0:10
hi I'm Dustin Abbott and I'm here today to give you my review of the Nicor z 135mm f1.8 s plena lens today now they
0:19
released their premium 135 mm which I'll just refer to as the plena from here on out which by the way I wish that all
0:26
premium lenses had a unique name attached to them it would make my job much simpler but as many of you know I'm
0:32
late to the Nikon party I didn't add a Nikon body to my own personal review kit
0:38
until spring of 2024 so anything released before that point on Z Mount and some released after that point I'm
0:45
still playing a bit of catchup trying to cover it at this point now one advantage
0:51
however of being late is that I have an opportunity to compare the planet to the excellent vro lab 135 mm f1.8 certainly
1:00
has been a bit of a disruptor here on the z-mount space I will be doing a separate head-to-head video later on
1:07
that will come down the road but today I'm going to dive deep into the performance of the planet itself before
1:12
I do that however I do want to express my gratitude to my friend Evelyn Drake of the camera store TV she is a
1:19
fantastic person and she was kind enough when I lamented over my difficulty in
1:25
getting Nikon loaners with connecting me with her contact Chris with Nikon candada and Chris has been great to work
1:31
with and getting me a copy of the planet and hopefully future lenses and so that I can do Nikon zount reviews more
1:37
regularly so thanks to both Evelyn and Chris that aside let's dive in today's
1:42
review today's episode is brought to you by Phantom wallet the minimalist modern wallet that is now even better with the
1:49
new Phantom X that is crafted from aluminum right here in Canada it is 22%
1:55
smaller and 35% lighter while still making it easy to access your cards and money when you need them thanks to their
2:01
unique Fanning mechanism you could even customize your wallet due to its modular design with accessories like a money
2:08
clip cash holder ID display and even chipolo and air tag tracking integration
2:14
visit store. fanom wallet.com to check out their unique sizes Styles and finishes that span from aluminum to Wood
2:21
to carbon fiber and use code Dustin 15 for 15% off when you're ready to check
2:27
out those of you that are familiar with Nikon's premium lenses here know that
2:34
they are aren't particularly small lenses and often when compared side by side by side with the comparative lenses
2:41
from other brands they tend to be the largest ones out there that's true here
2:47
though the Advent of the lab makes it a little bit less true at this point this
2:52
uh Nicor lens is 98 mm or 3.9 in in diameter and it is
2:59
M or 5.5 in in overall length and so the vro is actually a little narrower and a
3:06
little bit longer but when you put together all of the volume and you multiply that the planet is right around
3:12
1% larger in volume so in other words they're pretty much the same that being said though the pla is a heavy lens it's
3:20
considerably lighter than the lab the plena weighs 995 gam or as Chris Nichols calls it one
3:27
plena or 35 ounces that about 273 G
3:32
lighter than what the vro lab is at this point ironically as I did a little bit
3:37
of research this of the kind of Premium sine lenses and so this kind of falls in the category with the f1.2 35 50mm and
3:45
85 mm f1.2 s line lenses this is actually the smallest and lightest of
3:50
those four lenses which kind of surprised me can because often 85 or 135
3:56
mm lenses I should say tend to be the largest of Those comp comperative lenses front filter size is 82 mm which is
4:03
pretty standard for all of these lenses the body is nicely made it is primarily Metals with some Plastics and obviously
4:11
some rubberized surfaces there as well it is Thoroughly weather sealed with um Coatings like flooring on the front and
4:18
rear elements and then there are 11 different seal points throughout the lens the dials buttons switches things
4:25
like that one thing that I will just kind of briefly hit that's really not a knock against the plena but more just an
4:32
observation about modern 135 mm design one of the things that I actually really
4:37
enjoyed many years ago with the Canon 135mm f2l was the fact that it could be really
4:45
effectively used with teleconverters which gave you some extra options with what you could do with 135 mm lens these
4:52
days it doesn't seem like that's even a consideration with any of the modern 135mm lenses and so I do miss that extra
5:00
versatility that a prime like this could potentially offer and just not the case anymore in this case however at least
5:07
Nikon is doing something productive with that space there's no space at all for any kind of telecon converter but they
5:13
do have an extra big rear uh element here that is very close to the lens
