0:10
hi I'm Dustin Abbott earlier this year I
0:13
reviewed the young new YN 11 MIM f1.8
0:17
which was the first lens from yango in
0:20
their new command what they call the
0:22
commander series and they call them the
0:25
commander because they have the ability
0:26
to be wirelessly controlled via an
0:29
optional remote now they've added a the
0:33
new kind of addition to the series in
0:35
the form of three new lenses that are
0:37
coming a 23mm f1.4 33mm f1.4 which we're
0:42
reviewing today and a 56 mm f1.4 all of
0:45
which will be able to be used with that
0:47
same remote control unit that allows you
0:49
to uh control Focus to do ab Focus pulls
0:53
um to wirelessly start video recording
0:56
things like that variety of different
0:57
functions and so it's it's quite useful
1:00
and it will uh these three lenses will
1:02
be available eventually on Sony E which
1:05
I'm reviewing here Nikon Z and then Fuji
1:08
X Mount now these are apsc lenses
1:10
designed for apsc or DX uh crop cameras
1:14
and all three of these platforms has a
1:16
1.5 times crop factor so in this case
1:19
this 33mm lens has a full frame
1:22
equivalent of 49.5 mm so basically it's
1:25
a 50 mm normal lens just to give you an
1:28
idea of the angle of view this is an
1:30
incredibly featur lens for right under
1:33
$270 it's a lot of lens for the money
1:35
and so I think it's going to be a very
1:36
compelling option if you're looking for
1:38
a fast standard prime lens that's very
1:41
feature-rich has weather ceiling a lot
1:43
of bang for your buck for your apsc
1:45
camera sound interesting well let's find
1:47
out more right after a word from our
1:49
sponsor today's episode is brought to
1:51
you by Phantom wallet the minimalist
1:54
modern wallet that is now even better
1:56
with the new Phantom X that is crafted
1:58
from aluminum right here in in Canada it
2:00
is 22% smaller and 35% lighter while
2:04
still making it easy to access your
2:06
cards and money when you need them
2:08
thanks to their unique Fanning mechanism
2:10
you could even customize your wallet due
2:12
to its modular design with accessories
2:14
like a money clip cash holder ID display
2:17
and even chipolo and air tag tracking
2:19
integration visit store. fanom
2:22
wallet.com to check out their unique
2:24
sizes Styles and finishes that span from
2:27
aluminum to Wood to carbon fiber and use
2:30
code Dustin 15 for 15% off when you're
2:36
out so as noted this is a normal 50
2:39
mimish type lens the full name here is y
2:43
no YN 33mm f1.4 s da DSM WL Pro now that
2:49
is a long mouthful of a name but
2:52
essentially much like what Fuji does
2:54
they're kind of giving you the whole
2:55
feature list in the name itself so in
2:58
this case it's the 1.4s s in this case
3:01
refers to Sony or the fact that it's for
3:02
Sony e-mount their da designation means
3:05
that it's an apsc lens uh DSM refers to
3:09
a digital stepping motor or the
3:11
autofocus system WL refers to wireless
3:14
control and then Pro is a designation
3:17
they use that essentially just means
3:18
that it has upscale build and some
3:21
additional features doesn't necessarily
3:23
designate any one feature but just kind
3:25
of it'ss their higher grade of feature
3:28
list now this lens as you can see it is
3:31
still quite compact but it is a little
3:33
bit heavier than what the competing
3:35
lenses a 33mm f1.4 lenses that are
3:39
available and I looked across a few
3:41
platforms considering that this is going
3:42
to be available in a variety of
3:43
platforms the most direct competitor
3:45
from a first party is going to be uh
3:48
Fuji's own 33mm f1.4 a great lens by the
3:51
way um but this lens is even a hair
3:54
heavier than that first-party lens it's
3:56
a 370 G or 13 O that Fuji lens is 360 G
4:02
there are some also some 33mm f1.4
4:05
lenses from tokina and from vro those
4:08
weigh in typically around 270 G so
4:10
definitely heavier than those but as
4:12
we're going to see it's also way more
4:14
featur rich and kind of value packed
4:16
than any of those options overall
4:19
dimensions here are 69 mm in diameter or
4:22
2.7 in it is 87 mm or 3.4 in in length
4:26
it takes a very standard 58 mm filter
4:29
thre thread filter size up front and it
4:32
is one of these rare lenses only the
4:34
second lens that I've actually ever
4:35
tested that has the Wi-Fi logo on the
4:38
front of the lens and the first one of
4:40
course was from Y no as well and so the
4:42
YN 33mm is the second of these that I
4:45
have tested now as noted there is this
4:48
is a feature-rich lens so like the Fuji
4:51
lens it has an aperture ring unlike that
4:54
Fuji lens however we have the option to
4:56
declick the aperture making this a
4:58
little bit more of a better hybrid lens
5:00
