Sony 50mm F1.2 GM vs Sony Zeiss 50mm F1.4 Planar

0:00
Hi, I'm Dustin Abbott and I'm here as promised to give you a little bit more of a detailed
0:15
breakdown head-to-head comparison between the Sony FE 50mm f1.4 planar, the Sony Zeiss lens
0:23
that was the original premium 50mm option on Sony, and then of course the newer
0:29
Sony FE 50mm f1.2 G Master lens, which is the new top of the heap premium lens
0:36
And so I'm going to try to break down the major areas of distinction between these two because
0:41
there are two different people in the market right now. One of those are those that already
0:47
own the Planar, like myself, and are wondering if there is some compelling reason to upgrade to the
0:52
G Master. And then there are those of you that are trying to maybe decide between these two lenses
0:58
and you own neither of them. And this will give you a little bit of a primer on, you know
1:02
maybe how to make a little bit more educated choice about that. Now, I come with a fairly long experience with the planar lens
1:11
I've owned it for about three years at this point and used it extensively, used it for weddings, for portraits, you know, a variety of different applications
1:19
And then, of course, the G Master, I have been spending a lot of time
1:23
concentrated recently as a part of my review cycle for it. And so I feel like I can give you, there's definitely differences that have emerged that I will highlight as a part of this
1:34
both in functionality, but then also in performance optically. And I'll try to break that down for you here as we proceed
1:42
Today's episode is brought to you by Phantom Wallet, the minimalist, modern wallet that sets you free from a bulky, traditional wallet
1:50
while also making it easy to access your cards and money when you need them, thanks to their unique fanning mechanism
1:57
Visit phantomwallet.com to check out their unique sizes, styles, and finishes that span from aluminum to wood to carbon fiber
2:06
You can even customize your wallet with new accessories like a money clip
2:11
cash holder, ID display, and even the Chipolo tracking integration if you're the kind of person who loses their wallet
2:20
Use code DUSTIN15 for 15% off when you're ready to check out
2:25
So I'm going to start by giving you some reasons that I think the Planar is a better choice
2:31
Then we'll move to the G Master towards the end. And with a little bit of a summation as to the compelling reason to choose each one at the very end of it
2:41
So first of all, starting with the Planar, the top advantage I would say is, of course, price difference
2:46
The Planar was never a cheap lens, around $1,500, but the G Master is more expensive still at around $2,000
2:53
And so while it is cheaper than competitors that are on Canon RF or Nikon Z or Z at this point
3:01
certainly it is much more expensive than what the planar lens is at about $500 different
3:07
I actually find the planar lens to be the more attractive lens if you really care about the aesthetics of lens design
3:15
All of the Sony Zeiss lenses, I mean, for one thing, There's something that, you know, just feels upscale about Zeiss branding because of the Zeiss brand that they had very carefully built
3:25
And so the distinctive, you know, kind of Zeiss badging, along with just a kind of cleaner overall aesthetic, the metal focusing ring
3:34
those things, you know, make me think that the G Master, which is highly functional
3:40
and in my opinion on the G Master lenses, of which I own several, is that they are, they're highly functional
3:45
they're fantastic you know in terms of performance but as far as the actual design I just find them
3:52
to be a little bit on the busy side there's a lot going on there and the I find the more workman
3:57
professional grade yes but workman than the more pleasing aesthetic of the planar that may be a
4:02
trivial thing to you but for some people it does matter so that's one reason to consider that
4:07
I mentioned the manual focus ring here and not only do I like the fact that it's it's the metal
4:14
ribs, you know, which obviously are very long lasting. But when it comes to the feel of the
4:20
focus ring, unfortunately, the G Master lens, it is so lightly damped that there is very little feel
4:25
to it. Now it's nice and smooth in its rotation, but when you focus the planar, the damping is
4:34
just much better. It actually feels more like true manual focus. Whereas I find that the G Master
4:40
doesn't have a lot of feel, and it's so light that it's easy to kind of focus too fast as a
4:46
byproduct of that. And so I do prefer the feel of the focus ring on the planar
4:51
Now there isn really much of a difference between these two lenses in terms of the overall size They the exact same length 108 millimeters and their weight is within two grams of each other
5:04
Actually, the Planar at 780 grams is ever so slightly heavier than the GM at 778 grams
5:11
But, I mean, a negligible difference you're not really going to feel, obviously
5:15
but the planar is a little bit narrower a lens just by about three and a half millimeters or so
5:22
for some people that may matter probably for most of you it doesn't they use the exact same filter
5:28
size which is 72 millimeters so really not a lot of physical difference between the two lenses in
5:33
terms of that and so there are a few reasons to consider the the planar but I would say that there
5:40
are also some really compelling reasons to consider the G Master. First of all, of course, is that
5:45
larger maximum aperture. Now in certain applications, f1.2 versus f1.4, not a radical difference, but
5:53
there are some intrinsic advantages that do come with a wider aperture lens. And we'll see a bit of
5:58
that as we look at a breakdown between the two optically in just a moment. Another thing that I
6:04
did observe as a part of my initial review of the planar is that it's not the brightest f1.4
6:10
in that when I compared it even to other f1.4 lenses I found that in some situations
6:15
it's light transmission was not quite as high as some others and that is really highlighted when I
6:21
compare these two lenses in that rather than getting a one-third stop you know luminosity
6:28
difference between the two actually get somewhere between one half and two-thirds stop and so this
6:34
is actually a the G Master is a brighter lens even beyond what the aperture difference suggests
6:41
The G Master I believe has a better weather sealing to it. Now this the planar lens does
6:48
have a gasket though back in at this point the gaskets were so thin that it's hard to even feel
6:53
them and you know Sony did suggest that it is weather and dust sealed however I've never been
