Some new lens makers have really saturated the market with their product since arriving on the scene, but Swiss/Korean lensmaker Irix has been far more selective in their releases, with the Irix 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly being only the fourth lens they’ve released since their first release in 2016. The Irix 45mm is their first lens in the “standard/normal” space, with their first two lenses being very wide angle: a 15mm F2.4 (my review here) and an even wider 11mm F4 lens. They then added a very nice 150mm F2.8 Macro lens (my review here), a lens which I like even better on my Canon EOS R5, as it gives better manual focus aids along with stabilization (something sorely needed with a longer focal length like that). I’ve found that Irix lenses offer a very nice value for money, with a great build quality, good mechanical performance, and a nice optical performance as well.
I’m a fan of the 45mm focal length. I’ve owned two 45mm lenses (Tamron SP 45mm F1.8 and the Samyang AF 45mm F1.8) and have been partial to them both. The focal length is slightly wider than 50mm but can do all of the 50mm things quite well while also being slightly more flexible for other subjects. I have a lot of fun out shooting with such a focal length, and the Irix 45mm proved no different.
The Irix quirk is that they produce manual focus only lenses but tend to sell them (at least in the stills versions) only for DSLR mounts, which tend to be much less forgiving of manual focus. I don’t actually own any DSLRs anymore, so I’m performing this test on my Canon EOS R5 via adapter. It seems to me that Irix would be better suited developing future lenses for Canon RF, Sony FE, and Nikon Z mounts than the current mix of Canon EF, Nikon F, and Pentax K mounts…though Irix does have a slightly different version of this lens designed for the medium format Fuji GFX system coming soon.
So is there a market for a manual-focus-only 45mm option for DSLR mounts in 2021? I honestly don’t know, but the idea of a nice quality, F1.4 lens under $700 USD is always worth investigating, particularly when it adapts easily to mirrorless bodies due to having an electromagnetic aperture iris and full electronic communication. The shooting experience is much like using a Zeiss lens in a similar situation; something I’ve never considered a hardship. You can check out my review if you want more info, or just look at photos here in the gallery.
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
Keywords: Irix 45mm F1.4, Irix 45mm F/1.4, F1.4, Irix, 45mm, Irix 45 1.4, Review, Dragonfly, Irix 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly Review, Irix 45mm F1.4 Review, Canon EOS R5, EOS, R5, EOS R5, EOS R6, mirrorless, full frame, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Handling, Bokeh, Portraits, Resolution, High ISO, Image Quality, Sample Images, Photography, 45Mpx, Canon
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Some new lens makers have really saturated the market with their product since arriving on the scene, but Swiss/Korean lensmaker Irix has been far more selective in their releases, with the Irix 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly being only the fourth lens they’ve released since their first release in 2016. The Irix 45mm is their first lens in the “standard/normal” space, with their first two lenses being very wide angle: a 15mm F2.4 (my review here) and an even wider 11mm F4 lens. They then added a very nice 150mm F2.8 Macro lens (my review here), a lens which I like even better on my Canon EOS R5, as it gives better manual focus aids along with stabilization (something sorely needed with a longer focal length like that). I’ve found that Irix lenses offer a very nice value for money, with a great build quality, good mechanical performance, and a nice optical performance as well.
I’m a fan of the 45mm focal length. I’ve owned two 45mm lenses (Tamron SP 45mm F1.8 and the Samyang AF 45mm F1.8) and have been partial to them both. The focal length is slightly wider than 50mm but can do all of the 50mm things quite well while also being slightly more flexible for other subjects. I have a lot of fun out shooting with such a focal length, and the Irix 45mm proved no different.
The Irix quirk is that they produce manual focus only lenses but tend to sell them (at least in the stills versions) only for DSLR mounts, which tend to be much less forgiving of manual focus. I don’t actually own any DSLRs anymore, so I’m performing this test on my Canon EOS R5 via adapter. It seems to me that Irix would be better suited developing future lenses for Canon RF, Sony FE, and Nikon Z mounts than the current mix of Canon EF, Nikon F, and Pentax K mounts…though Irix does have a slightly different version of this lens designed for the medium format Fuji GFX system coming soon.
So is there a market for a manual-focus-only 45mm option for DSLR mounts in 2021? I honestly don’t know, but the idea of a nice quality, F1.4 lens under $700 USD is always worth investigating, particularly when it adapts easily to mirrorless bodies due to having an electromagnetic aperture iris and full electronic communication. The shooting experience is much like using a Zeiss lens in a similar situation; something I’ve never considered a hardship. So let’s explore this unique lens together. If you would prefer to watch your reviews, you can choose either my long format definitive review or shorter standard review below.
Thanks to Irix for sending me a loaner copy of the lens for review. This (as always) is a completely independent review.
Irix 45mm F1.4 Build and Handling
Irix was unique from other companies in the early days because they adopted a bifurcated approach to their lenses build. The 11mm and 15mm lenses debuted with two different build levels – the “entry-level” Firefly and the premium Blackstone. The former already had a high degree of build quality, with nice materials and weather sealing, but, like most lenses, Firefly lenses had more use of composites in the outer shell around a metal frame. The Blackstone utilized a magnesium alloy outer shell and had a degree of build not unlike a Zeiss Milvus lens. Very, very nice. Both versions housed the same optics. But Irix seems to have only kept up the two “trim levels” for its first two lenses, as both the 150mm F2.8 Macro and now the 45mm have a third designation, which is “Dragonfly”. I suspect the two trim levels proved a little confusing to the market, so Irix has focused on merging the best traits from both trim levels into one (though the Firefly and now Dragonfly designation is also confusing.)
Their new Dragonfly build includes the hard case previously only included with the Blackstone edition along with the slightly higher degree of weather sealing found in the Blackstone trim. Smaller details like the use of UV reactive paint in the engraved barrel marking also made the transition. What they’ve retained of the Firefly build is the rubberized focus ring material rather than the metal one on the Blackstone (not necessarily a bad thing, as the focus ring has great grip) along with the use of some composites in the barrel to keep the weight down (though the Irix 45mm is hardly light at 925g!) Here’s what Irix says regarding the build:
“DRAGONFLY features:
Reinforced internal construction based on metal elements
Scratch-resistant finish
Anti-slip focus ring with special finish for easy focusing
Engraved markings filled with UV reactive paint
Sealings to protect against dust and water
Rigid carrying case included as standard
The Dragonfly finish is a combination of reinforced metal and composite elements. This combination has resulted in an extremely durable construction, which thanks to numerous seals, remains resistant to adverse weather conditions.”
Here’s a look at the diagram of seal points, which seems to indicate about four different seal points:
In the hand, the Irix 45mm F1.4 comes across as being a very nicely made lens. It’s heft in part gives that impression, sure, but the overall feel of everything is excellent. It starts with the included molded carrying case. Irix cases may be my favorite for the simple reason that they are cleverly designed to take up as little room as possible. Because the case is molded to the contours of the lens, carrying the lens in the case doesn’t take up much more room than carrying the bare lens. The molding of the case ensures that most knocks and bumps are not going to impact the lens itself.
This is not a small lens. It is more in the vein of the Sigma ART series than the tiny Samyang AF 45mm F1.8 lens I own for Sony. It is 87mm in diameter (3.43″) and 105mm in length (4.13″). That weight of 925g (right over 2 pounds) puts it about 110g heaver than the Sigma 50mm F1.4 ART, though the monstrous Sigma 40mm F1.4 ART is 300g heavier. Some people like heavy lenses; other definitely don’t. I suspect a natural sorting will take place as to those willing to endure the heavier weight of such a lens and those who aren’t.
As noted in the intro, the Irix 45mm F1.4 has an electromagnetic aperture iris, meaning that there is no external aperture ring and that aperture is controlled from within the camera in a similar fashion to most autofocusing lenses. The benefit of this is that focus can be done with the aperture iris completely open (allowing more light for focus), and the iris quickly closes to the preset aperture at the moment the shutter button is depressed. It also means that the lens is fully electronic and all EXIF information is properly sent to the camera. Essentially the only difference between this lens and an autofocus lens is that you have to manually focus yourself.
