Yongnuo 35mm F1.8 ART Review | High Quality on a Budget?

0:00
[Music]
0:10
hi I'm Dustin Abbott and I'm here today
0:12
to give you a review of the Yong No 35mm
0:14
f1.8 Art lens now I want to preface this
0:18
review by saying that I am disappointed
0:20
in Yongno for in my opinion taking a
0:23
step back in at least one area even as
0:25
they've taken a step forward in another
0:28
as far as far as taking a step back I've
0:30
been praising them the last couple of
0:31
years because their recent designs were
0:33
innovative unique they were their own uh
0:36
intellectual property development
0:38
whereas early on my exposure to Yongno
0:41
was that they were making clones of
0:42
existing you know Canon EF designs and I
0:45
remember probably 14 years ago that they
0:48
came out with a a clone of the EF50mm
0:51
f1.8 and so my that was my kind of early
0:54
impression so I you know when I
0:55
revisited them over the last few years I
0:57
was happy to see that they were charting
0:58
their own
1:00
course using the art label while they're
1:02
not may not be a copyright issue that
1:05
I'm aware of that's obviously up to them
1:07
it does feel like a bit of stolen valor
1:09
in that Sigma has worked very hard to
1:11
take that art label and to cultivate it
1:13
as being a unique representative of
1:16
their optical performance and they've
1:18
been very successful with that and it
1:19
feels like Yongo is maybe trying to
1:21
steal a bit of that thunder and so I I
1:24
do want to decry that because I I don't
1:26
like that aspect of it at the same time
1:29
I don't want that to overly prejudice my
1:31
feeling of this lens itself which does
1:34
take some strides forward in some
1:36
optical areas that have been
1:37
deficiencies in previous Yong no lenses
1:40
this is an APS-C lens uh 35mm
1:43
f1.8 and so we're going to you know that
1:46
disclaimer aside we are going to step in
1:48
and take a look at the overall
1:50
performance of this lens now let me
1:52
start with a disclaimer this lens was
1:53
sent to me by Yong No for evaluation
1:56
they have had no input in my review as
1:58
you might expect from my intro here and
2:00
they will not see this review before it
2:02
goes to the public so now let's take a
2:05
look at the build and the design here
2:08
this is a 35mm lens but for APS-C i'm
2:11
reviewing it on Sony E-mount i suspect
2:13
there will also be at least Fujifilm X
2:16
potentially Nikon Z as well and uh and
2:19
so 35 mm with that 1.5 times crop factor
2:22
on APS-C translates to a 50 52 1.5
2:26
millimeter lens and so essentially right
2:28
on around the normal range as we call it
2:31
the full name here is Jeango 35mm f1.8
2:35
SDA art and so S stands for Sony and so
2:39
in this case Sony E-mount obviously if
2:41
it was uh an Fujifilm Xmount there would
2:44
be an X there instead of an S for
2:46
example da is their way of referring to
2:49
not to Dustin Abbott but to APS-C and
2:52
ART is and I asked this is the first of
2:54
a new series of lenses that they are
2:56
using the art label much like Sigma to
2:59
indicate a higher level of optical
3:01
correction and also higher performance
3:04
in general now as far as the physical
3:07
design is a longer lens than what I
3:10
typically expect seeing from an APS-C
3:12
35mm f1.8 in fact it is nearly 80 mm
3:16
long which is more than 25 mm longer
3:20
than for example the Viltrox 35mm f1.7
3:24
air so that's a obviously very
3:26
significant difference and u so 3.14 in
3:30
makes it a a reasonably long lens for
3:32
something like this the diameter is far
3:35
more typical it's 63.5 millimeters or
3:37
about 2 and a half inches and it weighs
3:40
in at 265 g or 9.34 oz it's a little
3:44
heavier than the Viltrox Air series for
3:46
example which I'm using kind of as a
3:48
benchmark here because it is it's a
3:50
great little lens the Viltrox
3:52
weighs 70 g and so that means that this
3:55
is about 95 g heavier now a big part of
3:58
that is that rather than using plastics
4:00
as used in the Vtrox lens we have got
4:03
basically all metals here in the barrel
4:06
it does feel like a nice construction
4:07
and I will say on that point 52mm front
4:10
filter thread another thing that's
4:12
interesting when you look at the front
4:13
of the lens something I've never seen
4:14
before often there are there's different
4:17
types of information that are given
4:18
there but this lens actually has not
4:20
only the minimum focus distance 35 cm it
4:23
also has the maximum magnification of
4:25
0.12 times which is the first time in
4:29
the hundreds and hundreds of lenses that
4:30
I've reviewed that I have ever seen the
4:32
maximum magnification put right on the
4:35
lens in any way but particularly right
4:36
at the very front of the lens now as
4:39
beyond that there really isn't much
4:40
going on here in the feature department
4:43
it is a bare lens barrel no switches no
4:46
uh aperture ring nothing like that all
4:48
