Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Flickr 500px
See My Reviews

Zhiyun Molus X60 RGB COB Light Review

Dustin Abbott

April 2nd, 2024

It would be easy to dismiss the Zhiyun Molus X60 as being a gimmick because it is so cool looking…but then you realize just how versatile and useful a light it actually is. The Molus X60 is surprisingly bright (enough to use as a fill light for portrait sessions) as a standard bi-color (2700-6500K), but then can also swap into RGB mode to provide splashes of color and mood to photos and videos. It can be powered by a variety of options, including a cool battery grip that makes it look like a vintage camera. That grip has real power, too, rated at at 2550 mAh, 55.08 Wh, which is enough to power the light for 50 minutes at 100% power. There are a variety of configurations beginning at $200 USD and moving up to $399 USD, but is this the monolight for you? Find out my thoughts in my review here:

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Zhiyum for sending me a review sample of the Molus X60. As always, this is a completely independent review.

The Molus X60 leads the pack on “cool factor”. I had a number of people ask me if it was some kind of retro camera, as when the reflector and battery grip is attached it does have a very unique profile.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Specs

  • Output: 2010 Lux at 3.3′ (6500K, without reflector).
  • 2700-6500K CCT; Full RGB Color Control
  • AC or Battery Power
  • Onboard & App Control
  • CRI 95 | TLCI 98
  • Active Cooling, Ultracompact Design
  • ZY Mount, Optional Bowens Adapter
  • Includes Mini Reflector & Diffusion Dome
  • Includes Power Adapter & Bag
  • Battery grip rated at 2550 mAh, 55.08 Wh (50 minutes at 100%)
  • 0.7 lb / 319g (Fixture) or 1.5 lb / 689g (Fixture with Battery)
  • COB (Chip on Board) = greater efficiency

I really liked a lot about the SmallRig RC-60B in my recent review of it, but there were a few key areas where I was critical. One was the fact that power output dropped during my output test, meaning that full power was available for far less than the rated 45 minutes (full power was only available for 32 minutes in my tests), and then, secondly, I found the usefulness of the light limited somewhat by the lack of Bluetooth control, meaning that however you had the light positioned, you would need access to turn it on/off or make adjustments. Neither of those things are an issue on the Molus X60, however, as I found that it ran at a constant rate during my power tests and also has an easy to use Bluetooth app for remote control.

So how did things hold up in my tests?

Tests

  • Lux Value
  • Battery Life
  • Portrait light
  • Video Light
  • Effects

Results from Lux Value tests.

I like to use a Lux meter and test the output from these lights to see if things hold up to the manufacturers claim. The claim for the Molus X60 is right over 2000 Lux at 1 meter distance. I used a measuring tape to set the distance and took several readings at both 1 meter and then at 3 meters (a more practical distance if you are lighting a set, for example). The results?

  • Bare Light output at 100%, 6500K, @ 1 Meter = 1873 Lux
  • Bare Light output at 100%, 6500K, @ 3 Meter = 759 Lux

Now my test is surely not as scientific as the testing standards from the manufacturer, but the fact that I was within 5% of the stated output is enough to verify that their claims are roughly accurate.

The Molus X60 does come with a mini reflector that significantly amplifies the output. With the reflector in place I got the following values:

  • With Reflector output at 100%, 6500K, @ 1 Meter = 12,000 Lux average
  • With Reflector output at 100%, 6500K, @ 3 Meter = 1788 Lux

Moving to a warmer color will reduce the output somewhat. I did a couple of tests with the lux meter just a few inches in front of the reflector, and got a max output at that close distance of 393,960 lux at 6500K. Moving to the warmest setting (2700K) reduced the output to 308,830 lux, which is still very bright, obviously, but significantly less. Moving to RGB mode will further reduce output, obviously, as emphasizing a single color reduces output. Zhiyun cites the output at various colors at roughly one third of the peak output of the light (brightest is right under 700 lux at one meter, without reflector). Many times that’s okay, however, as you don’t want to bathe whole scene in that light, like here:

…but instead provide some accent lighting with it, as I’ve done in this video to add a little splash of orange to my set background.

Also included in a small silicon diffuser that slips over the reflector. It will soften the light and make it more flattering, though at the cost of nearly halving the output. I tested the lux value at 207,110 under the same conditions.

On the practical side of things, I found the amount of light output from Molus X60 sufficient to doing fill light for environmental portraiture. I could throw the very compact light into my camera bag and then just mount it on the top of the my portable tripod even when working alone. The light was plenty sufficient for allowing me to balance the ratios between a dim foreground and a bright background, like in this shot:

I also found that I am mostly working at far less than 100% output if using the light for my lighting my YouTube videos. There’s a surprising amount of output from this little light due to the COB (chip on board) design.

Results from Battery Life Tests:

There is obviously a wide variety of ways to power the Zhiyun Molus X60, including the battery grip, AC adapters, V-mount batteries, and even standard power banks. I tested a couple of different options to evaluate runtime.

First with the standard grip, which is very cleverly designed so that it easily clips into place and then releases via a release button on the face of the light. I ran the light at 100% and started with a full battery. The light shut off after 52 minutes, which slightly exceeded the rating of 50 minutes provided by the manufacturer. I noticed no light dropoff during that time and also noted that though I did the test in my office while working on my computer nearby, I heard very little sound from the cooling fans. When I handled the light at the end of the test, however, I noted how cool everything was. The chassis not only looks cool but also cools efficently.

My one critique of the battery grip is that it utilizes four indicator lights for state of charge rather than a more precise digital readout showing a percentage. That would have been useful.

On a positive note, I have felt that the battery grip recharges reasonably fast. It only seems to draw at 30 watts, but doesn’t slow down as much nearing peak capacity as some batteries. I always want to return to a 100% state of charge so that I have as much runtime as possible for my next use, and I found that I was happy with the charging rate.

I also tested the light powering it from a 99Wh V-mount battery. I got about 80 minutes off the V-mount battery running the light at 100% power output. With the battery grip and a V-mount battery you could get an easy 2 1/2 hours run time if you dropped output even to 90%.

Portrait Light Test

I’ve always been a fan of fixed lighting for portraiture, as it is makes it very easy (obvious) to see the modeling of the light and also makes focus in a dim space easier than with a strobe. The compact size of the R60 makes it very easy to throw into my camera bag even with the reflector attaches, and that has allowed me to use it in a variety of portrait settings. In this shot I used the low evening sun as the accent light to the left of the model while using the X60 as my main fill light. The two light sources blended together very nicely for this lovely portrait.

In this shot I used the light as the primary light source in a shadowed area between trees. I went for a lower key look that I think works nicely here.

The compact size means that I can throw it onto a lightweight tripod and position it in a place where it will be hidden from camera.

I used it to offset very harsh, dappled lighting for this shot, and you can see that the inclusion of the light allowed me to keep my subject more in the natural shadow but get enough light on her that the background isn’t blown out and harsh.

Fixed lights like this are great if you want to do a mix of photo and video, as the lighting will be the same for both unlike strobes. The constant modeling of the light also makes using fixed lights like this more accessible for new photographers than using strobes.

A CRI rating of 97+ means good color accuracy, obviously important for portrait work. I found the Molux X60 a nice tool for portrait work, though the quantity of light is going to work best with a single person or a couple as opposed to a group unless you have multiple lights going. It can’t match a strobe for pure output.

Video Light Test

There isn’t much challenge here, as the primary purposes of a video light are to provide sufficient output, to be consistent enough to avoid any kind of strobing effect, and preferably to have good options for controlling the light output. If you want to get serious about modifying the light, you’ll probably want to invest in some of the other accessories…or just buy the Bowens adapter from Zhiyun that will allow you to then utilize a wide variety of Bowens mount modifiers. Zhiyun notes that the X60 can utilize all of the same accessories as their popular X100 light.

I found the light output and quality sufficient for my video work when lighting the set for some of my YouTube episodes utilizing the reflector, and if I needed less light, the included dome diffuser. I really appreciate the ability to remotely control the light via the app.