for use when doing video and so the you
5:03
have the ability to have the onethird
5:04
stop detents throughout or you have the
5:07
ability to do a smooth aperture rack uh
5:10
without any kind of clicks as per usual
5:12
you have a strong detent and a bigger
5:14
space between F-16 and then automatic
5:17
mode if you don't like apture Rings you
5:19
can put it in a mode and control it from
5:21
within the camera also on the side we
5:24
have a custom or function button that
5:26
can be programmed to different functions
5:27
from within your camera above that we
5:29
have a custom switch and so that uh
5:32
switch can be used in a couple of ways
5:35
uh first of all it can just in your kind
5:37
of standard mode it can be just your AF
5:39
MF switch essentially and so in one mode
5:41
mode one you're going to have um
5:43
autofocus in mode two going to have
5:46
manual focus enabled however you can
5:49
also use this um through a little bit
5:51
different sequence to set up the
5:53
wireless control if you're wanting to
5:55
use that function and there is a
5:57
specific uh sequence of powering off off
6:00
and holding something down that allows
6:01
you to switch into that mode inside the
6:05
lens itself we have nine rounded
6:07
aperture blades down near the base of
6:09
the lens we do have a little rubber
6:12
gasket that is covering a USBC Port uh
6:16
this is a little bit of a pain I would
6:18
prefer that actually to be on the mount
6:19
itself for one thing it is very hard to
6:22
get out unless you have very long very
6:24
sharp fingernails it's very difficult to
6:26
get anything in there to pry that free I
6:28
had to use like a very small flat
6:30
screwdriver to pry that out I have done
6:32
firmer update it did need one when I I
6:34
did that the other thing however is even
6:36
once you've pried that little gasket out
6:38
it's very small and so it could be easy
6:40
to lose make sure you don't because that
6:42
does provide a point this is not weather
6:44
sealed in itself which is why the rubber
6:46
gasket needs to go over it so watch out
6:48
for that the lens itself does have
6:51
weather ceiling however a nice gasket
6:53
here inside some internal seals and then
6:55
also a flooring coating on the front
6:57
element all good minimum Focus distance
7:00
is right under 40 mm however it is a
7:05
0.10 times magnification so not as good
7:08
as Fuji the same as either the vro or
7:11
tokina lens not really a forte for this
7:14
particular lens we also have an included
7:16
lens hood and I will say it's it's just
7:19
plastic it's not metal like the lens
7:21
body itself however it is a little bit
7:24
thicker grade Plastics than some of the
7:25
lens hoods that I review and so it
7:27
doesn't feel particularly cheap and so
7:29
um overall no complaints about that if
7:31
Bay bayonets on there nice and there's
7:34
no lock but there's enough of a precise
7:37
click there that it's not going to be
7:39
moving around on you either and so
7:41
anyway a very nice package for right
7:44
$270 that's a lot of lens and a lot of
7:47
features for the money now autofocus
7:49
Here Comes via their DSM or digital
7:52
stepping motor I'm not entirely sure if
7:55
there's any actual differentiator
7:57
between a digital stepping motor and the
7:59
typical STM or stepping motor however um
8:03
I will say this this is a good focused
8:05
motor after a firmware update when I
8:07
initially got the lens you know probably
8:09
pre- retail firmware uh it wasn't fully
8:12
compatible with my cameras after I did
8:14
the firmware update it works fantastic I
8:16
found it to be fast I found it to be
8:18
quiet I found it to be accurate as you
8:20
can see here there's it's not
8:22
instantaneous but there's very little
8:23
lag between even close and distant
8:25
subjects back and forth uh went great uh
8:29
I happened to be out hiking with this
8:31
lens on One camera and then on the other
8:33
camera I actually had the Sony 50mm
8:35
f1.4g Master on a Nikon body via the
8:39
mega dap adapter uh that I just released
8:42
a review of recently and what I found is
8:44
that while autofocus was often quite
8:46
good with that combination on Nikon if
8:49
it was a closer Focus subject I it could
8:51
be really frustrating it just didn't
8:52
want to grab it and so I had you know
8:54
worked until I finally got the shot that
8:56
I wanted uh with that you know through a
8:59
little little bit of manual override and
9:00
all that I switched over to this camera
9:02
and took the exact same shot with the YN
9:05
33mm and it was just such a a pleasant
9:08
relief that it just instantly locked on
9:10
what I wanted it to the closer Focus
9:12
subject got accurate focus and it was
9:14
able to nail that shot I also got very
9:17
good results when shooting portraits