The focus ring is pretty great. It has a unique texturized surface and a rubber finish that provides very sure grip while focusing. It employs a ridge in the focus ring (with a blue line painted on it) that helps to serve essentially like a focus throw position. You can look at that visually and have a high degree of repeatability for focus throws by simply returning to that same position with the ridge. You can do this to some degree even by touch. Irix claims that this was a popular feature on the 150mm, and I believe it. I estimate about 175 degrees of focus throw is there, and I found it pretty easy to get precise focus adjustments in my tests…including shooting through the trees to a distant barn:
And for nailing focus on portrait shots at varying distances.
There are also distance marking engraved on the barrel next the focus ring, and that section feels like a metal alloy.
The focus action is perfect for smooth, precise focus throws in video. I love a lens like this for video work because of the control, and I found the ridge and focus marker line genuinely useful for getting to my “spot” during a focus throw. There is some focus “breathing”, however, as the size of objects does change relative to whether they are in or out of focus.
I had the opportunity to test the lens on my Canon EOS R5 and Sony a7RIII, and mirrorless bodies certainly help with manual focus lenses. You can magnify the focus area to visually confirm focus, use focus peaking and overlays, and even utilize the Focus Guide on the EOS R5 which makes manual focus simple and accurate, though slower in process than autofocus. Irix lenses make so much more sense on mirrorless bodies, so I’m perplexed why they continue to develop almost exclusively for traditional DSLR mounts whose cameras lack all of these aids. Manual focus is much more challenging on traditional DSLRs, though there is a focus confirm chip on the lens that will allow a “beep” when focus is achieved.
The Irix 45mm has features that make it a nice option for video work. The smooth focus action helps, and a good manual focus lens allows for unique control over focus that an autofocus lens simply doesn’t. But if you are serious about video, you may want to consider the CINE version of the lens instead, which is geared, has a declicked aperture ring, has a support foot, and features the industry standard 95mm front diameter.
The Irix 45mm also utilizes another unique feature of Irix lenses in the form of a tension ring above the focus ring that allows you to increase tension and even lock focus in a certain position. This could be handy for street shooters, for example, who might have a standard focus distance they want to instantly focus to, or for someone working on a tripod that wants to lock in a certain position and make sure focus doesn’t get bumped. It’s not a feature that I often use, myself, but there are obviously those who do value it.
The included lens hood is fairly pedestrian. It is plastic with a slight tulip contour and has a satin finish on the outside and a matte finish inside to help with stray light bouncing around. It is fairly deep, and the lens with the hood mounted becomes quite long.
There is a large but common 77mm filter thread up front.
Inside the lens, we have nine rounded aperture blades which do a reasonable job of keeping a circular shape. Here’s a look at F1.4, F2, and F2.8:
There’s definitely some “cat-eye” geometric deformation (and a bit of a swirling effect), but if you want round bokeh circles across the frame, shoot at F2.8.
There is no image stabilization in the lens, but if you happen to have a body with IBIS (another reason for IRIX to develop for mirrorless!!), you can get that assistance with the focal length automatically transmitting to the camera. I was able to handhold this 1/5th second image while testing:
Minimum focus distance is a slightly better than average 40cm, and, while the maximum magnification figure isn’t listed, it looks to be around 0.19-.20x. Close up performance lacks some contrast, so don’t hesitate to stop down to F2 to get higher contrast while retaining nice bokeh.
All in all, we’ve got a beautifully made lens with great handling, though the size will undoubtedly be off-putting to some potential buyers. Irix knows how to make nice lenses!
Irix 45mm F1.4 Image Quality
There is a unique tension in wide aperture lens design that I’ve watched play out time and again. The classic lens design often allowed for lower contrast at wide apertures to allow for softer, creamier bokeh and overall rendering, and then the lens would gradually gain sharpness and contrast as stopped down. Some newer designs strive for very high correction of aberrations to achieve high contrast and performance even wide open, though often at a cost of slightly harsher bokeh and a more “clinical” look. Irix seems to have opted more for the classic design in their 45mm F1.4. This is an 11 element in nine group optical design, with a high number of those elements being special elements. These include 4 HR (High Refractive) elements along with 1 extra low dispersion element (ED) along with an aspherical element. The lens boasts of IRIX’s “Neutrino Coating” as well.
I didn’t see a lot of longitudinal chromatic aberrations (LoCA) despite the fast maximum aperture. There’s a mild amount of fringing here before and after the plane of focus, but not enough to really show up in many images.
I see no evidence of lateral CA (LaCA) along the edges of the frame, either.
Distortion is also so mild as to require no correction, though there is a significant amount of vignette here at F1.4:
I had to use roughly a +90 to correct that vignette, which tells me that there is at least 3 stops of vignette in the extreme corners. Much like a Zeiss lens, however, the vignette is very linear and focuses the eye towards the center of the frame. You can use it creatively, though that doesn’t work in every scene:
Stopping down to F2 helps naturally correct for a lot of that vignette if you don’t want it, and because it is linear it corrects fairly well in post.
While chromatic aberrations are not strong, there are some uncorrected spherical aberrations that make for a light “haze” over textures, giving images at F1.4 a slightly “dreamy” look…at least when viewed at pixel level. This F1.4 portrait doesn’t look particularly sharp when viewed up close, but you can see how that the global image and then close in crop on the right shows more apparent sharpness…but all I’ve done is add some of Lightroom’s “Dehaze” slider.
There are pros and cons to the lower contrast at F1.4 that we’ll explore in a moment. First to my chart tests. This test has been done on a 45MP Canon EOS R5, 2 second timer, on a tripod with everything carefully focused at 10x magnification. Here’s the chart where the details are coming from:
First, at F1.4, here are the crops from the center, midframe, and bottom right corner.
You can see that there is a decent amount of resolution there, but the spherical aberrations reduce contrast and give what looks like a bit of a Vaseline smear over the front of the lens.
F2 is better, but I find the big jump comes at F2.8, where contrast radically improves:
Extreme corners are good at F4 and exceptional by F5.6, where resolution across the frame is fantastic:
I did see some scenes where details popped even at wider apertures, though, like this shot at F1.8:
What’s also worth considering, however, is that global contrast looks great, in part because the lens has really fabulous defocus (bokeh). Look at this monochrome, for example:
Here’s another example that I love. It’s an F1.4 image, and isn’t amazingly sharp/high contrast at a pixel level, but at a global level it looks awesome (this is Lightroom’s “Warm Contrast” profile):
And here’s the tradeoff for that lower contrast at wide apertures – the quality of the bokeh is really fantastic. Great rendering allows a lens to produce gorgeous images even if the lens isn’t technically perfect (the Canon EF 85mm F1.2L II is a great example of that). Some of the most stunning portraits I have ever seen have been taken with that Canon lens, but if you are testing it on a technical level, it actually doesn’t chart particularly well.
It is March here in Eastern Ontario, Canada, which means that the snow is melting and leaving piles of ugly grey slush, and, since nothing new is growing yet, nature is covered with the squashed, decayed detritus from last autumn. It is the most difficult period of the year for taking photos where I live. Despite that, however, I was able to get many stunning images, and it has everything to do with the quality of the rendering. Take this shot, for example:
The subject in this image is a pine bow that fell to the ground and the needles are decaying and falling off. The background is dried growth along the edge of the bank of a lake. Despite this, the artistic rendering and lovely bokeh from the lens makes for a visually interesting image.
And how about this?
All this image shows is an exposed bit of moss where snow has melted away and exposed a bit of green against a backdrop of exposed roots and eroded earth. And yet there is some visually arresting about the end result.
How about last year’s dried weeds?
My point is that the power of fine rendering even in the absence of technical perfection makes for images that, when viewed globally (essentially the only way your audience will ever look at them), are visually appealing in a way that images from a better corrected, more clinical lens would not be. I love image sharpness and I’m definitely a pixel peeper because of the work I do, but I also recognize two things 1) I don’t look at anyone else’s work that way and 2) I really like the feel of the images I get from the Irix 45mm F1.4 despite its lower than desired wide open sharpness.