Effects Test

It has become standard for any lights like these to have various lighting effects, and while I often find these quite gimmicky, I will note that the Molus X60 is more versatile than most in this area because of its RGB abilities. Most of the time these type lights only have the ability to change color temperature in a limited range and then intensity, but an RGB light like this can produce intensely different colors. That makes the effects more intense.

As such, the RGB version of the light has six more EFX than the standard bicolor version, and those additional effects in many ways are the most effective due to the use of color.

Perhaps more gimmicky is the inclusion of a music mode where the light reacts to the pulse of music and adds pops of color, though I found the music needed to be fairly loud for this to work effectively. It could be interesting if your thing is shooting music videos, though.

Things I Like

  • Portability – can be easily packed in to bag
  • Looks very retro cool
  • Flexibility – 4x different power options
  • Battery grip integration well executed
  • Carrying case
  • Battery grip life long enough to be useful
  • Nice amount of light
  • Can be used with Bowens mount accessories via adapter
  • Runs quiet and cool
  • RGB capabilities expand versatility
  • Bluetooth control
  • AC Adapter included

Things I Don’t Like

  • Battery grip has only four indicator lights rather than percentage
  • Bowens mount accessories will have to be via adapter
  • More expensive than SmallRig RC-60B even for the bi-color version

Conclusion

I’m loving this new generation of COB lights with built-in power options. The Zhiyun Molus X60 doesn’t take up much more room in my bag than a V-mount battery and yet provides a great solution for location lighting, working well for both video and stills.

The X60 can put out a very usable amount of light for many situations. You’ll need multiple lights if you intend to light a full set, but for solo work it is plenty even when used at medium distances. I’ve actually really enjoyed using it as an easy lighting tool for portrait work.

The X60 solves a few of my very short list of complaints against the RC-60B, namely the lack of Bluetooth app control and the fact that the battery life runtime was mitigated by the power output stepping down as the battery life depleted.

You will pay a bit more for the Molux X60, but for some people it will be worth it. Packages range from $199-$399, depending on how much want in your kit. The most expensive “Pro” kit comes with two of the battery grips and a softbox, which is actually a really strong value when you break down the pricing of those items individually. I’ve reviewed the “combo” package, which includes one battery grip but no softbox, and, to me, isn’t nearly as compelling a value at $329. That extra $70 for the Pro package gives you more bang for the buck, which is the reason why it is the top seller. The nice thing here is that if you already have a good power bank that has a PD rating of at least 60 watts, you can go with the cheapest option and still get an amazing, stylish light. I really like the way the battery grip works together with the light here, though, and it gets you away from any cords, which is always pretty sweet.

Bottom line: this is a very stylish, very flexible, and surprisingly useful compact light that puts out a surprising amount of light. I’m loving it.

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Zhiyun Molux X60 @ Zhiyun (use code “10ZYX60TOCXX” at Zhiyun or Amazon for 10% off) | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Zhiyun, Molus, X60, RGB, Molus X60 Review, COB, RC-60B, LED, Video, 60W, Battery Grip, Softbox, VB-99, V-Mount, Video Light, Portrait, Review, Studio, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA, #zhiyun, #molusx60, #videolighting

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

SmallRig RC-60B Portable COB LED Video Light Review

Dustin Abbott

February 12th, 2024

The SmallRig RC-60B COB LED light is an evolution of most similar type lights you’ve seen for two primary reasons. A) It is unusually compact and portable (weighs just 650g, about the weight of a typical mirrorless camera) and B) It has a built in battery that will give you up 75 minutes of runtime in ECO mode or 45 minutes in full pop mode. I’ve found the RC-60B to be very useful, as it is small enough to pop into a camera bag and use fully portably, and the fact that the power input port is USB-C means that you do portable power to extend the battery life from a V-mount battery or even PD power bank. That’s extremely useful, and a reasonable price of $199 means that there’s a lot to love here. Find out all my thoughts in my video review here…or read on for the details of my various tests and findings.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to SmallRig for sending me a review sample of the RC-60B. As always, this is a completely independent review.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Specs

  • Built-in 3400mAh Battery (basically equivalent of having a built in 50Wh V-mount battery)
  • 45 minutes full power | 75 minutes ECO
  • Type-C PD Fast Charging (up to 100W PD)
  • Can be powered from a variety of power sources (power banks, V-mount batteries, AC adapter)
  • Weighs only 650g (1.4lbs)
  • Rated at 11200 lux at <1 meter (with reflector)
  • 2700-6500 Kelvin color temperature range
  • COB (Chip on Board) = greater efficiency

Tests

  • Lux Value
  • Battery Life
  • Portrait light
  • Video Light
  • Effects

Results from Lux Value tests.

The first test was the intensity of light with the reflector in place and the lux meter at the edge of reflector (full power) at different color temperatures.

  • 2700K = 291,650 Lux
  • 4500K = 346,970 Lux
  • 6500K = 356,860 Lux

Conclusion: You can get about 20% more light intensity at 6500K (cool) than at 2700 (warm). If you need maximum light output, choose a cooler color temperature. Note: subject tests done at 4200K, so the light can be slightly brighter than these values.

The second test was to compare the light intensity between the ECO and full modes. Tests done with the reflector in place and at a distance of 1 meter and 3 meter distances. Test done with AC adapter as the power source and at 4200K temperature.

  • ECO mode = 11,980 lux @ 1M | 917 lux @ 3M.
  • FULL mode = 17530 lux @ 1M | 1375 lux @ 3M

Conclusion: you get more than one third more power in the full mode vs eco mode, though obviously at the cost of faster battery use.

The third test was to compare light output using three different power sources: AC adapter, V-mount battery, and built in battery. These test results will be shown as at the source, 1 meter away, and 3 meters away. Tests done at 4200K and with full mode engaged.

  • AC Adapter: at source 348,330 lux | 17530 lux @ 1M | 1375 lux @ 3M
  • V-Mount: at source 335,140 lux | 14340 lux @ 1M | 1296 lux @ 3M
  • Built In Battery: at source 326,090 lux | 12550 lux @ 1M | 1196 lux @ 3M

Conclusion: the AC Adapter produces slightly better results even though technically the V-mount battery is producing 100W of input power as well. Using the V-mount battery gives you a little more output and the AC Adapter will give you the brightest output.

The fourth test determined how much using the softbox reduced light output. This test was done in four different ways – with the diffuser in place, without the diffuser, and then in ECO and Full Modes for each. Tests done at 4200K.

  • Softbox with diffuser and ECO Mode: 1542 lux @ 1M | 139 lux @ 3M
  • Softbox with diffuser and FULL Mode: 1627 lux @ 1M | 190 lux @ 3M
  • Softbox (no diffuser) and ECO Mode: 5087 lux @ 1M | 462 lux @ 3M
  • Softbox (no diffuser) and FULL Mode: 7458 lux @ 1M | 636 lux @ 3M

Conclusion: using the softbox and its variants reduces the amount of light but improves the quality of light (softer, more evenly spread). Use the diffuser if you have the light close to your subject and remove the diffuser if your subject is further away.

Results from Battery Life Tests:

Test #1: Internal Battery Life in ECO Mode:

The test began at 11:31 AM with the internal battery at 100% and the RC-60B running at 100% output. The light was off (battery exhausted) at 12:43 PM for a running time of 72 minutes. Considering the possible variables, that is very close to the claimed run time of 75 minutes in ECO Mode.

If you combine the SmallRig V-mount battery and the internal battery of the RC-60B, you can get nearly 215 minutes of runtime, which is well over 3 1/2 hours. Not bad for a completely portable solution, and using multiple V-mount batteries could extend that significantly.

Test #2: Internal Battery life in FULL Mode:

The test began at 4:45 PM with the internal battery at 100% and the RC-60B running at 100% output in full mode. After 20 minutes the light was still showing 3 out of 4 bars. Went to 2 bars at 25 minutes. At 5:17 (32 minutes) dropped to 80% power to extend life. At roughly 40 minutes the output dropped to 65%. Hit 0 bars at 5:27 PM though light was still running. Light went out at 5:29, or 44 minutes. 45 minutes a bit of an oversell, as that is not all achieved at maximum output…or at all.

