Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Flickr 500px
See My Reviews

Zeiss Milvus Planar T* 1.4/85mm Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

January 29th, 2016

Zeiss Milvus Planar T* 1.4/85mm Image Gallery

I’m always excited to spend time with a Zeiss lens.  I love the beautiful build, the great optics, and the more deliberate process of manually focusing the lenses.  Not everyone enjoys the manual focus process, but I like the analog, organic process when I have time to be more deliberate in my shooting.  I keep an EG-S precision focus screen in one of my 6D bodies specifically for use with MF lenses, and that inexpensive addition makes for a much easier shooting process.  I’ve even done some event shooting with MF lenses, and so long as you think about prefocusing in some situations, it is certainly possible.  The Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4 is a beautifully made lens that shares a lot of the Otus’ line DNA, but adds a trick of its own with fully weather sealed construction, a first for Zeiss lenses (at least in a Canon/Nikon sphere). Here’s a close look at the build and handling of the lens:

Here is a very careful look at the image quality, bokeh, and resolution of the lens:

Here is a video review of the lens that I know you’ll enjoy!

Here’s a link to my full real world review of the lens:  click here.

Images Taken with the Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4

Images of the Zeiss Milvus 85mm f/1.4:

Gear Used:

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Zeiss Milvus Planar T* 1.4/85mm Lens
Super Precision Matte Eg-S Interchangeable Focusing Screen
Adobe Lightroom CC Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure X (Use Code “dustinabbott” to get 10% anything and everything)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Three Way Shootout Part 2: Resolution

Dustin Abbott

April 13th, 2015

Red vs. TungstenThis article will seek to examine what is probably the single biggest burning question for us all:  can the Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD live up to the superlative standard for sharpness (particularly in the corners) set by the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS?  I first want to give a shout-out to Tamron of Canada (Amplis Foto) for providing the copy of the Tamron for this comparison and B&H Photo of New York for providing the 16-35mm f/4L IS and the 16-35mm f/2.8L II for this comparison.  The copy of the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 that I use for comparison was purchased from the great people at Amplis Foto a few years ago.  Reward these companies that provide the answers to your questions by shopping there.  Back to the question of whether or nor the Tamron can optically compare to the Canon…

Before answering that question, let me first say this:  There is only one loser in this comparison, and that is the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II. It tells its age in many ways, including very poor performance in the corners, noticeably inferior contrast (even stopped down), poorer flare resistance, and much more chromatic aberrations (both green and purple fringing).  One thing that I have learned as a reviewer and one who actually does photography with a huge variety of lenses is that field use is kinder to many lenses than chart testing.  Some lenses don’t chart very well, but compensate by producing good pictures when actually used.  Some of you may own the EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II and probably have produced some stunning photos with it.  I have certainly seen a number of amazing images from it.  If you own it and like it, then just go on enjoying it; the existence of these other lenses doesn’t make yours worse!  I have had to the same thing with my EF 135mm f/2L despite its optical performance being passed by both the Zeiss APO Sonnar T* 2/135mm and the Samyang 135mm f/2 ED UMC.  But when this lens has to go head to head with the new Canon or the new Tamron, it comes away looking pretty bad by comparison (with a few notable exceptions that will show up in the next articles).  When I took it and f/4L IS out I could definitely tell a difference between the images.  The difference was immediately noticeable when comparing images, as both the sharpness and contrast differences (along with chromatic aberrations) were quickly apparent.

Not so with the Tamron and the f/4L. These are both amazing optical instruments. There is a bit of give and take:

  • The Canon has better chromatic aberration control (almost none). The Tamron has very little, but more than the Canon.
  • The Tamron is much better in the vignetting department, with noticeably less shading in the corners. That difference is even more apparent when it is stopped down to f/4.
  • The Canon is marginally sharper in the extreme corners, with the advantage virtually gone by the time the Tamron is stopped down to f/4.
  • The Tamron produces slightly more micro-contrast.
  • The Tamron (obviously) produces a more blurred background at or close to minimum focus.
  • The Tamron (surprisingly) has less distortion.

Most of these differences, however, are only distinguishable by comparing images taken in controlled environments side by side.  In fact, it is very hard to distinguish images taken by these lenses from each other except if they are shot with narrow depth of field (the f/4 backgrounds are a little busier due to the smaller aperture). The color rendition is quite similar. There were a few situations where the Canon had some motion blur because it would drop to a lower shutter speed due to the slower maximum aperture, but under normal circumstances I would just raise the ISO to compensate. This is really only an issue if you are a low light situation where that isn’t an option.

In subsequent articles we will look closer at:

  1. Angle of view
  2. Distortion
  3. Coma and shooting the stars
  4. Bokeh
  5. Flare Resistance
  6. Handling

This article is going to take a closer look at resolution, however.  The best way to visualize this comparison is by watching the video below where I go through the process of acquiring the images and then interactively look at the results.  I think you will find this very interesting:

None of these images have received any processing or correction.  I shot them as RAW images so that there would be no in camera processing.  There is not additional sharpness, chromatic aberration correction, distortion correction, or vignette correction.  As you can see, the optical difference between our two top competitors is marginal.  Both the Tamron and the Canon f/4L IS offer extremely impressive resolution.  If you would prefer to do this comparison yourself, here are the full size images of the Tamron at f/4 (top) and the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS at f/4 on the bottom – if you will click through you can go to a page with the full size images that you can zoom into at any point.  One thing to note:  the focus point was the poles in the center of the image, which means that at this aperture the bottom corners (and bottom quarter of the image) are not yet in focus, so don’t draw any conclusions on any of the lenses from that.

Tamron f-4Canon f-4

Here are the pertinent crop comparisons.  In this series, the Tamron is on the left (as marked) and the Canon is on the right.  Other than the heavier vignetting of the Canon and a minute amount of additional fringing on the Tamron, making a visual distinction between the lenses is difficult.  I do think the extreme left still slightly favors the Canon, but every other portion of the image is a draw.

As a final comparison, here is the f/4 image from the older Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II:

Canon II f-4You can quickly see that the newer lenses outresolve the older f/2.8L lens in a dramatic way.  That is particularly true in the corners, but is true throughout the frame as well.  The older lens also demonstrates far more chromatic aberrations and reduced contrast.  If you want to look further, I am including 1500px copies from the Tamron at 15mm, 20mm, and 30mm in f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, and f/11.

