Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Flickr 500px
See My Reviews

NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH Review

Dustin Abbott

September 27th, 2021

NiSi has historically been a company that has made filters for other people’s lenses, and a search of their products shows a lot of filters with very high reviews.  But at some point they clearly decided that their optical glass expertise could just as easily go into the construction of lenses themselves, which has resulted in their first lens, the very intriguing NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH.  This wide angle prime (it actually has an angle of view more like a 14.5mm lens) is extremely wide, but with lower distortion than most equivalent lenses.  Furthermore, by avoiding the challenges inherit in designing a very large aperture lens, they have been able to produce a lens that is compact (80.5mm in length), can use traditional screw in filters (72mm size), and that weighs only 470g despite a very nice all metal and glass construction.  As first lens design attempts go, this is a very good one.  I’ve been able to get very good results from the NiSi15 (as we’ll call it for brevity in this review) even on my demanding 50MP sensor on the Sony Alpha 1 that I’ve used for this review.

This “killer app” with this new NiSi 15mm shows up in the photo below, namely the ten straight aperture blades that produce stunning sunstars even at F4.  Yes, the blades are never fully retracted, and this design allows for beautifully rendered sunstars with long, clearly defined shafts of light that add terrific visual interest to photos.  Flare resistance is good overall, too (though not perfect), allowing you to shoot into the light and capture the beauty of brightly lit scenes.

At a price point of under $500, the NiSi 15mm is reasonably priced relative to performance, allowing photographers a chance to get a very wide angle of view on their Sony FE (reviewed here), Canon RF, Nikon Z, or Fujifilm X mount cameras.  The lens isn’t perfect, but it is a lot of lens for the money and has relatively few flaws.  You can certainly get some beautiful  and dynamic images with it!

So should you consider the NiSi15 for yourself?  You can either watch my video review or read on in this text review to help yourself make an informed decision.

 

Follow Me @  Patreon  |  My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px

Thank you to NiSi for sending me a loaner of the lens for review.  As always, this is a completely independent review.  The opinions here are completely my own.

NiSi15 Build and Handling

Gone are the days where new lensmakers started with cheap plastic lenses.  These days it seems like many of them start with a classic Zeiss-like approach to lens design – all metal and glass.  That’s the reality here, too.  The NiSi15 has a beautiful build quality with a classic aesthetic.  It’s primarily a black anodized metal finish with a silver accent ring in the middle.  

That silver accent ring has a practical function, though, as it has the hyperfocal distance markings for various aperture values there.  I did test hyperfocusing a bit, but, as per usual, found that I actually got more reliable results by just magnifying the area that I wanted to focus on.  The NiSi15 has an extremely wide angle of view (112°), which makes it wider than the Laowa 15mm F2 Zero D lens (110°) but not quite as wide as the Sony FE 14mm F1.8 GM (114°).  NiSi indicated to me that the lens is actually a 14.5mm lens, which seems to be accurate from comparison with these two lenses.  It certainly delivers a dynamically wide angle of view:

There is a low profile aperture ring with one third stop detents, though there are only markings for the full stops (F4, 5.6, 8, etc…)  The aperture ring moves smoothly and precisely, though there is no option to declick it.

The focus ring moves extremely smoothly, with near perfect damping that does remind me of a Zeiss lens.  All focus is internal, so the lens retains a constant length at all times.  The focus throw is fairly good as well (wide angle lenses often have shorter focus throws).  I did find that there wasn’t a lot of room between one meter and infinity, and it is possible to get inaccurately focused landscape results if you don’t focus precisely in that zone.  Infinity focus was basically right at the mechanical hard stop.  I often pulled back just a fraction to ensure perfect infinity focus, though I don’t think there was a significant different between the hard stop and my “fraction less” position.  This made landscape focus pretty simple.

The NiSi15 is a nicely compact lens for a full frame wide angle.  It is 75.6mm in diameter and 80.5 mm in length and weighs 470g (3 x 3.2″ and 1 lb), making it just a little smaller and lighter than the Laowa 15mm F2 lens.

This leaves you with a relatively common 72mm front filter thread.  This allows you to use traditional screw in filters (a big plus) and is also small enough that the smaller 100mm square filter systems will also work on it.

There is a fairly shallow metal lens hood included with a petal-shaped design.  The bright orange/yellow branding on the hood reminded me a bit of the Zeiss Otus series.  The lens is compact enough with the hood in place that I mostly just kept it in place, though it can be reversed for storage.

There are no electronic contacts or a weather sealing gasket at the lens mount.  This is a fully manual lens, meaning that you won’t get EXIF data about aperture or lens designation embedded in your files.  You’ll also have to manually input the focal length into your camera if you have one that has in-body-image-stabilization.  This is pretty much par for the course with many such lenses, though I do wish at least some basic electronic communication could be introduced.

The headline feature here is that NiSi has (wisely) elected to forego the modern standard of rounded aperture blades and has instead employed ten straight blades in the aperture iris.  If this was a “bokeh lens”, that would produce less desirable bokeh highlights, but a wide angle lens with a maximum aperture of F4 isn’t going to have a lot of opportunities to produce a lot of bokeh highlights. 

What it can produce, however, is sunstars.  By employing straight blades they have enabled the lens to produce beautifully defined sunstars that add a lot of character to images.

Furthermore, they’ve designed the lens where the blades show a bit even at F4, meaning you can get those sunstars without stopping down.  This will allow you to get creative images even at night, for example.

The NiSi15 can focus as closely as 20cm, which allows for a decent though unexceptional 0.13x magnification figure.  That’s well below the 0.25x of the Laowa but better than the 0.10x of the Sony 14mm GM.  Here’s what MFD on the NiSi looks like:

Here’s about as close as you can get and about as much bokeh as you’re going to see from the lens:

The bokeh here is okay but unexceptional.  That’s not really the strength of this lens.  I found a friend’s Audi and an early morning sunrise produced a more interesting image.

All told, the NiSi15 is a nicely built lens that works well.  The mechanical engineering seems precise, and the rings move nicely.  This is a great first lens for NiSi.

NiSi15 Image Quality

The NiSi15 enters an arena with several existing competitors optically.  The Samyang AF 14mm F2.8 (my review here of the Canon RF mount – same optics) provides a slightly wider angle of view and autofocus at roughly the same price (the MSRP is higher at $799 USD but the lens is frequently discounted to a similar price point.  The Laowa 15mm F2 Zero D (my review here) has a slightly narrower angle of view but considerably wider maximum aperture, but is also the most expensive at $849 USD.  The NiSi15 can be had for $499 USD, which makes it the natural bargain of the main choices.  But can it compete optically?  

First of all, a look at MTF charts for the NiSi (#1), Laowa (#2), and Samyang (#3).

These are not really apples to apples comparisons, as the NiSi has a smaller maximum aperture, but it is instructive nonetheless.  It reveals that the overall sharpness curve is pretty similar across these lenses, with very sharp centers, good mid-frames, and fairly good corners (the NiSi’s greatest edge is there, at least at the lenses maximum apertures).  The only true direct comparison from the MTF charts is found between the NiSi and Samyang at F8, where it shows a similar performance in the center but with the Samyang winning on the edges.  In fact, NiSi gives MTF charts at F4, F8, and F11, and, while it shows some slightly varied sharpness curves (there’s a bit more inconsistency at F4), the lens actually doesn’t really get sharper stopped down and actually loses a bit in the corners when stopped down to F8 or F11.  It’s an unusual performance in that peak average sharpness is found wide open at F4.  I was curious to see if my tests and real world results followed that same pattern.  

Let’s orient ourselves by first checking in with a real world image with a lot of depth and detail:

Obviously there is a lot of detail captured here on my 50MP Sony Alpha 1 sensor, which I would say that the NiSi performed just fine on.  It’s worth noting that this is a slightly better performance than, say, the Canon RF 15-35mm F2.8L IS at 15mm, and that is a $2400 USD lens.

Laowa really touts the low distortion of their 15mm F2 (that’s what “Zero D” means), but the reality is that the NiSi15 performs fairly similarly.  A look at my Vignette and Distortion chart shows very low levels of distortion:

I used only a +2 to correct an almost imperceptible amount of barrel distortion, though I’m not sure that correcting it is even worthwhile, as it reveals a very mild mustache pattern.  There’s not enough distortion there to present a problem for essentially any kind of application.  Real world lines look nice and straight:

Vignette is moderately heavy (I corrected with a +68), which is about on par with the Samyang and considerably less than the Laowa 15mm F2.  Most of these wide angle lenses have a fair amount of vignette, and nothing stood out to me as unusual about the NiSi15.  In fact, the positive is that the vignette cleaned up without adding any kind of false color to the corners, which can be an issue at times with these type lenses.  

I also didn’t see any kind of issue with chromatic aberrations of either the longitudinal or lateral kind.  There was little fringing to be seen of any kind.  Here’s a look at various scenarios where that fringing might show up.

So far we are doing pretty good.  The typical major flaws of wide angle lenses are 1) high distortion 2) heavy vignette 3) lateral chromatic aberrations.  None of these are a problem here.  So how about sharpness?

Here’s a look globally at my test chart:

And here is a look at the crops from across the frame at F4 (center, mid-frame, and then bottom right corner):

That a consistently good performance across the frame, and even the corners look quite good.  According the MTF charts, we shouldn’t really expect more resolution with the lens stopped down, and, while I do think that is accurate, I felt like there was slightly more contrast when I compared the F4 result to F5.6 on the right below:

When I compared F5.6 to F8, however, I saw what looked like essentially an identical result, so I would say that sharpness and contrast peaks at F5.6.  Real world results show a lot of detail across the frame at F5.6:

Designing a low distortion, high resolution ultra wide angle lens is seriously challenging, and there’s no question that NiSi has pretty much nailed things here.  I was able to capture a lot of compelling images with high detail during my review period.