Test #3: V-mount battery life in ECO Mode:

I ran RC-60B in ECO mode at 100% output using SmallRig VB-99 Pro Battery. Test started at 9:11 AM with the V-mount at 100% charge. After 20 minutes the V-mount showed 84% charge. It hit 50% charge after 70 minutes. At 11:25 (134 minutes) the V-mount was showing 0% but still outputting full power. At 11:31, the V-mount LCD was off and the RC-60B was running on internal battery. The V-mount battery gave roughly 140 minutes of run time.

Test #4: V-mount battery life in FULL Mode:

Began test using VB-99 Pro Battery at 100% charge at 5:31 PM. Light was at 100% output in FULL mode. After 10 minutes battery life was between 89 and 90%. 75% battery life arrived after 22 minutes, meaning that we should get close to 88 minutes in total. The battery showed 39% at 6:23, 52 minutes in. The light was still going strong at 6:51 (80 minutes), and dropped out at about 7 PM, for about 89 minutes. The V-mount battery will give you nearly 1 1/2 hours of runtime at full, meaning that you can get over 2 hours of full power output combining a V-mount battery (6700 mAh) with the internal battery (3400 mAh).

Portrait Light Test

I’ve always been a fan of fixed lighting for portraiture, as it is makes it very easy (obvious) to see the modeling of the light and also makes focus in a dim space easier than with a strobe. Putting the RC-60B relatively close to the subject and using the softbox and diffuser makes for very nice, very pleasing light.

A CRI rating of 97+ means good color accuracy, obviously important for portrait work.

Using one of these for a hair or key light could be interesting. The light weight would make it easy to put up higher, though the downside is the need to physically access the light to control it.

Video Light Test

There isn’t much challenge here, as the primary purposes of a video light are to provide sufficient output, to be consistent enough to avoid any kind of strobing effect, and preferably to have good options for controlling the light output. Now, to be fair, the inability to use Bowens mount accessories means that you are essentially using the reflector or softbox to modify the light output, though the softbox does give you the option of using a diffuser or honeycomb (both included).

I found the light output and quality sufficient for my video work when lighting the set for some of my YouTube episodes, though I will note that I needed to remove the diffuser from the softbox to project enough light far enough to accomplish my purpose. Obviously having the ability to control the color temperature is nice, though again I really wish for app control to make tweaks to the light’s output or color without having to get up and go to it.

Effects Test

It has become standard for any lights like these to have various lighting effects. These are just modifications of color temperature, duration, and intensity to mimic some of these light sources for video footage. There are nine different effects to access here.

Navigation isn’t as efficient as a touchscreen, but I figured out how to access and modify all of the effects within a couple of minutes. You can modify the intensity, duration, and color temperature on each of them.

The results are pretty standard fare. It’s enough to give a bit of the effect to your video clips, but isn’t anything high end. For most people this will mostly be a gimmick…but you don’t have to use it if you don’t want to. Better that it is included in case you do need it.

Things I Like

  • Portability – can easily be used handheld
  • Flexibility – power options without cords
  • Carrying case – includes spots for optional accessories like PD adapter
  • Included cables are very nice – one perfect length for V-mount, the other 3M/10F for AC Adapter.
  • Battery life long enough to be useful
  • Nice amount of light
  • I love the compact softbox. Still portable, and includes both a diffuser and honeycomb for more lighting flexibility. Good quality of light for different purposes. Very compact when collapsed.
  • Quiet. Very little noise in ECO mode (23db) and not much louder in full mode (26db). I can hear it in an otherwise silent room, but more as light white noise.
  • Price $200 and has built in battery – costs less than some V-mounts this size
  • USB-C chargeable makes recharging on the fly very easy.

Things I Don’t Like

  • No Bluetooth or remote control
  • No Bowens mount
  • Unit automatically reduces output to preserve battery life when internal battery runs low. This could ruin a shoot.

Conclusion

The SmallRig RC-60B is a very appealing light that is small enough to pop into a camera bag and, because of the built in battery, can be easily used for run and gun videography or even portrait/macro photography. Having a USB-C charger makes recharging the battery easy, and this also gives you a huge variety of powering options…many of which are also portable.

The RC-60B can put out a very usable amount of light for many situations. You’ll need multiple lights if you intend to light a full set, but for solo work it is plenty even when used at medium distances. Using the optional softbox and PD AC Adapter do add some additional cost, but also add a lot of extra flexibility.

The biggest negatives are that there is no remote control of the unit (no APP control or DMX), which means using these mounted high is not an option (though, frankly, there are better options for fixed lighting) and no Bowens compatibility. The latter is pretty understandable, however, considering that the Bowen mount is wider in diameter than this whole unit! I also didn’t like the fact that when running the light full powered on internal battery there was a noticeable drop in light output after 32 minutes as the light attempted to not deplete the battery as quickly. I would prefer the light run on full power for 35-37 minutes than it arbitrarily reduce power to try to get to that 45 minute goal (which it didn’t reach anyway!)

Those complaints aside, it is very hard to argue against the value of the SmallRig RC-60B. You typically pay about $179 USD to get a V-mount battery with this capacity, and for $199 USD you are getting the light, a reflector, a nice custom case, cables, a battery mount clamp, and a handle for portable shooting. All of the above save the softbox and the PD Charger are included in the box.

That’s a great value, and I genuinely enjoy the light and in particular it’s portability and flexibility. If you’re looking for a versatile LED light for video (and even portrait) work, the SmallRig RC-60B is a very intriguing option.

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the SmallRig RC-60B @ SmallRig | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: SmallRig, COB, RC-60B, LED, Video, 60W, Built In Battery, RA-D30, Softbox, VB-99, V-Mount, Video Light, Portrait, Review, Studio, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA, #smallrig

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Rotolight AEOS Dual-Mode Light Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

March 2nd, 2019

I’ve spent time with a lot of different lights since becoming a reviewer.  They typically fall into one of two categories.  They are either A) portable flashes/strobes for photography or B) fixed or continuous lights for videography.  Some of the more recent continuous lights have had the option to be run off batteries, which helps them to, at the least, provide some field value, though rarely anything like what a strobe can provide.  But never before have I reviewed a light that has the capability of doing both continuous lighting and strobing…until now.  The Rotolight AEOS lighting system is uniquely both a high end continuous broadcast quality light with a substantial light output while also functioning as a HSS strobe (complete with Elinchrom Skyport wireless built-in).  In fact, my title image for this page is a self-portrait using an Elinchrom Skyport wireless trigger on the Sony a7RIII to strobe the shot.  The flexibility of the Rotolight AEOS system for hybrid photographers/videographers or location photographers is endless, from various lighting modes and colors to even special effects like fire, lighting, strobing, police flashing lights, and more…  I’ll cover more in my video review, but these image galleries pay tribute to the various ways you can use the AEOS for all kinds of photography along with video work.