we've got is the manual focus ring so
4:50
you know you would think since that's
4:51
the one thing on the lens barrel that it
4:53
would be like flawlessly executed but at
4:54
least in the copy I'm reviewing though
4:56
it is metal and it's nicely built feels
4:58
like there's just a little bit of rub
5:00
inside there and so unfortunately it
5:03
doesn't move quite as smoothly as what I
5:05
would like it may loosen up with some
5:07
wear over time but right now uh it isn't
5:10
fantastic and so uh I also found that
5:13
the the overall throw here is it's it's
5:16
distinctly nonlinear and so it seems to
5:18
be really sensitive to speed like
5:20
particularly sensitive to speed and so I
5:22
actually found repeating focus pools a
5:24
little bit difficult because it just
5:26
didn't seem all that predictable to me
5:28
so unfortunately I don't love the manual
5:30
focus lens or manual focus ring here and
5:33
manual focus performance so it's a good
5:34
thing that the auto autofocus
5:36
performance is pretty good inside there
5:38
are nine aperture blades and so it does
5:41
a pretty good job of keeping a spherical
5:43
shape as you stop it down but there is
5:44
that kind of weird clipping at the
5:46
bottom at the side of the lens fairly
5:49
near the the base at the back there is a
5:52
USBC port it's covered with a little
5:54
rubber gasket i I don't love these
5:57
designs because I find these little
5:58
gaskets they're could be very easy to
6:01
use now these are this one is easier to
6:03
get out than some that I've used but it
6:05
also means that if it rubs on something
6:06
and pulls in just the right way it also
6:08
could pull it out and you wouldn't want
6:10
to lose that because it would kind of
6:12
impinge on the weather sealing of the
6:13
lens this is does have some weather
6:16
sealing it has a gasket at the lens
6:18
mount it has a flooring coating on the
6:19
front element i'm not aware of there
6:21
being any kind of internal seal so that
6:23
makes it a bit like Sigma's IER lenses
6:26
for example where you've got a gasket
6:27
and some coating on the front but you
6:28
don't have any internal seals but at
6:31
least we do have uh some weather sealing
6:33
and of course the fact that this is
6:35
internally focusing and there is no zoom
6:37
means that there's you know not a whole
6:39
lot of uh ingress points into the lens
6:41
itself to get moisture or dust in there
6:43
so I think it'll probably hold up well
6:45
in that regard it does include a lens
6:47
hood and it's pretty decent here uh it
6:49
is plastic but it is decent plastics uh
6:52
it's got some rigidity to it it locks on
6:54
in a nice precise way so no problem
6:57
there as noted the materials here are
6:59
nice i will say that the design itself
7:01
because it's extra long it's feels like
7:03
there's some empty space on the barrel
7:05
that could at least use some branding to
7:07
fill in there almost like a a space here
7:09
where you could put a like a tripod
7:11
collar on there and it feels like that
7:13
could have been filled in with a little
7:14
bit of something you know like an
7:16
aperture ring would have been nice but
7:17
nonetheless um it is a nicely built lens
7:20
but it is very simple now when it comes
7:22
to autofocus it's unique here previous
7:25
Yongno lenses I've been reviewing more
7:26
recently they always have DSM on there
7:29
which refers to digital stepping motor
7:31
in this case there's no reference to the
7:32
focus motor and if I dig into the
7:34
literature it says it's an STM focus
7:35
motor so what's the difference between a
7:37
digital stepping motor and a stepping
7:39
motor i have no idea but the performance
7:42
is basically identical to what I've seen
7:44
from their DSM equipped lenses initially
7:47
I did have a few firmware quirks that I
7:49
had to report back to Yongno but this
7:51
remember I'm I'm reviewing a pre-release
7:53
copy of the lens they were able to do a
7:56
firmware update that fortunately solved
7:58
all of those issues and so now autofocus
8:00
is really quite good and so that means
8:02
uh quite good uh speed you know front
8:05
and back no issues with that i had good
8:07
precision overall no problem locking on
8:09
to subjects and getting you know
8:10
definite well focused results uh overall
8:13
speed performance is fine it's quiet
8:16
it's accurate you know it's it's good no
8:19
reservations there on the video side of
8:22
things again the same firmware update
8:24
helped to you know iron out some tweaks
8:26
or some concerns that I was having some
8:27
bugs with the autofocus there and so
8:30
before I was having a little bit of
8:31
issue with focus pulls but now as you
8:33
can see they move seamlessly back and
8:35
forth no hesitation no visible steps all
8:38
good on that front there is some very
8:41
minor focus breathing but nothing
8:43
excessive there and so about I would say
8:45
typical or average for lenses in this
8:48
class i also found that my hand test