9:19
with this lens and that included I did a
9:21
lot of shooting through branches got
9:23
trying to get unique frames and looks as
9:25
a part of the portrait series and again
9:28
always just very accurate aut Focus
9:29
right on the eye everything even
9:31
shooting at f1.4 continually I got very
9:34
accurately focused results on the video
9:37
side of things I found that my video
9:39
pulls were good there is some Focus
9:41
breathing but it's not strong and so I
9:43
saw good results uh going back and forth
9:46
good confidence there my hand test was
9:49
mostly good it did stick a few times on
9:51
my face didn't transition to the hand
9:53
even though the the face was well
9:55
obscured by the hand but for the most
9:57
part it did fine also found that video
10:00
AF in general was you know largely good
10:04
and and so I had zero issues overall
10:06
with that as well just making those
10:09
transitions it's not abrupt um and it
10:11
was fairly confident in Focus transition
10:14
so overall I think autofocus is pretty
10:16
well executed here for an inexpensive
10:20
lens now in terms of the Optics I'll
10:22
give you an overview here and then as
10:24
always the Deep dive breakdown will be
10:26
at the end of the video if you want to
10:27
go deeper this is an optical design of
10:29
11 elements in nine groups that includes
10:32
two extra low dispersion elements four
10:34
high refractive index elements and so
10:37
over half the elements are exotic
10:39
elements the MTF chart is is solid it's
10:42
not incredibly sharp in the center but
10:44
you can see that it is sharp and quite
10:46
consistent across the frame not any kind
10:48
of big dips I found to me the biggest
10:51
Optical issue with the lens was that
10:53
there is some fringing longitudinal
10:56
style chromatic aberration it is
11:00
uh conditioned upon the the shooting
11:03
scene and so in some places it didn't
11:06
seem all that bad but for example when
11:08
shooting these lenses and shooting that
11:10
lens designation on the front of the
11:12
lens I found that there's definitely
11:14
some fringing in that lettering and then
11:16
also you can see some uh fringing around
11:19
specular highlights Boke balls in the
11:21
background I did not see any kind of
11:23
lateral style chromatic aberration near
11:25
the edge of the frame so that helps an
11:27
overall sharpness when shooting
11:28
landscape for example for those of you
11:31
that are interested in whether or not
11:32
this is going to cover the fullframe
11:34
image Circle I can assure you that it
11:36
does not and so you can see here that
11:38
there is a a pretty fair portion of the
11:40
full frame image Circle that is not
11:42
covered by this lens this is an apsc
11:44
lens that's how you're going to want to
11:46
use it I was actually surprised that it
11:48
had a little bit more Distortion than
11:50
what I expected for a normal lens which
11:52
is not typically a a hard engineering
11:55
for Distortion there was actually a plus
11:57
n of barrel distortion a plus n to
11:59
correct vignette was moderate it took a
12:02
plus 57 to correct about two stops and
12:04
so not terrible there but definitely
12:07
more Barrel Distortion than what I
12:08
expected my chart test looked good but
12:12
not exceptionally good at f1.4 and then
12:15
you can see here that across the frame
12:17
contrast doesn't look amazing and I
12:19
would say that contrast at f1.4 is is
12:22
not fantastic however in many kind of
12:24
real world shots it looked better to me
12:26
than what it suggested on the chart for
12:28
example for portter work you can see
12:30
here that there's plenty of resolution
12:31
in contrast on the faces about as much
12:34
as what you would like you will see a
12:36
contrast boost at f2 you will see a
12:39
further Improvement as you can see here
12:41
by f2.8 part of that is because fringing
12:44
is reducing and contrast and detail is
12:47
increasing by the time you get to
12:49
landscape apures it is sharp all across
12:51
the frame good results there you will
12:53
find that as per usual defraction will
12:56
start to set in around f11 and then by
12:59
F16 which is minimum aperture uh their
13:02
defraction is a little bit more obvious
13:03
there and so I typically use kind of f11
13:06
as my upper limit when I'm personally
13:08
shooting the bouquet quality is really
13:11
quite good from this lens uh I in most
13:14
all situations I found that it was
13:15
fairly creamy I liked the look of it uh
13:18
sometimes in some of those transition
13:20
zones a little bit more edging than what
13:22
I would like but that's typical of most
13:25
lenses except for the truly truly
13:27
exceptional ones in that regard I also
13:29
found that flare resistance was fairly