7:00
able to find a diagram of how this lens is actually made internally whereas with the G Master it's
7:06
much more out there you know exactly where the seal points are it's got the flooring coating on
7:11
the front element and so I believe that it has the higher grade of weather sealing. Now the primary
7:18
difference in terms of performance that I have noted with the planar and then going to the G
7:22
Master is that the planar lens you can tell that it was designed at a little bit of an earlier point
7:28
in terms of autofocus performance. And that I don't find that autofocus precision
7:33
is as good as what later lenses would be to come. And I have noted in real world use
7:40
some focus misses periodically that are frankly surprising in this day of IAF
7:46
And that I tend to expect almost flawless performance, particularly in a portrait type setting
7:52
This lens will miss occasionally in my experience, whereas the G Master is pretty much flawless
7:58
in the IAF performance. And even shooting at F1.2, it just delivers accurately focused results
8:05
again and again. It has the quad XD motors as opposed to the SSM, I think it's called
8:12
focus motor that's in this. Both of them focus quietly and quickly, but the GM's just got that
8:18
edge. It's got more torque and that results not only in a bit more speed, but also results in more
8:23
precision in autofocus. Your mileage again may vary with this distinction, but the planar lens
8:32
came before Sony was implementing the focus hold button. Now you may not use the focus hold button
8:37
at all. You may use it all the time. And so, you know, whether or not you do, we'll make that a
8:42
distinctive or not. In this case, we've actually got a redundant focus hold button. So we've got
8:47
it in two positions and so that you have easy access, whether you're shooting in a horizontal
8:52
or vertical shooting. And so that obviously is advantageous if you use a focus hold button
8:59
I'll also note that the quality of the lens hood here is nicer on the G Master
9:05
It's just pretty plain plastic here, obviously different shapes. This lens hood is actually deeper
9:12
but that tends to be unnecessary on the G Master, which I think has a little bit better flare resistance
9:18
But it's a shallower lens hood, but it also has this rubberized transition
9:21
which is really nice to have because it means you have a soft touch if you bump against something
9:27
Also, it makes it easy to set a lens like this, which a lot of people like to do because that's
9:31
actually a really stable position. It's much more stable than what this is, obviously. And so that
9:38
is nice, as is having a lock on the actual lens hood. And so, you know, again, maybe a minor thing
9:45
to some people, a bigger thing to other people. We're going to dive just for a couple of minutes
9:50
into an image quality comparison to give you a few more areas of distinction between the two lenses where they differ where they really don So we start by taking a look at the two lenses compared at f1 and f1 So first of all again I want to point out that difference that in the
10:07
actual brightness of the lens. So you see that to get basically an equivalent exposure, I have
10:12
1 4 hundredth of a second shutter speed on the f1.2 lens and I have got a shutter speed of 1
10:20
2 50th of a second. In theory that actually should be only one third stop apart for the aperture
10:27
difference but we can see here that it's actually exposed two thirds of a stop apart and so it goes
10:33
to show just the advantage of the G Master in terms of brightness. Now in the center of the frame we
10:37
can see that the two lenses are close. I mean if we look around this zone in the center of the frame
10:42
And both of them look obviously really, really good. I do note that there's a little bit of a moire pattern and just a little bit more resolving
10:49
of fine details on the G Master lens. And so it has just ever so slightly advantage in the center of the frame
10:56
In the mid frame, I also think that it looks just a, has a little bit more distinctiveness
11:01
a little more acuity to the textures at F1.2 versus F1.4. Down in the corner of the frame, again, just a slight bit of advantage there for the G Master
11:11
in that it's just rendering a little bit more different tonality there in the image here
11:17
Now if we stop down to f2 on both lenses, we see that they start to equalize a bit more
11:24
I do think in the center of the frame, we've got a little bit more contrast for the G Master lens
11:29
And, you know, in the mid-frame here, I think that the planar has essentially caught up
11:35
It looks to me like it actually has a little bit better mid-frame contrast
11:39
and down into the corner they are more similar than different at this point right off to the
11:44
edge of the frame I think the G Master holds right out to the edge maybe a hair more and if we pop
11:50
over on this side I think the same is probably true but at the same time there really is not a
11:56
significant difference between the two if you didn't have them side by side you'd probably
12:01
have a hard time distinguishing the performance here if you stop on down to f 2.8 in some ways
12:06
it becomes harder still to make a distinction again a little bit more of that moire pattern
12:11
so when you when i start to see that false color it shows really really high contrast in detail
12:16
i just know this out of familiarity with the sensor of my camera and so i do see more of that
12:21
here than what i do on the planar so there's a little bit more contrast there at the center of
12:26
the frame or excuse me the mid frame both of them are exceptionally good um as far as contrast goes
12:32
in this zone. I mean, one doesn't necessarily look better than the other. If anything, I would say I
12:38
favor the planar just a tiny bit. And down here in the corner, they look basically identical
12:44
Look at Sir Winston for a moment. Very, very similar. And on this side, you know, they look
12:50
more similar than different, I would say. If I pop up into this corner, you can see that performance
12:56
also looks really similar and both of them show really good centeredness and overall I would say
13:03
that the corner performance now probably just slightly favors the planar. So again the advantage
13:08
of the GM is at wide apertures. Now a more distinct advantage optically for the G Master lens is in
13:16
close-up performance. Not only does it have a higher magnification as you can see but if we go
13:21
into a pixel level and I'll give you a little bit more screen here you can see that the GM is
13:26