8:50
went fine with good transitions from my
8:52
hand to my eye and back and forth and so
8:55
in general I would say that video AF was
8:58
fine and did all that I wanted it to and
9:01
so no concerns there on that front so
9:03
let's take a look at the optics and I'll
9:04
give you an overview here for those of
9:06
you that want more information i will
9:08
have my deep dive kind of optical
9:10
examination at the end of the video this
9:12
is an optical design of 10 elements in
9:14
nine groups i don't know the breakdown
9:17
of of what elements are there i know
9:19
that there's at least some aspherical at
9:21
least a aspherical elements maybe more
9:23
because there is aspherical as a part of
9:25
the design there um I will say that you
9:29
know it's a two-edged sword when it
9:31
comes to using the art name uh yes you
9:34
can maybe take some of the the credit or
9:37
some of the the brand recognition that
9:39
Sigma has created through consistently
9:40
delivering very strong optical designs
9:43
under the- art brand but it also means
9:45
that when I see that word art I also am
9:47
going to expect more in terms of the
9:49
optical performance means I evaluate a
9:51
little more carefully in regards to that
9:54
i will say however that this lens mostly
9:56
survives that um that that critiquing
9:59
the MTF as you can see it looks quite
10:01
consistently good uh very linear across
10:03
the frame and only a minor amount of
10:05
drop off towards the corners that's a
10:07
great looking MTF chart one area of
10:11
clear improvement over their commander
10:13
series lenses all of those lenses did
10:15
suffer from some chromatic aberrations
10:18
and I found that I could definitely see
10:20
some fringing uh lateral style excuse me
10:23
longitudinal style chromatic aberration
10:24
before and after the plane of focus you
10:26
can see here in this comparison to the
10:28
33mm f1.4 just how much radically
10:31
different the 35mm f1.8 from Yong no is
10:35
i did see a bit of lateral style
10:37
chromatic aberrations near the corner of
10:39
the frame nothing significant nothing
10:41
that I consider to be too much of an
10:42
issue there however for those of you
10:45
wondering how well this covers the
10:46
full-frame image circle the answer is
10:49
not very well uh you might be able to
10:51
get very slightly wider than the 35 mm
10:55
um or the you know 52.5 millimeters in
10:57
terms of the crop factor on fullframe
10:59
but I mean you might be able to pull it
11:01
back to maybe 45 millimeters but not
11:03
worth doing if you're looking for a
11:05
secret full-frame lens fortunately these
11:07
days there's lots of great inexpensive
11:09
full-frame lenses that you can choose
11:11
from if that's what you're looking for i
11:13
did find that distortion was very low no
11:16
issue with that i saw I I dialed in a
11:18
plus one to correct the tiniest amount
11:21
of barrel distortion but you would never
11:22
notice it uh vignette is about average a
11:25
plus 55 is what I dialed in so near two
11:29
stops of vignette in the extreme corners
11:30
nothing particularly heavy nothing too
11:32
bad there i found that chart testing
11:35
results and this is at 26 megapixels on
11:38
Sony which is the current highest
11:40
resolution available there that it all
11:43
looks it looks good it's consistently
11:45
good across the frame um and so you know
11:47
I have no reservations about that but
11:50
what I did find and that is that this
11:53
Viltrox 35mm
11:55
f1.7 air series lens that it's just as
11:58
good in terms of the optics and so if
12:00
you know this was to be some kind of
12:02
like kind of next level performance I
12:04
don't know that that's necessarily true
12:05
i mean the Viltrox is a very good lens
12:07
but I wouldn't say that the Yongno is
12:10
particularly better in any kind of
12:12
category there however just you know
12:15
moving away from the comparison I would
12:17
say that real world results really were
12:19
consistently great and what kind of
12:21
stood out to me is that the micro
12:22
contrast is quite good and so a lot of
12:25
these inexpensive lenses and this is a
12:26
lens that will cost they're telling me
12:28
under $200 US dollars that a lot of
12:31
these lenses they don't hold up as well
12:33
when you're looking at kind of at a
12:34
pixel level and looking at areas of high
12:37
contrast a lot of times you'll see just
12:39
some kind of haze around some of the
12:40
textures they're not able to just nail
12:43
down that high level of acuity that I
12:45
like to see on higherend lenses this
12:48
lens however is doing a really good job
12:49
in those circumstances contrast holds up
12:51
under careful examination that micro
12:54
contrast that I'm referring to there you
12:56
will see a little bit of boost at f2
12:58
it's primarily seen in the corners and
13:00
then just a little bit more as you stop
13:01
down to f2.8 through you know f5.6 and
13:04