13:31
good mostly good I did get some very
13:33
mining minor ghosting in this shot but
13:36
even when the sun is right out of frame
13:38
and quite intense you can see that
13:40
there's no veiling there's no flare
13:42
artifacts and so for the most part I
13:44
found that the results were really quite
13:46
good my conclusion is this I am just I
13:50
Come Away really Amazed by how good
13:53
budget lenses can be in
13:55
2024 I looked back as I kind of
13:58
contemplated this putting in perspective
14:00
and back in 2016 I reviewed a manual
14:03
everything um Ren and 21 mm F 1.4
14:08
samyang this is back before they did
14:10
autofocus there's no features at all I
14:13
mean forget any of these things no
14:14
weather ceiling nothing it's fully
14:16
manual no electronics manual apture ring
14:20
manual focus ring that's it and that
14:23
lens cost 450 bucks almost $200 more
14:26
than what this lens does this lens that
14:28
is loaded with Fe features has different
14:30
app control function button it's got
14:32
weather ceiling it can do firmware
14:34
updates all of that for less than
14:39
$270 it's pretty much pretty close to a
14:42
a g Master feature set has good AF and
14:45
has a fairly Strong Optical performance
14:47
$270 and considering how much inflation
14:50
has increased the price of almost
14:51
everything else it's pretty
14:53
extraordinary how good of value a lens
14:55
like this really is and so if you're
14:57
looking for a normal uh nifty50 type
15:00
lens for your apsc camera this is a
15:03
really compelling package it's got a lot
15:05
going on for it and it worked really
15:07
really well I have no problem giving it
15:09
a recommendation if you want more
15:10
information you can check out my full
15:12
text review which is linked in the
15:13
description down below also a linkage
15:15
there to an image gallery and some
15:17
buying links and now if you want a
15:19
deeper dive into the optical performance
15:21
stay tuned with me let's jump into that
15:23
together so we'll start by taking a look
15:25
at vignette and Distortion so as far as
15:27
the Distortion Point as noted there's a
15:30
surprising amount of barrel Distortion
15:31
for a 50 mm style lens uh however as you
15:35
can also see it is quite linear not
15:38
difficult to correct that's a plus n to
15:39
correct for that as far as the vignette
15:42
it is more solid there in the corners as
15:44
you can see but again it corrected
15:46
pretty cleanly I used a plus 57 there in
15:49
the corners you can see here that there
15:52
is some fairly pronounced fringing
15:54
longitudinal style chromatic aberration
15:56
so some magenta style fringing four and
15:59
then a blue green after the plane of
16:02
focus some images didn't do too bad you
16:06
know for example this although there's
16:07
some shiny surfaces yeah you can see a
16:09
little bit of green fringing here and
16:11
there but nothing that is really
16:13
pronounced a tiny bit of on the specular
16:16
highlights here but again not very
16:18
strong in this image however you can see
16:19
the fringing is considerably stronger uh
16:22
you can see that fringing in this
16:24
lettering here and various outlines on
16:26
the SLR and then around the specular
16:29
highlights you can see that green
16:30
fringing there as well now lateral style
16:33
chromatic aberration not a problem there
16:35
is the tiniest little uh hint of them
16:38
there but this is at about 200%
16:41
magnification you're not going to see
16:43
that in the real world at all so not a
16:45
problem so I look at the chart test this
16:48
is at 26 megapixels on Sony which is
16:51
currently the highest level of
16:53
resolution that we've got available this
16:55
is showing these results at 200%
16:57
magnification so we can see in the
16:59
center of the frame good detail that is
17:00
there contrast isn't off the charts good
17:03
and so some of the fine uh textures are
17:06
not quite as resolved is what I would
17:07
like mid-frame result is really quite
17:10
similar not far off there down in this
17:13
Zone we can can see some drop off from
17:16
up here to down here just a little bit
17:18
less contrast there and that's going to
17:20
play out into the corners where again
17:21
there Still Remains a pretty decent
17:23
amount of detail there but contrast
17:25
isn't you know knock your socks off good
17:28
to put this in reward perspective
17:29
however even at f1.4 I feel like that is
17:32
plenty of detail uh for everyone I think
17:36
that no problem there at Portrait
17:38
distances I thought it was actually
17:39
pretty great here's another shot here
17:41
and so you can see again punching into
17:43
100% magnification good detail
17:45
everywhere good contrast a you know
17:47