Another key metric for a wide angle lens is the ability to resist flaring, particularly when the “killer app” is to produce beautiful sunbursts.  You don’t get those without putting a bright source of light in the frame.  Fortunately I do think that flare resistance is very good here, though not perfect.  The NiSi15 gets very high marks for resistance to veiling, or a loss of contrast when bright lights are in the frame.  Contrast remains very high with the sun directly in the frame.

I did see a few minor ghosting artifacts (little blobs of false color caused by flare), but they were extremely mild and essentially non-destructive.

They will get a little more pronounced if you stop the lens down (often the case), so expect a more pronounced “optical path” flare pattern, like here:

The unique good news here is that you don’t actually need to stop down to get the sunstar effect, so, well, don’t!  You might have also noticed in all of these images that contrast remained excellent in all of these examples; that aspect of flare resistance is impeccable.  

I find wide angle lenses great for getting visually arresting images.  The NiSi15 falls in what I consider the ultra-wide “sweet spot”, where it is extremely wide but not so wide that composition becomes impossible.  Get close to things and allow the optics to produce interesting results:

If you are too far away (like in a landscape scene), you end up with a lot of empty space in the foreground, which is rarely interesting.  This shot isn’t terrible, but there’s a lot of empty water here.  

I shot the same scene with a 75mm lens and got a much more interesting result.

You have to learn the art of composing with a wide angle lens.

Let’s talk color for a moment.  I found the colors to be more saturated than, say, the Laowa 15mm F2, but this is no Zeiss lens, either.  I found colors sometimes a little hard to process, as they seemed to push towards garish fairly quickly.  I had to use a delicate touch to make sure that colors had a richly saturated look but without being extreme.  The colors of this shot were some of my favorite from the lens, as the saturation levels look great.  All I did here to the RAW image was pull down the highlights a bit and open the shadows; the colors are right out of camera.

You’ll pick up a lot of sky colors with a wide angle lens, which is wonderful if the sky is beautiful:

It is rather less amazing if there is a lot of bland sky in the frame:

My original point remains – use a wide angle lens to its strengths, and it will reward you with amazing images.  Use it wrong, and you’ll probably end up discarding half of what you capture.

All told, this is a very good lens optically, and I felt like NiSi’s experience with optical glass showed here in their first lens.  I would encourage you to check out many more images in the image gallery here.

Conclusion

I get “pitched” to look at new gear every day, and many times I have to say “no” due to the reality that I only have so much time.  When NiSi reached out to me, I first went to the web address they sent me and did a little research of their new lens.  The MTFs looked solid, the low distortion was appealing, and the idea to go with straight blades for the sunstars all seemed like wise design elements.  I decided I would invest the time to review it, and I’m glad I did.  There are reasonable alternatives to the NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH on the various lens mounts it is designed for (Sony FE, Nikon Z, Canon RF, and Fuji X), but the NiSi15 seems to offer very strong value for money to me.  Yes, I would have liked an F2.8 aperture instead, and yes, I would always prefer weather sealing, but a nicely built, high performing wide angle lens for full frame cameras that costs less than $500 is fairly rare.

The NiSi 15mm F4 is a well made lens mechanically.  Everything is all metal and glass and works just as it should.  I also appreciate the compact nature of the lens that fits nicely on the various mirrorless cameras systems it is designed for.

There’s no question that you can get compelling images from the NiSi 15mm lens, and I hope this is the beginning of many more lenses to come.  I enjoyed my time with the NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH…and its amazing sunstars!

Pros:

  • Excellent build quality
  • Internally focusing design
  • Great manual focus ring
  • Aperture ring works with precision
  • Compact size and reasonable weight
  • Gorgeous sunstars
  • Good resolution across the frame
  • Low distortion
  • Great price to performance ratio

 

Cons:

  • No weather sealing
  • Color rendition not top tier
  • Lens performance doesn’t really improve when stopping down

 

Gear Used:

Purchase the NiSi 15mm F4 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany  

Purchase a Sony a7C @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony Alpha 1 @ Camera Canada | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase a Sony a9M2 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Sony a9 Camera:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada  | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 
Sony a7RIV Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

Purchase a Sony a7C @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Peak Design Leash Strap:  Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK

Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Exposure Software X6 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)
Visit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gear

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:  My Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px |  Google+ |


 

Purchase the NiSi 15mm F4 @ B&H Photo https://bhpho.to/3kkdSW8 | Amazon https://amzn.to/3AncCr3 | Amazon Canada https://amzn.to/3zlLxDj | Amazon UK https://amzn.to/3EyeiAj | Amazon Germany https://amzn.to/2YZ6reP 

Keywords:  NiSi 15mm F4, NiSi, 15mm, F4, ASPH, Sunstar, NiSi 15mm Review, NiSi 15mm F4 review, NiSi 15 F4, F/4, Wide Angle, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, Sony a9, sony a7III, sony a7RIV, a7R3,  Sony Alpha 1, Sony A1, Canon RF, Nikon Z, Fuji X

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

September 18th, 2021

NiSi has historically been a company that has made filters for other people’s lenses, and a search of their products shows a lot of filters with very high reviews.  But at some point they clearly decided that their optical glass expertise could just as easily go into the construction of lenses themselves, which has produced the very intriguing NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH lens.  This wide angle prime (it actually has an angle of view more like a 14.5mm lens) is extremely wide, but with lower distortion than most equivalent lenses.  Furthermore, by avoiding the challenges inherit in designing a very large aperture lens, they have been able to produce a lens that is compact (80.5mm in length), can use traditional screw in filters (72mm size), and that weighs only 470g despite a very nice all metal and glass construction.  As first lens design attempts go, this is a very good one.  I’ve been able to get very good results from the NiSi 15mm lens even on my demanding 50MP sensor on the Sony Alpha 1 that I’ve used for this review.

This “killer app” with this new NiSi 15mm shows up in the photo above, namely the ten straight aperture blades that produce stunning sunstars even at F4.  Yes, the blades are never fully retracted, and this design allows for beautifully rendered sunstars with long, clearly defined shafts of light that add terrific visual interest to photos.  Flare resistance is good overall, too (though not perfect), allowing you to shoot into the light and capture the beauty of brightly lit scenes.

At a price point of under $500, the NiSi 15mm is reasonably priced relative to performance, allowing photographers a chance to get a very wide angle of view on their Sony FE (reviewed here), Canon RF, Nikon Z, or Fujifilm X mount cameras.  The lens isn’t perfect, but it is a lot of lens for the money and has relatively few flaws.  You can certainly get some beautiful  and dynamic images with it!

Check out my text or videos reviews to see if this is a lens for you, or you can just enjoy the photos I’ve had a chance to take with the lens below.

 

Follow Me @  Patreon  |  My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px

Thank you to NiSi for sending me a loaner of the lens for review.  As always, this is a completely independent review.  The opinions here are completely my own.

Photos of the NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH

Photos taken with the NiSi 15mm F4 ASPH

Gear Used:

Purchase the NiSi 15mm F4 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany  

Purchase a Sony a7C @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony Alpha 1 @ Camera Canada | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase a Sony a9M2 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Sony a9 Camera:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada  | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 
Sony a7RIV Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

Purchase a Sony a7C @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Peak Design Leash Strap:  Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK

Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Exposure Software X6 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)
Visit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gear

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:  My Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px |  Google+ |


 

Purchase the NiSi 15mm F4 @ B&H Photo https://bhpho.to/3kkdSW8 | Amazon https://amzn.to/3AncCr3 | Amazon Canada https://amzn.to/3zlLxDj | Amazon UK https://amzn.to/3EyeiAj | Amazon Germany https://amzn.to/2YZ6reP 

Keywords:  NiSi 15mm F4, NiSi, 15mm, F4, ASPH, Sunstar, NiSi 15mm Review, NiSi 15mm F4 review, NiSi 15 F4, F/4, Wide Angle, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, Sony a9, sony a7III, sony a7RIV, a7R3,  Sony Alpha 1, Sony A1, Canon RF, Nikon Z, Fuji X

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Irix Edge Filters Review

Dustin Abbott

April 7th, 2019

Irix made their mark with a bevy of well-received wide angle lenses, including a super-wide-angle 11mm F4 lens along with a 15mm F2.4 that I reviewed last year.  Their most recent lens release has set their sites in a different direction – a telephoto macro lens.  The Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro is a very intriguing lens featuring a longer-than-usual focal length, a large maximum aperture, and Irix’ signature quality build.  It’s already caught the attention of the industry and has received the iF Design Reward for 2019 – an impressive achievement!  You can find my review of the Irix 150M here.  But Irix has embraced a more holistic approach to their lens design, recognizing that photographers also need filter systems and solutions to help create compelling images.  A good filter used properly can really expand your artistic options and is worth investing in.  The Irix EDGE filters are nicely made, reasonably priced options that are solid alternatives to the well-known filter brands  Join me for a closer look at the Irix Edge filters and to determine if they just might be the filters for you (shot below taken with the EDGE CP-L filter mounted on a Fujinon XF 16-55mm F2.8).

Check me out on:  Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px

Prefer to watch your reviews?  Take a look at my video review here:

Images of the Irix Edge Filters

One nice thing about Irix EDGE filters is the fact that Irix sells a lens with a 95mm front filter thread (15mm F2.4), which means that larger filter sizes are on Irix’ radar.  I see filters in most all sizes between 52mm and 95mm.  I think their 95mm filters, in particular, are very competitively priced relative to the competition probably to help their 15mm F2.4 lens compensate for having such a large filter size.

The Irix Edge filters come in somewhat non-traditional packaging.  Traditional filters come in smaller plastic cases with the filter sitting on a bit of foam and on display through the clear packaging, but the Irix EDGE filters come in a larger, slim plastic case with a card-stock like paper slider that has branding information and specs on it.  The actual plastic case has an incorporated handle and clips open on the side.  The filter itself sits in a molded dense foam that is shaped for the filter with two slots to allow one to easily grip the filter and bring it out.