A lens with good rendering can help an artist make just about any subject desirable…like a length of chain:
If you buy this lens, do yourself a favor and shoot portraits through foreground objects. The lovely foreground and background bokeh allow for images with depth and character:
The Irix 45mm F1.4 shows fairly strong flare resistance for a wide aperture prime. For stills images I got virtually no flare artifacts other than some localized veiling/loss of contrast wide open, and next to nothing stopped down. I even shot right into a flash set on TTL and very little flare artifacts even the lens wide open. The sequence of photos below shows various situations with a shot wide open (F1.4) and then a second at F11.
I found color rendering from the lens to be rich. It doesn’t have Zeiss microcontrast, but there is something about the color and overall look of images that feels somewhat Zeiss-like in character.
Irix chose to go a bit old school with the lens design here, opting to not correct all of the spherical aberrations in order to allow the lens to have a bit more character in its bokeh and overall rendering. That choice will be endearing to some photographers while others will prefer a lens like the Sigma 50mm F1.4 ART, which has more contrast and sharpness at F1.4 even while having a bit less in the rendering department. Most lenses are a delicate balance between the two extremes, and few lenses give you both contrast and soft bokeh. You have to choose your own set of priorities. Take a look at the lens image gallery to check out more photos and see if they suit your tastes.
Conclusion
The Irix 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly is a nice addition to IRIX’s (slowly) growing lineup of lenses. I don’t mind the fact that they aren’t rushing the lenses out. They’ve accepted completely different challenges with both of their most recent lenses, and I think taking your time and getting the lenses right the first time is an admirable approach. I don’t know how big of a space they have carved out in the market yet, though I would think that shifting their focus towards mirrorless design would probably help that. Both the Canon RF and Nikon Z have a dearth of third party development for them at the moment, and that seems like a golden opportunity for a company that doesn’t need to worry about reverse engineering focus algorithms. Even a mild redesign to existing lenses to allow for them to be built in native mirrorless mounts would be a good first step.
The IRIX 45mm F1.4 is a beautifully built lens with nice attention to detail. Everything works as it should, and, while it is manual focus only, the quality of focus makes it a relative joy to use in the field. Using it adapted to a mirrorless body only furthers the experience. On the downside, however, the lens is large and heavy, which will deter some potential buyers.
This isn’t a technically perfect lens. The wide open sharpness and (particularly) contrast is unimpressive, though the tradeoff of this is a truly gorgeous bokeh rendering. I loved the look of wide aperture images on a global level even while being slightly unimpressed at a pixel level, though images taken at smaller apertures became technically flawless with very sharp detail throughout the frame. You’ll have to determine for yourself if this particular approach to optical design is what you are looking for, but I do appreciate a lens with excellent character in an era where the prevailing trend is often towards technical perfection. I continue to look forward to testing new IRIX gear in the future; there is always something intriguing about what they bring to the table!
Pros:
Fantastically well executed build
Good weather sealing
Gorgeous manual focus action high on precision
The marked notch on the focus ring is a genuinely useful (and innovative) feature
Gorgeous bokeh rendering
Beautiful color
Good chromatic aberration control
Good flare resistance
Strong sharpness and contrast at smaller apertures
Cons:
Large and heavy
Wide open contrast is low, making the lens appear a bit “soft”
No autofocus
Designed for DLSRs when mirrorless cameras are so much more forgiving to manual focus
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
Keywords: Irix 45mm F1.4, Irix 45mm F/1.4, F1.4, Irix, 45mm, Irix 45 1.4, Review, Dragonfly, Irix 45mm F1.4 Dragonfly Review, Irix 45mm F1.4 Review, Canon EOS R5, EOS, R5, EOS R5, EOS R6, mirrorless, full frame, EOS R5 Review, Canon R5 Review, Canon 70-200 Review, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Handling, Bokeh, Portraits, Resolution, High ISO, Image Quality, Sample Images, Photography, 45Mpx, Canon
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Irix made their mark with a bevy of well-received wide angle lenses, including a super-wide-angle 11mm F4 lens along with a 15mm F2.4 that I reviewed last year. Their most recent lens release has set their sites in a different direction – a telephoto macro lens. The Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro is a very intriguing lens featuring a longer-than-usual focal length, a large maximum aperture, and Irix’ signature quality build. It’s already caught the attention of the industry and has received the iF Design Reward for 2019 – an impressive achievement! You can find my review of the Irix 150M here. But Irix has embraced a more holistic approach to their lens design, recognizing that photographers also need filter systems and solutions to help create compelling images. A good filter used properly can really expand your artistic options and is worth investing in. The Irix EDGE filters are nicely made, reasonably priced options that are solid alternatives to the well-known filter brands Join me for a closer look at the Irix Edge filters and to determine if they just might be the filters for you (shot below taken with the EDGE CP-L filter mounted on a Fujinon XF 16-55mm F2.8).
Prefer to watch your reviews? Take a look at my video review here:
Images of the Irix Edge Filters
One nice thing about Irix EDGE filters is the fact that Irix sells a lens with a 95mm front filter thread (15mm F2.4), which means that larger filter sizes are on Irix’ radar. I see filters in most all sizes between 52mm and 95mm. I think their 95mm filters, in particular, are very competitively priced relative to the competition probably to help their 15mm F2.4 lens compensate for having such a large filter size.
The Irix Edge filters come in somewhat non-traditional packaging. Traditional filters come in smaller plastic cases with the filter sitting on a bit of foam and on display through the clear packaging, but the Irix EDGE filters come in a larger, slim plastic case with a card-stock like paper slider that has branding information and specs on it. The actual plastic case has an incorporated handle and clips open on the side. The filter itself sits in a molded dense foam that is shaped for the filter with two slots to allow one to easily grip the filter and bring it out.
The Irix Edge filters feature waterproof and oil repellent NANO coating prevent from stains, fingerprints and enable using in extreme weather conditions. The NANO coating is also anti-reflective, and is put on both sides of the optical glass in the filters to help minimize reflections (which can be an issue with some filters). They are very low profile filters, which is an important key to limiting vignette on certain lenses (like their 15mm F2.4 lens, for example). I tested a ND1000, a circular polarizer, and their proprietary new Light Pollution filter. The ND1000 was the slimmest at 3.5mm, followed by the light pollution filter at 4mm, and finally the circular polarizer at 5mm. The filters also have a nicely knurled edge that makes them easy to grip (and rotate in some cases).
The filters are (according to Irix) designed to compliment the aesthetics of the Irix lenses, though, to be fair, filters pretty much look like filters and I doubt you’ll notice much.
We’ll take a quick look at the individual filters, their purpose, and how they perform. I’ve used a lot of different filters over the years, and here are some of the things I look for:
Color casts | some filters (particularly ND filters) tend to introduce a color cast to images. Obviously the more neutral the better here.
Vignetting | this primarily comes down to the thickness of the filter
Reflections and flare | some filters introduce more flare artifacts when shooting into a backlit scene.
Clarity | putting a bad filter in front of a good lens is like smearing Vaseline on the front of the lens.
While there is some debate on this issue, I’ve personally moved away from using UV or protective filters. Most good lenses released in the past few years come with good, hard protective coatings on them that are resistant to scratching. It’s been well documented that digital sensors aren’t affected by UV light like film was, so that’s also a moot point. I’ve found that UV filters often introduce a weak link into flare resistance, for example, and I don’t consider the trade-off worth it. Your mileage may vary, and, if you want them, Irix sells UV filters in a wide variety of sizes.
Irix Circular Polarizing Filter
A circular polarizing filter is, I believe, the most important filter in a photographer’s kit. It can be used to help eliminate reflections and glare depending on where you rotate it to. Take, for example these two photos with a coach in the background. The leather surface of the couch is reflecting the sun from the window in the back. Because of the polarizing filter, I can choose how much of the reflection is there.
The difference in the two shots is simply the angle of rotation I dialed in with the filter. I will often use a CP-L to control the amount of reflectiveness on shiny surfaces like water or glass, too.