Check me out on:  Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px

Photos of the Rotolight AEOS

Rotolight AEOS Product Photography

Rotolight AEOS Portrait Photography

Rotolight AEOS Macro Photography

 

Purchase the Rotolight AEOS Location Light @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Visit Rotolight.com for more information
Purchase the V-Mount Battery @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV (5D4): B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Sigma MC-11 Adapter:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK
Peak Design Slide Lite: 
Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK

BenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo  | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X4 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)
Visit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gear

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:  My Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px |  Google+ |






 

Use Code “DUSTINHDR” to get $10 off ($15 CDN) Luminar and/or AuroraHDR

 

Purchase the Rotolight AEOS Location Light @ B&H Photo https://bhpho.to/2IK7mqV | Amazon https://amzn.to/2EGy0wU | Amazon Canada https://amzn.to/2Sy3YiB | Amazon UK https://amzn.to/2C3sB1f | Amazon Germany https://amzn.to/2EGozh9 | Visit Rotolight.com for more information:  https://www.rotolight.com/

Purchase the V-Mount Battery @ B&H Photo https://bhpho.to/2IM2Zfh | Amazon https://amzn.to/2EELXeH | Amazon UK https://amzn.to/2NFOGI0 | Amazon Germany https://amzn.to/2Xy2rg5

Keywords: Rotolight, Rotolight AEOS, AEOS Review, Rotolight AEOS Review, AEOS, Review, Dustin Abbott, HSS, Flash, Strobe, LED, Elinchrom, Skyport, Videography, Photography, Location Photography, Bi-color, Bi-Colour, Accu-Colour, Portrait, Video, Video Test, Product Photography, Macro, Broadcast Lighting, Portraiture, V-Mount, Effects, XFX

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM Review

Dustin Abbott

August 15th, 2017

Last year Canon introduced a novel concept that might have been lost on a lot of Canon shooters due to it being implemented on a lens for Canon’s mirrorless EOS M system – the EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM that I reviewed here. That concept was a macro lens with a built-in LED ring light to help illuminate subjects. Macro photography is notoriously demanding for light; effective aperture changes at close focus distances (becoming smaller and requiring more light), and, with lenses that can focus so closely, there is often some shadowing of the subject by the lens/camera. Canon introduced an interesting solution to this problem that didn’t require big, bulky external flashes or some other lighting solution in the form of small LED ring lights built into the front of the lens itself on both the right and left sides. The low power draw and flexible nature of LEDs made this viable from an engineering perspective. And it works, at least in a limited way. I was impressed in most ways by the EF-M lens; it was compact, sharp, and versatile. So, when Canon announced this lens – the EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM – I felt it was a natural way to bring this concept to a larger audience. In this review we will explore whether or not the 35 Macro is the lens for you.

Prefer to watch your reviews? I’ve got you covered. See my detailed video review here:

Who is the 35 Macro For?

Before proceeding, let’s first deal with Canon’s existing macro prime lens for the EF-S (APS-C/crop sensor) lens mount (which includes the Rebel/xxD/Kiss line, the XXD line [60/70/80D], and even the 7D series). The EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro USM is a more traditional focal length for a macro lens, with a full frame equivalent of 96mm – very similar to Canon’s multiple 100mm full frame macro options. It is a [relatively] older design, introduced in 2005, and is a lens I personally owned for years when I primarily shot APS-C. Since that point, Canon has developed two new priorities that the older 60mm lens is missing. The first is Canon’s “Hybrid IS (Image Stabilization)” that debuted with the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L IS Macro USM. It was an image stabilization system that was designed to not just cope with camera movement at typical focus distances but also with the unique stresses that macro shooting provides. While no IS system is perfect at macro distances, this made a huge difference in allowing for fairly effective hand-held macro shots (something very difficult with non-stabilized macro lenses). The second, more recent shift is due to the development of Canon’s DPAF focus system (Contrast AF), and, more specifically, the ability to have servo AF (autofocus) during video recording.

Canon’s USM focus motors are great for stills. True ring USM provides a lot of torque for quick, accurate focus. But the nature of the focus system becomes a disadvantage when shooting video. Focus shifts aren’t very smooth, and the focus motor is often noisy, with clicks and pulses that diminish both video and sound quality. Canon developed its STM (stepping motor) technology for this very reason, and it emphasizes smooth focus transitions. STM motors are also much quieter during video focus. Canon has made progress with the speed of focus in its STM motors for stills capture, too.

The 35 Macro includes these modern touches, but in a different type of focal length that is effective for different things. Canon’s press release says this, “The EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM from Canon is a 56mm-equivalent prime lens designed for APS-C-format DSLRs. Offering a life-size 1:1 maximum magnification and a 5.1″ minimum focusing distance, this lens further distinguishes itself with an integrated Macro Lite LED on the front of the lens to provide additional illumination to close-up subjects. Aiding its ability to reproduce small subjects at life size, the optical design incorporates one aspherical element to reduce spherical aberrations in order to provide a high degree of sharpness and clarity.

Benefitting the optical attributes is a Hybrid IS image stabilization system that serves to minimize the appearance of camera shake for sharper results when working handheld and in difficult lighting conditions. A lead screw-type STM stepping motor also benefits handling by producing fast, smooth, and quiet autofocus performance to suit both stills and video applications. This AF motor can be manually overridden at any time by turning the dedicated focusing ring for making fine-tuned adjustments.”

A 96mm equivalent (EF-S 60mm) has different strengths and weaknesses than a 56mm equivalent (EF-S 35mm). I’ll quickly detail those to help you if you are trying to choose which lens suits your needs more. The 60mm lens is a great dual-purpose macro/portrait lens. It is extremely sharp, and the combination of the longer focal length and similar maximum aperture allows you to shoot portraits with the background more blurred (some compression from the longer focal length). It will be the preferred lens for shooting insects or flowers due to being able to have a narrower angle of view (backgrounds less busy) and a little longer working distance (how far you can be from your subject and still fill the frame). Potential downsides will be if you want to shoot video you will definitely find the USM motor detrimental both in the quality of focus and the noise. There are also situations where a longer focal length makes for a less versatile lens for general purpose shooting. If your priorities are mostly stills and you would like the lens to double as an effective portrait lens, then I think the EF-S 60mm Macro is a good choice.

The 35 Macro has different strengths. It is smaller (a half inch shorter at 2.2”/55.8mm vs 2.75”/68.8mm) and lighter (6.7 oz/190g vs 11.8oz/335g). Neither lens is big or heavy, but if you want to travel light, the 35 Macro is the winner (and also will be better suited to using on Canon’s mirrorless (EOS M) via the adapter. It has the STM motor, which will give much quieter, smoother video performance while offering roughly similar speed for stills (in this particular lens). It has built in IS (Image Stabilization), which will make it much easier to shoot hand-held macro and general purpose shots along with being better suited for video. It is roughly $100 cheaper. It also has the built-in LED ring “lite” (Canon speak), which has some value in a limited application. But it is the focal length that may be the biggest point of distinction. The EF-S 60mm is a medium telephoto, with all of the strengths and weaknesses that come with that. The longer focal length and no stabilizer will be more challenging for doing handheld macro but will also provide a field of view too narrow for doing things like food photography in many situations.  Even in my Angler Port-a-Cube light tent that I shoot product photography in, I find shooting some products difficult with a longer focal length, and I sometimes use the Tamron 45mm f/1.8 VC in that situation mostly because of the more advantageous focal length.  The 35 Macro certainly could fill that role well.

I included this section mostly to give you an opportunity to seriously consider what lens would serve your actual photography needs best.  Both are excellent lenses in their own right, but they by nature suit different needs.

Build, Design, and Features

If you have used Canon’s newer 50mm f/1.8 STM lens, then you have a pretty good idea of the build of the 35 Macro.  It is extremely lightweight (6.7oz/190g), which is pretty amazing when you consider that this is a full 1:1 macro lens, has IS, and also has the built in LED lights.  Like the 50mm f/1.8 STM, it feels fairly “plasticky”.  Like that lens it shares a matte-type finish.  The lens mount appears to be metal but, if so, is an extremely lightweight one.  As noted, the lens is really quite compact.  It has two switches on the side of the barrel (AF/MF and ON/OFF for the IS system).  There is also a small button for enabling the built in LED lights, which we will examine more closely in a moment.  Finally, there is a single ring closer to the front of the barrel for manual focus.  Since this is an STM lens it lacks any kind of distance window or distance markings.  

STM Observations

On that note:  STM lenses are really designed primarily around autofocus, and, of course, for many people, that’s all they need.  But when you need to manually focus (which is a more common occurrence with macro lenses), STM lenses number among my least favorite to manually focus.  Why?  Because STM employs a “focus by wire” manual focus system, where input from the MF ring is routed through the focus motor and it is the focus motor that actually moves the elements.  This requires the camera to be on and not in sleep mode, and while you have full time manual override, the shutter button must be half depressed before it will recognize any input.  You would be surprised how many times I’ve had people ask me if their lens is broken for the simple reason that when they turn the MF ring nothing is happening.  Even when you know how the system works, however, the focus-by-wire system still disappoints, as there is both some input lag that makes fine tuning (crucial for macro) frustrating at times and also because there is no real tactile input from the focus ring, which essentially just endlessly turns.  STM implementation has improved somewhat, but it still is far from perfect.