This second series will share similar images from the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS (f/2.8 results won’t appear for obvious reasons):  16mm, 20mm, and 31mm in f/4, f/5.6, f/8, and f/11.

The third series shares the images from the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II:  16mm, 21mm, and 31mm in f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, and f/11.

Our final series is from the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8.  These images (for obvious reasons) are only at 14mm:  f/2.8, f/4, f/5.6, f/8, and f/11

It may be harder to visualize the differences in these images, so let me summarize my findings: at 15/16mm for the Canon f/4L and Tamron further stopping down is just about either getting a slightly deeper depth of field or because you want a slower shutter speed:  they are both essentially perfect sharp at f/5.6 and sharpness doesn’t change at f/8 or f/11.  f/5.6 is probably a great aperture to choose for landscape work, as it represent something close to peak sharpness across the frame.

As for the Rokinon, it suffers in this comparison for a few reasons.  The incredibly heavy vignetting really detracts from the image quality here, but note that this is very easy to correct for in post.  The Rokinon also suffers because of its fairly extreme distortion that stretches the edges of the image and gives the appearance of softness.  Towards the center of the image it is fairly equal to the other competitors, but is definitely the worst in the extreme corners.  Stopped down and corrected it continues to offer great image quality at its bargain price point, but it is not at the level of our top two performers.

At 20mm most of the previous observations remained true, although the Tamron looked better in the corners than the Canon f/4L while the Canon looked better in the center (essentially reversed, which could be a focus variation).  When stopped down to f/5.6 and beyond the images were indistinguishable from each other.  The older Canon continued to lag behind the other two lenses in an equally obvious way.  Test say that the Tamron is actually the sharpest option available in the 21-24mm range.

A 30mm the older Canon seems to fall behind even further.  It is quite soft wide open even towards the middle of the frame when compared to the other two.  The Tamron is now basically equal to the Canon f/4L even wide open at f/2.8.  Both of these lenses are producing a nearly flawless result, however, with great resolution across the frame and excellent contrast.

(Believe it or not, there are a couple of places in later discussions where the older Canon f/2.8 II is a winner, but resolution and overall image quality is not one of them.)

Put simply, while I do feel that there is a very marginal advantage at wider apertures for the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS (at least at 16mm), you can take resolution off the table as a means of making your decision between the new Tamron 15-30 VC and the Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS.  In subsequent articles were will compare the differences in other areas that might help you make that decision one way or another, but I don’t think that you can declare a clear winner between these two new wide angle zooms when it comes to resolution…unless you need an f/2.8 aperture.  The Tamron is the far and away winner of our four contestants in resolution at f/2.8 (though the f/4L concedes this by default).  In practical use for most subjects, however, it would be hard to distinguish the images from one lens to the other.  The only exception to this rule is close focus shots at maximum aperture.  The f/2.8 aperture is going to produce more defused backgrounds, but this also represents a fairly marginal use of these types of lenses.  This series of images demonstrates how similar in practice these lenses really are.

If you were unable to tell the difference, here’s the clue:  Canon images are first in the sequence, Tamron images are second.  Most of the Tamron images are at f/2.8 (other than some of the landscape shots), while the similar shots from the Canon are at f/4, of course.  I think you will probably agree that in real world use, you aren’t going to be tell a resolution difference between these lenses.  They are just going to produce great looking, sharp images…period.  If you can’t produce sharp results with either of these lenses, then I’m afraid you can’t blame the glass.  These lenses offer the pinnacle of image quality in wide angle zooms.  The shootout will continue, but between our main competitors you will probably have to call this one a draw.

If you want to read the other sections, take a look here:

Part 1:  Specs, Build, and Objectives

Part 2:  Resolution

Part 3: Angle of View, Distortion, and Bokeh

Part 4:  Flare Resistance, Astraphotography, Handling, and Conclusions

Part 5:  Gallery of Favorite Images from the Review

 

Gear Used:

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Lens (Canon EF)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Lens
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Rokinon 14mm f/2.8 ID ED UMC for Canon
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (Use code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews! Consider supporting Amplis Foto in Canada by buying the new Tamron 15-30 VC from them. They provide service in Canada for all Tamron products, and a great people to work with.

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Three Way Shootout Part 1: the Lenses

Dustin Abbott

April 9th, 2015

Header 1

When I did my review of the Tamron 15-30mm VC last month, I did it without the benefit of having its direct competition (at least in a Canon mount) on hand. The review period was quick because of the demand for review pre-release copies and so I didn’t have a chance to get the competitors on hand. I had to rely on my memory of those lenses and the gut impressions I got from using them. Subsequent reviews by other review sites have largely confirmed those impressions. I felt strongly enough about the Tamron that I put my own preorder in. My one regret, however, was that I didn’t get a chance to directly compare the 16-35mm f/4L IS with the Tamron. When Tamron of Canada mentioned that I could get some more time with the 15-30 VC I immediately reached out to my buddies at B&H Photo to provide me a comparison copy of the 16-35mm f/4L, and just for the fun of it, to throw the older 16-35mm f/2.8L II into the mix as well. They were very obliging, and so I owe a debt of gratitude to both them and Tamron of Canada (Amplis Foto) for enabling this bit of “fanboy fantasy”. A lot of you have requested this comparison, so you thank these great companies for making it happen!

As I mentioned, there have been a number of reviews that have come to light since I launched mine in mid-February. Those reviews have for the most part affirmed the various conclusions that I came to myself. However, in one case, the chart testing at The Digital Picture by Bryan Carnathan (a reviewer that I have a lot of personal respect for) seemed to indicate that the Tamron was not a sharp as what I found to be, or at least as compared to the Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS. While I did directly compare the Tamron 15-30 to two lenses from my own kit: the Tamron 24-70 f/2.8 VC (which by the way, has since been serviced by the fine people at Tamron Canada and is sharper than ever!) and the Rokinon 14mm f/2.8, I regretted not being to compare it to its natural competition.