A CP-L can also be used to intensify a sky, giving photos a more contrasty look. I’ve done that with this shot of the Wyndam SeaWatch Plantation resort I stayed at in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina. The photo is essentially unedited in post; the effect was achieved in camera.
Above all, though, I love the additional punch that a CP-L gives to colors and contrast. It helps lenses become a little more “Zeiss-like” in their “pop”. You’ll be able to see what I mean in the gallery below:
Irix ND1000 Filter
Neutral Density filters are designed to limit the amount of light that reaches the sensor. There are a number of applications for this, including trying to set a certain frame rate for video, trying to lower shutter speed to sync with flash units or to use wide aperture lenses in bright light, or, most commonly, to allow for long exposure photography. Often a long exposure allows for a more visually interesting image where dynamic elements (skies or water) are smoothed out. Case in point is this photo underneath a pier. Without a filter, the chop and movement of the water makes for a slightly busy image.
Add a ten stop ND1000 filter and you can use a much longer exposure time, which smooths the water and creates a more visually interesting image.
My primary concern with ND filters (particularly “heavy” ones like the 10-stop ND filter I’m testing here) is that lower quality glass can introduce color casts (I’ve seen magenta and cyan casts most commonly). We can see that this wasn’t the case with the images above.
A secondary concern is that if a filter isn’t nice and slim, the longer exposure period really intensifies vignette. Fortunately that isn’t a problem with the EDGE filters, and I’ve not noticed any additional vignette when using the ND1000 filter on the wide angle 15mm lens. This image is a 30 second exposure taken with the Irix EDGE ND1000 filter on the Irix 15mm F2.4 lens. While the bare lens does have some vignette, I did not have to do any additional vignette correction with the filter attached, nor did I have to do any color balance correction.
The final concern is that filters can reduce clarity on an image if the optical glass isn’t high quality. A bad filter can make a great lens look like garbage. Fortunately, that’s not the case here. Here’s a more than 3 minute exposure I took of Niagara Falls using the Irix 15mm and the EDGE ND1000. As you can see from the roughly 125% crop, detail has held up exquisitely well.
Here’s a gallery with a few other images taken with the EDGE ND1000 filter.
Irix Edge Light Pollution Filter
The final filter that I looked at was Irix’s new Light Pollution filter. This filter reduces yellow light, helping to eliminate the murky, yellowish cast to images taken at night or in cities. The byproduct is a cooler, cleaner, more dynamic look that works well in the right situation. It’s definitely an improvement for astrophotography work:
When used in daylight, it creates a cooler image that has it’s own visual charm:
I don’t live in a major city, so my uses for this type of lens are fewer, but I did like the effect for some of my winter images as it gave them a cool, wintry look.
Here’s a few more from the Light Pollution filter (used on the Laowa 15mm F2 Zero D lens for Sony FE).
Price and Conclusion
My experience with the Irix EDGE filters has been very positive. They are not fancy or exotic, but they are well made, optically excellent, and extremely competitively priced. The 77mm Circular Polarizer that I tested can be had for only $65, the massive 95mm ND1000 for $130, and the 72mm Light Pollution filter I tested rings in at $122. Filters can become very expensive, but to get well-made filters with Nano coatings and great performance for this price helps eliminate some of the sting. Irix also makes a very reasonably priced square filter holder, which then opens the door to using ND grad filters effectively. In a broader sense, however, I also want to commend Irix for thinking about the big picture of how their lenses will be used. Often photographers buy lenses and then are left stuck when it comes to after-market filter solutions, but Irix is doing a good job of supporting their products and allowing photographers to get the best out of them…something not every lens maker does.
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Irix made their mark with a bevy of well-received wide angle lenses, including a super-wide-angle 11mm F4 lens along with a 15mm F2.4 that I reviewed last year. Their most recent lens release has set their sites in a different direction – a telephoto macro lens. The Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro is a very intriguing lens featuring a longer-than-usual focal length, a large maximum aperture, and Irix’ signature quality build. It’s already caught the attention of the industry and has received the iF Design Reward for 2019 – an impressive achievement for such a new lensmaker! 150mm is a fairly unique focal length for a macro lens. There are a large number of macro options around the 100mm range, with a variety of others falling between 35-70mm, but there are relatively few longer telephoto options. There is an older Sigma design at 150mm, and an even older Canon and Sigma option at 180mm, though these lenses are all 2-3x more expensive than the Irix 150M. To be fair, however, they are autofocus lenses, and the Sigma options include very important optical stabilizers, but if you are someone who does most of your macro work on a tripod and would actually prefer a manual focus lenses for the superior quality of focus, then the Irix 150M is going to be a great option for you. Read on to find out why…
Prefer to watch your reviews? Check out my full video review here:
Irix 150M Build and Handling
The new Irix 150M comes in a Canon EF (reviewed here), Nikon F, and Pentax K mounts. Irix has impressed me with the build quality of the two lenses that I’ve reviewed from them thus far. There’s a lot of attention to detail, and in a well-established industry where there are relatively few new ideas, I’ve been impressed to see Irix deliver some features that I’ve not seen before. The best way to get all of the information is by watching my first look video episode here:
A case in point of that great attention to detail starts with the packaging, and the standout here is the fantastic molded case design. It is both more stylish and more functional than just about any case I’ve seen before. It is molded to the shape of the lens and thus allows a fairly robust lens to fit in a surprisingly compact space. It has a nice padded handle, quality zippers, and a lot of style. Sigma lenses also have nice, padded cases, but they are square and require a lot more storage space than that of the Irix 150M. I feel like this case is compact enough that I would actually use it!
The Irix 150M is a manual focus lens, which is less of an issue with a macro lens than if it were a standard telephoto. It also lacks image stabilization, which is arguably the greater liability. This is a fairly long focal length, so doing handheld macro work is pretty much out of the question. I found that true even with the 70mm F2.8 Macro ART lens from Sigma I reviewed last year, so you can only imagine how much truer that is of a lens with a focal length more than twice as long. The relatively fast maximum aperture helped make it only a minor issue for me when shooting normal (non-macro) work, though you do have to be very intentional about keeping that shutter speed up to avoid motion blur. I was aware of that and didn’t really have any issues. Basically all of the non-macro shots in this review (and the image gallery) were shot handheld, and I don’t recall any images lost to motion blur. I also didn’t shoot below 1/200th of a second when shooting handheld to make sure that wasn’t an issue. Here’s a fairly close image to show that it can be done:
While a lens with this focal length can double as a nice portrait lens and even general purpose telephoto lens due to being able to really compress backgrounds, the main purpose here is macro work. Both the lack of autofocus and the lack of image stabilization is offset in this purpose, as serious macro work requires a tripod and most macro photographers prefer manual focus for precision control over the incredibly tiny depth of field at macro distances. If that describes your kind of macro work, then the Irix 150M is going to be a great value lens for you. Why?
There are a number of reasons to choose a 150mm macro lens over a shorter focal length. The Irix 150M gives you a longer working distance than, say, the Canon EF 100mm F2.8L IS Macro lens (13.58″ / 34.5 cm vs. 11.81″ / 30 cm). It’s not a massive difference, but it is enough to allow for more light on your subject, a much more compressed background with bigger, softer bokeh highlights, and also more room to avoid scaring a living subject. Look at this comparison:
Even though I’ve moved the Irix 150M a little further away than the Canon to achieve similar framing, the Irix bokeh highlights are much bigger and softer. The Irix has also let extra light in by comparison. The ability to really blow out backgrounds is one strong reason to consider a longer focal length in a macro lens.
The flipside is that a longer focus length is also less versatile as a general purpose lens. There will be a number of situations where it is too long and the angle of view is too narrow. I think it is important to understand what kind of focal length best suits your purposes.
The Irix 150M is (at least initially) only released in Irix’s “Firefly” build. The “Blackstone” is the more robust build (in terms of more metals used in construction), but frankly, the build quality is already exceptionally good here and more robust materials might just add unnecessary weight. The Irix 150M has both a weather-sealing rubber gasket at the lens mount along with internal seals at 5 key junctures, which provides a solid degree of weather-sealing.