5:19
mount it's also slightly curved which allows it to more evenly distribute light onto the sensor and that has some
5:25
practical advantage that we'll talk about in just a moment now as far as the overall feature set here we do have an
5:31
AF MF switch that is really near the lens mount I can't speak for other cameras since I'm reviewing it here on
5:38
my Z8 but on the Z8 itself that is unfortunately located right between two
5:44
camera functions and so here we have a flash SN Port that's covered with a rub rubber gasket and then we have the lens
5:50
release Port that is our button that's right below that and so unfortunately this fits in a space that's kind of like
5:56
squeezed right between those two things it's not necessarily an easy place to get to with my thumb because of those
6:03
the position of those other things right beyond that we do have the customizable control ring that is standard on Nikon
6:09
lenses it could be used as an aperture ring but it can be used for other functions as well and that could be like
6:17
exposure compensation ISO various things like that so as an aperture ring it's
6:23
you know it leaves a little bit to be desired in that obviously there is no markings here no communication so I mean
6:30
I have the my Z8 does have a top mounted LCD so I could see if I was using it for aperture what I'm selecting but it's not
6:37
going to be true for every Nikon body obviously and so I I don't love it as much for that I will say there's no
6:44
click or dclick option it's always going to be D clicked but on the plus side what I did find is that if I you know
6:51
move with good Pace I could do very smooth aperture racks which by the way I couldn't do with the vro vro does like
6:59
visible steps as you can see here um even if I have it in the dclick mode and
7:04
so certainly that is one advantage that the plena has and that you can do smooth aperture racks there one of the things
7:10
that Engineers really went for is it allows them to have nearly perfectly round specular highlights which is
7:15
different from all the other 135 mm lenses on the market the closest is actually the lab lens but it isn't as
7:22
good as what the plan is the plan retains a nearly perfect circular shape near the edge of the frame and so if
7:28
that's something that's a big deal to you to you it's something that it is something that the planet does really really well now one of the things that
7:33
is missing here that I'm accustomed often seeing on 135 mm lenses is actually a focus limiter switch and for
7:41
whatever reason Nikon elected to exclude that here what we do have is a couple of
7:47
function buttons here that can be customized and so they both perform the same function and the purpose of that is
7:53
just to have one if you're shooting in horizontal mode it's right there if you're shooting in vertical mode it's
7:58
right there and so they are redundant to allow you to always have one close to hand whatever orientation that you're
8:04
shooting in manual focus ring here is wide it is ribbed and it has great damping and so it's actually a really
8:10
great manual focus ring there's not really any kind of sense of lag as you're doing input here and so you get a
8:17
a pretty good Focus manual focus simulation and it I is able to focus with precision and good feel overall
8:25
then there's a little bit of an oddity here and that what appears like a third ring near the front it's rubberized but
8:31
it's not a ring at all it's just a a cosmetic ring I'm not quite sure what purpose it plays but anyway it's it's a
8:38
little bit of an an oddity something that I've actually never seen before on any other lens design before now the
8:44
planet does not come with any kind of lens-based VR and I would say that that
8:49
isn't unusual at all that's the case with almost all the 135 mm lenses I've tested however there's one exception to
8:55
that and Canon's own 135 f1.8 8 L on their RF Mount does have lens based
9:03
stabilization so for me using the Z8 it wasn't a big deal because the camera based stabilization does a good job if
9:10
you happen to be shooting with a camera that doesn't have stabilization it's obviously going to be much more of a factor unfortunately however you don't
9:16
really have an option on Z Mount that comes with uh that lens based
9:22
stabilization now the planet is able to focus as closely as 82 CM which is
9:27
fairly close for 135 m M lens it is able to achieve a 0.20 times level of magnification that's
9:35
a 1 to five and while that's nowhere near macro range I will say that the up close performance is really excellent
9:42
you're able to uh get a nice flat plane of focus and really great contrast and detail so that's a plus there the vro
9:50
has a little bit higher level of magnification at 0.25 times one final observation on the build