Threesome-2

I decided that I would do my own direct comparison of these three lenses, but I will stick to my strengths here. This will not be a chart comparison, but rather a real world photography comparison but doing my utmost to deliver those results in as accurate, controlled, and unbiased way as possible. I appreciate those that do chart testing, and always enjoy looking at those results and using them as a part of my own purchase decisions. I recognize that it is easier to be scientific with chart testing. But much like testing a camera without a lens attached (hello, DXO) I don’t find that they always tell the full story. In real life no photographer shoots charts; we shoot real-world subjects…with lenses attached! I personally find results that imitate the way I will actually use a lens to be more personally beneficial.

On top of that I want to do my best to help those of you that are weighing which of the fine options to choose for your own kit. I will do my absolute best to highlight the strengths and weaknesses of each lens along with some visual evidence to back those conclusions up. I don’t work for any of these companies, nor do I own stock in them. I’m not trying to sell you anything. If anything, I am just thankful that after a long period of having no great option available in the wide angle zoom department, Canon shooters suddenly have a wealth of choices.

But what about the new EF 11-24mm f/4L? I do plan to review that lens at some point, but I don’t feel like it is really a natural competitor to any of these lenses. It costs nearly three times as much as the Tamron and the 16-35 f/4L IS and almost twice as much as the 16-35mm f/2.8L. While there is some focal length overlap, it is a far more extreme instrument, and, frankly, there are only a limited number of photographers that actually need the extreme focal length provided by the 11-24mm f/4L. These three lenses, however, are very natural competitors.

Natural Competitors

Part One Header

The Tamron is uniquely situated to compete with both of these Canon options, as it has the wider aperture of the former combined with the image stabilizer of the latter. At the same time it is a unique lens, so the feature set of the lens ends up being a combo of these two lenses rather just one of them. Part of what I will be doing is comparing the feature set of each lens to help you make a more informed decision if you are in the market. Unfortunately there is no lens here that has it all; as always, there is some give and take.

The 16-35 f/2.8L has a wide aperture that lets in twice the light as the f/4 lens and retains the ability to use traditional filters, but it lacks an image stabilizer and has the weakest optics by a good margin.

The 16-35mm f/4L IS has amazing optics and an effective image stabilizer, and it too retains the ability to use traditional filters, but it has a slower aperture than the other two and is thus less appealing as an event/wedding lens where you need to stop action and need the wider aperture.

The Tamron 15-30 VC has the wide aperture, image stabilizer, and the great optics, but at the cost of being able to use traditional filters and considerably more size and weight.  It also sports a six year warranty in North America – kind of a big deal!

Both the Tamron 15-30 VC and Canon 16-35mm f/4L IS are released at very reasonable prices relative to their performance, and I noted with delight in my review of the Canon that it was proving the exception to the rule of Canon’s recent exorbitant initial pricing. It has held the price point of $1199 thus far, and other than the usual sales and rebates, I fully anticipate this continuing to be the market price. The same applies to the Tamron, which is being introduced at the same price point despite being an f/2.8 lens. Its price significant undercuts the Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II ($1699) and the Nikon 14-24 f/2.8G ($1999). I fully anticipate Tamron stealing some market share from both of those lenses.

Here is the introductory video that will show you the difference in size and build and lay out the objectives for this comparison.

Here are a few of the questions that I would like to answer during this comparison:

  • Would my perceptions regarding what I found the more exciting lens bear up under direct comparison with the 16-35mm f/4L IS?
  • Is the 16-35mm f/4L IS as bad for astraphotography as what I remembered?
  • When compared directly, does one of these lenses have a clear resolution advantage in field use?
  • I noted the amazing contrast of the new Tamron 15-30. Will that still be the case when compared with the 16-35mm f/4L IS?
  • Is the added bulk and complication of not being able to use front filters a deal breaker with the Tamron 15-30 VC?
  • Is the added width of the Tamron on the long end going to make much of a difference?  Is the extra length on the Canons?

I’ve already begun a series of comparisons to answer these questions and more.  I’m discovering some interesting things, so stay tuned.  I will be breaking down strengths and weaknesses in a variety of fields for each lens, so keep watching for new articles and updates.  Take a look at each part of this comprehensive series.

Part 1:  Specs, Build, and Objectives

Part 2:  Resolution

Part 3: Angle of View, Distortion, and Bokeh

Part 4:  Flare Resistance, Astraphotography, Handling, and Conclusions

Part 5:  Gallery of Favorite Images from the Review

Gear Used:

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Tamron SP 15-30mm f/2.8 Di VC USD Lens (Canon EF)
Canon EF 16-35mm f/2.8L II USM Lens
Canon EF 16-35mm f/4L IS USM Lens
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (Use code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews! Consider supporting Amplis Foto in Canada by buying the new Tamron 15-30 VC from them.  They provide service in Canada for all Tamron products, and a great people to work with.

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21mm Review

Dustin Abbott

April 1st, 2015

I spent about six weeks with the big brother of the Distagon T* 2.8/21mm a few months ago (the Distagon T* 2.8/15mm – click for the review) and thoroughly enjoyed using it. I produced a number of images with it that have been very well received both critically and commercially. I have to confess to having a pretty big soft spot for Zeiss glass. I enjoy using the beautifully crafted tools and love the look of the images that I can produce. An older Zeiss Planar T* 50mm lens has become my lens of choice for shooting my video reviews. I don’t tend to do any color grading on my YouTube videos, so I find that I can get image quality straight out of the camera that I’m happy with.

As a result, I was looking forward to getting my hands on the “little brother” of the Distagon 15mm, and my expectations from it have certainly been met. I noted in my review of the 15mm that ultrawide angle lenses like it provide more of a compositional challenge for many photographers. Canon has recently announced an 11-24mm f/4L lens that I will review in the next couple of months, but upon its announcement I wondered how many photographers actually need a reticular lens that wide. There are a few, of course, that do architectural or interior work, and even a few landscape photographers that might benefit from it, but 11mm on a full frame body is really, really wide. Many photographers will find that 11mm is so wide as to make a lot of compositions very challenging.