The lens barrel is primarily made of metal alloys, and the internals are all made of metal. The Irix 150M has a satin anodized metal finish that is a lot like that found on Zeiss Milvus lenses.
The focus ring is very wide (about 2 inches), with a pebbled rubber finish that provides good grip, a soft touch material, and unlike the rubberized rings on some other lenses, doesn’t seem prone to collecting lint. It has a unique feature that I like in the form of a raised notch that helps aid grip but also gives an additional point of tactile feedback when you are, say, looking through the viewfinder rather than at the ring itself.
The focus ring moves smoothly (though not Zeiss-smooth) without any “hitches” at any point in the focus throw. The focus throw is long (always expected in a macro lens) but not excessively so. I calculate it at somewhere near 275 degrees of rotation. The Irix 150M is an internally focusing lens, so nothing changes length or extends during focus. This makes the external dimensions a constant 3.43″ (87mm) in diameter (with a common 77mm front filter thread) and 5.04″ (128mm) in length. This is “large side of medium” lens, with a weight of 1.81 lbs (840g). The ratio of build quality to heft seems about right, however, particularly when you consider that 70-200mm F2.8 zooms run more in the 1400g+ range.
In what is a somewhat surprising move considering the price, a tripod collar is included. I don’t know of any other macro lens in this price range that includes one. It’s a nice design, too, with a compact, non-bulky design of nice grade lightweight metals. It can be fully rotated and removed, and the foot is Arca-Swiss compatible, meaning that you can clamp it right down on many tripods without the need for a quick release plate. Though the lens is not heavy in an absolute sense, a tripod foot is welcome because it helps with balance. Balance in a macro lens is important, as you will often be using it on a tripod in odd positions and good balance of the lens/camera weight makes balancing the whole setup easier.
I also like the fact that if you remove the tripod collar the branding information on the tripod collar is repeated underneath and etched into the lens barrel. Some lenses look incomplete when the tripod collar is removed, but that’s not the case here.
Another unique Irix design feature is a focus tension ring. This enables you to either lock in a focus position and prevent any inadvertent bumps to the focus ring to change focus or to introduce more “drag” onto the focus ring if you are making fine adjustments.
It’s a nice feature that works well in real-world shooting, though how much you need it will depend on what you are doing.
Another nice design element is the aperture iris. It has 11 rounded aperture blades that definitely retains a more circular shape when stopped down than lenses with fewer blades.
The aperture is electronically controlled (electromagnetic), and thus communicates EXIF information properly back to the camera as well. You control the aperture from within the camera like autofocus lenses.
The Irix 150M also includes a fairly deep and otherwise unremarkable lens hood, though it’s worth noting that a Canon lens at this price point probably wouldn’t come with one.
You can probably tell that I’m quite pleased with the basic design of this lens. It’s clean, functional, and well built without being excessively heavy or large. I’m personally somewhat tired of the trend towards ever-larger-and-heavier lenses, and Irix has shown the proper restraint here. This lens is actually smaller in dimensions that Canon’s 200mm F2.8 lens, an older design that most consider relatively compact. The Irix 150M has a nicer build grade than that lens, and is a macro lens to boot.
Irix 150M Image Quality
The Irix 150M has fairly simple optical formula, but one that definitely works. It is 12 elements in 9 groups. The Sigma 150mm F2.8 Macro is a far-more-complex 19 elements in 13 groups. Those of you who ascribe to the “less-is-more” philosophy when it comes to lens design will be pleased by Irix’ choice to keep things simple. The Irix 150M delivers a very strong optical performance, besting the Canon EF 100mm F2.8L Macro IS that I’ve used as a benchmark for years. The best way to see the details is by watching this video segment:
There is essentially only one place where the Canon 100L Macro is competitive…and that is in the center of frame at F2.8 where it shows roughly equal sharpness and contrast.
As you move out towards the edges, the Canon starts to soften up and lose some contrast, while the Irix lens stays razor sharp right into the extreme corners.
If you “speak MTF” you can see why – there is very little dip towards the corner in the MTF charts. The Irix 150M has a very impressive MTF performance.
By F4 the superior resolution and contrast of the Irix lens can be seen even in the center of the frame.
The difference is even more obvious in the corners, with the Irix 150M is fantastically sharp at F4. Bottom line is that this is an impressively sharp lens.
The Irix 150M finds a wonderful tension between sharpness/contrast in the plane of focus while retaining a nicely soft defocused region. It’s pretty close to perfect in my estimation.
The lens is incredibly sharp and retains nice bokeh at macro distances, too. It is a true 1:1 macro lens, capable of very high reproduction ratios. That fantastic contrast and exceptionally low chromatic aberrations of any kind results in very pleasing images:
Here’s a few other macro images that I took during my review period. This is an excellent lens for macro.
If there is a fly in this ointment, it’s the fact that the longer focal length paired with no image stabilization in either the lens or the camera bodies it is designed for results in the reality that motion blur can rob a bit of sharpness from images even at shutter speeds like 1/200th second if you are handholding the lens. I would recommend keeping your shutter speeds faster whenever possible, as longer focal lengths like this really do benefit from some stabilization.
It’s for this reason that this is a nice lens to adapt to a Sony body where one can take advantage of the image stabilization. I really like the Irix 150M on my Sony a7RIII, though I did run into one odd quirk. The Irix is the first Canon EF mount lens that didn’t fit onto my Sigma MC-11 adapter properly. The Irix 15mm F2.4 that I have fits fine, but the 150M wouldn’t fully bayonet into place. That could be copy specific to either my MC-11 or the Irix lens, but it was odd. I used a relatively inexpensive Vello adapter instead, and it worked fine, bayoneting properly into place and retaining full aperture control. Just to be safe, I manually set the focal length in Steady Shot to ensure maximum stability. I enjoyed the stabilization and felt more free to shoot handheld with the combination. Images looked great:
Distortion is very low from the Irix, as is vignette. At F2.8 there was considerably less vignette on the Irix than on my Canon macro lens. What little vignette was there I corrected with a value of +36 and a midpoint of 23 in Lightroom. The final image below shows a comparison in a scene where vignette would be highly visible. You can see a bit of vignette at F2.8, but at F5.6 the illumination is essentially perfect. The larger 77mm front filter size seems to pay dividends in this area.
Extremely low levels of longitudinal chromatic aberrations makes the Irix 150M the perfect lens to shoot subjects with shiny surfaces like this vintage camera. It does a beautiful job:
I happened to have some of the Irix Edge filters (Irix’ own line of filters) on hand during my review period, and I loved the intense contrast that comes from pairing this lens with their circular polarizer. Even though my world is a little colorless at the moment, I brought home images with excellent punch combined with lovely bokeh.
Under extreme conditions I was able to produce some flare with the 150M including some loss of contrast (veiling) and a few ghosting artifacts. The veiling reduced with the lens stopped down but a few more ghosting artifacts appeared.
The longer focal length and narrower angle of view suggests that this will be a factor less often than with a wider lens.
There are very few optical flaws to note from the Irix 150M. It produces highly detailed images with great contrast and bokeh. If you can eliminate motion blur from the equation through the use of a tripod or a faster shutter speed, you will love the images you get out of this lens.
Conclusion
When you consider that the Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro lens comes to market at a price tag of $595 USD, you can’t help but be impressed by the achievement of this lens. It’s no wonder that it has already received a design award, as it features a beautiful build, exceptional optical performance, and such a reasonable price. To be fair, a telephoto macro lens isn’t for everyone, and I would personally have loved to see Image Stabilization as part of this equation for both the occasions you might want to do close focus work and don’t have a tripod but also to enhance the usefulness of the lens as a general purpose telephoto. The nice bokeh and sharpness makes it a nice portrait lens, though DSLRs remain a less than optimal platform for using manual focus lenses which does diminish your keeper rate. I’d love to see this lens released in a Sony FE mount, as it just makes so much sense with the combination of mirrorless focus aids and the in-body-image-stabilization of many Sony cameras (or the new Nikon Z6). Nailing a portrait like was easy with the Irix 150M on a Sony a7RIII.