up to f8 kind of your peak landscape
13:07
apertures you're able to get nice crisp
13:09
landscape type results there at that
13:11
point in this case uh it has a smaller
13:13
minimum aperture than what I often see
13:15
in these style lenses usually it's f16
13:17
this will go down to f-22 but of course
13:20
that means that there is more potential
13:21
at f-22 for defraction as compared to
13:24
f-16 and so typically I try to use f11
13:28
as my cut off point and anything after
13:30
that you're getting diminishing returns
13:32
and so only do that if you if absolutely
13:35
necessary the bokeh quality was
13:38
generally good and so when I put it in
13:40
advantageous situations I feel like it
13:42
rendered very nicely in some situations
13:44
where there was a more busy background
13:46
and andor a lot of it falling in what I
13:49
call the transition zone before
13:50
everything is fully out of focus i felt
13:52
like there it you know it felt more like
13:54
a budget lens it wasn't incredibly
13:57
creamy in those situations but of course
13:59
you know it is an APS-C lens with a
14:01
maximum aperture of f1.8 so you can't
14:03
expect you know f1.2 type results and we
14:07
certainly don't get
14:08
those the flare was a mixed bag uh
14:12
directionally into the sun it did pretty
14:13
good coatings held up pretty well but
14:15
what I noticed is if the sun was right
14:17
out of frame you or frame you get some
14:19
of that flashing effect that could be
14:21
quite disruptive to the image and so you
14:22
do you will have to be careful in your
14:24
composition just being aware of that
14:27
another area where I did see some real
14:29
improvement is that I suspect that this
14:31
is using different optical glass than
14:33
what we've seen in some of their
14:35
previous lenses optical glass feels
14:37
better colors are are nicer they're
14:40
there's kind of a look that comes with
14:42
some cheaper lenses where the colors
14:44
they're just it's very hard to define
14:48
but there's there's just something about
14:49
them that feels cheap this doesn't fall
14:52
into that category optical glass is
14:54
better it reminds me of the leap ahead
14:56
that Viltrox has taken to where they're
14:58
just their optical glass is is
14:59
demonstrabably better than what it was
15:01
in their early years of lens development
15:03
and I feel like this lens is taking a
15:05
similar leap there where the colors
15:07
really look quite good so my conclusion
15:10
is is that I definitely like the optical
15:13
improvements and I think that I will
15:15
applaud Yongno for taking some steps in
15:17
the right direction controlling
15:19
chromatic aberrations better nicer
15:21
optical glass and just a generalized
15:23
more punch to the images and the
15:25
resolution so all of that is good i
15:28
don't like the use of the art name and I
15:30
won't belleager that too much since I
15:31
did hit it a lot in my opening but I
15:34
really wish that they would have come up
15:35
with something unique to them that that
15:38
demonstrated that this was going to the
15:41
next level of optical design but not
15:42
take something that has been uniquely
15:44
Sigma's for over a decade at this point
15:47
and and so anyway I wish they hadn't
15:49
done that this is a very good lens in a
15:52
lot of ways and if you you know end up
15:53
buying it you're going to get a very
15:55
very nice lens i think the challenge for
15:57
Yongn though is that the market
15:58
particularly over the last two years has
16:00
become very saturated uh I've referred
16:02
to the Viltrox but into that space
16:04
during that time we've gotten lenses
16:06
from TT Artisan we've got lenses from
16:09
seven artisans uh you know not to
16:11
mention the other players that were
16:13
already in the market there's just a lot
16:14
of competition in that particular space
16:16
and at these very common focal lengths
16:19
and so you know there's not necessarily
16:22
a lot to set them apart from the
16:24
competition there's not more features
16:26
the optical performance is great but as
16:28
I said I don't know that it's better
16:29
than what Viltrox's is i will give you a
16:32
detailed breakdown and head-to-head
16:34
comparison with the Viltrox in a
16:35
subsequent video though it's going to be
16:37
some weeks out just because my schedule
16:39
is so full with new releases but stay
16:41
tuned for that if you want more
16:43
information in the meantime you can
16:44
check out my full text review that's
16:45
linked in the description down below uh
16:47
there's also some buying links there if
16:49
you'd like to purchase one beyond that
16:51
if you want that deep dive into the
16:52
optical performance stay tuned with me
16:54
right now let's jump into it together so
16:56
we'll start our examination by taking a
16:58
look at full-frame coverage you can see
16:59
that we have this hard mechanical
17:01
vignette here which shows that part of
17:04