The Accessible One

21mm, however, is within what I call the landscape photographers “sweet spot” between 18 and 22mm. It makes for a very natural landscape or wide angle composition. I have a 12mm Rokinon prime for mirrorless bodies that I really love, as 12mm on a crop (Canon’s is 1.6x) falls also within this sweet spot. It is just a very natural and easy focal length to use. The less extreme nature of the focal length also means that this lens is both easier to engineer and more accessible to use. Here a few examples when compared to the Distagon 15mm:

  • Price: the 21mm currently retails at B&H Photo for $1843; the 15mm for $2950
  • Size: the 21mm is 4.29”/109mm and 600g ; the 15mm is 5.31”/135mm and 820g
  • Design: the 21mm has a traditional removable lens hood and lens cap; the 15mm has a fixed lens hood and a large lens cap that fits over the lens hood.
  • Front Filter: the 21mm uses a large but fairly common 82mm filter (I have a number of them already); the 15mm uses a much larger, rarer, and more expensive 95mm filter.

The tradeoff is that the wider focal length can produce uniquely dramatic images when used correctly that the less extreme 21mm cannot. But many photographers will find the 21mm a more natural choice for some or all of the reasons above.

Build and Handling

The Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21mm is instantly recognizable as a Zeiss lens. It has that finely tooled look and feel that reminds one of a Swiss swatch. It is all metal and glass, with a beautiful semi-glass finish that has a fine patina that is very elegant. I am particularly fond of the chrome “nose” on the lens that has the threads of the bayonet mount for the lens hood on the outside and and filter threads on the inside. It adds a very elegant “finish” to the lens when viewed from either the front or in profile. A relatively small petal design lens hood mounts on the bayonet mount and can be reversed for storage. This helps keep the space requirements for storage down, so while I wouldn’t call the lens small, I could safely call it a modestly sized lens. It is not much larger than the Rokinon 50mm f/1.4 that I am concurrently reviewing. One thing to note on the lens hood: it is very important to mount it correctly. There are multiple positions where it will fit on, but unless it is aligned correctly the blades of the lens hood will produce very intrusive vignetting. I had a couple of shots spoiled by not correctly mounting the lens hood. One easy tip: when mounted correctly the words “Carl Zeiss” should be facing upward.

On either side of the lens barrel near the mount is some fine ribbing that provides both some texture variation and also very good grip for mounting or unmounting the lens. Next comes the hyperfocal scale (which seems to be accurate) along with the distance scale. This is followed by the focus ring, which is finely ribbed metal all around and is about an inch in width. The focal ring is pretty much what I would call perfectly damped. It focuses easily enough that I use one finger for focus, but has enough resistance to hold whatever focal position I select and to allow for fine, precise focus. The focus confirm chip will cause the camera to “chirp” and light up the proper selection point in the viewfinder when focus is achieved.

I have found this particular lens very, very easy to focus. I can safely say that it is perhaps the easiest manual focus lens that I have used for achieving focus. I can’t recall discarding any photos for being out of focus from this particular lens. I do have an EG-S focus screen (a super precision matte focus screen) mounted on my Canon 6D body, which certainly helps, but focus is aided by a few other factors. First, while the focal length is wide, it isn’t so wide that one feels an odd sense of being far away from everything like one does when using a more extreme focal length. The lens is also extremely sharp, which further aids being able to visually confirm focus. The focus confirm chip seems properly calibrated, which helps. Finally, 21mm even at f/2.8 has a fairly deep depth of field at most focal points other than close to minimum focus, so near misses are not going to come with much of a penalty if any. Achieving accurate focus at any distance seems quite easy, and I would estimate the focus “throw” on the lens to be about 60 degrees.

Image Quality

I mentioned this lens is sharp. It is very sharp, even wide open, with sharpness beginning in the middle and effectively moving out towards the corners. Only the extreme corners are less sharp than what they could be, but, as you can see from these shots, they are still very good. Stopping down will marginally improve sharpness, but it is more about depth of field than it is sharpness.  The extreme corners do sharpen up when the lens is stopped down.  This video takes a close, interactive look at the image quality and will give you a better sense of what the lens can produce.

Vignetting is not nearly as extreme as with the wider 15mm Distagon. There is some mild vignetting that clears up fairly easily. Distortion is fairly well controlled, but there is a bit more barrel distortion than one might expect. It is still much better than what zoom lenses starting at 24mm exhibit, but, for example, the aforementioned Rokinon 12mm (about 19mm full frame equiv) exhibits a bit less distortion despite a wider forcal length. There is a bit of distortion in the corner extremes, and the lens isn’t as good for astraphotography as the Distagon 15mm because it does exhibit some coma towards the edge of the frame. There are better choices for astraphotography, one of which is the new Tamron 15-30mm VC lens I recently reviewed.  The Distagon 21mm is part of an interesting comparison for this type of shooting done by photographer Ron Brunsvold.  The Distagon 21mm turned in a good but not great performance, which confirms my thoughts regarding its performance in this area when compared with the Distagon 15mm and some other options.

Images shot at closer range and a wide aperture (like the f/2.8 shot above) show that excellent three dimensional effect so common with with Zeiss lenses.  The portrait below shows a similar effect.

Chromatic aberrations are virtually nonexistent in field use. The performance here, like the 15mm Distagon, is exceptional.

The lens handles flare reasonably well, with a very fine line of ghosting artifacts under full glare (just enough to produce some stylish effects for cinematographers like this).

The contrast remains flawless, however, and there continues to be excellent dynamic range. Zeiss lenses do a remarkable job in difficult lighting conditions because of their incredible contrast (and obviously highly effective coatings – that’s what the T* stands for).

There are two very important qualities of Zeiss lens performance that tend to set them apart. The first is color rendition. Zeiss lenses like the Distagon 21mm produce extremely accurate, extremely rich color. They also have some of the best contrast/microcontrast of any lens, period. Textures are rendered with exquisite detail because of both the sharpness of the lens along with that exceptional contrast. If you prefer to do minimal post processing or color grading, then it is hard to beat a Zeiss lens. Images out of camera just have a “look” about them that is, frankly, special. Here are a few landscape samples that show just what I am talking about.

One final bit of optical goodness is that the bokeh rendering is rather tasty for a wide aperture prime. The lens can focus very closely (down to 8.66”/22cm – from the sensor). When you subtract roughly 4 ½” (almost 11cm) from that figure for the length of the lens plus add on the lens hood it means that you can get as close as just a few inches away from your subject. This allows for nice subject isolation along with some environmental bokeh, and that rendering is quite artful. The downside of this is it very easy to end up shadowing your subject by the lens itself at that close a distance.  I would not consider this a great candidate for use with extension tubes because you are already on top of your subject with the native minimum focus distance.