definitely stronger not even close here yeah even at f1.2 versus f1.4 sharper higher contrast of the
13:33
textures in the center of the frame and both of them have a fairly flat plane of focus but the
13:40
g master is definitely the sharper of the two now having that wider maximum aperture also translates
13:45
into having a little bit more bokeh and you can see it's a little bit softer a little bit larger
13:50
these are not necessarily identical i did hand hold these shots but i stood at basically the same
13:55
same spot and tried to achieve a similar result and so you can just see that there's definitely
14:00
a difference there if we stop down to f2 we can see that that advantage remains and that the bokeh
14:06
circles are basically pretty close to being as big i'll toggle back for a second they're almost
14:11
as big as what the uh the planar lens shows at f1.4 and so that is a little bit of an advantage
14:18
there both of them give you a nice circular shape across the frame but you definitely get softer
14:24
bokeh at f2 than you do on the planar lens. Now the final thing we'll examine, which is again very
14:31
interesting, is the difference when it comes for portrait work. So first of all, just a quick
14:37
background. This is strobed, flashes right off of camera here, and so I'm using the exact same
14:44
flash trigger you know same settings for it It just a matter of difference in the two lenses So first of all if we look at f1 versus f1 I did a blind test with my wife Of course she doesn really know the difference between the
14:59
lenses as to which she preferred. She chose the G Master result every time in the comparisons I
15:05
showed her. And for her, the difference was is that the skin tones just showed a kind of a better
15:10
transition. They looked a little bit more natural. And you can see there is some truth to what she
15:15
says. I'll also note there's a little bit more pop in the contrast like around the eyes which
15:20
seem to sparkle a little bit more in the hair. There's more contrast there but if we move away
15:26
from sharpness and into softness you can see that larger aperture advantage and that the bokeh
15:32
is just softer everywhere that you look. There's less hard edges there. If we jump back to this
15:38
other side here you can see that with the planar there's just more that kind of catches the eye
15:43
in a negative kind of way where everything is just softer overall here when you're looking at
15:49
the GM lens and you get into more complicated situations like these bare branches and the GM
15:54
result is definitely preferable. Now if we stop down to f2 on both lenses some of those advantages
16:00
remain but they are less pronounced and so if we look at the actual face I think that the contrast
16:06
difference is mostly equalized at this point and so you see more of that sparkle in the eyes that
16:12
we on the planar that we saw at f1.2 on the g master if we look at the bokeh obviously now
16:19
they're both working with the same aperture however the larger aperture lens does still
16:24
hold a little bit of an advantage and that everything is still a little bit softer here
16:29
and as we look again into this area here which is you know more difficult there's still just more
16:34
hard edges that with the um with the planar lens over in this zone everything's just a little bit
16:41
softer with the G Master. And so we can see even stop down, there is still some minor advantage
16:47
though you would be hard pressed to see it at anything but a pixel level comparing these two
16:53
lenses. So again, the optical advantages are largely at wide aperture, not when you stop down
16:59
So I think that really the G Master advantage is at that f1.2. It just gives you some very obvious
17:06
disadvantages in terms of both performance wide open, but also the softness of the bokeh and the
17:12
ability to further defocus a background, I think that does stand out from the planar lens. I think
17:20
the biggest reason to upgrade if you own the planar would be if you are looking for the better
17:26
autofocus and the brighter aperture as a part of that. And so I guess the question is, do you
17:31
actually shoot wide open because if you shoot at f1.4 on the planar you're going to love shooting
17:38
even more so at f1.2 on the g master lens and that I think are the those are the two primary areas to
17:45
consider the upgrade to this or the purchase of this and spending the additional money is that
17:50
you do get better wide open performance and then you also get better autofocus performance stop
17:57
down as we saw there's not really much of a difference between these two lenses they're both
18:01
exceptionally good. The biggest reason to either hold on to your planar or to consider buying it
18:08
is at the end of the day, it's most going to be about saving money. I doubt that the difference
18:13
in the physical appearance is going to be enough to sway you either way. And so I do think that
18:19
it is that overall just price point that makes it attractive. And particularly if you, you know
18:25
you shoot at, say even at F1.8 or F2, there's not going to be much difference between the two
18:31
lenses and performance. And definitely if you tend to stop down more, you're really not going
18:35
to see any kind of radical image quality difference. You might see a little bit of
18:39
autofocus difference, but if you already own the planar and you're happy with the results you're
18:43
getting, hey, enjoy the lens that you have. Because the truth of the matter is, it's going to be more
18:47
than a $500 difference to sell your planar and then to purchase the G Master. And of course
18:53
if you're just making a fresh purchase, you can decide whether or not these different areas that
18:57
I've highlighted are worth an additional $500 to you. At the end of the day, once again, as Sony
19:02
shooters, we're spoiled for choice. And in this case, even in the premium category, we really have
19:08
two excellent lenses here to choose from. And I hope that this little video has helped you to make
19:13
a more informed decision about which of these two lenses best suits your own individual needs
19:19
I'm Dustin Abbott. And if you'll look in the description down below, you can find linkage to
19:22
my full review of either of these lenses. There's also linkage there to purchase either one of them
19:27
and beyond that, there's a linkage to follow me on social media, to become a patron, sign up for
19:33
my newsletter. And of course, if you haven't already, please click that subscribe button
19:37
right here on YouTube. Thanks for watching. Have a great day and let the light in