That’s not to say you can’t make this lens work on a Canon, Nikon, or Pentax DSLR (I’ve got a lot of great photos that demonstrate otherwise!), but my point is that the weaknesses of this lens are really more about the inherit limitations of manual focus lenses on cameras not well designed for manual focus. The lens itself is pretty fantastic, but unfortunately you can’t divorce it from the cameras it was designed for. Still, the incredibly reasonably price means that the Irix 150M has a great price-to-performance ratio, and if you are primarily looking for a super sharp, beautifully handling macro lens to use for macro (on a tripod), then by all means, go for the Irix. If you view a macro lens as more of a general purpose prime lens that can also do macro, you may want to look elsewhere.
Pros:
Beautiful build with some genuinely innovative touches
Great price-to-performance ratio
Inclusion of tripod collar, case, and lens hood
Fantastic sharpness from F2.8 on and across the frame
Beautifully soft bokeh rendering
Excellent contrast ratio
Extremely low CA
Distortion and vignette well controlled
Cons:
Lack of image stabilization means that macro must be done from tripod
Flare prone in isolated situations
Nailing focus at medium distances on a DSLR is difficult
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
Irix made their mark with a bevy of well-received wide angle lenses, including a super-wide-angle 11mm F4 lens along with a 15mm F2.4 that I reviewed last year. Their most recent lens release has set their sites in a different direction – a telephoto macro lens. The Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro is a very intriguing lens featuring a longer-than-usual focal length, a large maximum aperture, and Irix’ signature quality build. It’s already caught the attention of the industry and has received the iF Design Reward for 2019 – an impressive achievement!
There are a lot of cool things about this lens, but one of the most interesting is the fantastic molded case design. It really minimizes the amount of space the lens needs while providing great protection. It’s this kind of attention to detail that is helping to set Irix apart. Stay tuned for my ongoing coverage of the Irix 150mm F2.8, and in the meantime you can see the images that I’m getting with it here!
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The new lensmaker Irix came onto the scene a couple of years ago with the announcement of a beautifully designed 15mm prime lens available in two different build/trim levels. This has become Irix’s unique approach to marketing their lenses, offering up two “trim levels” much like an automaker might. The Firefly versions of their lenses have the same optical formula, but rely on a more traditional engineered plastics housing with a feature or two missing compared to the premium build. The higher end build is the “Blackstone”, which I am reviewing here. The Blackstone 15mm (and later, 11mm) lens has a build grade more similar to a Zeiss lens than your typical commercial grade build. In some ways the “Blackstone” design most resembles a “Classic” Zeiss finish, with a semi-glass anodized metal finish that looks fantastic. Irix upped the ante by adding a robust weather sealing to the design. What’s interesting is that when I reviewed a similar lens from Zeiss – the Distagon 15mm f/2.8 – it cost nearly $3000 USD. The Irix 15mm f/2.4 (even in the upscale Blackstone trim), costs only $675. Like the Zeiss, however, it is a manual focus lens with an electronically controlled aperture iris.
The combination of value and quality is definitely interesting and has helped Irix get at least some limited exposure. I was intrigued (I’m always glad to see new lens makers come onto the scene), but was involved in other projects at the time and so the lens went in and out of my radar. I’ve gotten periodic requests from my audience to review the lens, but had never gotten around to it. When Irix reached out to me, however, I was definitely open to reviewing this intriguing lens, which purports to offer an excellent build along with great image quality at a reasonable price. Read on to join me in discovering if the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 lives up to its billing.
Prefer to Watch Your Reviews? My full video review can be seen below.
Irix Blackstone 15mm Build and Design
First, a little about Irix. Irix is a Swiss lens designer whose lenses are manufactured in Korea. My contact with the company has been with someone based in Poland, so this is truly a multi-national company.
But what really stands out to me in this whole company is the unique degree of innovation I’m seeing. A company like Voigtländer has been making lenses since 1756, so this isn’t exactly a brand-new industry, and, while companies are always improving the optics, coatings, and operation of their lenses, most of them pretty much do the same things. It’s rare that I see new features actually make it into lenses. Irix has definitely got some flare, however, along with a few genuinely useful features I haven’t seen elsewhere. First of all, Irix wins major style points for the way that their lenses are presented, from the fancy metal tin to the very cool molded hard case for the lens. I particularly like the case because the compact, molded nature of it means that it takes up much less room in a bag and will be more likely to come along. Check out this video to really get a closer look at what I’m talking about:
One aspect that I will touch on but hope to delve into further when I review the Irix 11mm f/4 is that Irix has recognized that the challenge with wide-angle lenses is often when it comes to using filters. Filters give you creative choices when using a wide angle lens. You can use a polarizer to either reduce or even enhance reflections or to create richer color. Neutral Density (ND) filters give you creative control over exposure and are essentially required to do long exposure work in most lighting conditions. Irix has thought this through and given photographers options with the Blackstone 15mm. First of all, it actually has a 95mm filter thread up front (like the Zeiss Distagon 15mm), so you can use traditional filters. 95mm filters are expensive, yes, but Irix has actually created their own line of filters (Edge) that are reasonable and yet look pretty good. This includes both screw-on filters and also a square filter holder and square filters that allow you to use graduated filters. While square filters are more cumbersome, graduated ND filters are some of the best tools there are for landscape photographers.
If you want to go lower profile, however, Irix has wisely elected to also include a gel filter holder in the design. This allows you to insert small gel filters in the holder built into the lens near the lens mount. These gel filters are incredibly inexpensive (you can get the full set of 15 variations for less than ten Euros!) This is very clever, because it gives buyers a compelling reason to choose this lens over a competing one.
Another clever feature that is designed around accommodating filters is a little window built into the lens hood that gives you access to a circular polarizing filter (which needs to be rotated to the proper position to provide maximum benefit). You can easily rotate the filter by reaching a finger through and using the knurled edge of the filter to rotate it forwards or backward. It’s more convenient than reaching around the front of the lens hood and rotating the filter, particularly since there isn’t much room between the filter and the interior of the lens hood.
Also smart is the front lens cap, which is actually beveled inward along the front edge. This makes the front cap easier to pinch with the lens hood attached and also makes it store in your pocket a little easier. The plastics in the front and rear cap feel a little thin and flimsy, but the pinch action on the front cap does work fine. I like the way that the Irix logo is displayed on the front cap.
As previously mentioned, the shell of the Blackstone 15mm is made of a premium aluminum-magnesium alloy. It has a anodized metal finish that resists fingerprints and scratches (and actually seems to work!) It’s a very attractive lens – all shiny and sleek. The lens is moderately sized at 114mm (Diameter) x 100mm (Length), or 4.49” x 3.94”. Due to the all-metal-and-glass construction, the lens is fairly dense at 685g (1.51lbs), though that weight is still quite moderate.
The next unique element on the lens (one I’ve never personally seen on a manual focus lens before) is the inclusion of a clutch/tension ring that allows you to lock the focus ring at any particular focus point. Rotating the ring to the left engages the lock, while rotating the ring to the right loosens it back up. This might be useful if you wanted to make sure that focus didn’t shift from a critical point while, say, carrying the lens in a bag or mounted to a camera on a strap or harness. I didn’t personally use it during my review period, but that was primarily due to something I really, really liked.
Most manual focus lenses allow you to focus past infinity. People ask me what that means, as it does seem illogical. What it means is that you can actually focus to a place where, essentially, nothing is in focus. You can pass infinity focus and begin to actually defocus the lens, almost like eyeglasses that are too strong and actually diminish vision. “Why would they do that?”, you might ask, and the reason is because of thermal expansion. How hot or cold the lens is can actually slightly shift the tolerances, and if you left no “play” at the end of the focal range, you might actually be unable to achieve infinity focus under certain conditions.