The lens should also be considered by event and wedding photographers.  It is a very valuable focal length for that kind of venue, and the combination of relatively low distortion, great color, excellent wide open sharpness, and ease of focus makes it a compelling option in that kind of setting.

I really enjoyed using the 21mm Distagon. Between the ease of focus and the exceptional image quality, it is both a joy to take images and to view them afterwards. I used the lens along with a pair of manual focus primes (50mm and 135mm) from Samyang/Rokinon for a portrait session and found that the Zeiss was, by far, the easiest of the three to nail focus with. This was due to several of the factors that I mentioned earlier along with the fact that the electronics that Zeiss does include (auto aperture iris control, full EXIF data, and focus confirm) all aid in the acquisition of images.

It is a great lens for doing environmental portraiture and was a nice compliment to the tighter framing of the 50/135mm lenses. I had a chance to shoot in diverse conditions due to shooting both in the wintry environs of Canada in February and early March (in extemely cold conditions) along with some desert beauty in the state of Arizona and even some in-between images in and around the Ozark Region of Missouri. I got a broad range of photos that I am proud to add to my portfolio. You can view more of these images by visiting the lens image gallery here.

Zeiss Shortcomings

I’ve reviewed a number of Zeiss lenses in the past year (I’m working on my seventh in past 8 months), and so it feels like déjà vu to beat the same gong at this point in the review, but let’s be honest about the two main drawbacks when considering a Zeiss lens: 1) they are expensive and 2) they are manual focus only. The Distagon 21mm is only inexpensive when compared to its more expensive big brother. There are any number of less expensive options in both zoom and prime lenses. One doesn’t buy a Zeiss because it is the cheapest option. In fact, if you are one who tends to go through a lot of turnover in your kit, Zeiss may not be your best option. They are lenses to hang onto, to use and cherish, because your results with them over time will only get better. I think of a Zeiss lens as an investment, not an impulse purchase. Don’t buy it and let it collect dust in your bag – use it.

The second issue is just as big for many photographers. Many photographers could not be bothered to mess with manual focus, or perhaps are even intimidated by the prospect. But there is also a percentage of photographers that are perversely the opposite. They prefer a manual focus lens. If you are one of them, then Zeiss lenses are probably your dream come true, because no other modern lens focuses quite as well as them. If you prefer to manually focus, you might as well use the best manual focus lenses.

One little nitpick is that if Sigma can include a nice padded pouch for its much, much cheaper lenses, then surely Zeiss could do the same.  Zeiss lenses are too nice to not be properly protected.  I would recommend picking up the LowePro Lens Case 9x13cm along with the lens to have a nice bit of protection for it – particularly when traveling.

I want to raise one final negative in the midst of all of the positives here. The Distagon 21mm, like all other Zeiss lenses that I have used, claims no weathersealing. No rubber gasket around the lens mount. No mention of how well the front element is sealed. There are no switches to seal, and no autofocus motor to seize up, but still, it seems to me that there could be some attempt to add that peace of mind, particularly on a lens so clearly marketed to landscape photographers. I will balance these remarks by saying that I have never let a lack of weathersealing stop me from shooting Zeiss lenses in any and all weather conditions and have never had an issue yet. There is relatively little to go wrong here, and Zeiss lenses are made to last for a very, very long time.

Conclusion

In conclusion, you can probably tell that using the Zeiss Distagon T* 2.8/21mm has been a joy for me. I know as a photographer when I am reviewing a Zeiss lens that I am going to get a number of images that are going to be special. I know as a lens reviewer and lover of fine gear that I am going to get to use a piece of gear that is finely tooled and crafted and will be a genuine joy to use. The Distagon 21mm is all of these things. It is also very accessible in both its focal length and its ease of use despite being a manual focus lens. If you have never used a manual focus lens, this may be one of the easiest places to start. If you have never experienced the exceptional quality of the images captured with a Zeiss lens, then this is also a great place to start. Zeiss lenses have their own unique set of drawbacks that I have tried to detail above, but there is an indefinable joy in using them as well. If you don’t need the more extreme focal length provided by the Distagon 15mm and want Zeiss quality, the Distagon 21mm is a more accessible option that will satisfy you again and again with great image quality.

Pros:

  • Uniquely beautiful Zeiss build quality
  • Incredibly smooth focus ring
  • Very easy lens to use
  • Excellent sharpness wide open
  • Minimal distortion
  • Accurate color rendition
  • Excellent contrast
  • No discernible CA for field use
  • Reasonably sized 82mm front filter/uses traditional filters

Cons:

  • No Autofocus
  • High price tag
  • No weathersealing
  • More coma than the 15mm Distagon
  • No storage case included.

Review Notes:  I reviewed a retail copy of the lens provided for me by Zeiss USA.  Special thanks to the team at Zeiss for being great to work with and for making some great camera lenses!

Gear Used:

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Zeiss Distagon T* 21mm f/2.8 ZE Lens for Canon EF Mount EOS DSLR Cameras
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (Use code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

[contact-form][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Website’ type=’url’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* Review

Dustin Abbott

December 10th, 2014

Header

Worth the Hype?

Expectations mingle with skepticism when you approach such an extreme instrument as the Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* ZE. It more than doubles the price of its competitors (even those with larger apertures), and sets a new upper limit for size and weight in an 85mm lens. One can’t help but think, “Is this thing worth the price and bulk?” I remember having similar thoughts when I first switched to a full frame camera body (Canon 5D MKII). I was initially critical as I viewed the early pictures from the camera, wondering if there was really that much of a difference. I wanted to be wowed out of my socks, and I actually considered not keeping the camera in the first few days. But as I used the camera, taking it into various situations and digging deeper into the stages of taking, viewing, and processing the images, I began to realize the full range of nuance and depth that was there when compared to the cameras I had used before. The shallow depth of field, the vastly improved low light performance, and increased complexity of color… It took time and experience to fully realize the quality of a full frame camera.