The Irix Edge filters feature waterproof and oil repellent NANO coating prevent from stains, fingerprints and enable using in extreme weather conditions.  The NANO coating is also anti-reflective, and is put on both sides of the optical glass in the filters to help minimize reflections (which can be an issue with some filters). They are very low profile filters, which is an important key to limiting vignette on certain lenses (like their 15mm F2.4 lens, for example).  I tested a ND1000, a circular polarizer, and their proprietary new Light Pollution filter.  The ND1000 was the slimmest at 3.5mm, followed by the light pollution filter at 4mm, and finally the circular polarizer at 5mm. The filters also have a nicely knurled edge that makes them easy to grip (and rotate in some cases).   

The filters are (according to Irix) designed to compliment the aesthetics of the Irix lenses, though, to be fair, filters pretty much look like filters and I doubt you’ll notice much.

We’ll take a quick look at the individual filters, their purpose, and how they perform.  I’ve used a lot of different filters over the years, and here are some of the things I look for:

  1. Color casts | some filters (particularly ND filters) tend to introduce a color cast to images.  Obviously the more neutral the better here.
  2. Vignetting | this primarily comes down to the thickness of the filter
  3. Reflections and flare | some filters introduce more flare artifacts when shooting into a backlit scene.
  4. Clarity | putting a bad filter in front of a good lens is like smearing Vaseline on the front of the lens.

While there is some debate on this issue, I’ve personally moved away from using UV or protective filters.  Most good lenses released in the past few years come with good, hard protective coatings on them that are resistant to scratching.  It’s been well documented that digital sensors aren’t affected by UV light like film was, so that’s also a moot point.  I’ve found that UV filters often introduce a weak link into flare resistance, for example, and I don’t consider the trade-off worth it.  Your mileage may vary, and, if you want them, Irix sells UV filters in a wide variety of sizes.

Irix Circular Polarizing Filter

A circular polarizing filter is, I believe, the most important filter in a photographer’s kit.  It can be used to help eliminate reflections and glare depending on where you rotate it to.  Take, for example these two photos with a coach in the background.  The leather surface of the couch is reflecting the sun from the window in the back.  Because of the polarizing filter, I can choose how much of the reflection is there.

The difference in the two shots is simply the angle of rotation I dialed in with the filter.  I will often use a CP-L to control the amount of reflectiveness on shiny surfaces like water or glass, too.  

A CP-L can also be used to intensify a sky, giving photos a more contrasty look.  I’ve done that with this shot of the Wyndam SeaWatch Plantation resort I stayed at in Myrtle Beach, South Carolina.  The photo is essentially unedited in post; the effect was achieved in camera.

Above all, though, I love the additional punch that a CP-L gives to colors and contrast.  It helps lenses become a little more “Zeiss-like” in their “pop”.  You’ll be able to see what I mean in the gallery below:

 Irix ND1000 Filter

Neutral Density filters are designed to limit the amount of light that reaches the sensor.  There are a number of applications for this, including trying to set a certain frame rate for video, trying to lower shutter speed to sync with flash units or to use wide aperture lenses in bright light, or, most commonly, to allow for long exposure photography.  Often a long exposure allows for a more visually interesting image where dynamic elements (skies or water) are smoothed out.  Case in point is this photo underneath a pier.  Without a filter, the chop and movement of the water makes for a slightly busy image.

Add a ten stop ND1000 filter and you can use a much longer exposure time, which smooths the water and creates a more visually interesting image.

My primary concern with ND filters (particularly “heavy” ones like the 10-stop ND filter I’m testing here) is that lower quality glass can introduce color casts (I’ve seen magenta and cyan casts most commonly).  We can see that this wasn’t the case with the images above.

A secondary concern is that if a filter isn’t nice and slim, the longer exposure period really intensifies vignette.  Fortunately that isn’t a problem with the EDGE filters, and I’ve not noticed any additional vignette when using the ND1000 filter on the wide angle 15mm lens.  This image is a 30 second exposure taken with the Irix EDGE ND1000 filter on the Irix 15mm F2.4 lens.  While the bare lens does have some vignette, I did not have to do any additional vignette correction with the filter attached, nor did I have to do any color balance correction.

The final concern is that filters can reduce clarity on an image if the optical glass isn’t high quality.  A bad filter can make a great lens look like garbage.  Fortunately, that’s not the case here.  Here’s a more than 3 minute exposure I took of Niagara Falls using the Irix 15mm and the EDGE ND1000.  As you can see from the roughly 125% crop, detail has held up exquisitely well.

Here’s a gallery with a few other images taken with the EDGE ND1000 filter.

Irix Edge Light Pollution Filter

The final filter that I looked at was Irix’s new Light Pollution filter.  This filter reduces yellow light, helping to eliminate the murky, yellowish cast to images taken at night or in cities.  The byproduct is a cooler, cleaner, more dynamic look that works well in the right situation. It’s definitely an improvement for astrophotography work:

When used in daylight, it creates a cooler image that has it’s own visual charm:

I don’t live in a major city, so my uses for this type of lens are fewer, but I did like the effect for some of my winter images as it gave them a cool, wintry look.

Here’s a few more from the Light Pollution filter (used on the Laowa 15mm F2 Zero D lens for Sony FE).

Price and Conclusion

My experience with the Irix EDGE filters has been very positive.  They are not fancy or exotic, but they are well made, optically excellent, and extremely competitively priced.  The 77mm Circular Polarizer that I tested can be had for only $65, the massive 95mm ND1000 for $130, and the 72mm Light Pollution filter I tested rings in at $122.  Filters can become very expensive, but to get well-made filters with Nano coatings and great performance for this price helps eliminate some of the sting.  Irix also makes a very reasonably priced square filter holder, which then opens the door to using ND grad filters effectively.  In a broader sense, however, I also want to commend Irix for thinking about the big picture of how their lenses will be used.  Often photographers buy lenses and then are left stuck when it comes to after-market filter solutions, but Irix is doing a good job of supporting their products and allowing photographers to get the best out of them…something not every lens maker does.

Thanks to Irix for the loaners!

Purchase the Irix Edge Filters @Irix | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

Purchase the Irix 150mm F2.8 1:1 Macro @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV (5D4): B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Sigma MC-11 Adapter:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK
Peak Design Slide Lite: 
Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK

BenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo  | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X4 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)
Visit Dustin’s Amazon Storefront and see his favorite gear

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:  My Patreon  | Sign Up for My Newsletter |  Instagram | Facebook | Twitter | Flickr | 500px |  Google+ |






 


Use Code “DUSTINHDR” to get $10 off ($15 CDN) any Skylum product:  Luminar, Aurora, or AirMagic



 
 

Keywords: Irix Edge, Edge Filters, Edge, Irix, Review, Dustin Abbott, Circular Polarizer, UV, Neutral Density, ND1000, Light Pollution, Irix 150mm, 150mm Macro, Irix 150 Macro, Irix 150mm Macro, Irix 15mm, Long Exposure, Irix 11mm, 15mm, 11mm, Irix 15, Irix 11, Reflections, Sample Images, Video Test

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone Edition Review

Dustin Abbott

August 28th, 2018

The new lensmaker Irix came onto the scene a couple of years ago with the announcement of a beautifully designed 15mm prime lens available in two different build/trim levels.  This has become Irix’s unique approach to marketing their lenses, offering up two “trim levels” much like an automaker might.  The Firefly versions of their lenses have the same optical formula, but rely on a more traditional engineered plastics housing with a feature or two missing compared to the premium build.  The higher end build is the “Blackstone”, which I am reviewing here.  The Blackstone 15mm (and later, 11mm) lens has a build grade more similar to a Zeiss lens than your typical commercial grade build.  In some ways the “Blackstone” design most resembles a “Classic” Zeiss finish, with a semi-glass anodized metal finish that looks fantastic.  Irix upped the ante by adding a robust weather sealing to the design.  What’s interesting is that when I reviewed a similar lens from Zeiss – the Distagon 15mm f/2.8 – it cost nearly $3000 USD.  The Irix 15mm f/2.4 (even in the upscale Blackstone trim), costs only $675.  Like the Zeiss, however, it is a manual focus lens with an electronically controlled aperture iris.

The combination of value and quality is definitely interesting and has helped Irix get at least some limited exposure.   I was intrigued (I’m always glad to see new lens makers come onto the scene), but was involved in other projects at the time and so the lens went in and out of my radar.  I’ve gotten periodic requests from my audience to review the lens, but had never gotten around to it.  When Irix reached out to me, however, I was definitely open to reviewing this intriguing lens, which purports to offer an excellent build along with great image quality at a reasonable price.  Read on to join me in discovering if the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 lives up to its billing.

Check me out on:  Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

Prefer to Watch Your Reviews?  My full video review can be seen below.

Irix Blackstone 15mm Build and Design

First, a little about Irix.  Irix is a Swiss lens designer whose lenses are manufactured in Korea.  My contact with the company has been with someone based in Poland, so this is truly a multi-national company. 

But what really stands out to me in this whole company is the unique degree of innovation I’m seeing.  A company like Voigtländer has been making lenses since 1756, so this isn’t exactly a brand-new industry, and, while companies are always improving the optics, coatings, and operation of their lenses, most of them pretty much do the same things.  It’s rare that I see new features actually make it into lenses.  Irix has definitely got some flare, however, along with a few genuinely useful features I haven’t seen elsewhere.  First of all, Irix wins major style points for the way that their lenses are presented, from the fancy metal tin to the very cool molded hard case for the lens.  I particularly like the case because the compact, molded nature of it means that it takes up much less room in a bag and will be more likely to come along.  Check out this video to really get a closer look at what I’m talking about:

One aspect that I will touch on but hope to delve into further when I review the Irix 11mm f/4 is that Irix has recognized that the challenge with wide-angle lenses is often when it comes to using filters.  Filters give you creative choices when using a wide angle lens.  You can use a polarizer to either reduce or even enhance reflections or to create richer color.  Neutral Density (ND) filters give you creative control over exposure and are essentially required to do long exposure work in most lighting conditions.  Irix has thought this through and given photographers options with the Blackstone 15mm.  First of all, it actually has a 95mm filter thread up front (like the Zeiss Distagon 15mm), so you can use traditional filters.  95mm filters are expensive, yes, but Irix has actually created their own line of filters (Edge) that are reasonable and yet look pretty good.  This includes both screw-on filters and also a square filter holder and square filters that allow you to use graduated filters.  While square filters are more cumbersome, graduated ND filters are some of the best tools there are for landscape photographers.