9:57
that I'll make here is that the lenso kind of surprised me it feels frankly a little bit cheap for what is basically
10:04
the most expensive 30 135 MIM lens on the market the Plastics Plastics don't feel particularly high grade it does
10:10
have a little locking mechanism here but again everything about it just doesn't feel premium to me so it feels like a
10:16
little bit of a misfit on a lens that otherwise the build quality is fantastic and so those kind of minor niggles aside
10:24
this is a really beautifully made lens and yes it's it's big and heavy but that's true of all all the lenses in
10:30
this class and so it certainly is not unusually so and your other only other option in Z Mount is the lab and it's
10:36
considerably heavier and so overall I think the planet does what it needs to do so how about autofocus autofocus Here
10:43
Comes courtesy of dual STM Focus Motors now I was a little surprised by that I expected to see uh linear Motors dual
10:50
linear Motors or something like that which tends to be uh what's being used in other comparative lenses at the same
10:56
time however focus seems to work just in fact I was in testing Focus early on I
11:02
found that it was surprisingly reactive to the cats moving around and any of you that own cats or have been around cats
11:09
know that they are not the most Cooperative of subjects and so I saw Nala you know she was set up very nicely
11:15
here on a planter I thought okay this is a great shot I go and I get my camera by the time I get the camera and start to
11:20
take the picture she immediately starts running and jumping off and so typically in that case it's kind of a blown
11:26
opportunity but I went ahead and just you know pivoted and snap a picture with zero expectations of it being in Focus I
11:33
was very surprised to find that in fact it was in focus and it was perfectly focused and so uh kudos to them in that
11:40
moment it exceeded my expectations for how good and reactive it was going to be and in general shooting I found that
11:47
Focus speed was plenty uh adequate and I was able to take photos of whatever I uh
11:52
planned to take photos of I wouldn't say that it's quite at the level of something like the Sony 135mm f1.8g
11:59
Master which essentially is like a sports lens um in amongst its other qualities with its dual linear Motors
12:06
but anything short of that I think that it performed at a really really high level what I found in my formal test
12:12
where I was forcing major Focus changes back and forth is that Focus speed is good as you can see here the only thing
12:19
that I noticed that I didn't like is that there was there's an occasional rack in the wrong direction before Focus
12:24
then quickly progresses to the right destination and so you're losing split seconds there due to a little lack of
12:31
confidence for whatever reason and so that's my only critique there I also found that in my portrait session that I
12:38
did and I shot portraits at a lot of distances as close as about a meter and as far out as about 20 M and what I
12:44
found is that I got really consistently good results and focus the only time that I had any kind of issue was in this
12:51
particular shop where there are some foreground branches shooting along this the shore of a river and spring
12:59
and and so I had limited angles to work from so it's fine I'll shoot through these branches to get to my subject who
13:05
is standing out on some rocks but my friend Justin who is my model for this series uh he his position was fine but
13:13
some of those foreground branches sometimes Focus would catch on those rather than getting to his eye the last
13:19
time I did a review actually with this lens I had similar issue with uh with snowflakes that were falling and so I
13:25
think that it's maybe just more that the iaf system in my Z8 is a little more easily tricked by that however I was
13:31
able in the end to just get the result that I wanted just with a little bit of patience and so uh outside of that
13:37
however my autofocus was generally fantastic for Stills on the video side of things I was a little bit less
13:44
impressed for a couple of reasons first of all when doing just my basic Focus pulls you can see that there's a fair B
13:51
of we'll call them H Jinks there those racks that I saw a little of for Stills they're more exaggerated here uh just a
13:58
little bit more just kind of moving around it's certainly anything but a cinematic experience there's also a
14:04
fairly significant amount of focus breathing there and so again that also pulls you out of the the shot and so I
14:10
would definitely say I in this case I would personally be doing manual focus pools rather than autofocus pools
14:17