The same was true with the Otus. Let me put it this way: if you are just picking up this lens and firing off a few shots in a camera store, you will probably never appreciate the depths of how amazing it is. Manual focus is frequently a lost art amongst photographers, and my experience is that even for those of you familiar with using a manual focus lens there is a bit of a learning curve as you develop a feel for the unique focusing character of each lens (consider this the analog equivalent of doing an AFMA on an autofocus lens!). Put simply, your ability to nail focus grows exponentially the more you use a lens. Your first shots with this lens probably won’t be your best, but here’s a warning: shooting with this lens is addictive, and may just change the way you view the rest of your lens collection.

I’ve had the unique privilege of using a LOT of lenses the past several years both as an owner and as a reviewer. I would say that 50 different lenses in the past 3-4 years is a very conservative estimate. There are also a number of shooting environments within close distance that I have shot often and with a variety of lenses. I can’t go to some exotic destination with every lens that I review, so I have shot some familiar environments with a lot of different glass. I am first a photographer and secondly a reviewer; I shoot tens of thousands of photos each year. I say this to say that I know what to expect in certain environments and weather conditions. As I began to use the Otus in those environments and weather conditions I found my typical expectations shattered.

Mind Officially Blown

Wide aperture primes typically have certain strengths and weaknesses. At large apertures they will perform well IF you put them in situations where they can succeed. This is typically at close to medium focus distance (4-12 feet), the distance that many of them are optimized for. You often need to avoid high contrast situations, otherwise you will deal with chromatic aberrations and fringing. Oh, and don’t expect extreme sharpness, because usually that is going to require stopping down a fair bit. If you break those rules, you are typically going to end up with poor results. Resolution falls apart if you are shooting towards infinity at wide apertures, with images having soft, hazy results and low contrast. Chromatic aberrations and general optical ugliness make you regret your aperture choice.

But not the Otus.

I have yet to find a situation that it DOESN’T perform well in. I have broken all the usual rules and have gotten extremely unique, incredible images. Take this landscape scene, for example (this is color processed unlike most images in this review).

I shot it at f/1.4 and near infinity focus in the ultimate high contrast situation – a snowstorm. A million little opportunities for green or purple fringing. This would have resulted in nothing but disappointment with any prime I’ve used before. Imagine my amazement when I zoomed in 100% and found crisply defined textures in the needles of the tamaracks and even found the falling snowflakes clearly defined with no discernible aberrations of any kind. They weren’t soft or hazy; each flake was clearly defined.

It created a wonderful, natural texture to the image. The unique, soft foreground blur looked almost like a tilt-shift effect except the focal plane has field curvature. The unique combination of softness and sharpness made this instantly one of my personal favorite landscape shots of the year. It is subtle, nuanced. A piece of art, in my opinion. But it is also a shot that would have looked like garbage at close inspection with most lenses I have used in comparable shooting conditions.

Resolution is one of the most distinguishing qualities of this lens. It is impossible to realize how much detail the lens resolves when viewing images at typically web sizes. I have no doubt, for that matter, that the lens outresolves the sensors of my Canon EOS 6D cameras handily. But when you have a chance to view images under full magnification you realize just how much detail is resolved that is, frankly, missing when shooting with lesser optics. The only comparison I can make is to a good macro lens, and that is only at the distances where a macro lens is optimized for. The Otus continues to resolve like that at all focus distances. I am including a number of photos here along with near 100% crops to show how incredible the resolution from the Otus is.  These are all at f/1.4 (wide open) taken from a variety of distances and the crops taken from wherever in the frame was my primary point of focus.

The incredible performance of the Otus means that there is basically no penalty for shooting it wide open other than potentially the depth of field being more shallow than you would like. This makes it one of the best low light lenses of all time, as you can literally shoot the lens wide open and still have stunning sharpness and none of the usual optical comprises that come with a large aperture prime wide open. Videographers are going to LOVE this lens.

Build Quality

Another reason they will love it (as will anyone else) is for the focus ring. Like the optics, the quality and precision of the focusing action on the Otus will probably ruin you for most other lenses. It is incredibly smooth. If you are using Live View focus, for example, it is very easy to support the lens with your left hand while using just a finger to precisely dial in focus (the lens hood was designed perfectly as a natural place to support the lens with your left hand. The long focus throw allows for very precise focus at all distances, and the smooth action of the focus allows one to make more rapid major adjustments than many lenses. I found the Otus 85 to be one of the easiest manual focus lenses to use…ever. The electronic connection to the camera body provides visual and audio feedback when focus is confirmed by lighting up the appropriate focus point in the viewfinder and a “beep” when focus is achieved.  The aperture iris is also controlled by the camera like any other lens, and your EXIF data is all properly communicated to the body.  I did not observe any metering issues at all.  If you aren’t put off by the concept of manual focus, the Otus will certain give you nothing to complain about in the focus department.

The design of the Otus is unique amongst other Zeiss lenses (other than the Otus 55, of course). Zeiss has gone to some lengths to distinguish these most premium of lenses from their already premium stable of lenses. The Otus has a very smooth body with relatively little “interruptions”. There are two large semi-gloss sections with a rubberized focus ring between them. This is a departure from the usual metal focus ring, but I found the texture very nice for grip and focus. Time will tell how well the rubber will hold up; the typical metal focus rings from Zeiss will obviously last a VERY long time. There is a focus window (along with usable depth of field markings) and two Zeiss badges on either side of the barrel. Other than this there are only some markings in bright yellow. Yes, yellow.

The color has a practical purpose. It provides high contrast that helps in lower light situations. Still, I am less than thrilled with the look. It feels inelegant in what is otherwise a very elegant lens, and a departure from the usual Zeiss design that is classy to a fault. Still, Zeiss is emphasizing that this is a serious tool for serious photographers, so I understand the logic even though the “gear lover” in me prefers the look of some of Zeiss’s other designs.

The large, metal lens hood is a great example of Zeiss’ ability to design highly functional tools. It clicks in securely and is designed to flow from the body with a gradual flare that makes it appear as if it is a permanent part of the lens itself. The overall lens look with it mounted is as curvy as Marilyn Monroe. It has the same finish as the rest of the barrel along with a lightly flocked interior to capture stray reflections. I kept it in place almost the whole time I had the Otus, as its depth provided great security for the front element and is also the perfect place to rest your left hand and support the lens. The Otus has a metal filter thread in a very odd size – 86mm. It is highly unlikely that you will have an 86mm filter in your collection, but if you can afford this lens, you can probably afford a new filter!