Fair enough, but the problem is that most of the time people are shooting in more moderate conditions where that extra travel in the focus ring past infinity just ends up messing up their images. Irix has implemented an extremely clever solution to this problem. The Blackstone 15mm has, like all manual focus lenses, a mechanical hard stop at the “infinity” end of the focal range (you cannot focus any farther). But before that, where normal (for more environmental conditions) infinity is calibrated, there is actually a mild detent that you can easily feel when focusing even if you aren’t looking at the lens (it is also marked in the same UV fluorescent paint as all the other distance markings). Under normal conditions all you need to do is focus to that infinity detent and you have perfect infinity focus, which actually works absurdly well for about 90% of the situations I used the lens in). It means that you honestly don’t have to think much about focus at all, only using focus when you need to focus on a closer subject (or, in extreme weather, to focus beyond that point to infinity). The detent is just firm enough to easily hold that position, which is the reason why I didn’t use the lock ring. Most of the time where I wanted focus was exactly on that infinity detent. While I’ll deal with astrophotography a little later in the review, I will note that this detent was perfect for shooting the night sky, and this feature alone was enough to make really enjoy the lens for that kind of work. Sometimes the hardest part of astro work is nailing focus.
In real world shooting, this was my favorite thing about the Blackstone 15mm. It gave me great confidence that when I was shooting with the lens prefocused to that infinity detent and stopped down to f/5.6 or f/8, I was getting essentially perfectly focused results every time. Kudos to Irix for finding a better way to handle this problem.
The focus ring itself looks beautiful, with tight metal ribbing that provides endless amounts of grip. I wasn’t a huge fan of the focus action, however, that had a slightly gritty feeling when making larger focus changes. It lacks the perfectly damped, smooth feel of the better Zeiss or Voigtländer lenses, and I felt the damping was a bit heavy (which also somewhat eliminates the need for the locking clutch). The actual amount of focus throw/travel was excellent, however, allowing for precision at all focus distances. Distances markings are clearly legible in that special paint, and hyperfocal guides are included for f/8, f/11, and f/16 (f/22 is the smallest aperture available).
A small knurled ring near the lens mount allows for both a nice texture variation (cosmetically appealing) and also provides a natural place to grip the lens when mounting/unmounting it. All of this is very good design. The lens is just as handsome as the Zeiss Distagon 15mm f/2.8, which is to say very nice indeed.
A badge near the lens mount touts Irix’s proprietary “Neutrino Coatings” (everybody’s got their own special coatings). We’ll examine how effective they are in a moment.
The metal lens mount shows off a few other details. One is the gel filter holder previously mentioned. Another is the electronic contacts that reveal that, like Zeiss, this is a manual focus lens but uses a modern electromagnetic aperture iris (which means that you open/close the aperture iris via the camera by selecting the aperture value you want) and also that it communicates EXIF data to the camera body. Both of these are good things! The final detail there is that you can see a rubber sealing gasket near the lens mount. This is the external evidence of the weather sealing on the lens, but Irix says this, “Blackstone, the Premium version has durable body made with aluminium-magnesium alloy, that ensures foolproof protection of your lens, even in extreme situations. Its construction is equipped with four rubber seals, that protect the camera mount and focusing mechanism against the dust and moisture, as well as front or side accidental water splashes.” That seems fairly confident, though “foolproof” may be a little extreme (never underestimate how foolish people can be!) Still, the specificity of the language does inspire confidence.
The lens can focus down to 11″ (28cm) and produces a rather uninspiring amount of magnification there (0.11x). While the maximum aperture of the lens is moderately wide, the nature of the wide angle focal length means that blurring out backgrounds isn’t going to be a big strength for this lens. This photo represents best case scenario:
You can see a bit of busyness in the bokeh circles, but the most defocused region is fairly smooth. But let’s not kid ourselves; you don’t buy a 15mm lens for the bokeh!
The aperture iris is the standard 9 rounded blades.
Some might ask why the filter thread is so large when the front element is relatively small. The answer is due to the curved front element (which enables the wide angle of view). A smaller filter thread (or edge of the lens) would cause heavy vignette, as would the lens hood on a smaller diameter. All of this is necessary to keep these things far enough away to allow the lens to “see” properly. Sometimes you just can’t compete with physics.
All in all, there are a lot of positive takeaways from an examination of the build, design, and features of the Blackstone 15mm. It’s a premium lens with a lot of clever engineering, which is to say that you are getting a lot of lens for your money.
Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 Image Quality
Irix has a key advantage at this focal length compared to competing lenses – the maximum aperture of f/2.4, which is slightly better than a 1/3rd stop advantage over f/2.8 (f/2.2 and f/2.5 are the 1/3rd stops between f/2 and f/2.8). On my Canon 5D Mark IV body that I used for this test, f/2.4 is not an option because it doesn’t fall on a traditional increment. It displays at f/2.5 instead, although the aperture physically opens up a little wider than that. Unfortunately that will almost certainly cause some confusion for some who will think their lens is “broken”. While most of the time people use wide angle lenses at smaller apertures (for landscapes or city/architecture), there are situations where having a wider aperture is useful. These might include shooting astrophotography (where more light sensitivity is very important) or in other low light scenarios.
The Blackstone 15mm has a sophisticated optical formula of 15 elements in 11 groups, including 3 high-refractive elements, two extra-dispersion elements, and 2 aspherical elements. There are also the previously mentioned neutrino coatings to help with flare resistance, aid contrast, and reduce chromatic aberrations. We’ll determine how all of this adds up in our coverage of the image quality from the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone.
My coverage of image quality falls into two categories: 1) Resolution, where I cover sharpness and contrast and 2) Rendering, which looks at the global look of images in areas like color rendition, bokeh, flare resistance, chromatic aberration, etc…
The best way to see my findings on image quality is by watching this detailed video episode where I interactively break down the image quality of the 105 ART.
Blackstone 15mm Resolution
Those of you who follow my reviews know that I prefer whenever possible to not test a lens’ resolution in a vacuum. I prefer to have at least one lens whose performance I’m familiar with as a benchmark. I keep an extensive (and diverse) personal kit for this reason (and let’s be honest, also because I love lenses!) I elected to use the Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 VC lens for this comparison for several reasons. First, I had it on hand. Second, I’ve used it extensively for comparisons with a number of wide angle lenses and so I have a clear understanding of where it stands in the hierarchy of lenses. Finally, it shares a similar focal length on the wide end (and frames nearly identically).
If you didn’t watch the video episode on image quality, I’ll quickly recap a few of the areas that I perceive strengths and weaknesses between the two lenses. Obviously the Tamron is a completely different kind of lens: it’s a zoom, has autofocus, and has image stabilization. It is also much more expensive, much larger and heavier (1100 vs 685g), and cannot use traditional filters. Despite these significant differences, there will certainly be some cross-shopping for those debating the merits of a zoom vs a prime. When it comes to image quality, the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 has lower distortion and chromatic aberration (the Tamron has some lateral CA on the edges of the frame). It also has less veiling from the sun in the frame, though it has it’s own unique flare characteristic that we’ll detail in the next section. The Tamron has lower vignette, delivers better microcontrast levels, and has slightly better color rendition. There’s pros and cons to each (I’ve yet to find a perfect wide angle lens), so you have to prioritize what matters to you. Do you value the versatility of a zoom, or do you prefer a more compact lens that will allow you to use screw-in filters?
Let’s take a look at some comparisons. As this was a backlit scene, I’ve raised the shadows by equal amounts on all images to allow for as fair a comparison as possible.
With both lenses wide open (Irix at f/2.4, Tamron at f/2.8), we see that the lenses frame roughly identical. The Tamron shows off its lower levels of vignette by delivering a brighter image along the edges, though a closer look reveals that the Irix shows better contrast due to lower CA there. The Tamron shows greater impact from the sun in the frame with a localized veiling in that area. The Tamron shows slightly higher resolution and definitely better microcontrast (textures pop more due to better contrast on a pixel level). What’s very positive for the Irix, however, is the fact that even at f/2.4 there is strong resolution right across the frame.
