F0.95, there's definitely very, very heavy vignette
10:50
and a mild amount of distortion. If we stop the lens down to about the F2 range
10:55
I'm estimating that based on the shutter speed, we can see that the vignette continues to remain a factor
11:01
It's not really much lighter, just mildly better than what it was before
11:05
And so obviously that's something that isn't going to just very quickly clear up
11:09
as you stop the lens down a little bit. That does become a real world factor, as you can see with this image at wide open
11:17
There is very heavy vignette stopping on down, again to a little bit beyond F1.4, probably around F1.8 to F2 range
11:26
You can see that the vignette is much lighter. And if I stop on down to like a landscape aperture, this is somewhere in F5.6 or F8 even, I think, by the shutter speed, probably around F2
11:39
You can see that the vignette becomes much different of a factor. But there's one other thing that you may have noticed, and that is that the vignette is heavy enough at very white apertures that it does play a little bit of havoc with the automatic white balance
11:53
I'm using a Canon EOS R5 for this test, and so you can see that it very much trends towards a cooling
12:00
And I did note that somewhat, that I got kind of cool images, cool white balance, and that has a lot to do with the amount of vignette that is in the frame
12:08
You eliminate that vignette, as you can see here, same scene, same lighting conditions, but a smaller aperture with less vignette, and you get a, you know, a fairly different white balance that is a much more accurate one than the one on the left
12:22
A few other metrics to take a look at. Here we can see that fortunately there's not really much of an issue with lateral comatic aberrations
12:31
I see very little fringing in these black and white transitions near the edge of the frame
12:35
That's good news. Now on the less good news is that while I don see a massive amount of fringing here in this longitudinal chromatic aberration test you can see that there is quite a lot of spherical aberration and a kind of a bleeding effect at F0 which is not uncommon for lenses with this large and maximum aperture that does result in a heavily reduced amount of
13:02
contrast that has little to do with typical chromatic aberrations and is more a byproduct of
13:07
this really massive amount of a maximum aperture. Now, it is that spherical amount of aberrations
13:14
and the lower contrast that will become a factor when we do our test
13:17
test results here. So once again, we've got a 45 megapixel Canon EOS R5, you know, so very high
13:25
resolution here. And you can see in the middle of the frame that resolution, even at 0.95
13:32
is actually pretty good. You can see, however, the contrast is reduced. Stopping on down
13:38
even to the F1.2 range does a significant amount of improving of that contrast in the center
13:43
the frame. However, if you move off the center hardly at all, you can see a pretty severe drop off
13:49
in the amount of contrast and then thus apparent resolution. And so you can see here that either at
13:55
F0.95 or 1.2, that we don't really have a lot of acuity. And if we move into the corners
14:02
corners, you can see the potential for resolution is there, but that very low acuity makes me feel
14:07
like I'm looking at a small aperture rather than a large aperture, because this is kind of what you
14:13
see as a result of diffraction. And so anyway, just a generalized loss of contrast
14:18
You can see that there's actually the potential for resolution there into the corner
14:21
but that low contrast really robs the acuity and the ability to render the fine details
14:28
Stopping down to F1.4 has a significant improvement in contrast relative to wide open in the
14:33
center of the frame. You can just see there's a lot more contrast, and thus, you know, just the resolution is showing up there
14:39
So is it starting to hit the mid-frame yet? the answer is a somewhat but not significantly
14:46
So you can see that there's definitely more contrast like in the writing here, a little bit more detail in the prime minister's face
14:52
The shadows are getting a little bit darker, but we can see that there's still a lot to be desired
14:57
as we move from the midframe, you know, towards the corner where you can see some improved contrast
15:02
but the acuity while improving still has a ways to go. Now between F1.4 and F2
15:09
we can see that the midframe is taking a pretty significant. significant leap forward, looking a lot better at this point. The corners are improving here
15:18
but not to excellent levels as of yet. Stopping down from F2 to F2.8 moves us into very good territory
15:26
here in the corner. Not quite excellent level, but very close to it. Going from F2.8 to F4
15:33
however, takes us into truly excellent levels where resolution is looking really fantastic now
15:39
all across the frame, obviously in that extreme corner, it looked great
15:43
mid-frame looks fantastic, and center of the frame is just fabulous. Going from F4 to F5.6, kind of completes the picture in the corner
15:52