Sony 50mm F1.2 GM vs Sony Zeiss 50mm F1.4 Planar

Dustin Abbott

Logistic Regression Machine Learning | Logistic Regression Tutorial | Tutorialspoint

How to Hide Photos in Gallery in Xiaomi Redmi Note 11 - Move Photo to Secret Folder

How to Change the Timelapse Speed on the iPad Pro 4th Gen (2022)

Re-Lyte vs. LMNT Review - And Why You Should Avoid LMNT!

Tamron 35-100mm F2.8 VXD Review | Does the Oddball Zoom Excel?

7 Chinese Badminton Principles That Made Us Rethink The Game

How to extend C drive in Windows 11 with unallocated space

5 Reasons I Love the Shearwater Perdix 2 Bronze Edition for CCR Diving

Assassin's Creed Shadows - The Onryo Samurai: Assassinate Ido Yoshihiro and Escape Katano Castle

Matthew Cremona: Serpentine Chest of Drawers Build Part 1 | Design & Lumber Selection

Cancun Mexico Travel Guide: Things To Do Cancun

What Type of TV Should You Buy? OLED, Mini-LED, RGB Compared

Tarik Skubal will only make one start for Team USA in the WBC | Baseball Today

Money Mike’s Syndicated Podcast: Caitlin Clark's Impact on WNBA, Fever's New Offense, CBA Progress

Krimbo Talks S1mple Most Competitive and OhnePixel Ice Cream - iBUYPOWER EP 6

Up next in 10

Sony 50mm F1.2 GM vs Sony Zeiss 50mm F1.4 Planar

Dustin Abbott