Those using one of Canon’s more recent DSLR’s that include their excellent touchscreen will have the best experience, as using Live View focus and the touchscreen allows one to select a focus area without being concerned if an AF point is on it.  Magnifying the image gives you even more finite control.  Still, hardcore macro shooters (focus stackers, for example), might prefer a different macro option.

On a positive note, while STM originally prioritized smoothness of focus over speed, this lens actually focuses very quickly.  Canon calls this a “lead screw type STM”, which indicates to me that there are a few different approaches to STM and might be the reason that recent STM lenses have had greater focus speed.  It’s impressive, actually, when one considers how much bigger the focus range is for a lens that can focus down to just a few inches (5.1″ from the sensor!).  I found that I could go from macro range, bring the camera up, and shoot towards infinity with very little focus lag at all.  The lens lacks any kind of focus limiter, so being able to quickly “rack” focus is definitely important.  The smoothness and quiet focusing of the STM motor also makes it an excellent option for video work.

I had zero complaints about autofocus accuracy, too.  The lens snapped on focus confidently and accurately, and I didn’t really see any focus misses during my review period.  This shot, for example, shows the excellent focus accuracy of the lens:

On my canon EOS 80D test body the copy I reviewed required no focus calibration at all, which is somewhat rare in my experience.  So, outside of my continued disappointment with the nature of STM lenses for manual focus, I was generally very pleased with the autofocus performance of the lens.

Hybrid IS and LED “Lites”

Starting with the Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS (a lens I own and love) Canon began implementing a new type of IS (Image Stabilization) system for macro lenses (and a few others with very close focus abilities).  Macro distances require greater precision, as effective apertures close, light often diminishes, and any kind of blur occupies many more pixels due to the close focus.  Macro work basically required the use of a tripod (and, to be fair, a tripod still produces the best results).  But Canon’s hybrid IS system was designed to not only compensate for camera shake at normal distances but also the unique types of movement often associated with macro work.  As a result, it became much easier to do handheld macro shots.  This lens in some ways makes it even easier due to the shorter focal length.  The IS system is quite effective in all settings, from normal distance to macro to video work.  It is extremely quiet and unobtrusive, with no jerking during on/off transitions and no obvious noises that would impact video.  Combine this with one of Canon’s newest bodies that offers in body image stabilization during video work and you could get nicely clean results.

The most relevant metric for me with a lens like this is whether or not I can get good macro results “on the fly”, and this handheld photo is evidence that you certainly can with the 35 Macro.

The key feature for this lens is the built in “Macro Lite” LEDs.  Take a look at this video for a closer look.

 

From Canon, “Built-in front-facing Macro Lite LED can be used to produce additional illumination to subjects when working at close distances. The light can be configured to illuminate only the right or left side, or both sides, and the brightness can be adjusted in order to produce greater visual depth and reduce shadows caused by the close proximity of the lens to the subject.”  There are essentially six options (other than off) for the lighting.  There are two brightness options with both lights illuminated (they form a shape like this ( ) on either side of the front element).  You can also choose to select either side alone at either of the two brightness levels.

It’s important to have realistic expectations for the amount of light coming from “Macro Lites”, as they are really designed around a specific purpose.  At portrait distances they will make almost no difference at all.  Canon doesn’t provide a rating, but the amount of light will not make much of a difference at any distance beyond about three feet.  Look at the comparisons at several  different focus distances – this is with the lights in their brightest mode.  The comparison images are with the light turned off.

This comparison shows the difference between the two light settings:

I’ve mentioned the challenges associated with macro shooting and light.  Physics means that less light reaches the sensor anyway at macro distances, but there’s also a strong possibility of the camera/lens combo also shading your subject due to the extremely close focus distance (at minimum focus distance the subject is no more than 2 inches from the end of this lens, as the minimum focus distance of 5.12″/13cm is measured from the camera’s sensor, not the end of the lens).  This is where the built in lighting system is really effective.  It gives you back some of the lost light at macro distances, and with some control over the output and even direction of the light by allowing you to power only one side light if desired.  I particularly find this helpful for doing quick, hand-held macro work.  More light equals a faster shutter speed which in turn means less chance for your image to be negatively impacted by motion blur.  Here’s an image that was helped by utilizing the Macro Lites:

I think you will be pleased with the difference these lights can make as long as you have realistic expectations.  In certain situations they can make a very positive difference.  Watch out for situations where you have a shiny, reflective surface, however, as since they are fixed into the lens there is no opportunity to position them in such a way to minimize reflections.

The addition of the built in LED lights means that there isn’t room for traditional filter threads on the 35 Macro.  Canon solves this by including a “lens hood” (ES-27) that is really more of an adapter to add filter threads in a 49mm size.  It screws in at the front of the lens and will provide a [very] small amount of shading from external light but primarily serves to allow you to use filters.  Note that this is an either/or thing, as the adapter will cover the LED lights and you will not be able to use both filters and the lights.  The adapter is shaped somewhat like a rear lens cap, which gives the lens an unusual profile when attached.  It’s a functional solution to the problem of not having traditional filter threads on the front of the lens, but the other obvious downside is that you have to remember to bring it along.

I’ve now used two lenses from Canon with this approach to adding light to macro situations, and I do feel that the “Macro Lites” are more than a gimmick as long as you use them within the limited scope of their effectiveness.

35 Macro Image Quality

Macro lenses by nature tend to be very sharp lenses (resolving fine details at macro distances requires it), and the 35 Macro is no exception.  If you would like to see a detailed visual breakdown of the image quality, watch this video:

 

I compared it to the sharpest 35mm lens that I’ve ever used, the Canon EF 35mm f/1.4L II, and when I shot them at equivalent apertures (the 35L II is stopped down two full stops at f/2.8 and is entering optimal performance) I was pleasantly surprised to find the inexpensive 35 Macro reasonably held its own.  In the center the full frame lens showed a little more contrast, but resolution was fairly close.  At the edges of the frame that 35L II was definitely the stronger of the two.  Here’s a look at the f/2.8 comparison with crops from across the frame.

With both lenses stopped down to f/4, however, the gap closed, and the 35L II’s advantage in the extreme corners was smaller, and, by f/5.6, they delivered roughly equal performance.  

In real world shooting I saw plenty of detail in images at all focus distances.  This is one of the sharpest EF-S lenses that Canon has made.  

I was also pleased with other areas of lens performance.  I saw very little chromatic aberration in field conditions, making that essentially a non-factor for your work.

Flare resistance was also quite good, with minimal amounts of ghosting and/or veiling.

While testing for this I also found that the seven-bladed aperture produced a sunburst effect that I consider quite exceptional.  Very artistically usefully for adding an extra touch to images!

I found that images had very nice contrast and color rendition at all aperture values, making this a versatile lens for shooting in a variety of conditions.  Combine this with very pleasing bokeh rendering and you have a lens with the potential for creating a lot of beautiful images.

While the quality of the bokeh is excellent at all focus distances, the potential for creating a lot of background blur is limited by the combination of a relatively short focal length (35mm or 56mm FF equivalency) and a moderately wide maximum aperture (f/2.8).  At close focus distances you can easily blur out the background:

But if you move back just a foot or two, the background blur really diminishes, leaving the potential for busyness:

It also limits the options for shooting portraits.  At a distance of around twelve feet (roughly 4 meters), there is little blurring of the background even at f/2.8 in this quick portrait of my son.  The quality of the blur that is there is good, but there isn’t much of it.  This is where a longer focal length would be handy to allow for a more defocused background.  

The lens does have some vignette at f/2.8, but it is mostly cleared up by f/4.

Distortion is quite well controlled, with only the smallest hint of barrel distortion.  This should be a straight line – and it basically is:

All in all the optical performance from the lens is excellent, particularly when one considers its relatively inexpensive price point.  I recommend that you take a look at the Image Galleries for more samples that I’ve taken.