because I just I don't like the way that that looks in general and then what I found when I tried to do my hand test
14:24
which if you watch my channel you're familiar I do it on all the lenses that I test I just I could get focused to
14:30
switch to my hand basically period even though it was there very prominently f um kind of situated uh it just wouldn't
14:37
transition to my hand at all in that and so I tried to do a secondary test where I approached the camera and uh you know
14:44
stepped in and out of frame and what I found there is is kind of the same symptom that even when I step back into
14:50
frame so obviously there's something very easily to do eye detection on which was set up instead there's a it would
14:58
one there's like this lag and once at some point where it decides to focus it you know snaps into Focus fairly quickly
15:05
but it's not very reactive to a change that's happening in frame and so obviously I was not thrilled about that
15:12
even though as I if I moved in a linear fashion where it's already tracking the eye and just was moving towards the
15:17
camera it did fine in that instance the other thing that I also found is that when I shot just stable shots you know
15:23
of be you know kind of landscape type scenes or things like that the focus was fine it was St did what I wanted it to
15:30
do and so no hesitations on that so I would have no qualms with using it like
15:35
what I'm doing right now on camera for stable static shots but things that require reactiveness in video I don't
15:43
think that it did an excellent job on that however when we get to the image quality size of things I have zero
15:50
reservations this is a gorgeous Optical instrument I will be doing a deep dive at the end of the video if you want more
15:57
information on the actual lens performance but this is an optical design of 16 elements in 14 groups that
16:03
includes a number of aspherical elements extra low dispersion and then two Sr or
16:09
shortwave refractive elements as a part of the design as well you can see from the MTF chart that this is an extremely
16:16
sharp lens uh MTF shows very very good results across the frame with a little
16:21
bit of of Fade to the corners but overall very very high performance and
16:26
as I begin to dive into that performance I was just I was just consistently impressed with the sharpness and
16:32
contrast of all of my real world shots I thought they were fabulous you know this shop for example even at f1.8 of kind of
16:40
some dried plants you can see that the amount of contrast and detail is just fantastic there's no bleeding around the
16:47
edges there's no uh spherical aberration anything like that it's just fantastically sharp and as you can see
16:54
it also has beautiful bouquet at the same time so as far as the technical side of things uh when it comes to
16:59
vignette and Distortion uh it's another part of their design of that rear element was to minimize vignette as much
17:06
as possible and basically vignette is so minuscule that yeah I could I could dial in a little
17:13
bit of correction in the plus 20s to plus 30 range if I wanted to but for
17:18
example this shot a real world shot that's at f1.8 you know All Bright edges
17:23
uh with this lock in it you can see that there's just no hint of venette in the real world shot and so I basically could
17:29
only find vignette when shooting on my test chart and not in the real world at all there is a tiny amount of pin
17:35
cushion Distortion a minus three again it's so minimal that I doubt you would ever see it in real world shots and of
17:40
course being a first-party lens you got all the corrections you need built in already I also found that there's very
17:46
good fringing control that was true whether shooting longitudinal style chromatic aberration on my test chart or
17:53
again out in the real world I just didn't see any fringing before or after the plane of focus likewise with lateral
17:59
style chromatic aberration near the edge of the frame they're just not there and so this is an extremely well corrected
18:05
lens and so that also means that it's very well corrected when it comes to my results on the the chart and so center
18:12
of the frame it is fantastically sharp extremely sharp in the mid-frame and again a little bit of drop off in the
18:18
corners but not much it's it still looks very very good there it's you know it's
18:23
I would say it's sharper in the corners than what mini lenses are in the center of the frame overall performance perance
18:29
is compared to the lab is they're close I think the pl is a little sharper in the center of the frame at least in the
18:34
copies I tested the lab I would say is a little sharper in the mid-frame and then in the corners I had a hard time picking
18:41
a winner they were roughly the same there likewise with portrait shots and testing portrait resolution again