Stopping the Irix down to f/2.8 does a lot to equalize the vignette situation, and leaves the two images looking more similar on a global level. The superior microcontrast and color rendition of the Tamron lens (a serious strength for this lens) delivers a more vibrant image with all settings equal, though the Irix shows better flare resistance. The resolution is roughly similar across the frame, with the Tamron showing a little more “punch” due to contrast and the Irix handling the edges a little better with slightly higher resolution and better chromatic aberration control.
Moving on down to a more traditional landscape aperture (f/5.6), the general trends continue. The Tamron image has a little more contrast when viewed globally, but both images look fantastic at a pixel level all across the frame (I included the bottom right in this comparison). I noted that both lenses metered identically at each aperture value that they shared. You can see the ghosting pattern following the shaft of light from the Tamron becoming slightly more pronounced.
When I compared f/11 results to the f/5.6 results from the Blackston 15mm, I saw just the slightest bit of softening due to diffraction, but the results were more similar than different. In terms of resolution, the Irix is right up there competing with the best lenses at this focal length, but the color and contrast lags a bit behind the best. If compared to lenses at its price point, however, I think it would be the hands-down winner.
Here’s a few landscape images that show how great landscape images from this lens look.
In real-world shooting (outside of the comparison sphere), the colors and contrast look very good.
Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 Rendering
As I’ve already noted, I think that color rendition from the lens is good but not exceptional, and the same applies to the contrast (both global and micro). In some real-world scenarios I felt the color looked quite good:
But how about some of the other metrics?
This brick wall comparison shows that vignette is fairly heavy at f/2.4, but by f/4 a lot of it has cleared.
You’ll also note that even in this very challenging test (the camera was only about three feet from the wall), distortion is near non-existent. At more typical distances you can see only the mildest amount of barrel distortion (though all wide angle lenses that cannot tilt will show some perspective distortion or keystone effect). This lens wouldn’t be as good as tilt/shift lens for shooting real estate or architecture, but it is definitely a better option than most wide angle lenses that I’ve tested. It even compares pretty well to the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D (zero distortion) lens I own for Sony, delivering similarly low levels of barrel distortion. Here’s an interior shot with a lot of lines.
The chromatic aberration control from the Blackstone 15mm is pretty close to perfect. As we noted in our landscape comparison, there is no lateral chromatic aberrations to be seen along the edge of the frame. I didn’t notice CA in any of my real world images, in fact, including this incredibly challenging scene where I was capturing a board room scene for a hotel property. The client wanted to demonstrate how close the conference rooms were to nature, and wanted the outdoors to be pictured in the scene. The midday sun was extremely harsh, so this created a huge contrast variance between the board room and the outdoors. The rock edges, glass bottles, door frames, and chrome chairs are all perfect places for chromatic aberrations to lurk, but the crop from the photo shows how well the lens has dealt with all of these. Bravo, Irix!
Another important aberration to be corrected for in a wide angle lens is comatic aberrations, often called “coma”. Comatic aberrations show up with bright, distant points of light like stars as deformation of the geometric shape along the edges. This can take shape as flying insects, saucers, or ducks in appearance rather than crisp star points. Wide angle lenses are the most commonly used instruments for shooting astrophotography, so I always try to test for this. What I found is that while the lens does have some comatic aberrations along the edge of the frame, the lens was still fairly appealing for shooting astro due to A) having a wider than typical maximum aperture and B) the aforementioned infinity focus detent. I got very crisp looking results, and the coma is only visible at a pixel level.
As you can see from these photos, stopping down to f/2.8 makes little difference in either sharpness or improvement of the coma, so I would probably just shoot at f/2.4 for the additional light gathering potential. This isn’t a perfect performance here, but I felt like it was better than average with all aspects considered.
A more complicated topic is that of flare resistance. As we noted previously, the Blackstone 15mm is actually highly resistant to veiling with the sun right in the frame. It shows little ghosting in terms of the typical pattern along a ray of light. But what it will show (if you don’t compose to combat it) is a massive red ghosting ring around the outside of the frame. Here’s an example of three different compositions of the same scene. In one I purposefully allowed the ring to show up. It’s pretty dominant if you allow this:
It showed up mildly in a few other situations, but its also not difficult to compose your image to where flare is scarcely an issue at all. Just use the lens wisely.
Another positive is that the sunburst with the lens stopped down looks nice. I always like a nice sunburst effect as I feel it adds a nice finishing touch to images.
As previously mentioned, creating bokeh (defocused areas) with this lens isn’t easy. It doesn’t have much of a magnification factor, and this just isn’t a strength for wide angle lenses. Here’s the best I could do around minimum focus:
This isn’t really a factor here.
So, other than that big ghosting artifact if you aren’t careful, there are few serious flaws here. The lens produces beautiful images if you use it to its strengths. I would have liked to see a little more microcontrast and more punchy color, but you can also add those pretty easily in post. Here’s an image that I postprocessed, and I think it looks pretty fabulous.
It’s taken me a while to get an Irix lens in my hand, but I have to say I’m pretty impressed for this new company’s first “kick at the can”. The Irix 15mm f/2.4 (particularly in this Blackstone finish) comes across as a pretty mature offering. It has a lot of great innovation in its presentation, build, and feature set, and I found it a genuine joy to use. I think Irix has been very clever to not rely on others to solve the filter issue and to address it themselves. By doing so they have eliminated some of the challenges inherit to wide angle lenses. I particularly like the detent at [typical] infinity focus that allows one to quickly focus properly for landscape shots (and the stars!) in most environmental conditions. My recommendation for areas that Irix can focus on improving are in the smoothness of the manual focus ring along with improving color and microcontrast. From what I’ve seen here, however, I certainly believe that they are capable of making top grade lenses. This lens is already as sharp as the Zeiss Distagon 15mm f/2.8, and at a fraction of the price. The Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 represents a great value for landscape (and even architectural) photographers on a budget, and, if you don’t mind a less pro-grade build, the Firefly version can be had for under $500 USD while delivering an identical optical performance. There’s a lot to like here, and I look forward to seeing what Irix has to offer in the future.
Pros:
Professional grade build with excellent materials
Quality weather sealing
Innovative design in packaging, handling, and features
Very low distortion
Very good resolution from f/2.4 on
Impressively low amount of chromatic aberrations
Detent at typical infinity is extremely useful
Options for filter use great at this focal length
Slightly wider than average maximum aperture
Highly competitive price
Cons:
Focus ring action could be smoother
Colors and microcontrast not as vibrant as some competitors
Strong ghosting ring can occur with bright light source in the frame
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
Keywords: Irix, Irix 15mm, Irix 15 Blackstone, Irix Blackstone, 15mm, f/2.4, Irix 15mm 2.4, Irix 15mm Review, Irix 15mm 2.4 Review, Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4, Irix Blackstone Review, Dustin Abbott, Sample Images, Video Test, Canon 5D Mark IV, Sony a7R3, Sony a7riii, canon 5d4, Sharpness, Resolution, Comparison, Tamron 15-30 VC, Tamron 15-30 2.8, Review, Comparison, Test, CA, Distortion
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.
The new lensmaker Irix came onto the scene a couple of years ago with the announcement of a beautifully designed 15mm prime lens. I was intrigued, but was involved in other projects at the time and so the lens went in and out of my radar. I’ve gotten periodic requests from my audience to review the lens, but had never gotten around to it. When Irix reached out to me, however, I was definitely open to reviewing this intriguing lens, which purports to offer an excellent build along with great image quality at a reasonable price. I’ll be determining if the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 lives up to the billing in my review. In the meantime, however, I invite you to check out the image galleries below and check back regularly for new photos.
Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.
Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!
Keywords: Irix, Irix 15mm, Irix 15 Blackstone, Irix Blackstone, 15mm, f/2.4, Irix 15mm 2.4, Irix 15mm Review, Irix 15mm 2.4 Review, Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4, Irix Blackstone Review, Dustin Abbott, Sample Images, Video Test, Canon 5D Mark IV, Sony a7R3, Sony a7riii, canon 5d4, Sharpness, Resolution, Comparison, Tamron 15-30 VC, Tamron 15-30 2.8, Review, Comparison, Test, CA, Distortion
DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.