This is a large lens. It is quite long for an 85mm lens (without the hood it is 4.9″/124mm long), which makes it a good third longer than all of its competitors (most of which average around 3.3-3.4 inches). While I didn’t have a Canon 85mm f/1.2L on hand for visual comparison, I did have my Canon 135mm f/2L on hand. You can see that the Otus is slightly longer than the bare 135L but is a bit shorter when both lenses have their hoods attached. The Otus is also much heavier than its competitors. Most 85mm f/1.4 lenses average around 25oz/650 grams, but the Otus weighs in at a hefty 42.4oz/1200 grams. The next heftiest 85mm option is the Canon 85mm f/1.2L, which weighs 36.2oz/1025g. The Otus weighs less than a 70-200mm f/2.8 lens, but only about a fifth less, so that is a fair approximation. I did not find the weight bothersome for my purposes, but I am also relatively young and quite fit. Most potential buyers are aware of the size and heft of this lens. One aside here: the Otus seems to be a true 85mm. Most of the competitors frame a bit wider than the Otus, which

Did I mention the lens was expensive?

It is very expensive. It costs twice as much as Canon’s 85mm f/1.2L II lens, which is already an expensive tool. One could buy nearly five of Sigma’s 85mm f/1.4 lenses for the price of the Otus. But a month with the Otus has got me thinking that it just might be worth every penny of that astronomical price tag. It’s optics are, put simply, peerless.

Peerless Optics

I’ve begun to include a torture test of text on a very white page of a book (the Good Book seems appropriate for a lens reviewer who is a pastor, right…) This really shows a lens’ propensity for chromatic aberrations and the degree of microcontrast it has, along with general resolution. Put simply, a good performance is text that is black and inky in the focus zone and without large amounts of fringing in the out of focus region. The Otus passes this test like no other.

This is a stunningly good performance. The text is resolved perfectly (right down to showing the fibers of the paper), and only the very faintest amount of green fringing is visible beyond the plane of focus. There is no apparent purple fringing in the foreground bokeh. The Canon 85LII is a fantastic performer in many ways, but this comparison will show that the Zeiss is not only far sharper but has FAR less chromatic aberrations – they aren’t even in the same class in this regard. Be sure to click on the link and compare the chromatic aberrations as well as the microcontrast! Even when the Canon is stopped down to the same aperture (f/1.4), it is still not noticeably inferior. The new Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART has exceptional optics that have been lauded across the board, but its performance here is also markedly inferior.

But I am not a chart reviewer; I am a photography reviewer. What I can tell is that while the Sigma is a great lens optically, the Zeiss Otus 85 is in a whole other class. Its ability to shoot wide open shots at landscape distances without any softness or haze in the textures is unparalleled. It continues to resolve extremely high at all focus distances. The utter lack of chromatic aberrations keeps that resolution from being marred.

But it’s more than that. The lens has incredible microcontrast, so fine details are rendered precisely in all situations. The Zeiss APO Sonnar T 2/135mm is the only lens I’ve ever used that rivals this ability. Add to this the fact that the lens seems utterly resistant to flare and ghosting and you have a lens that handles every situation that I threw at it with utter aplomb. This shot was taken at a wide aperture right into the sun with bare branches as my subject; this should be a nightmare…but it’s not.

I also found that the lens seemed to handle situations with a broad dynamic range exceptionally well. It seemed to help keep highlights and shadows in greater balance than most lenses. I shoot a huge amount of religious events, and I found the Otus kept lights in the church from blowing out, even without touching the highlight recovery slider. This is again one of those situations that I know what to expect…but the Otus defies those expectations.  And this is wide open, f/1.4!  Look how sharp and contrasty the image is – this is a low light monster!

Church Setting

Here’s another example of a landscape taken at f/2.8 in difficult conditions. Snow makes some areas extremely bright, while the foreground is in shadow. Note how that all elements (shadows, highlights, even the sky) remain balanced. This is more of what I would expect after post-processing images to recover highlights and boost shadows…not right out of the camera in a RAW image.

The Otus is obviously a superlative option for portraiture. The 85mm focal length is one of portrait photographer’s favorites. It provides a nice balance between the exaggeration of certain features with wide focal lengths while avoiding some of the compression of those features that longer lenses create. Fashion photographers will find this lens an exceptional asset; it renders fine details in the lips, eyes, and hair that will stand up to dramatic enlarging. Few people would volunteer to the scrutiny of their skin’s shortcomings that this lens’ radical resolution will produce, so I will put myself under the microscope.  One caveat – my wife focused these and is unfamiliar with both manual focus and dealing with the extremely narrow depth of field provided by a lens like this. As a result the focus may not always be on the key place, but these images work for our purposes.

Yes, that is a scary amount of resolution when it is your own skin on display!  And this is at wide open apertures.  The resolution and larger depth of field even at f/2 is even more bitingly sharp. Take a look at this near 100% crop:

f-2

There is sometimes a philosophy that sharp lenses aren’t good choices for portrait lenses, but as a portrait photographer and editor I would much rather have “too much” detail that I can soften in post-production than to be lacking that detail to begin with.  For example, here is another f/1.4 image that was processed for a softer, more flattering feminine look…but the detail is still there if you look close.

Feminine-2

That extreme resolution and smooth gradations in both color and highlight transition areas result in light falloff and detail that will make your SLR suddenly look like a medium format camera. And that raises an interesting perspective on the price of the Otus. It is extremely expensive as an SLR lens; as a medium format lens, not so much. The price of the Otus is below average for Hasselblad lenses and a downright bargain compared to Leica lenses. Medium format cameras are used by many top portrait/fashion photographers. The typical limitations associated with medium format cameras include much lower frame per second rates and poor performance at high ISO settings. A Nikon D810 + the Otus 85 would rival most every medium format combo for image quality and resolution at a far lower price tag and in a far more flexible package. The Otus would a serious weapon in a portrait photographer’s arsenal.

That being said, however, I hope that I have raised the point adequately that the Otus 85 is far more than just a portrait lens. I have found that it can create uniquely beautiful images in just about every setting and with most all styles of photography. It is a premium photography lens, not just a premium portrait lens.