18:48
they're they're so close that I really couldn't call a winner there which is fantastic considering that this lab lens
18:54
has been borne out to be one of the sharpest 135 mm lenses ever and so that tells us how good the
19:01
plena already was I found that the lens produces really amazing micro contrast
19:06
you know for example in uh this shot of Justin where look at his beard and the detail and contrast that's there again
19:13
looking at another shot of these dried plants you can just see how much Precision is there in resolving all of
19:19
the fine textures those Corners are fine wide open but you can see that they take
19:24
a big Leap Forward at f2.8 and they become razor sharp at at f2.8 which
19:29
means that anything between f2.8 and f8 you're going to get perfect results now
19:35
you can stop down a bit if you want to extend the depth of field but outside of that you're going to get really
19:41
consistent performance across all of those apertures means that landscape shots look amazing resolve all kinds of
19:47
fine detail as is usual a at f11 you start to see a bit of defraction from a
19:53
high resolution body like this and then at F16 it's a little more pronounced but again it still looks pretty good at F-16
19:59
truth be told and so if you want to shoot at F-16 because you want that depth of field go for it your results
20:05
are still going to look really really fantastic now as noted earlier the bokeh
20:11
is exceptionally good here it's for one thing specular highlights they're the
20:16
more most perfectly round that I've ever seen on 135 millim lens uh and really
20:21
very few lenses match that kind of level of you know consistency of shape in general and so really really fantastic
20:28
job on that but it's not just the specular highlights the bouquet in general is just beautiful it's creamy
20:33
it's soft you got great subject isolation I love uh you know look at
20:39
this shot for a moment of Justin I had taken this old vintage hat Hatchet along
20:44
and I didn't know what we were going to do with it but we came upon the section where there had been some clearing done so I had him kind of stand in the midst
20:49
of the devastation there at the hatchet so even at a distance of you know probably 15 M away you can see shooting
20:57
at f1.8 he he looks amazingly sharp and then there's just this kind of cutout look of separation from the background
21:03
that is unique to 135 mm lenses just no lens seems to really do it quite like
21:09
that and and so it's it's it's fantastic I really really appreciate that colors
21:14
are generally really really pleasing my one complaint and it's kind of a general Nikon complaint is that with certain
21:20
skin tones I find that the magentas are just a little oversaturated and so sometimes to produce a more pleasing end
21:27
result I find that I do need to pull some of the saturation out of those magentas to avoid the skin looking kind
21:33
of too Rosy uh it's less true with darker skin tones it's mostly with Caucasians that I see it but it's just
21:39
something that's kind of a general observation and that was true of the pla but it's also true on the lab as well so it's it's more of a a Nikon color
21:46
science thing and less of an optical glass thing in either of these lenses the final thing that I looked at was
21:52
flare resistance and it is great it is very very resistant to uh any kind of
21:57
bright lights in the frame so it makes it a really useful lens to use even when you're shooting back lit back lit
22:02
portraits or things like that it really holds up well to the light and so fantastic so my conclusion is this this
22:10
is a great combo of build features autofocus Optical performance all of
22:16
those things but of course the elephant in the room is the price this is the
22:22
most expensive of even the first party 135 mm lenses and now you've got this vro option that is is priced at
22:30
$900 and so you could buy 2.7 of the lab lenses for the price of the $2,500 plena
22:37
that's a challenge obviously but at the same time and I'll I'll bring this out more in my head-to-head comparison I did
22:44
note a lot of subtle differences when using the two lenses side by side where the planet just works better you know
22:51
aperture racking manual focus more consistent autofocus when I was shooting portrait side by side the plan and
22:57
nailed basically all of them with that exception that I pointed out to the lab had some misses here and there and so if
23:02
you're shooting professionally and you want the most reliable lens it's going to produce the most fabulous results the
23:10
plum might be worth it for you there if you shoot an icon Z Mount and you want the best I would say the planet is still
23:16