the image circle full-frame image circle
17:05
is just not being covered now if we look
17:07
at vignette distortion we can see that
17:09
there's a really minimal amount of
17:11
distortion i used a plus one to correct
17:14
just a tiny bit of barrel distortion
17:16
corrected nice and linear but I mean in
17:19
99.9% of situations you could leave that
17:22
uncorrected and you wouldn't have any
17:23
problem vignette is moderate i used a
17:26
plus 55 to correct here in the center it
17:28
did correct nice and clean no odd
17:31
discoloration left behind and so uh
17:33
nothing to worry about on that front as
17:36
I pointed out earlier longitudinal style
17:38
chromatic aberration has really been a
17:40
bit of a bugaboo for Yong No lenses
17:42
we've really seen progress on that front
17:45
here and so there is minimal amounts of
17:46
fringing before and after the plane of
17:48
focus that looks great nice and clean
17:51
what that means is that in situations
17:53
like this where previous Yongno lenses
17:55
would just show maybe some blooming on
17:58
the textures uh some loss of contrast
18:00
maybe some extra fringing in these high
18:02
contrast areas we can see here that
18:04
we've got great micro contrast even at
18:07
f1.8 and so it looks it's just a it's a
18:10
real improvement on that front and as we
18:12
look towards defocus we can see there's
18:14
maybe a tiny bit of fringing here but
18:16
for the most part there is just really
18:18
minimal fringing in the image when it
18:20
comes to lateral style chromatic
18:22
aberrations you can see that there is a
18:24
little bit uh as we get here towards the
18:26
edge um where you're getting some false
18:28
color on the sides of the black and
18:30
white there uh not a necessarily a major
18:33
issue in real world shooting but uh
18:35
certainly that is the area where there's
18:37
more of that style fringing than there
18:39
is of the longitudinal style now when we
18:42
get to resolution contrast this is 26
18:44
megapixels on Sony which is the highest
18:47
APS-C resolution currently available
18:49
there uh 200% magnification so we can
18:53
really see all the flaws here looking in
18:55
the center of the frame good uh detail
18:57
and contrast there not off thecharts
19:00
contrast but good and a lot of crisp
19:03
detail that's being shown there
19:04
mid-frame is still looking very
19:06
consistently good no problems there and
19:09
as we move towards the edge I like to
19:11
look here and here you can see that
19:13
there's only minimal drop off from this
19:15
zone to this zone as we move towards the
19:17
corner and right here into the corners
19:20
we can still see a very decent amount of
19:23
magnification this is looking similar
19:25
here on the left side up into the left
19:27
corner again looking consistently good
19:29
upper right corner also looking good
19:32
good centering performance so at 100%
19:34
magnification with real world shots to
19:36
put that into perspective you can see
19:38
there is lots of detail and very good
19:40
contrast it's holding up very well in
19:43
this this image here which allows you to
19:45
have a very nice amount of detail even
19:48
moving out towards infinity where a lot
19:50
of these lenses fall apart uh these
19:52
cheaper lenses like this it actually
19:54
looks really good there's good detail
19:56
and contrast there it's you know it's
19:58
not the highest resolution that I've
19:59
seen but a very strong performance and
20:02
here at a little maybe more optimal zone
20:05
here shot of Nala you can see there's
20:07
great detail and contrast in the area of
20:09
focus around the eyes accurate focus
20:11
there and a pretty decent looking uh
20:14
defocused background as well so if we go
20:16
from f1.8 to f2 we really don't see a
20:20
marketked difference i think there's a
20:22
little bit more contrast darks look a
20:23
little bit darker there but you know
20:26
nothing that really stands out in terms
20:27
of the resolution but you can see again
20:30
here in the hair that it's just there's
20:32
there's more contrast that's available
20:34
there a little bit more contrast in the
20:36
Canada here you can see it's just a
20:38
little softer looking and so there is a
20:40
mild amount of improvement there in
20:42
terms of contrast however you'll see a
20:44
more market improvement in contrast at
20:46
f2.8 where uh all of the darks are
20:49
starting to really darken up and so you
20:52
can see that the text is popping more
20:54
there's more detail there if we look up
20:56
into the upper left corner we can see uh
21:00
just a whole lot more contrast coming
21:02
here you can see that more pattern
21:03
starting to emerge because contrast is
21:05
improved and just a whole lot more
21:07
delineation of detail in the hair here
21:10
in the text it all is looking much
21:12
better between f2.8 and f5.6 even here
21:15
in the corner you can see now that
21:17
resolution is completely crisp all