 

Conclusion

From the reaction (or lack thereof) to this lens (and my coverage) on my social media and YouTube channels, I can surmise that this lens is “flying under the radar” compared to other high profile lenses and cameras it is competing in press coverage for.  It’s a shame, as this one of Canon’s better EF-S lens releases.  The compact size and light weight of the 35 Macro make it a very nice option for the Rebel and SL lines, and I think it is worthy of consideration for those who own one of Canon’s mirrorless options, too.  The build quality feels somewhat “plasticky”, but that too contributes to the light weight.  Everything works as it should, with speedy (and accurate) autofocus, excellent image quality, and genuine usefulness.  The greatest downsides to a lens like this (in my opinion) are really the limitations of this focus length and maximum aperture, which essentially require you to be very close to your subject to generate much blurring of the background.  The “Macro Lites” are also useful, but within that same limited proximity to your subject.  The Hybrid IS system allows for fairly effective handheld macro and will also increase the usefulness of this lens for video work.  The Canon EF-S 35mm Macro f/2.8 IS STM is also reasonably priced ($349 in the US Market), making it an easy pick if the nature of the lens suits your needs.  If you are looking for a “normal” focal length lens that also doubles as an excellent 1:1 macro lens, then look no further – the 35mm Macro IS lens is what you’ve been looking for!

Pros:

  • Excellent image quality at all apertures
  • Good contrast and color rendition
  • Nice quality of bokeh
  • Autofocus is speedy and accurate
  • Hybrid IS system works effectively and quietly
  • Macro Lites are useful when used within their limits

Cons:

  • STM manual focus action isn’t as precise…and macro shooters like to manually focus
  • Potential for creating background blur is limited
  • Build quality feels cheap
  • Macro Lites have limited range

Gear Used:
Canon EOS 80D: B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon.ca
Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS: B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon.ca 
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :



Travel Banner:

Get Spare Cards and Readers Steady up your Shots Get a Tripod Protect your Gear Get Bags and Cases Dont forget that Lens Select a Spare Camera Check out all of the Photo Gear youll need.

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

July 11th, 2017

Canon has just released a brand new lens for it’s EF-S (APS-C crop sensor) cameras – the new Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS.  This lens offers a different approach to macro than the existing EF-S 60mm f/2.8 USM lens.  It has a wider focal length, Image Stabilization, an STM focus motor, and a unique built-in LED light similar to the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 IS STM lens I reviewed for Canon’s mirrorless system.  I will be bringing you my signature detailed real world review before long, but in the mean time enjoy these galleries that I’ll be adding to as my review progresses.  The EF-S 35mm Macro promises to be a nice choice for those doing video (IS + STM) along with those doing food or product photography where they need a wider focal length.

Photos of the Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM

Photos taken with the Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS STM

Gear Used:
Canon EOS 80D: B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon.ca
Canon EF-S 35mm f/2.8 Macro IS: B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon.ca 
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :



Get Spare Cards and Readers Steady up your Shots Get a Tripod Protect your Gear Get Bags and Cases Dont forget that Lens Select a Spare Camera Check out all of the Photo Gear youll need.

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Review

Dustin Abbott

August 9th, 2016

Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Review

Intro:  A 28mm Macro?

Wow! It feels like a very long time since I’ve held a new Canon EF-M lens. Canon’s release schedule of lenses for its mirrorless system has been, ahem, rather sparse. The system launched with two lenses (Canon EF-M 22mm f/2 STM and 18-55mm f/3.5-5.6 IS STM) in June 2012, but the next lens (the very well regarded EF-M 11-22mm f/4-5.6 IS STM) didn’t arrive until 2013 (and wasn’t released in the United States until 2015), then the 55-200mm f/4.5-6.3 IS STM in 2014 (ditto on the US release), and then the 15-45mm f/3.5-6.3 IS STM in 2015. I skipped that last lens, as it held little interest for me. Four years from the release of the first M system and we still had only one prime lens…and no dedicated macro option. That finally changed in July of 2016 with the release of the lens at hand, the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 IS STM.  Is the 28mm Macro the lens we’ve been looking for?

Many EOS M shooters (myself included) have been clamoring for a dedicated macro lens for the EF-M for some time. In my mind it seemed logical for Canon to produce a mirrorless version of its excellent EF-S 60mm f/2.8 Macro lens, and so I was bit nonplussed by the announcement of this lens. I wasn’t ecstatic over its focal length (too short) or its slowish maximum aperture (f/3.5). I expected the lens to be optically good (all the EF-M lenses have been) and light/compact, but wasn’t particularly interested by the basic specs.

But as the details emerged on the lens my interest grew. My initial disappointments are still a factor in the final outcome of this review, but I am happy to say that Canon has managed to design a very compelling lens despite those shortcomings. It all comes down to one significant factor: innovation.

In the following video review I deliver my conclusions.  If you  prefer to watch your reviews, click the video below.

Build, Design, and Specifications

 

The basic build of the 28mm Macro is pretty much what you would expect. Canon’s design language for the EF-M lenses is very good. The lens has a sleek, modern look in an almost gunmetal finish with a knurled grip section and focus ring to break up the satin fish of the barrel. As per usual for STM lenses there are no distance markings or focus window. That may be more of a factor here than usual, as most EF-M lenses with STM are unlikely to be manually focused very much. But macro shooters are much more likely to use a manual focus ring, and having no visual indicator on the barrel of focus position may be a disappointment.  Fortunately the touch screen of the M system makes selecting your exact choice of focus point easier. The knurled grip section has thrown me more than once, as it feels like it should be either the focus ring (or when the brain is switched off, a zoom ring). What it actually is turns out to be the portion of the barrel used to either retract or extend the lens for shooting (this is a retractable lens design), and this section is four times as wide as the tiny textured section on the focus ring near the front of the barrel.

The one thing that occupies any real estate in that middle knurled section is the release for the lens. It is a retractable design, which aids in it being very compact. If you don’t have the lens extended into shooting position you will get a message on the screen which says, “Set the lens to the shooting position”. The lens will not focus until you have complied. The lens extends about a half inch further out when in shooting position. There are two shooting positions. The first is simply noted with a white notch on the barrel, while the second is labelled “Super Macro”. I’ll detail the second mode more in a moment, but I will note here that this represents what I believe to be the chief engineering flaw in the lens design. The Super Macro mode has a very limited focus range (only a few inches), and so does not support full focus to infinity. The full focus range is available in the normal shooting position. The problem lies in the fact that due to the retractable nature of the lens, you must use the release switch and then rotate that middle section of the barrel to extend the lens to shoot with. The action is nice and smooth, but the real problem is that there isn’t a strong defined detent for the normal mode. It is exceptionally easy to move right past it to the hard stop…which is Super Macro mode. I missed multiple shots where I was trying to quickly get into shooting position to capture some moment only to discover that I couldn’t focus more than a few inches from the lens. Frustrating! Canon should have made the detent for the normal shooting mode (full range of focus) more definite so that you could had to purposefully (not accidentally) move beyond it to Super Macro mode. This was perhaps my single greatest frustration in real world use of the lens.  The white line before the Super Macro mode represents the normal shooting position.

The 28mm Macro is both short (1.79”/45.5mm in length) and light (4.59oz/130g). While not as tiny as the 22mm f/2 lens the lens is remarkably compact and its light weight proved almost unnoticeable when packing it around. I actually climbed down a mountain for nearly three hours with it mounted on the EOS M3 carried in one hand and couldn’t have been bothered to return it to my backpack…the combo is that light.

Canon’s first few EF-M lenses had an improved build quality over their EF-S siblings, up to and including metal mounts. Canon has departed from that formula with the last few EF-M lenses, though, and while the build quality still feels a bit better than many EF-S lenses the 28mm Macro sports a plastic bayonet mount with “Made In Taiwan” subtly stamped there. Gone are the days when EF-M lenses were made in Japan. The good news is that the very light weight of the lens means that relatively little stress will be put on that mount, so it probably isn’t really a problem. Still, I always prefer seeing a metal mount.  This lens is pretty close to being a “plastic fantastic” in its build.