it you just need to be ready to pay for it as well I'm Dustin Abbott and if you want more information you can uh get all
23:23
of that in either the full text review that's Linked In the description below there is linkage to an image gallery and
23:29
some buying links there if you want to purchase one and of course if you want even more look at the optical
23:35
performance stay tuned with me right now and we're going to dive into that Optical Deep dive together okay let's
23:40
start by taking a look at vignette and Distortion and as you can see neither of those are really an issue here at all
23:46
there's such a minimal amount of vignette that even doing a mild amount of Correction it you here on a test
23:52
chart you might be able to see it a little bit but as we're going to see in a moment out in the real world you really can't see just a tiny bit of a
23:58
pinch here from pin cushion Distortion but a minus three corrects all of that in a nice linear fashion now on the left
24:04
I have the plena on the right I have the lab and you can see that it's there's definitely a tremendous amount of more
24:12
vignette on the lab than there is on the plenel lens and it's just a much more evenly illuminated it really looks like
24:18
an after correction result compared to the uh vro lab on the right side this
24:23
real world shot has zero correction and you can see that all the corners that are to be bright you can see that they
24:29
are bright and so vignette is just not an issue at all with this lens and furthermore you can see that if we punch
24:36
in and take a look at the textures on the lock you can see just how beautiful all of those are being rendered
24:42
longitudinal style chromatic aberration are really not much of an issue here you can see the tiniest amount of fringing
24:50
there but it's not enough that it showed up in real world shots for me at all uh for example here along this chain link
24:57
fence you can see in the links before and after the plane of focus you just don't see any fringing there so just not
25:03
a problem likewise with lateral style chromatic aberations very very nice and clean really strong contrast right off
25:10
into the corners great transitions from black to white without any kind of color fringing all of this helps to result in
25:16
a really great looking resolution result as well so this is on a 45 megapixel Z8
25:21
this result is shown at 200% magnification you can see in the center of the frame fantastic sharpness and
25:27
contrast looks fantastic uh looking in the mid-frame it looks excellent there you can see all
25:33
kinds of fine details all very very good as we pan down it stays strong and right
25:39
off into the corner the corner looks really really strong as well for some perspective you can see that it is
25:45
clearly the better result in the center of the frame compared to the lab which is now on the right side it just looks
25:52
sharper crisper details mid-frame I think it the situation reverses and I would say that the contrast is better on
25:59
the lab lens it looks really really great there and as does the planet but I would say the lab looks a little bit
26:04
better and if we poke back down into that corner you can see that they really are more similar than different and
26:11
there's just not a lot to separate them the lab might have the slightest bit more contrast right off in this little
26:17
percentage but it's very very close we look up in this corner and again they're looking very very similar um up in this
26:24
corner I would argue that maybe the plena is better and so you can see there's they're just very very similar
26:31
and the plan's performance carries off into real world shots you can see here at f1.8 there's lots of little fine
26:37
details there and all of them are just really really well resolved no bleeding at the end of those textures they look
26:43
really fantastic uh this shot here I mentioned this in the earlier part of the review this is f1.8 at a good
26:50
distance away from the subject you can see that all of the detail and contrast on my friend Justin they all look really
26:57
really great you can see the plan of focus here is nice and crisp and then as we transition towards defocus just know
27:03
that there's all kinds of junk here like they took some kind of machine through here and just shredded everything so
27:09
there's lots of transition zone ugly materials and you can just see that it's
27:14
melting away to defocus just beautifully well stepping back again you can see that really nice three-dimensional
27:20
cutout effect and so that's what a great lens like this can accomplish another
27:25
shot here of Nala and you can see that if I look in there at the details it just looks fabulous all of those little
27:32
fine hairs are just really perfectly resolved there's no fringing on the whiskers as they come out fantastic I