good-looking result overall if we
17:49
compare f1.4 to f1.8 here in the center
17:53
of the frame we can see that there's
17:54
definitely an uptick in the contrast
17:56
particularly when it comes to the uh
17:58
Shadow areas uh black levels are
18:01
definitely lower and thus giving more
18:04
detail same happens here to where you
18:06
can just see that the contrast is better
18:08
look at this writing along here and then
18:10
compare it over here definitely crisper
18:12
looking and you can see that that result
18:15
it does very very slightly influence
18:17
what we see in the corner of the frame
18:19
as well again for some real world
18:21
perspective you can see kind of the
18:23
tradeoffs here so if we take a look here
18:25
in the center of the frame you can
18:26
definitely see that there is darker Lev
18:29
of contrast thus the detail pops a
18:31
little bit better on this at the same
18:34
time I think that f1.4 looks pretty
18:36
decent and of course the trade-off is if
18:38
you step back you can see that the
18:40
background is just a little bit harsher
18:42
at f1.8 it's not as defocused as we see
18:46
at f1.4 and so specular highlights
18:48
aren't quite as soft so I would say if I
18:51
were doing that tradeoff in most cases I
18:53
would say I can live without that if I
18:56
can get this and then also a softer back
18:58
ground so I don't really have any
19:00
complaints about the overall detail and
19:02
contrast in real world images so there
19:04
is further contrast Improvement at f2
19:08
and then more still at
19:09
f2.8 we can see that as we move towards
19:12
the mid-frame by f2.8 that's really
19:14
starting to look really good a market
19:16
difference from this to that at f2 other
19:20
side of the the frame it's the same
19:22
thing you can see that that looks okay
19:23
but this is looking now really really
19:25
good we can see if we look at a few
19:27
other places that now uh Corner
19:29
performance looking quite good there
19:31
definitely much improved here in this
19:33
lower right corner and then in this
19:35
upper left corner you can see a pretty
19:37
consistent result there some good
19:39
centering now by the time you hit F4 and
19:42
f5.6 you're getting into Peak
19:44
Performance all across the frame you can
19:45
see detail and contrast is really good
19:48
everywhere here's a real world example
19:50
at f5.6 we can see if we look in the
19:52
center of the frame look at all the
19:54
detail I love in these dead trees here
19:57
you can just see really CR details and
19:59
then as we look right off here to the
20:01
very edge of the frame and then the
20:03
shadow area all of that looks really
20:05
really good fantastic as per usual
20:07
you're going to see that detail continue
20:09
through f8 at f11 some slight softening
20:12
due to the effects of defraction by F16
20:14
which is minimum aperture you're going
20:16
to see that the image is considerably
20:17
softer and that's due to the effects of
20:19
defraction now as noted previously our
20:22
maximum magnification is not really very
20:25
0.10 times quite low however you can see
20:29
that the up close detail and contrast is
20:31
really pretty good you can also see that
20:33
we've got a pretty flat plane of focus
20:36
uh holding off right towards the edges
20:38
of the frame I felt that the overall
20:40
blend of sharpness and then bouquet is
20:43
pretty good from this lens again it
20:45
looks good on the subject but the
20:47
background looks nice and soft here in
20:49
this shot here um got frost crystals on
20:52
the grass and you can see that yeah
20:55
there's some kind of Prismatic effect
20:57
there but as it transitions it
20:58
transitions towards creamy really quite
21:01
well this shot here too you got some in
21:03
the transition zone here but it really
21:05
it doesn't look too bad again subject
21:07
looks good overall image I think looks
21:10
pretty fantastic now in the shot I want
21:12
to highlight two things first of all the
21:14
bright Sun is just right there right out
21:17
of this Frame but you can see the
21:18
contrast and detail is held up pretty
21:20
well then in this shot here the sun
21:23
being right here you can see a little
21:24
bit of a ghosting artifact in this Zone
21:26
here overall however the image has held
21:29
up well and so I think that it handles
21:31
flare reasonably well also overall
21:34
outside of some fringing and a bit of
21:36
distortion really not a bad Optical
21:38
package for the money so thanks for
21:40
watching until the very end I hope the
21:41
Deep dive into the Optics has given you
21:43
the full picture and so you can decide
21:45
whether or not the young newo 33mm f1.4
21:48
is a lens for you as always thanks for
21:50
watching have a great day and let the