to where everything now is pin sharp there in the corner, great contrast, great resolution
15:58
So this translates into very strong real-world performance at landscape apertures, so even if we look off into the distance
16:06
you can see, for example, in these bales of hay, just how pristine that they look
16:10
The detail as it draws towards infinity looks fantastic. And then there's great contrast and detail
16:17
and everything here from the road surface to all the various leaves there along the way
16:23
Everything looks really crisp, really excellent. So in the real world at kind of close up distances here
16:29
we can see the difference between F0.95 and F1.2 is pretty significant in the amount of detail that we get
16:36
F1.2 with this composition, you know, just slightly off center, looks quite excellent at F1.2
16:43
however, not nearly as excellent if we look at the F0.95 comparison
16:49
Likewise, in this a little bit more distant subject here, we can see that the wide open result
16:54
does show some fringing here and just kind of that general lower contrast, whereas stopping
17:00
it on down to about F1.2, F1.4 makes a significant. difference in the amount of contrast that is there. So it's just kind of the nature of the lens
17:11
design. Now our maximum magnification figure of only about 0.10 times is quite low, as you can see
17:19
That is one of the disappointments to me of the lens because, to me, an advantage of having such a
17:24
large maximum aperture is that you can get fairly close to a subject. If you can get close
17:28
you can completely blur out a background. A little bit less potential for that because of the low
17:33
minimum focus distance of about 50 centimeters and then of course a fairly low
17:39
magnification level and again we see that really mark a difference that wide open you can see
17:44
everything has very low contrast again the potential for resolution is there contrast is just really
17:50
low we stop down to close to the f1.8 f2 range and you can see it looks fantastic and so just a
17:58
dramatic difference by stopping it down a little bit so that's something to bear in mind if you
18:02
get close to your subject and you, you know, you can play with the background a little bit
18:07
and you want the sharpness. Stop down a little bit and it makes a significant difference
18:12
Now your trade-off, obviously, for lower contrasts is that it tends to produce really soft
18:17
creamy backgrounds. And so here, I've deliberately defocused my subject here in the foreground just a little bit
18:23
And so with such a large maximum aperture, you do get bouquet circles
18:28
In this case, we are looking at a branch of an evergreen that is, you know
18:32
wet with raindrops. And so you can see there is a little bit of a tendency towards
18:38
you know, a little bit maybe more of a circular, not circular shape, but an outlining as what I would like
18:44
But you can just see the potential for some really lovely bouquet. It does start to clip a little bit towards the edges of the frame
18:50
which I did see in some other shots as well. Now in this case, obviously I have actually focused on a similar type subject
18:58
So you do see a little bit of chromatic aberration, but nothing extreme here
19:02
But what you do see as a trade-off is quite a lovely and soft background
19:08
And one of the thing that I going to explore a little bit more as we progress here towards the end is that Lawa colors tend to be a little bit muted for my taste And you can see here that we also gotten a little bit of that cooling to where it should be a little bit warmer than what it is
19:25
So it gives it a slightly zice quality. Zice color tends to be a little bit cool sometimes
19:29
but also a much richer than what we're seeing here. Now this image looks a little bit better
19:34
but I have switched to a landscape type profile that is going to serve the purpose of
19:40
deepening the saturation levels on the colors. What we can see, is that there's great amount of acuity here into the distance and at the distant shore
19:50
Everything is sharp and crisp and you can see here towards the foreground. Everything also looks really fantastic
19:56
So finally, let's explore flare a little bit. A serious weakness for huge glass like this tends to be that it's a little bit flare prone
20:05
And as we can see, that's certainly the case here if you don't try to, you know, shoot to protect the lens
20:12
The lens hood itself is really, really shallow, and so it's not doing a lot to actually block any kind of light
20:18
It's probably there more for protection than anything. And as we can see here, it's done very little at wide aperture, maximum aperture here to stop flare
20:27
And so there's lots of loss of contrast, along with some just kind of generalized kind of ghosting slash haze areas here
20:37
Stopping on down a bit in this scene, it starts to produce a more pronounced ghosting pattern
20:42
that will vary some depending upon where the sun is placed. And so, for example, in this video wide open
20:48
you can see as I pan up and down that the amount of flare will really change relative to position
20:54
And then in this stop-down video, you can see that ghosting pattern, flare pattern that is there