If you want to go lower profile, however, Irix has wisely elected to also include a gel filter holder in the design.  This allows you to insert small gel filters in the holder built into the lens near the lens mount.  These gel filters are incredibly inexpensive (you can get the full set of 15 variations for less than ten Euros!)  This is very clever, because it gives buyers a compelling reason to choose this lens over a competing one.

Another clever feature that is designed around accommodating filters is a little window built into the lens hood that gives you access to a circular polarizing filter (which needs to be rotated to the proper position to provide maximum benefit).  You can easily rotate the filter by reaching a finger through and using the knurled edge of the filter to rotate it forwards or backward.  It’s more convenient than reaching around the front of the lens hood and rotating the filter, particularly since there isn’t much room between the filter and the interior of the lens hood.

Also smart is the front lens cap, which is actually beveled inward along the front edge.  This makes the front cap easier to pinch with the lens hood attached and also makes it store in your pocket a little easier.  The plastics in the front and rear cap feel a little thin and flimsy, but the pinch action on the front cap does work fine.  I like the way that the Irix logo is displayed on the front cap.

As previously mentioned, the shell of the Blackstone 15mm is made of a premium aluminum-magnesium alloy.  It has a anodized metal finish that resists fingerprints and scratches (and actually seems to work!)  It’s a very attractive lens – all shiny and sleek.  The lens is moderately sized at 114mm (Diameter) x 100mm (Length), or 4.49” x 3.94”.  Due to the all-metal-and-glass construction, the lens is fairly dense at 685g (1.51lbs), though that weight is still quite moderate.

The next unique element on the lens (one I’ve never personally seen on a manual focus lens before) is the inclusion of a clutch/tension ring that allows you to lock the focus ring at any particular focus point.  Rotating the ring to the left engages the lock, while rotating the ring to the right loosens it back up.  This might be useful if you wanted to make sure that focus didn’t shift from a critical point while, say, carrying the lens in a bag or mounted to a camera on a strap or harness.  I didn’t personally use it during my review period, but that was primarily due to something I really, really liked.

Most manual focus lenses allow you to focus past infinity.  People ask me what that means, as it does seem illogical.  What it means is that you can actually focus to a place where, essentially, nothing is in focus.  You can pass infinity focus and begin to actually defocus the lens, almost like eyeglasses that are too strong and actually diminish vision.  “Why would they do that?”, you might ask, and the reason is because of thermal expansion.  How hot or cold the lens is can actually slightly shift the tolerances, and if you left no “play” at the end of the focal range, you might actually be unable to achieve infinity focus under certain conditions. 

Fair enough, but the problem is that most of the time people are shooting in more moderate conditions where that extra travel in the focus ring past infinity just ends up messing up their images.  Irix has implemented an extremely clever solution to this problem.  The Blackstone 15mm has, like all manual focus lenses, a mechanical hard stop at the “infinity” end of the focal range (you cannot focus any farther).  But before that, where normal (for more environmental conditions) infinity is calibrated, there is actually a mild detent that you can easily feel when focusing even if you aren’t looking at the lens (it is also marked in the same UV fluorescent paint as all the other distance markings).  Under normal conditions all you need to do is focus to that infinity detent and you have perfect infinity focus, which actually works absurdly well for about 90% of the situations I used the lens in).  It means that you honestly don’t have to think much about focus at all, only using focus when you need to focus on a closer subject (or, in extreme weather, to focus beyond that point to infinity).  The detent is just firm enough to easily hold that position, which is the reason why I didn’t use the lock ring.  Most of the time where I wanted focus was exactly on that infinity detent.  While I’ll deal with astrophotography a little later in the review, I will note that this detent was perfect for shooting the night sky, and this feature alone was enough to make really enjoy the lens for that kind of work.  Sometimes the hardest part of astro work is nailing focus.

In real world shooting, this was my favorite thing about the Blackstone 15mm.  It gave me great confidence that when I was shooting with the lens prefocused to that infinity detent and stopped down to f/5.6 or f/8, I was getting essentially perfectly focused results every time.  Kudos to Irix for finding a better way to handle this problem.

The focus ring itself looks beautiful, with tight metal ribbing that provides endless amounts of grip.  I wasn’t a huge fan of the focus action, however, that had a slightly gritty feeling when making larger focus changes.  It lacks the perfectly damped, smooth feel of the better Zeiss or Voigtländer lenses, and I felt the damping was a bit heavy (which also somewhat eliminates the need for the locking clutch).  The actual amount of focus throw/travel was excellent, however, allowing for precision at all focus distances.  Distances markings are clearly legible in that special paint, and hyperfocal guides are included for f/8, f/11, and f/16 (f/22 is the smallest aperture available).

A small knurled ring near the lens mount allows for both a nice texture variation (cosmetically appealing) and also provides a natural place to grip the lens when mounting/unmounting it.  All of this is very good design.  The lens is just as handsome as the Zeiss Distagon 15mm f/2.8, which is to say very nice indeed.

A badge near the lens mount touts Irix’s proprietary “Neutrino Coatings” (everybody’s got their own special coatings).  We’ll examine how effective they are in a moment.

The metal lens mount shows off a few other details.  One is the gel filter holder previously mentioned.  Another is the electronic contacts that reveal that, like Zeiss, this is a manual focus lens but uses a modern electromagnetic aperture iris (which means that you open/close the aperture iris via the camera by selecting the aperture value you want) and also that it communicates EXIF data to the camera body.  Both of these are good things!  The final detail there is that you can see a rubber sealing gasket near the lens mount.  This is the external evidence of the weather sealing on the lens, but Irix says this, “Blackstone, the Premium version has durable body made with aluminium-magnesium alloy, that ensures foolproof protection of your lens, even in extreme situations. Its construction is equipped with four rubber seals, that protect the camera mount and focusing mechanism against the dust and moisture, as well as front or side accidental water splashes.”  That seems fairly confident, though “foolproof” may be a little extreme (never underestimate how foolish people can be!)  Still, the specificity of the language does inspire confidence.

The lens can focus down to 11″ (28cm) and produces a rather uninspiring amount of magnification there (0.11x).  While the maximum aperture of the lens is moderately wide, the nature of the wide angle focal length means that blurring out backgrounds isn’t going to be a big strength for this lens.  This photo represents best case scenario:

You can see a bit of busyness in the bokeh circles, but the most defocused region is fairly smooth.  But let’s not kid ourselves; you don’t buy a 15mm lens for the bokeh!

The aperture iris is the standard 9 rounded blades.

Some might ask why the filter thread is so large when the front element is relatively small.  The answer is due to the curved front element (which enables the wide angle of view).  A smaller filter thread (or edge of the lens) would cause heavy vignette, as would the lens hood on a smaller diameter.  All of this is necessary to keep these things far enough away to allow the lens to “see” properly.  Sometimes you just can’t compete with physics.

All in all, there are a lot of positive takeaways from an examination of the build, design, and features of the Blackstone 15mm.  It’s a premium lens with a lot of clever engineering, which is to say that you are getting a lot of lens for your money.

Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 Image Quality

Irix has a key advantage at this focal length compared to competing lenses – the maximum aperture of f/2.4, which is slightly better than a 1/3rd stop advantage over f/2.8 (f/2.2 and f/2.5 are the 1/3rd stops between f/2 and f/2.8).  On my Canon 5D Mark IV body that I used for this test, f/2.4 is not an option because it doesn’t fall on a traditional increment.  It displays at f/2.5 instead, although the aperture physically opens up a little wider than that.  Unfortunately that will almost certainly cause some confusion for some who will think their lens is “broken”.  While most of the time people use wide angle lenses at smaller apertures (for landscapes or city/architecture), there are situations where having a wider aperture is useful.  These might include shooting astrophotography (where more light sensitivity is very important) or in other low light scenarios.

The Blackstone 15mm has a sophisticated optical formula of 15 elements in 11 groups, including 3 high-refractive elements, two extra-dispersion elements, and 2 aspherical elements.  There are also the previously mentioned neutrino coatings to help with flare resistance, aid contrast, and reduce chromatic aberrations.  We’ll determine how all of this adds up in our coverage of the image quality from the Irix 15mm f/2.4 Blackstone.

My coverage of image quality falls into two categories: 1) Resolution, where I cover sharpness and contrast and 2) Rendering, which looks at the global look of images in areas like color rendition, bokeh, flare resistance, chromatic aberration, etc… 

The best way to see my findings on image quality is by watching this detailed video episode where I interactively break down the image quality of the 105 ART.

 

Blackstone 15mm Resolution

Those of you who follow my reviews know that I prefer whenever possible to not test a lens’ resolution in a vacuum.  I prefer to have at least one lens whose performance I’m familiar with as a benchmark.  I keep an extensive (and diverse) personal kit for this reason (and let’s be honest, also because I love lenses!)  I elected to use the Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 VC lens for this comparison for several reasons.  First, I had it on hand.  Second, I’ve used it extensively for comparisons with a number of wide angle lenses and so I have a clear understanding of where it stands in the hierarchy of lenses.  Finally, it shares a similar focal length on the wide end (and frames nearly identically).