21:20
across the frame really great detail and
21:22
contrast now you can see here that
21:24
metering didn't remain flawless that uh
21:27
you can see it's it's overexposed a
21:29
little bit here at smaller apertures but
21:32
we can also see that uh there is some
21:35
effects of defraction here uh you can
21:37
see that maybe the the text there isn't
21:39
quite as crisp but I will say that even
21:41
at f-22 it really doesn't look too bad
21:44
and so I I think that this is an image
21:46
on this maybe lower resolution point
21:48
here on Sony you might see more
21:51
defraction if on a Fuji X mount for
21:54
example but overall here I would say the
21:56
lens is holding up quite well even at
21:58
small apertures so as we talked about
22:00
earlier the maximum magnification is
22:02
0.12 times which is not super high but
22:05
it's a usable amount we can see that up
22:07
close performance even at f1.8 is quite
22:10
good though good detail good contrast
22:12
nothing to complain about there taking a
22:14
look at a real world shot at minimum
22:16
focus distance contrast looks great um
22:19
I've shot this chest piece a lot and I
22:22
can tell you that this is holding up
22:23
really well in terms of the overall
22:25
contrast and detail you can definitely
22:27
see there's a pretty strong amount of
22:29
the cat eye deformation kind of shape
22:31
and this is kind of the oddity here is
22:33
just this little kind of like cutout or
22:36
clip that is there in those specular
22:37
highlights just a little bit odd we'll
22:39
examine that a little bit closer here
22:41
you can see it just here at f1.8
22:45
stopping down to f2 it's
22:48
um better um but there's still the the
22:52
it's it's like they're the roundness is
22:54
like a little bit lopsided in a bit and
22:57
we can see that even stopping down to
22:58
f2.8 we never get quite a round shape
23:01
it's almost a little bit more of like a
23:03
lemon shape so I don't love the shape of
23:07
the specular highlights so maybe that
23:10
not a strength necessarily in this shot
23:13
uh great on the great front is the
23:16
contrast and detail looks fantastic i
23:18
mean that looks great the bokeh looks I
23:21
think fairly good but it's not like
23:23
super soft and creamy this shot here
23:25
this is a pretty favorable ratio so
23:28
detail on the subject contrast there
23:30
looks good the background looks pretty
23:32
soft where there's more defined specular
23:34
highlights again you're going to see
23:35
those cat eye effects uh you know a
23:38
little bit more pronounced than what I
23:39
would like but in this zone the bokeh is
23:42
reasonably soft this shot uh again a
23:44
pretty good ra ratio and mostly soft
23:48
rather than hard edges and it looks you
23:50
know I would say pretty good
23:52
overall in this shot where we've got a
23:55
little bit busier i still like the look
23:57
of the image here right now this part
23:59
looks great obviously in some of these
24:01
busier things though you can see that it
24:04
it doesn't handle that transition zone
24:06
super well this shot you know it's it's
24:08
a lot of difficult background and you
24:10
can see it's not handling that very well
24:13
a lot of outlining just looks very very
24:15
busy to my eye and this is kind of
24:17
somewhere in between it's not a super
24:20
creamy or defocus background so I mean
24:22
it's a 35mm f1.8 eight lens but I do
24:25
think that the higher detail and
24:27
contrast of the lens means that the out
24:29
of focus backgrounds can also still have
24:31
a little bit too much detail to them and
24:34
so that is a potential downside for the
24:36
lens now if you're shooting landscapes
24:38
with this lens it's great i mean great
24:40
detail great contrast that's all going
24:42
to play to its strengths and so I think
24:45
that it's going to handle this kind of
24:47
image very well and as noted the optical
24:49
glass is looking better flare resistance
24:52
is only average at best you can see here
24:55
there is some loss of contrast there is
24:58
a little bit of a ghosting pattern
24:59
that's not too terrible we can see here
25:01
that you're going to get some ghosting
25:03
if the sun is right in the frame and you
25:06
know and it's kind of going diagonally
25:08
however if the sun is at other certain
25:11
points like kind of like right out of
25:13
frame you can see you get more strongly
25:15
pronounced uh ghosting and definitely
25:17
some veiling in this image as well
25:19
there's kind of like this whole zone
25:21
where there's kind of a flare pattern
25:23
you're just going to have to be careful
25:24
with composition coatings are not off
25:26
the charts good and so as you can see
25:28
this is a nice lens not a flawless lens
25:31
but a very nice lens optically so if you
25:33
do choose to buy one you're going to get
25:35
very nice performance out of it as
25:37
always thanks for watching have a great
25:39
day and let the light in