21:00
that is increasingly pronounced depending upon the position of the sun in the frame
21:06
Our final two images show that even at that large maximum aperture
21:10
where it is really susceptible to flare. We can see that if the sun is, you know, not like really directly into the frame, but it's present
21:19
you can see that there's a little bit, for example, on this left image, you can see a few
21:23
little artifacts but that tend to have artistic value. Likewise, here on the right, it's a little bit of a lot of loss of contrast and a little
21:31
bit of that kind of heavenly rays coming down. But I think it's a fairly artistic effect
21:37
And so the moral of the story is, is that if you're careful and competent, position. You can either use this to your benefit or you can highlight it. It really depends on what you're looking for in a particular shot
21:49
So as often the case with large maximum aperture lenses like this, they have kind of a split personality. And in some ways, I was quite reminded of my review of the Voightlander
21:59
Nocton 40mm F1.2 lens. In that wide open, it had a, you know, a little bit more of a dreamy, as it sometimes euphemistically called profile, lower contrast
22:10
and so textures, you know, bloom a little bit, but you have this beautiful bouquet quality
22:17
and so it has a rendering that I discovered a lot of you actually really, really like
22:21
And then, of course, the split nature of that was as you begin to stop the lens down
22:25
contrast, you know, jumped in, and by the time you got to, like, landscape actors
22:29
the lens was really razor sharp. And that is, in many ways, the way I'm reminded of in this particular lens
22:35
and that it does have a sweet spot in the very middle of the frame that even at F is 0.95, you can get some crisp looking results out of it in that sweet spot
22:44
right in the center of the frame. But even just a little bit off of that center axis and sharpness
22:50
begins to plummet along with contrast. And it's as you stop the lens down to F2 and beyond
22:57
that you really start to get a lot more contrast and sharpness. So the nice thing about that is that
23:02
it does give you a couple of creative options, different ways that you can approach a seam, whether you
23:07
want to prioritize kind of a, you know, a more dreamy, artsy type look, or if you want to stop
23:12
down a little bit and go for a little bit more of a modern punch to your images. But there are
23:18
many ways where this lens does have a somewhat kind of classic or retro rendering. And while I don't
23:26
necessarily love the flatter colors that I see out of Lawa lenses that are a little bit more desaturated
23:31
I do think that they offer certain creative potential for those that are going to do a lot of postwork
23:37
either with stills or with their video. So at the end of the day, I think that this is a lens
23:41
that will be intriguing to certain photographers, particularly when you consider the fact
23:45
that while it's not inexpensive at about 900 US dollars, neither is it prohibitively expensive
23:53
And so it is still accessible to a number of photographers that are interested in a beautifully made lens
23:59
that's fully manual and with the plus sides, not just the negatives, but the upsides that come
24:04
from having full manual control over a lens, to kind of enable your creative juices
24:11
And so for the right kind of photographer, I think that this is going to be a very valuable lens to them
24:16
It's not going to be a lens for everyone, however, and there are going to be a lot of photographers that are going to, number one, be put off by the fact
24:21
that it's manual focus to begin with, though I will note that on mirrorless platforms
24:26
that's a whole lot easier to deal with than what it was on DSLRs. But, you know, some people just don't want to be bothered
24:31
with the manual focus. And, you know, the fact that it's a huge maximum aperture
24:36
that's not going to be as sharp at F1.4 as, you know, some alternative options at F1.4 wide open
24:44
If that's really your priority, then this is not going to be a lens for you
24:48
However, if you're someone that has a kind of a different photography style
24:52
this is a lens that is going to really ignite your creative process
24:56
and so is well worthy of your consideration. I'm Dustin Abbott, and if you look in the description down below
25:01
you can find my full text review and lots of photos accompanying that
25:05
There's also an image gallery. If you want to check out more photos that I took with this lens during my review process
25:11
beyond that, there are buying links. Though, again, this is a brand new, just announced lens
25:16
So some of those links will take a little bit time to, you know, populate
25:20
But just check back and they will be ready to go. And of course, beyond that, there's linkage to purchase my merchandise
25:26
follow me on social media, become a patron, sign up for my newsletter. And if you haven't already, please click that subscribe button right here on YouTube
25:33
Thanks for watching. Have a great day. And let the light in