If you didn’t watch the video episode on image quality, I’ll quickly recap a few of the areas that I perceive strengths and weaknesses between the two lenses.  Obviously the Tamron is a completely different kind of lens:  it’s a zoom, has autofocus, and has image stabilization.  It is also much more expensive, much larger and heavier (1100 vs 685g), and cannot use traditional filters.  Despite these significant differences, there will certainly be some cross-shopping for those debating the merits of a zoom vs a prime.  When it comes to image quality, the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 has lower distortion and chromatic aberration (the Tamron has some lateral CA on the edges of the frame).  It also has less veiling from the sun in the frame, though it has it’s own unique flare characteristic that we’ll detail in the next section.  The Tamron has lower vignette, delivers better microcontrast levels, and has slightly better color rendition.  There’s pros and cons to each (I’ve yet to find a perfect wide angle lens), so you have to prioritize what matters to you.  Do you value the versatility of a zoom, or do you prefer a more compact lens that will allow you to use screw-in filters?

Let’s take a look at some comparisons.  As this was a backlit scene, I’ve raised the shadows by equal amounts on all images to allow for as fair a comparison as possible.  

With both lenses wide open (Irix at f/2.4, Tamron at f/2.8), we see that the lenses frame roughly identical.  The Tamron shows off its lower levels of vignette by delivering a brighter image along the edges, though a closer look reveals that the Irix shows better contrast due to lower CA there.  The Tamron shows greater impact from the sun in the frame with a localized veiling in that area.  The Tamron shows slightly higher resolution and definitely better microcontrast (textures pop more due to better contrast on a pixel level).  What’s very positive for the Irix, however, is the fact that even at f/2.4 there is strong resolution right across the frame.

Stopping the Irix down to f/2.8 does a lot to equalize the vignette situation, and leaves the two images looking more similar on a global level.  The superior microcontrast and color rendition of the Tamron lens (a serious strength for this lens) delivers a more vibrant image with all settings equal, though the Irix shows better flare resistance.  The resolution is roughly similar across the frame, with the Tamron showing a little more “punch” due to contrast and the Irix handling the edges a little better with slightly higher resolution and better chromatic aberration control.

Moving on down to a more traditional landscape aperture (f/5.6), the general trends continue.  The Tamron image has a little more contrast when viewed globally, but both images look fantastic at a pixel level all across the frame (I included the bottom right in this comparison).  I noted that both lenses metered identically at each aperture value that they shared.  You can see the ghosting pattern following the shaft of light from the Tamron becoming slightly more pronounced.

When I compared f/11 results to the f/5.6 results from the Blackston 15mm, I saw just the slightest bit of softening due to diffraction, but the results were more similar than different.  In terms of resolution, the Irix is right up there competing with the best lenses at this focal length, but the color and contrast lags a bit behind the best.  If compared to lenses at its price point, however, I think it would be the hands-down winner.

Here’s a few landscape images that show how great landscape images from this lens look.

In real-world shooting (outside of the comparison sphere), the colors and contrast look very good.

Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 Rendering

As I’ve already noted, I think that color rendition from the lens is good but not exceptional, and the same applies to the contrast (both global and micro).  In some real-world scenarios I felt the color looked quite good:

But how about some of the other metrics?

This brick wall comparison shows that vignette is fairly heavy at f/2.4, but by f/4 a lot of it has cleared.

You’ll also note that even in this very challenging test (the camera was only about three feet from the wall), distortion is near non-existent.  At more typical distances you can see only the mildest amount of barrel distortion (though all wide angle lenses that cannot tilt will show some perspective distortion or keystone effect).  This lens wouldn’t be as good as tilt/shift lens for shooting real estate or architecture, but it is definitely a better option than most wide angle lenses that I’ve tested.  It even compares pretty well to the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D (zero distortion) lens I own for Sony, delivering similarly low levels of barrel distortion.  Here’s an interior shot with a lot of lines.

The chromatic aberration control from the Blackstone 15mm is pretty close to perfect.  As we noted in our landscape comparison, there is no lateral chromatic aberrations to be seen along the edge of the frame.  I didn’t notice CA in any of my real world images, in fact, including this incredibly challenging scene where I was capturing a board room scene for a hotel property.  The client wanted to demonstrate how close the conference rooms were to nature, and wanted the outdoors to be pictured in the scene.  The midday sun was extremely harsh, so this created a huge contrast variance between the board room and the outdoors.  The rock edges, glass bottles, door frames, and chrome chairs are all perfect places for chromatic aberrations to lurk, but the crop from the photo shows how well the lens has dealt with all of these.  Bravo, Irix!

Another important aberration to be corrected for in a wide angle lens is comatic aberrations, often called “coma”.  Comatic aberrations show up with bright, distant points of light like stars as deformation of the geometric shape along the edges.  This can take shape as flying insects, saucers, or ducks in appearance rather than crisp star points.  Wide angle lenses are the most commonly used instruments for shooting astrophotography, so I always try to test for this.  What I found is that while the lens does have some comatic aberrations along the edge of the frame, the lens was still fairly appealing for shooting astro due to A) having a wider than typical maximum aperture and B) the aforementioned infinity focus detent.  I got very crisp looking results, and the coma is only visible at a pixel level.

As you can see from these photos, stopping down to f/2.8 makes little difference in either sharpness or improvement of the coma, so I would probably just shoot at f/2.4 for the additional light gathering potential.  This isn’t a perfect performance here, but I felt like it was better than average with all aspects considered.

A more complicated topic is that of flare resistance.  As we noted previously, the Blackstone 15mm is actually highly resistant to veiling with the sun right in the frame.  It shows little ghosting in terms of the typical pattern along a ray of light.  But what it will show (if you don’t compose to combat it) is a massive red ghosting ring around the outside of the frame.  Here’s an example of three different compositions of the same scene.  In one I purposefully allowed the ring to show up.  It’s pretty dominant if you allow this:

It showed up mildly in a few other situations, but its also not difficult to compose your image to where flare is scarcely an issue at all.  Just use the lens wisely.

Another positive is that the sunburst with the lens stopped down looks nice.  I always like a nice sunburst effect as I feel it adds a nice finishing touch to images.

As previously mentioned, creating bokeh (defocused areas) with this lens isn’t easy.  It doesn’t have much of a magnification factor, and this just isn’t a strength for wide angle lenses.  Here’s the best I could do around minimum focus:

This isn’t really a factor here.

So, other than that big ghosting artifact if you aren’t careful, there are few serious flaws here.  The lens produces beautiful images if you use it to its strengths.  I would have liked to see a little more microcontrast and more punchy color, but you can also add those pretty easily in post.  Here’s an image that I postprocessed, and I think it looks pretty fabulous.

I would recommend that you visit the Lens Image Galleries to see many more photos from the Blackstone 15mm.  It is certainly capable of producing beautiful images.

Conclusion

It’s taken me a while to get an Irix lens in my hand, but I have to say I’m pretty impressed for this new company’s first “kick at the can”.  The Irix 15mm f/2.4 (particularly in this Blackstone finish) comes across as a pretty mature offering.  It has a lot of great innovation in its presentation, build, and feature set, and I found it a genuine joy to use.  I think Irix has been very clever to not rely on others to solve the filter issue and to address it themselves.  By doing so they have eliminated some of the challenges inherit to wide angle lenses.  I particularly like the detent at [typical] infinity focus that allows one to quickly focus properly for landscape shots (and the stars!) in most environmental conditions.  My recommendation for areas that Irix can focus on improving are in the smoothness of the manual focus ring along with improving color and microcontrast.  From what I’ve seen here, however, I certainly believe that they are capable of making top grade lenses.  This lens is already as sharp as the Zeiss Distagon 15mm f/2.8, and at a fraction of the price.  The Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 represents a great value for landscape (and even architectural) photographers on a budget, and, if you don’t mind a less pro-grade build, the Firefly version can be had for under $500 USD while delivering an identical optical performance.  There’s a lot to like here, and I look forward to seeing what Irix has to offer in the future.

Pros:

  • Professional grade build with excellent materials
  • Quality weather sealing
  • Innovative design in packaging, handling, and features
  • Very low distortion
  • Very good resolution from f/2.4 on
  • Impressively low amount of chromatic aberrations
  • Detent at typical infinity is extremely useful
  • Options for filter use great at this focal length
  • Slightly wider than average maximum aperture
  • Highly competitive price

Cons:

  • Focus ring action could be smoother
  • Colors and microcontrast not as vibrant as some competitors
  • Strong ghosting ring can occur with bright light source in the frame

Gear Used:
Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV (5D4): B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Peak Design Slide Lite:  Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK

BenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo  | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :





Keywords:  Irix, Irix 15mm, Irix 15 Blackstone, Irix Blackstone, 15mm, f/2.4, Irix 15mm 2.4, Irix 15mm Review, Irix 15mm 2.4 Review, Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4, Irix Blackstone Review, Dustin Abbott, Sample Images, Video Test, Canon 5D Mark IV, Sony a7R3, Sony a7riii, canon 5d4, Sharpness, Resolution, Comparison, Tamron 15-30 VC, Tamron 15-30 2.8, Review, Comparison, Test, CA, Distortion

 

 

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

August 7th, 2018

The new lensmaker Irix came onto the scene a couple of years ago with the announcement of a beautifully designed 15mm prime lens.  I was intrigued, but was involved in other projects at the time and so the lens went in and out of my radar.  I’ve gotten periodic requests from my audience to review the lens, but had never gotten around to it.  When Irix reached out to me, however, I was definitely open to reviewing this intriguing lens, which purports to offer an excellent build along with great image quality at a reasonable price.  I’ll be determining if the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4 lives up to the billing in my review.  In the meantime, however, I invite you to check out the image galleries below and check back regularly for new photos.