That lightweight build contributes to it being a very useful walkaround lens…as does the focal length.

Ah yes, the focal length. My brain works in full frame, so when I heard 28mm I was immediately disappointed, as I thought moderately wide focal length and tiny working distance for macro. One of those is true (working distance), but the other is not. All lenses, including Canon’s EF (full frame), EF-S (APS-C or crop sensor), or EF-M (mirrorless APS-C) are affected by the crop factor of the body they are mounted on. Some people get confused by this and think that EF-S lenses state their “true” focal length and it is only full frame lenses that are affected by the crop factor. That’s not true. An EF-S 28mm lens or an EF 28mm lens are the same focal length (28mm), but both will be affected by the crop factor of the camera they are mounted on. The full frame lens might be mounted on a full frame body, where it will have an effective focal length of…wait for it…28mm. There is no crop factor on a full frame body, which is why it is called “full frame”.

Mount that 28mm same lens (or this EF-M lens) on a crop sensor body (Canon’s APS-C camera bodies have a 1.6x crop factor) and it has effective focal length of 44.8mm. Call it 45mm. In other words, almost perfectly equating the focal length of the human eye. This is called a “normal lens”, and there’s a reason why 50mm lenses are so popular. The applications for this kind of focal length are virtually endless, and you will probably find that it just feels “right” in many applications.

A 50mm(ish) lens with the ability to focus down as close as you could want is very, very useful. I found the 28mm Macro to be a great walkaround lens in a lot of ways (save one big one!)

I mentioned one thing that limits this lens as a walkaround lens, and here it is: that maximum aperture really isn’t very, ahem, maximum. While at macro distances the depth of field of 28mm (45mm equivalent) is appropriately small, the depth of field at portrait distances is rather poor. At 28mm and f/3.5 the depth of field is almost 2 feet (58cm) deep at a fairly close 6 foot focus distance. In other words, there isn’t a tremendous amount of separation from the background. Backgrounds will not be blurred away. The EF-S 60mm at f/2.8 and the same distances has a depth of field of just .33ft/10cm – nearly six times as shallow! My point? When I walk around with a prime lens it is typically because I want to play with depth of field. I want to create shallow depth of field shots to tell my story. The smallish maximum aperture of the 28mm Macro stifled my creativity a bit, and also meant that I had to crank the ISO up when shooting indoors.

If you don’t need to blur away backgrounds, this isn’t a big deal, but often macro lenses double as great portrait lenses, and the 28mm Macro disappoints somewhat in this application.

Innovative Features of the 28mm Macro

Canon has helped make this lens much more exciting than the raw specs due to several innovative features. The 28mm Macro has three innovative features up its tiny sleeves. One helps to solve the problem created by such a short focal length and the resulting very small working distance.

And that working distance is tiny.

The lens can focus down to 3.7”/9.3cm…but that is from the sensor, not the end of the lens. If I measure from the sensor (look for the circle with a horizontal line through it on the top of your camera) with the lens in the extended (shooting) position, I find that the lens extends out 8cm (nearly 3.25”) from the sensor, which gives you a working distance of about a centimeter (.4inches). Pretty much on top of the subject.

Enter innovation #1 – a built in LED ring light. On each side of the lens there is a half-moon light that, when both are on, looks a bit like the “partial metering” symbol on your camera. Despite look intently through the manual and available literate, I have been unable to nail down a rating of light output, but it isn’t bright enough to make much of a difference outside of a few feet. At best it can make a somewhat unique catch light at portrait distances, but won’t really alter exposure value on your subject’s face. See the unique little catch light in the cat’s eye?

But that’s not what it is for. When used for its intended purpose (adding some fill light to macro subjects), it can make a good deal of difference.

The light is activated by a small button on the upper left side of the lens barrel. There are two different brightness intensities with both lights activated, but you can also choose to activate only one of the “Macro Lites” (Canon speak) on either side and at either intensity setting (Canon calls these Dim and Bright). Changing up which light you use (and/or what intensity setting) can subtly alter the play of shadows and light.  Here’s a little series of the same shot with the “lites” in different mode.  The first shot features no light on, and shows the difference the lights make:

There’s a surprising amount of versatility at your fingertips, and this innovation makes the tiny working distance a little easier to cope with. I feel like Canon did a good job implementing this feature, though those accustomed to using a dedicated macro ring light will undoubtedly be disappointed by the relatively meager light output. The lights will extinguish when the camera goes to sleep (and will only power on when the camera is powered on). Using the lights will also burn a bit extra battery. Your last setting on the light will not be remembered, so the cycle will always be the same.

The inclusion of the Macro Lites means that there are no traditional filter threads for the lens, though Canon has helped to solve that problem by the inclusion of the ES-22 lens hood. I know that Canon never includes lens hoods with its EF-M or EF-S lenses, but don’t get your hopes up that this trend has changed. This tiny device is more of a filter adapter than lens hood. It provides almost no lens shading that I can tell, but does allow for the use of 43mm screw in filters. The lens hood/adapter threads in and covers the section where the Macro Lites are. That makes this an either/or experience. The lights will be completely blocked/sealed off by the ES-22 adapter. In fact, you might want to be careful to not activate the lights, as they will just burn battery and you won’t really be able to tell that they are on. I’m left to wonder how often people will remember to pack the ES-22 along…I’m guessing it will get forgotten at home pretty frequently. Still, kudos to Canon for thinking about this and trying to accommodate.

The second innovation is the inclusion of the Super Macro mode. While I’ve already lamented the engineering execution of accessing this mode, its inclusion is a genuinely useful feature. It allows for a greater than 1:1 reproduction value. Instead of a 1.0x times magnification, it actually extends magnification to 1.2x; greater than life size. Yes, this little lens can produce higher magnification than my Canon EF 100mm f/2.8L Macro IS (natively). Super Macro mode works essentially like an extension tube. It allows for closer focus at the cost of eliminating infinity focus. Focus is limited to just a few inches beyond the end of the lens, but it does allow for even more magnification…and autofocus continues to work. Due to the extremely narrow depth of field at these focus distances you will probably get better results with a tripod; handholding is tough! Canon recommends using Servo AF focus at macro distances. The lens is not compatible with traditional extenders or extension tubes, but having the equivalent of an extension tube built right in is very handy.  Here’s a look at the manual for the lens at six inches and then at super close distances.  The amount of magnification is impressive!

The third innovation is a little more common. The 28mm Macro includes Canon’s Hybrid IS, a stabilization system that helps with both angle and shift camera shake/movement.  While Hybrid IS is more effective than traditional IS systems at macro distances you should know that no IS system is as effective at macro distances than at normal shooting distances.  That is true of all lenses. The 28mm Macro’s Hybrid IS system is very helpful, however, and I shot basically all of the images in this review handheld…including the macro images. I shot a nicely sharp waterfall image while handholding a .5 second exposure (to blur the water). That seemed to be my limit, though. I tried on multiple occasions to go one step further (.4 seconds) but without success. The inclusion of the Hybrid IS system makes this a decent option for shooting video on your M/M2/M3/M10 body.

All in all this a very feature rich little lens, and it is those features that helped to elevate my interest and makes it a more compelling option than it would otherwise be.

Autofocus

Those of you who have followed my work know my love/hate relationship with STM. I won’t beat that same drum here, but the key element that affects this particular lens is the lack of a focus distance window and no real tactile feedback from manual focus. The EOS M3 body I’m using for review makes it very easy to switch in and out of manual focus (good, as there is no AF/MF switch on this lens), but manually focusing will take a little trial and error until you get accustomed to the lens.  STM (Stepping Motor) uses the focus motor to drive focus even during manual focus, and there is often a bit of lag between your physical movement and the resulting change of focus.  I found on more than one occasion that I focused past my intended focus point because the focus hadn’t yet “caught up” to my input.  The focus ring itself, though narrow, is easy to find (right at the end of the lens) and moves easily.