27:39
don't see much of a difference if I compare at f2 however at f2.8 you can see that even the center is now just
27:46
like ridiculously sharp the mid-frame has improved significantly and even
27:52
right up here into the corner look how great the corner looks now just really fantastic and that's true if if I pop
27:58
down into this corner as well centering is just really really excellent you can see everywhere we look really really
28:05
strong detail and performance so that's that's just great fantastic so we can see stop down a bit the pl is definitely
28:11
outperforming the lab in the center of the frame if we look here in the midf frame I would say I'd still choose the
28:18
plena and here into the corners it's probably a wash there very very close
28:24
but you can see that the pla definitely sharpens up really really nice nicely the lab does too but the plena I think
28:30
is just a tiny Cut Above an overall performance there now if we look in the middle of the aperture range like f5.6 I
28:37
really don't see a whole lot of difference after f2.8 uh it was already just ridiculously good there's just not really hardly any
28:44
room for improvement truth be told there's probably an extra percentage there but it's it's difficult to see
28:51
it's just a fantastically sharp lens I didn't see any drop off through f8 at f11 it's softened a bit due to
28:58
defraction and a bit more at F16 both of these results would still look really good at 100% level of magnification so
29:06
I'm not overly concerned with defraction on this particular lens even at f1.8 at minimum Focus distance you can see that
29:13
we've got just basically macro levels of resolution of the fine details all of
29:19
those little Ink Spots just show up really really nicely and we can see it looks good right off to the edge here a
29:25
nice flat plane of focus as well this is minimum Focus distance on a three-dimensional object again f1.8 you
29:32
can see that again contrast and detail are there there's no kind of fringing that's marring it it's just really
29:38
really fantastic and of course then melts off to the background and the way that we've come to expect here's another
29:45
shot that shows just that transition towards defocus and so I mean great detail where it matters here on the
29:52
subject which looks you know great and then that beautiful defocus very rare
29:58
lenses that can accomplish what this lens is doing to be that sharp and high contrast in the area of focus and then
30:04
that soft and creamy in the area of defocus then of course as noted with the plenum one of its great strengths is how
30:11
circular the specular highlights are right off into the corner and that's basically something that no other 135
30:17
MIM lens is doing and again also doing it while having great detail and contrast here's another shot that shows
30:24
again just you know it's they're very very slightly towards the edge but still
30:29
basically circular all throughout making for a really great looking end result I
30:34
love this shot it's very very simple but it just shows how great the kind of threedimensional rendering and how that
30:41
amazing contrast helps that to really just kind of Pop away from the background looks fantastic this shot
30:47
here this is f 3.2 I just I love all of those little fine details I love the
30:53
transition to defocus I like everything about it here's another shot of Justin and this was actually shot in apsc mode
31:00
so it's not high as high a resolution but you can see how great the detail and contrast there in his beard hair is just
31:07
every one of those just stands right out really really impressive looking this shot shows what I'm talking about when I
31:14
talk about just a little heavy in the magenta I you know because I was there taking the photos there wasn't this
31:20
level of pink in his face and so I think that that's a little oversaturated but I I love this rendering all around his
31:27
head the way it transition to defocus gorgeous finally at flare resistance this is f1.8 so if I put the sun right
31:34
up in the corner usually the position where I kind of get the worst results you can see it handled just great here
31:39
at f11 you can see you're not going to get much of a Sunburst effect here but what you can also see is there's no
31:44
flare pattern composing like this here I put it again at f11 a little bit more in the frame there's a very slight halo
31:51
effect but that's about all I could summon out of it this is an amazing lens optically so thanks for sticking around
31:57
to the end and I hope the Deep dive into the Optics of this bad boy has helped you to decide whether or not it is the
32:03
lens for you as always thanks for watching have a great day and let the light in