Yongnuo 35mm F1.8 ART Review | High Quality on a Budget?

Dustin Abbott

Laowa AF 35mm F2.8 APO Macro - A Flawed Macro Gem

7Artisans AF 18mm F2 | An APS C Pancake for $169!

The Best (Affordable) Way to Reach 600mm and 800mm on Sony

SongRaw 85mm F1.2 MS Review | Huge Lens, Huge Performance

Sony FE 600mm F6.3 GM OSS Review | 600mm in Under a Kilo!

Sony FE 400mm F4.5 GM OSS Review | Lightweight Perfection!

Bluetti Elite 100 Mini Review | 1000Wh in a Small Package

Peak Design Roller Pro | A Perfect Bag at an Imperfect Price

Sigma 20-60mm F2.8-4 C Review | Your New Favorite Tiny Zoom Has Arrived

Sigma 85mm F1.2 ART Review | My New Favorite 85mm F1.2

7Artisans AF 10mm F25 MAX Fisheye Review - A Better Fisheye?

Phenyx Pro PTU-7000 Wireless Microphone System Review

Samsung 990 M.2 SSD Review | A "Budget" Alternative

Neewer Q4 Pro 400Ws Flash Review | Overpowering the Sun

Thypoch Eureka 28mm F2.8 X-Mount Review | Reviving an Analog Past

Up next in 10

Yongnuo 35mm F1.8 ART Review | High Quality on a Budget?

Dustin Abbott