Check me out on:  Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

Photos of the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4

Images Taken with the Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4

 
Gear Used:
Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4:  B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay
Canon EOS 5D Mark IV (5D4): B&H Photo | Amazon.com | Amazon Canada  | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Peak Design Slide Lite:  Peak Design StoreB&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK

BenQ SW271 4K Photo Editing Monitor – B&H Photo  | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :





Keywords:  Irix, Irix 15mm, Irix 15 Blackstone, Irix Blackstone, 15mm, f/2.4, Irix 15mm 2.4, Irix 15mm Review, Irix 15mm 2.4 Review, Irix Blackstone 15mm f/2.4, Irix Blackstone Review, Dustin Abbott, Sample Images, Video Test, Canon 5D Mark IV, Sony a7R3, Sony a7riii, canon 5d4, Sharpness, Resolution, Comparison, Tamron 15-30 VC, Tamron 15-30 2.8, Review, Comparison, Test, CA, Distortion

 

 

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Venus Optics Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D Review

Dustin Abbott

March 5th, 2018

Check me out on:  Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :

It’s not an easy job to carve out a slice of the competitive camera lens market, but in recent years we have seen a few companies do just that. One of those is Venus Optics, a Chinese lens maker, who entered the market first with some innovative macro options – making lenses no one else was. Unlike some companies, however, Venus Optics was not content to stay in the “budget” lens category, and quickly moved on to more premium lenses sold under the Laowa brand. I’ve previously reviewed several of those, including the Laowa 105mm f/2 STF (Smooth Trans Focus) lens and the ultrawide 12mm f/2.8 Zero D lens. I found them to be premium, manual everything lenses whose all-metal construction reminds me of Zeiss in some ways, but even more of some of my favorite vintage lenses.  The most recent Laowa lens is one for Sony full frame mirrorless (FE), the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D.

Prefer to Watch Your Reviews?  Check out my video review here!

Laowa 15mm f/2 Build, Design, and Handling

I recommend that you watch this video to get a hands on, close look at the lens and its handling.

The Laowa 15mm bears many similarities to the 12mm f/2.8 Zero D lens, but with a few key improvements. If you don’t actually need the incredible nearly 122 degree field of view of the 12mm (and few do – 12mm is often too wide in many situations and presents a lot of compositional challenges) and shoot Sony E Mount, the Laowa 15mm f/2 makes a lot more sense. For one, it provides a full stop brighter maximum aperture of f/2 vs f/2.8. This allows you to have better results in low light conditions and will also give you more flexibility for shooting stars. A second key advantage to the 15mm f/2 lens is that it can use traditional screw on filters in a common (and inexpensive) 72mm size. Combine these advantages with the fact that the 15mm lens runs a hundred bucks cheaper and you’ve got a lens that is more practical for many shooters.

The 15mm f/2 is unquestionably a beautiful lens. It has a very sleek anodized metal body where markings are etched rather than just painted. Everything feels very premium to the touch and bears a lot of similarity to classic Zeiss lenses. The lens weighs 500g/1.1lb (about 110g less than the 12mm), and balances nicely on the Sony a7R III body I was using for testing. The lens is 66mm (2.6”) in diameter and 82mm (3.23”) long. While the lens wouldn’t be called small, it is certainly compact when one considers the wide focal length and large maximum aperture. I consider size and weight to be plus here.

The included lens hood is also made of metal and ribbed inside. It is fairly shallow, and I would suggest its primary value is for protection from dings more than shading the front element. Despite this the lens shows a high degree of flare resistance when shooting into the sun or backlit conditions, which I attribute more to the optical formula and coatings than the hood. Right before the transition to the hood there is a tasteful deep blue accent ring that evokes Zeiss to me. It’s subtle yet elegant.

The focus ring (this is a manual focus lens) has beautiful damping and glides smoothly with just about the right amount of resistance. There is about 140 degrees of focus throw, with about 80% of that focused on the range from minimum focus (15cm) to one meter. That’s right – 15cm. The lens focuses down very closely, allowing you to achieve a 1:4 magnification ratio (0.25x), which is exceptionally high for this kind of focal length. This will allow you to do some creative things, and, combined with the large maximum aperture, even throw a background reasonably out of focus if you are close to your subject.

Just note that perspective distortion increases as you get closer to your subject while trying to include the environment:

Because of this close focus ability a lot of the focus throw is in that early range, leaving a small amount from 1 meter to infinity, so in many normal cases only minimal focus changes will be required. For landscape shooting you can often just set the focus and leave it. There are hyperfocal markings on the lens barrel at f/5.6, f/11, and f/22 (minimum aperture value).

The aperture ring is interesting as well, with standard aperture “clicks” or detents at the full stop values (f/2, f/2.8, f/4, etc…) What’s interesting is that you also have a switch on the side of the lens that allows you to “declick” the aperture, which means you can smoothly open or close the aperture to any position. Videographers appreciate this feature, which allows them to do aperture “racking”.

An investigation of the rear of the lens produces both good and bad reactions from me. On the positive side the quality of the engineering extends to the rear of the lens, which looks very premium. It is designed that even as the rear elements move (the lens’ focus is all internal) there is never a gap that opens into the interior of the lens. I’m less excited by what’s missing: 1) any weather sealing and 2) any kind of electronic coupling to communicate with the camera. I recommend the former to Laowa because wide angle lenses are often used outdoors. There’s umm, weather out there! I recommend the latter because, unlike Canon and Nikon, Sony is very accommodating to third party lenses by allowing embedded profiles that can correct for things like vignette, distortion, or chromatic aberrations. While distortion isn’t an issue with this lens, vignette is, and I’m left making manual corrections to the vignette in post and essentially stuck with it if I shoot JPEGs or video. One also loses out on information like the aperture value that was chosen or even the lens designation and focal length in the metadata. I think that this should be Laowa’s next step in their lens design.

Despite these missing features, this is a beautifully crafted lens that has a build quality near the top of the heap.  It’s a beautiful lens that manages to also balance nicely on the Sony a7R3 body I tested it on.

Laowa 15mm Image Quality

The best way to get the details on the image quality performance is to watch this interactive image quality breakdown video.

The Laowa 15mm f/2’s optical formula has 12 elements in 9 groups, and this lens lives up to the “Zero D” (distortion) claim. When I compared it to a popular zoom that covers this focal length I was surprised by just how much of a difference there was between the two lenses. The Laowa produces nice, straight lines. Any wide-angle lens will provide a keystoning effect if the lens is tilted up or down (trees or buildings will begin to “lean”), but if the sensor is level you can expect next to no barrel distortion.  I did some direct comparisons to the Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 VC lens (hardly the worst offender in the distortion department that I’ve ever seen), but the difference in barrel distortion at 15mm is fairly startling.  Look at this comparison (both without any correction).

The byproduct of this for someone who, for example, shoots interiors, is that not only is the Laowa wider at short to medium distances (see the photo below), you also won’t have to lose even more of the image to distortion correction.  To me another big factor is the fact that less work is involved in processing images as you don’t have to work to get the lines straight!  

I’ve previously mentioned that the lens is also nearly impervious to flare, even with the bright directional sun right in the frame.  I consider this to a hugely important metric for landscape lenses, as there will be many backlit scenarios where you will want to use the lens.  Another great bonus here is that the lens produces a lovely sunburst effect when stopped down.

The lens does show a minor amount of lateral chromatic aberrations in high contrast areas along the edges of the frame, but fortunately this is the easy kind to fix. Clicking the “Remove Chromatic Aberrations” box in your favorite editing software should eliminate it.  This isn’t a major issue with the lens at all.

At f/2 the lens has a usable amount of resolution, but fairly weak contrast.  The sharpness profile is fairly even across the frame, though, so while the lens isn’t exceptionally sharp or contrasty wide open, the corner performance is comparatively strong.  Here’s a look at wide open crops from across the frame, left, center, and right.

Stopping down to f/2.8 provides a notable uptick in resolution and particularly in contrast.  It’s as if the veiling has lifted, and all the textures are much crisper.  This is very obvious in the center, but less so in the corners, which are improved but were already relatively good.  There’s less vignette, more contrast, and little more resolution.  I would say that critical sharpness begins at f/2.8.  Here is a comparison between f/2 and f/2.8 along with the f/2.8 crops:

At f/4 there is a bit more improvement.  Here’s a look at the crops:

At f/5.6 the illumination is much more even across the frame and is probably the optimal aperture for landscape shooting.  The corners look pretty good here, but the biggest advantage is how even the result is in terms of vignette, contrast, and resolution.  Here’s the crops to prove it:

When I compared the lens directly to the aforementioned Tamron at 15mm, f/2.8, I found the Laowa was certainly wider in framing, and the low distortion means that it won’t lose even more width during the distortion correction (and the Tamron will).  The difference between the two is night and day.  The Laowa also showed superior light transmission.  The Tamron showed less vignette, more contrast, and better center resolution.  The even performance of the Laowa means that the Tamron’s advantage is lost by the time you reach the corners.  f/2.8 Edge comparison then Center comparison.

When I stopped the lenses down the Tamron’s resolution and contrast advantage in the center shrunk to near nothing, so at landscape apertures there won’t be a significant difference (though ironically now the Tamron’s corners are a little better). 

If shooting landscapes, however, I favor the Tamron’s color rendition and contrast.  Out at infinity the Tamron has superior contrast and sharpness across most of the frame save the very edges of the frame:

One caveat, though:  the Laowa can use traditional filters; the Tamron can’t.  That could really close the gap on color and contrast.  Here’s one of the last shots I took with the Laowa 15mm, handheld, and I love both the look of the shot and the great detail in all of the pine needles.

If you want to shoot interiors or architecture, however, the Laowa is clearly a better choice.  That low distortion is a huge difference maker, as I detailed earlier.  Here’s a few interior shots with the Laowa:

The lens doesn’t show exceptional contrast, and I find colors slightly undersaturated, but these can be easily remedied to taste in post.  Here is a case in point:

This focal length is an excellent one for landscape work; it is wide enough to be used creatively but not so wide that composition becomes extremely challenging. The low distortion increases the usefulness for shooting architecture or interiors, so this might be an appealing option for those that do real estate photography.  Here’s a few other real world images:

You can find more images in the Lens Image Gallery here.