The autofocus on the 28mm Macro itself is fairly quick, and typical distance focus changes come quickly. Going from macro ranges to infinity is going to take a bit longer, but I was pleasantly surprised by how quickly the lens racked focus.  I got consistently well focused results for the most part, though the M system still slows down in poor lighting conditions.

One area where I was disappointed by the lens (or camera) is when shooting at medium (portrait) distances, particularly with a relatively busy scene beyond. The camera was frequently distracted by the background with this lens mounted, even when putting the focus box right on the face of the subject. There were times that I switched to MF and 10x magnify to get the result I wanted or tried to magnify the image and make the camera refocus.  I’m more apt to blame the still-not-there focus system of the M series than the lens.  Here’s an example of focus missed (which it did nearly every time in this kind of situation).

Overall the 28mm Macro delivered in the AF department, for the most part, and it was great to be able to switch from landscape scenes while hiking to shooting a macro shot of a daisy nearby within moments of each other.

Perhaps someday Canon will have a mirrorless body that has a killer AF system (and actually tracks), but it has not arrived yet. I expect greater results from lenses like this when/if Canon delivers DPAF in its mirrorless systems.

28mm Macro Image Quality

This is the bottom line for many of us. Fortunately the 28mm Macro delivers very nicely. Macro lenses are sharp by nature, and this one is no exception. Check out this crop of the tiny “hairs” on the stamen on this blossom:

What stands out for me, however, is the color rendition. I’ve been really impressed by the “look” of the images coming out of this lens. Deep, rich color, nice contrast, and a general “feel” to the images that I would often equate with a Zeiss lens. I found the lens to be an excellent travel companion, and I came back from a trip to Mont Tremblant, Quebec (which I chose as a review destination) with a portfolio of images (and memories) that I’m really, really happy with.  If you’d like to see more of my Tremblant images and read why it is such a great photography destination, click here. The lens has excellent micro contrast, which will be helpful not only for those looking to occasionally reproduce text but anyone who wants “pop” from their images.

I was similarly impressed by the great resolution at distance.  I shot a number of landscapes of scenes with a lot of depth to them, and it was great to see how well the distant details were resolved.  This is a lens that images look good from when viewed at high resolution.  Here’s one example (check out the distant details in the crop):

Wide open there is some noticeable vignette (no standard Lightroom/ACR profile existed at the time of my review), though it’s far from record breaking. Stopping down to f/4 helps some, and it is essentially gone for field purposes (save in the very extreme corners) by f/5.6. I’m seeing only the very slightest hint of barrel distortion when I shoot a brick wall, but not enough to really warrant correction. No nasty surprises in either department.

The low distortion helps aid this lens as a walkaround option as I found it very easy to stitch together images from it into panoramas when I needed more width.  The high resolution of the lens paired with the high resolution of the EOS M3’s 24MP sensor resulted in panoramas with massive amounts of resolution.  Here are a few examples:

After shooting hundreds and hundreds of images I’ve yet to see any observable field chromatic aberrations.  They just aren’t there. CA seems to be exceptionally well controlled. The lens retains excellent contrast when pointed at the sun and has only a bit of ghosting. The lens has seven aperture blades and produces a pleasing if not exceptional sunburst when stopped down.

The optical formula for the lens is fairly complex but not excessive 11 elements in 10 groups. My Canon 100L Macro is 15 elements in 12 groups. The optical formula is clearly getting the job done.

The resolution from the lens at all apertures is quite impressive. This is, perhaps, the sharpest EF-M lens produced thus far. I’m impressed by its performance both at macro distances and as a landscape option at infinity. Canon has delivered a strong optical instrument to us in the 28mm Macro.  Space does not permit here to share enough images, so I strongly recommend that you visit the Image Gallery here and see more for yourself!

Conclusion

Canon has confounded the “armchair generals” once again. This isn’t the lens that we asked for, but after having used it, I have to conclude that the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM might just be the lens that we need. Yes, I would have preferred a longer focal length for macro work, but the nearly perfect “normal” angle of view provided by this lens makes it a very versatile lens than what a lens with a longer focal length would have. I found it a very versatile travel option that really delivered a lot of stunningly good images in a tiny package. I would have liked a wider aperture, but realize that having one would have compromised the compact nature of the lens…which is a delight. That being said, my one optical complaint is that I feel trying to create a shallow depth of field for non-macro shots is limited with the 28mm Macro. The inclusion of the “Macro Lites” and Super Macro mode are better than gimmicks and I think will prove genuinely useful when used in the right way. I do wish the engineers had put in a stronger detent at the normal shooting spot so that I don’t always end up in Super Macro mode! The IS system works well, the lens focuses reasonably quickly, and has no real optical flaws. All in all, this is an excellent package at a reasonable price of $299 in the United States. The raw specs are unlikely to light anyone’s fire, but if you have an EOS M camera body of some kind you will be happy to know that the system’s sole macro lens is a very good one!

Pros:

  • Wonderful image quality
  • Compact, light package helps fulfill the EOS M’s mandate of being light and portable
  • Innovative features and design
  • Inclusion of Macro Lites and Super Macro
  • Hybrid IS works very effectively
  • Greater than 1:1 macro reproduction
  • Autofocus works quickly
  • Low distortion and good flare resistance
  • Zero chromatic aberrations
  • Strong infinity/landscape resolution

Cons:

  • Build quality on recent EF-M lenses not up to the initial standard
  • Irritation of inadvertently accessing Super Macro mode…constantly
  • Short focal length results in less blurred backgrounds
  • STM not ideal for macro/manual focus work

Gear Used:

Canon EOS M3 Mirrorless Body
Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52016DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

July 24th, 2016

Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM Image Gallery

Canon has finally released a macro lens for it’s mirrorless system (the EOS M).  The Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM  is a very interesting lens for unexpected reasons.  Few people were thrilled by its focal length (28mm, or 44.8mm full frame equivalent) or maximum aperture (f/3.5), but when the details of the lens began to emerge it quickly become more interesting.  First of all, the lens has incorporated twin LED lights.  Secondly, the lens sports a “Super Macro” mode which actually allows 1:2 Macro (slightly larger than life size).  This is incredible magnification, though at a tiny, tiny working distance (3.7″/9.3cm from sensor).  I will be sharing photos and videos here as I progress through my review.  Enjoy!

Check me out on: Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

Images of the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM

Images by the Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM

 

Gear Used:

Canon EOS M3 Mirrorless Body
Canon EF-M 28mm f/3.5 Macro IS STM
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52016DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Night Pro Vision 120F + 120R Rechargeable Cycle Lights

Dustin Abbott

April 23rd, 2016

28 Taillight Review Title

Night Pro Vision Line 120F and 120R Rechargeable LED Headlights/Taillights

This is the time of year when I pull out my bike and start getting out on the road.  While I don’t know if I could be labelled an “avid cyclist”, it is certainly a sport that I enjoy and do fairly frequently.  Much like photography, cycling is a very gear oriented sport – from the cycle itself (complete with custom tires, derailleurs, bars, brakes, grips, seats/saddles, trip computers, pedals, and on and on) to the helmet, shoes, gloves, clothes, and much more.  You can spend a LOT of money on cycling.

28 Night ProVision Mounted

One important addition is if you are cycling in poor light is both headlights (to help you see) and taillights (to help others see you!).  In  this video I review an inexpensive set of rechargeable LED headlights (Night Pro Vision Line 120F Headlights) and taillights (Night Pro Vision 120R Taillights).  Check out this fun, interactive video to see if they are for you.

The great news is that you can win a set for yourself by entering the giveaway below.  It runs through the 16th of May.  There are a variety of ways that you can put in entries…so, “good luck!”.

Night Pro Vision Giveaway


Equipment Used for Shooting:
Canon EOS 80D
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/1078007-REG/gopro_chdhy_401_hero4_silver_edition_adventure.html/BI/19614/KBID/12112/kw/GOH4AS/DFF/d10-v2-t1-xGOH4AS
EF-S 24mm f/2.8 STM Lens
EF 50mm f/1.8 STM Lens
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52016DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.