A Side of Bokeh with that Sharpness, Please

I’ve spent a lot of time talking about the resolution and contrast of the lens, but let’s examine one other aspect of image quality. Some lenses excel in the sharpness category but lose something in the “drawing” – the look of the photos that includes not just the focused region but the defocused area. The Canon 35L, 50L, and 85LII are not the champions in their various arenas in absolute sharpness or their handling of chromatic aberrations. The 35L and 50L face very strong competition from the Sigma ART series, for example, and the Sigma options are superior in absolute sharpness and have much lower chromatic aberrations at wide apertures. Yet many photographers prefer the “look” or “drawing” of the 35L and 50L; there is more to image quality than sharpness.

I’m happy to announce that with the Otus 85 you can have it all. It is incredibly sharp, but adds to that an absolutely beautiful drawing and transition from focus to defocus. Take a look at the gorgeous bokeh in this image, then take a look at the crop of the focused region (at f/1.4). Nice, eh?

The Otus Bokeh Monster

That crop should be loaded with chromatic aberrations, fringing, and be slightly hazy if this was like most other wide aperture primes shot wide open.  But this is no ordinary lens!

But now, let me tell you the story of this image. The only positive thing about the shooting conditions is that the light was pretty decent. The image looks warm, but it was about 20F/-6C outside. I shot this image in the parking lot of a strip mall; the bumper of my car was literally four feet from where I shot the image. This was just some dried reeds in the median between rows in the parking lot. The Otus’ ability to completely blur the background in such a pleasing way has created an image that looks like a bit of art (no distractions) despite the inauspicious shooting conditions. I share this to highlight how the Otus’ unique combination of sharpness and beautiful drawing will allow you to take images that stand out from the crowd.

Conclusions and Video Review

If you haven’t noticed, I kind of like this lens!  I have one nitpick: Zeiss has not included any kind of protective case, which frankly feels pretty cheap when most telephoto lenses in this price range come with premium hard cases. On a positive note, the box that the lens comes in has custom fit foam that adds a lot of protection value and could be used to display the lens when not in use. It is unlikely that one is going to use this to transport the lens for field use, however. Getting a real case is going to be an additional expense. This indictment is scarcely unique to the Otus, however, and I have no criticisms of the actual lens and the way it performs…in any way.

The Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* ZE is big and heavy. It is extremely expensive. It is manual focus only. But you already knew that. Perhaps you have already written this lens off because of those facts. But shooting with this lens is a revelation. Having used it for a while leaves me feeling that the weight and price may just be justified…if one can afford it. It is good enough and versatile enough that many shooters would better off owning fewer lenses to afford this one, and has caused me to mentally catalog my own collection and wonder what I would be willing to part with to aid that acquisition. If nothing else, the Otus 85 is most definitely on my wish list. I conclude by asking the same question that I did after reviewing the APO Sonnar 135/2: do you want the best? Because that is, unquestionably, what the Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 is.  Whether or not you are interested in this lens or not, you should be happy that it exists.  It is evidence of how much further optical performance can be pushed and sets a new benchmark for others to try to reach.

Pros:

  • Simply the best optics I have ever encountered, period
  • Stunning micro-contrast in every situation
  • Incredible resolution rivaling medium format
  • Virtually no chromatic aberrations
  • High resistance to flare
  • Built like a tank…a really sleek and beautiful tank
  • Virtually no distortion of any kind
  • The best manual focus ring I have ever used
  • Superior optics seem to enhance dynamic range – files are easier to process.

Cons:

  • Expensive.  Really expensive.
  • Manual focus only
  • No official weather sealing
  • Very large and heavy for an 85mm prime
  • Odd 86mm filter size
  • No real protective case included.

Click Here to Visit the Lens Image Gallery (Including Full Size Samples)

Disclaimer/end notes:  This lens was a retail sample provided to me for review purposes from Carl Zeiss (Americas).  My review was not influenced in any way by Zeiss; they simply provided me a sample.  The images in this review have (for the most part) received only minimal processing and are representative of what the lens itself can produce.  As always, I have striven to be as balanced and accurate as I can be in my reporting.  Thanks for reading!

You Might Also Like:

Zeiss APO Sonnar 2/135mm ZE Review
Zeiss 1.4/50mm Planar T* ZE Review
Sigma 50mm f/1.4 ART Review
My Top Ten Images of 2014 Part 1 | Part 2

Gear Used

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T* ZE Lens for Canon EF Mount
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (now released – use coupon code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

[contact-form][contact-field label=’Name’ type=’name’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Email’ type=’email’ required=’1’/][contact-field label=’Website’ type=’url’/][contact-field label=’Comment’ type=’textarea’ required=’1’/][/contact-form]

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* Image Gallery

Dustin Abbott

December 10th, 2014

Here is an image gallery from the incomparable Zeiss Otus 85mm f/1.4 Planar T* lens.  This is, bar none, the finest lens that I have ever used.  The images that this lens produces are amazing.  Included are a variety of shots that are untouched, some that are processed, some shots of the lens, and some crops to show off extreme sharpness.  I could easily share a hundred more fabulous images. The review can be found here.  Scroll towards the bottom to find some full size samples to download and examine.

Processed Favorites

General Gallery (Unprocessed)

Shots of the Lens

Full Size Samples (Right Click to Save and examine Full Size)

Wide Open Close Focus

Wide Open Close Focus

 

Wide Open Landscape

Wide Open Landscape

Clock Tower f-2.8

Clock Tower at f/2.8

Gear Used

Canon EOS 6D DSLR Camera (Body Only)
Otus 85mm f/1.4 Apo Planar T* ZE Lens for Canon EF Mount
Adobe Photoshop Lightroom 5 Software for Mac and Windows (Boxed Version)
Adobe Photoshop Creative Cloud 1-Year Subscription
Alien Skin Exposure 7 (now released – use coupon code “dustinabbott” to get 10% off)

Purchasing your gear through B&H and these links helps fund this website and keeps the articles coming. Thank you for your support.

B&H Logo

Great News! I can now offer a 5% discount on all purchases at Amplis Foto, Canada’s Leading Photographic Supplier. Please enter discount code: AMPLIS52014 in your cart. It is good for everything in your cart, and is stackable with other coupons, too! It will take 5% off your entire order! Proceeds go towards keeping this site going and providing you with new reviews!

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.