There is a fairly pronounced vignette at f/2 which diminishes a fair bit by f/4 but with only a very slight improvement at f/5.6.  There is definitely still a little left by traditional landscape apertures like f/5.6 and f/8.  Whether or not this is an issue will depend on the scene.  If you are shooting snowy scenes you will still notice some vignette at these apertures, and you can get a weird blue-green tint to the vignetted area.  You can see what I need in this corrected result:

Because there is no standard profile in Adobe yet, and not in camera profile due to the lack of electronics in the lens, you are left manually correcting the vignette in post…and just having to deal with it with JPEGs or video.  I consider this unfortunate considering how “open source” Sony is with third party lenses.  Update:  if you are willing to invest a minor amount of work, you can download a profile for the lens from Venus Optics here.  I find the vignette correction a little too aggressive in the extreme corners, but it works fairly well.  I made some minor tweaks to mine.  Here’s a look at the before/after of the f/2 image of our brick wall from above:

There’s a secondary issue with this profile for a camera without electronics – the profile has no way of adjusting for changed aperture, so it will apply just as much vignette correction to an f/11 image as an f/2 one.  Bottom line is that for me I’d rather make some quick manual adjustments than use this profile.

I also tested the coma performance of the lens, as this is a lens pretty much begging to be used for astrophotography.  That combination of a great, wide focal length, good light transmission, and unusually wide maximum aperture makes this an appealing option on paper.  In practice, there are some mild disappointments, as the lens does suffer from some comatic aberrations.  While star points look nice and crisp in the center of the frame, as you move towards the edges the stars elongate and appear to grow wings.  One constellation reminded me of a flock of ducks flying.  The upside is that you pretty much have to be looking at the image on a pixel level to see this (so if I owned the lens I wouldn’t hesitate to use it in this application), but I’ve seen much better performances in controlling coma than this.  The best lens I’ve reviewed in the past few years for astro is the Samyang XP 14mm f/2.4 lens, though that only comes in a Canon mount and would have to be used via adapter on a Sony body.  Here’s a look at the Tamron result (left) compared to the Laowa result (right).  Full Laowa image below.

There are some strengths and weaknesses here, but the near lack of distortion makes this a uniquely compelling lens for some shooting situations.

Good Option for Video?

I’ve had the question, “Is this a good lens for video?” asked of me several times.  In many ways the answer is a solid yes.  I used it a fair bit on a Moza Air Cross Gimbal with the a7R3, and got some fantastic footage.  While there is no autofocus, that isn’t necessarily a bad thing for video with a lens like this.  In many cases it will have been better to prefocus in such a way that everything will be in focus at all times, allowing you to not worry about focus shifting during your recording.  The low, low distortion makes this lens a real winner for doing something real estate walkthroughs or city shots where you want to avoid distortion of straight lines.  Potential negatives might include the vignette, though if stopped down a bit this won’t be a problem.  It isn’t an issue if you shoot Super 35, either, though you will have a less wide field of view, obviously.  Still, a 15mm lens with a 1.5x crop factor puts you right under the classic 24mm, which is very, very useful.  The lens has a very smooth focus ring, so if you are using a geared focus follow system or even something simpler, you should get smooth pulls.  Finally, you do have the option of declicking the aperture ring, which further extends the usefulness of the lens.  You can see some video work in my final video review here.

It is worth noting that for video work the fact that the lens doesn’t have high native contrast may not be a bad thing.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this lens fills a niche that is relatively unfilled by other lenses in the Sony FE lineup. There are few quality wide angle lenses available for the system, and no others that combine this wide a focal length with this wide of an aperture.  Furthermore, I’m not aware of any tilt/shift lenses available for Sony E mount, so this lens also fills a gap for work where very low distortion is required. If you don’t mind manual focus (which is much easier on Sony mirrorless!) you will discover a well-made, premium quality lens. I would like to have seen more contrast from the lens, and a little more saturated color, but that is a taste issue. I also would love to see some electronics in the lens, particularly for Sony FE, but that hasn’t been a part of Laowa’s designs as of yet (though at a price tag of $899 USD, it’s easy to argue that it should!) On a positive front, though, the close focus ability of the lens gives you some creative license, as does the extra bright aperture. All told this is the kind of lens with which you can have a lot of fun…and its reasonable size and weight make it easy to bring along. Venus Optics has given us another compelling option in the form of the Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D!

Pros:

  • Beautiful construction with a very “Classic Zeiss” aesthetic
  • Lives up to the Zero Distortion claim
  • Very good flare resistance
  • Chromatic aberrations very minor
  • Usable image quality wide open; very good image quality stopped down
  • Can use screw in filters in a reasonable 72mm size
  • Wider maximum aperture than competing lenses
  • Aperture can be declicked

Cons:

  • Colors a little flat
  • Fairly heavy vignette
  • In some settings the vignette has a greenish-blue tint to it
  • No electronics or weather sealing
  • Moderately expensive

Gear Used:
Venus Optics Laowa 15mm f/2: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amplis Foto (use code AMPLIS52018DA to get 5% off | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Peak Design Slide Lite: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :





DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

January 17th, 2018

The Laowa 15mm f/2 Zero D lens is another intriguing wide angle option from Chinese company Venus Optics.  This is the third of their lenses that I have reviewed, and each lens has had some unique selling points to set it apart from the crowd.  This is the first lens from Laowa that I have reviewed for Sony FE, and the Sony a7R series is a great platform for manual focus lenses.  It’s definitely an easier platform to focus them on and assure that you get good results.  One advantage over the 12mm f/2.8 Zero D (outside a larger maximum aperture) is that the 15mm can use traditional screw in filters at a common 72mm size.  I’ll be breaking down the strengths and weaknesses of the lens in my upcoming review, but, in the meantime, you can check images of the Laowa 15mm f2 along with images that I’m taking with it mounted on a Sony a7R III (and I might throw in a gallery of images from the APS-C a6500 as an option, too!).

Images of the Laowa 15mm f2 Zero D:

Images taken with the Laowa 15mm f2 Zero D:

 

Venus Optics Laowa 15mm f/2: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amplis Foto (use code AMPLIS52018DA to get 5% off | Amazon UK
Sony a7R III Camera: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK  | Ebay
Sony a6500: B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon.ca | Amazon UK | Ebay
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X2 (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. You can also make a donation here if you would like.  Visit my Amazon page for some of my gear of choice! Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52018DA in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

Check me out on:

My Patreon:  | Google+: | Facebook: | Twitter: | Flickr: | 500px: | Sign Up for My Newsletter :



DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/15mm Review

Dustin Abbott

January 24th, 2015

High Challenge, High Reward

In the fall of 2013 I reviewed a manual focus only ultra wide angle lens. I noted in that review that an ultra-wide lens is a challenging tool to use for many photographers because the extreme focal length requires a completely different mentality in composition. Distortion is always part of the package, exaggerating certain portions of the image. Wide angle lenses produce the illusion of space/distance. As a result it is possible to take some really bad pictures with such lenses. When used effectively, however, ultra wide angle lenses produce some of the most strikingly dramatic images possible. Some of my favorite images that I have ever taken have been with such lenses.  I love the look you can achieve by choosing what you will distort/emphasize to tell the story in a dramatic way.  In this image, for example, I chose to emphasize the bristlecone pine that stands as a sentinel overlooking the Grand Canyon in Arizona.

My previous ultra wide angle review was of the cheap upstart, the Samyang/Rokinon 14mm f/2.8. It offers surprisingly good optics along with a few drawbacks. The Zeiss Distagon 2.8/15mm is the Mercedes of the genre, offering a superlative build quality, killer optics, and one distinct advantage that we will address in a moment. It also comes with a distinct disadvantage, of course, and that is a price that is nearly 10 times that of the cheap Rokinon.

Wide angle lenses have distinct challenges, most notably distortion and the serious challenge of having to resolve incredible amounts of detail. Wide angle lenses are frequently used in situations where resolution in the corners matters. This has often been a shortcoming for wide angle lenses, unfortunately, and until the release of Canon’s new 16-35mm f/4L IS Canon’s wide angle zooms really suffered in this area. The resolution of the Zeiss Distagon is hard to beat, and part of its strength is its ability to resolve into the corners of the image.

Sexy, in a Zeiss Sort of Way…

The Distagon has a superlative build quality.  It’s sleek black metal body is, like many Zeiss lenses, rather sexy.  It is not a small or light lens, but neither is it exceptionally large or heavy. It is 5.31″/135mm long and weighs 28.92oz/820g. The lens is fairly narrow at the lens mount but tapers out toward the focus ring (which is actually an independently moving section with a finely ribbed ring in the center). Zeiss focus rings are typically made of metal (like this one) and designed to last for a lifetime. The lens makes one more dramatic taper to a very wide front element with a permanent lens hood.

The lens cap is like other ultra wide lenses with bulbous front elements in that it fits over the permanent lens hood rather than clipping into the filter thread. This lens cap (made of metal) seems to rely primarily on a vacuum suction effect to hold it on, and this is, in my experience, an imperfect system. I often carry camera and lens combos in a Black Rapid strap system and found in cold weather the contraction of the metal produced a slightly looser fit. The lens cap came off a few times, once while walking along a path at the Grand Canyon in Arizona. On this occasion the cap fell onto the path and got some minor cosmetic damage because of its metal construction and the rocky nature of the trail that I was on. (And yes, the gaffer tape was already applied, but it is still not a perfect solution.) I would recommend removing the cap when going out in a similar setting and relying on a filter to protect the front element.

Yes, a filter.

I alluded to a distinct advantage this lens has over other ultrawide angle options, including Nikon’s exceptional 14-24mm f/2.8 zoom and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 that I own. It is the widest lens that I am aware of that allows for the use of traditional filters. The filter thread is not small at 95mm, and filters in that size will not come cheap, but they will certainly be cheaper (and much easier to use) than add-on filter solutions that use square filters. I am a big fan of having a protection filter on my lenses at all times, and Zeiss was kind enough to provide a very nice Zeiss branded UV filter. It is particularly reassuring to have such a filter in place when the front element is bulbous and at least feels more exposed and vulnerable. One note on filters: the fixed (permanent) lens hood means that the filter is only exposed at certain points and means that using a filter removal tool is not a possibility. Don’t over-tighten those filters…particularly circular polarizers!

The lens’ internal construction is 15 elements in 12 groups including some two aspheric elements and an anti-reflective coating to reduce ghosting and reflections. The lens will focus down quite closely (9.84″/24.99 cm) and has a reasonable maximum reproduction value as a result.  This allows for some fun shots where you can really emphasize a key element while retaining a lot of context around the shot.  I’ve done that with this spiny cactus “portrait” here.

The Distagon has Zeiss’s signature smooth manual focus, and in this application the focus action is very smooth and quick with very light weight/damping. This lens is unique amongst the Zeiss lenses that I have used because of its comparitively short focus throw, which is only about 30 degrees from minimum focus to infinity. The focus ring has that great, mechanical feel without any of the “disconnect” that many autofocus lenses exhibit. The stops at minimum and infinity focus, for example, have a hard, definite feel. It is extremely easy to go from from extreme to another. The biggest challenge for manually focusing a wide angle lens is the “distance” from your subject the extremely wide focal length creates. This makes visual confirmation more difficult (although for some reason I find the Zeiss far easier to visually focus than the Rokinon). In many situations this isn’t particularly important; even at f/2.8 and a 5 foot focus distance the depth of field at 15mm is already nearly 8 1/2 feet. Stopping down to f/4 produces a depth of field of nearly 24 feet and and f/5.6 produces an infinite depth of field from 2.34 feet out to infinity. Using the hyperfocal guide imprinted on the lens is useful for achieving ultimate depth of field.

In Nikon mounts the Distagon 15mm will have a manual aperture ring, but in the Canon (ZE) mount the lens does not have the manual aperture ring and the aperture iris is controlled electronically from the body itself (this is either a pro or a con depending on your perspective). EXIF data is also communicated as per normal to the camera body. The only difference with this lens as compared to normal autofocus lenses in operation is the fact that there is no autofocus motor and the lens is manually focused. It even has focus confirm that will beep and light up the appropriate focus point when focus is achieved. I’ve received a number of questions regarding Zeiss lenses and using focus confirm with the lens wide open. I have recently acquired an EG-S focus screen that I will write about shortly, and it is definitely easier to visually determine focus at wide apertures with that screen in place, but I have a large catalog of images (a number of which that I have shared in the past year) taken at wide apertures using the focus confirm option and a standard focus screen. My keeper rate with Zeiss lenses in this fashion is actually very high once I develop a feel for the lens. If you have a camera body that allows for interchangeable screens, however, the insignificant investment for a focus screen ($34.99 is what I paid at B&H) that is more attuned to the unique needs of a manual focus prime makes a lot of sense.

At some point in my review of Zeiss lenses I typically have to address the elephant in the room (other than manual focus), and that is the price. The Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/15mm is a very expensive lens. It’s price clocks in at nearly $3000. That is not an insignificant investment, and there are a wide variety of options at any number of price points beneath it. Yet there is a reason why people choose the Zeiss and are very happy to have made the investment.

Image Quality

The Zeiss has very few optical shortcomings, and produces stunning imagery. There are a number of significant optical strengths for the lens, starting with resolution. I noted earlier that corner performance for many wide angle lenses is a significant Achille’s heel. The Zeiss resolves strongly throughout the frame, and that resolution is further boosted by a quality that I rarely see equalled by non-Zeiss lenses, and that is microcontrast. When I use that term I refer not only to the global contrast of any particular image but also to the unique quality of strong contrast in the fine details. It aids the appearance of resolution because images do not have any of the “haze” that makes them appear softer. This really helps images from Zeiss lenses like this one have a nice three dimensional quality.  Head to head comparisons consistently show that Zeiss lenses have better contrast than just about any of their competitors (including the Nikon 14-24mm f/2.8), which simply means that details resolve more crisply. While that may not be apparent in your average web share, it certainly will make a HUGE difference if you are doing large prints.

Another strength of the lens and Zeiss talking point is the lenses’ extremely strong performance in the chromatic aberration/fringing department. The lens exhibits essentially no fringing or chromatic aberrations in field use, which is yet another asset in helping images have that extra “pop”. Zeiss lenses are further renowned for their exceptional color rendering (and color accuracy), and the Distagon T* is certainly not an exception. A number of users have noted that their need for processing images dramatically decreases when using Zeiss lenses for all of the reasons above. This is obviously key for video users, as processing steps in video production are both time consuming and require a lot of processing power. One other interesting phenomena I have observed when using Zeiss lenses is that the dynamic range seems positively impacted. The sensor of one’s camera ultimately makes the determination of how great the dynamic range is, but Zeiss lenses seem to be particularly strong in dealing with scenes with strong highlights and shadows.

While flare control is not perfect, the performance here is very strong, with only a very small amount of ghosting in certain situations.  I don’t enjoy cleaning up ghosting in post processing, so the less of it the better! The lens also produces very, very nice sunbursts when stopped down that are clearly defined and attractive, as this photo shows.

The 18 point sunburst is a MASSIVE improvement on the extremely bland sunstars produced by the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 (which is one of the key areas that I have criticized it in the past). That alone can add a key element to one’s images that can set them apart from the crowd and is one of the single greatest qualities that have given me a bit of lens envy.  The image above would not have been nearly as dramatic with an inferior sunburst.

One fortunate quality shared with the Rokinon is the extremely low “coma” or distortion of light sources near the edge of the frame which, combined with excellent sharpness and contrast, make the Zeiss an extremely compelling option for astraphotography. The Zeiss shines when the lights go out, and not even the excellent new Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS compares in the least to the performance for shooting the night sky. Star points are produced with fine detail and precision, and there is excellent, clear contrast between the bright points of light and the dark of the sky that seems much muddier with zoom lenses. There is a fairly small list of lenses that are truly exceptional in this setting, but this is certainly one of them.

Picks and Pans

There are a couple of negatives that also need to be discussed. Vignetting seems particularly strong wide open and even into the f/4 range, although fortunately vignetting (at least for stills) is perhaps the single easiest thing to correct for in post.  If you are more of a JPEG shooter, however, this might affect you, and since Zeiss is a third party manufacturer camera bodies will not correct for peripheral illumination (vignetting) in camera.  That being said, unlike some wide angle lenses, the vignetting will actually clear up completely when the lens is stopped down to f/8 or more, so all is not lost.  Ultra wide lenses by nature tend towards distortion, and the Distagon T* is no Tilt-Shift lens. Just a little tip here: the angle of the sensor (camera) in relation to your subject will either minimize or emphasize that distortion. You can compose in such a way that minimizes that distortion (like in this shot with a tall, straight saguaro cactus in it):

But you can also use that distortion creatively (particularly in portrait oriented shots) to really emphasize and stretch the foreground like this:

This would not be my first choice for architectural work, but it is far from the worse option, too, as the image quality wide open allows it to be a more effective low light option than many other lenses. Its actual lens [barrel] distortion (not to be confused with the perspective distortion) is relatively low compared to its class.

One issue that I noted is that on my Canon 6D bodies the lens tended to underexpose by somewhere between 1/3rd and 1/2 stops. This is not a complaint that I have observed from others necessarily, but I did note it in my application and had to adjust for it in my shooting.  One final potential concern for landscape photographers is that the lens does not have weathersealing.  That being said, I have rarely been concerned when using manual focus lenses from any era in adverse weather because any concern about weathersealing would be purely mechanical and not about more delicate electronics.  I’ve never personally had an issue with a non-sealed manual focus lens in bad weather.  Still, the 2.8/15 represents a pretty big investment, so this may present a concern for you.

Conclusion

In conclusion, this is a master class lens that can produce epic images. Here are a couple that I’ve put a little “polish” on that I believe show off what can be achieved with this lens along with a little processing.  Most of the photos in this review have minimal processing, but I do want to show what can be achieved with such an amazing optic and post work.

I’ve shot with a similar focal length for several years and have learned a certain familiarity with it. The degree of challenge associated with the focal length pays dividends in the incredible image quality you can achieve with it. The Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/15mm is a very expensive lens, but those who make the investment find a highly rewarding lens that produces images inferior options cannot match.  You would be hard pressed to find an owner of the lens who would not say that it was worth its high price tag.  It is simply one the finest wide angle lenses that exists…period. You can count the ultra wide options that can compete optically on basically one finger. Its contrast is unrivaled, which gives images that extra “pop” that can set your work apart from the crowd.  Zeiss optics are a genuine joy to use, and despite a few shortcomings the Distagon 15mm is one of their finest.  If the prospect of manual focus and the price doesn’t turn you off, it is unlikely that anything about the actual lens will disappoint you.

Pros and Cons

 Pros:

  • Superior optical performance
  • Resolves into the corners
  • Exceptional contrast
  • Exceptional build quality
  • Smooth, accurate focus ring
  • Will accept traditional filters
  • Relatively low native distortion
  • Great looking sunstars
  • Chromatic aberrations are near non-existent
  • Exceptional color reproduction

Cons:

  • Extravagant price
  • Manual focus only
  • Not weathersealed
  • Some ghosting when the sun is directly in the frame
  • Fairly strong vignetting at wide apertures
  • I’m not crazy about the lens cap design

Review Notes:  I have reviewed a retail sample provided to me for review purposes by Carl Zeiss lenses (Americas).  All photos in this review were taken by myself with the lens other than the photos of the lens, which I took with a Canon 100mm f/2.8L IS USM.  I have striven for accuracy and objectivity as always.

Check out the Lens Image Gallery Here:  You can also find more Zeiss reviews here.

Gear Used:

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Zeiss Distagon T* 15mm f/2.8 ZE Lens for Canon EF Mount
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (Use code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

[contact-form][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Website’ type=’url’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.