Facebook Twitter Google+ YouTube Flickr 500px
See My Reviews

Sirui AF 20mm T1.8 1.33x Anamorphic Review

Dustin Abbott

March 7th, 2025

Sirui launched the world’s first autofocusing anamorphic cine lens in the form of the 1.33x Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 late last year. I covered that lens in depth, and you can get my full thoughts by watching the video review or reading the text review. In summary, however, I found the addition of autofocus to be invaluable in getting quick run and gun footage. It was far more useful than the typical cine lens for the type of footage that most of us are getting, eliminating the need for focus follow equipment or even particularly skill in pulling focus. Sirui is back with a second lens in the series with the AF 1.33x Anamorphic 20mm T1.8, and this lens has the potential to be even more useful due to the wider focal length that hits a sweet spot for a lot of video projects. Is this a lens you should add to your kit? Find out be exploring my findings in either my video review or in this text review.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a review sample of this lens. As always, this is a completely independent review. *The tests and most of the photos that I share as a part of my review cycle have been done with my Sony a7RV or Sony Alpha 1 cameras. Visit here to see the product listing page for the 20mm T1.8 1.33 Anamorphic.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Let’s dive a little more into the specifics of the lens.

  • This is an S35 (APS-C) lens, though it does a reasonable job of covering the full frame image circle on my Sony bodies.
  • It is a 20mm lens, excellent for wide angle shots (in full frame)
  • Switch to the 1.5x S35 crop, and you have a full frame equivalent of 30mm.
  • The anamorphic “squeeze” is a constant 1.33x, or a 2.35:1 ratio when shooting 16:9 (you will have some black bars on top and bottom and a wider cinematic look after desqueezing).
  • The T-stop of the lens is T1.8, which means that it is moderately bright and can create a fairly shallow depth of field.
  • Lens mount options include Sony E-mount (tested here), Nikon Z, Fuji X, and M43
  • The aperture and focus rings are geared with standard 360° throw rotation for the focus ring.
  • MSRP will be $799 USD.
  • You can choose between two different versions of the lens, including a blue streak/flare version and a natural warm streak version (tested here)

I wondered aloud in the previous review if the 40mm was a “one-off” of part of a series. We got the answer to that pretty quickly, as this 20mm was only about two months behind the 40mm. Typically they have assigned series names to all of their lenses (mostly utilizing celestial themes like Aurora, Saturn, Venus, etc…), but so far these lenses haven’t had a series name attached to them, relying on the 1.33x Anamorphic label to identify them on the top.

Unlike the Samyang V-AF series of hybrid cine/stills lenses, this lens makes less sense as a photography lens because of the anamorphic ratio. The raw images out of the camera will have a weird stretched look to them.

It is possible to edit that file into the appropriate ratio, but it will require a little unusual editing working through free transform, and even then the amount of transforming (desqueezing) needed is outside the range of what I can do in Lightroom, for example. Here’s the best I could do there with the image above:

I would only use this lens for standard photography as a last resort, so while this lens is capable of taking stills (just like any cine lens), it really should be treated as a pure cine lens, which is how I’ll handle this review.

20mm Anamorphic Build and Handling

As noted in the intro, I feel like the 20mm Anamorphic along with the 40mm take a number of design cues from the Aurora. This includes the feature set, the fonts, and the general finish of the lens, though the cine design of the lens is apparent from the geared design of the aperture and focus rings.

As with the Aurora lenses, the fonts on the side are bolder than most lenses. This is like the “large print” edition of lenses.

The Sirui badge on the right side and the click | declick button look pretty much identical to the Aurora lineup.

This is a fairly feature rich lens. It has a robust approach to aperture control, including a manual aperture ring that can be controlled with clicks (at one third stop detents) or clickless by changing the position of the switch on the right side of the lens.

You also have the option of switching into A (automatic) mode if you prefer to control aperture from within the camera. This isn’t an iris lock, but there is a nice long detent in between F22 (minimum aperture) and A mode that should keep you from accidentally straying in either direction.

The aperture shape was a little odd on the 40mm, the 20mm seems to have a more traditional (for cine) oval shape.

There are 11 aperture blades in the iris itself.

On the left side of the barrel there is a Function button that can be programmed to a wide range of functions from within the camera along with an AF | MF switch.

The front face is more clean and simple. I always like when there is lens information on the front of a lens.

You can see that the front filter thread is a common 77mm size, a filter size shared with the 40mm. The front of the lens is a standard 80mm diameter to accommodate a matte box.

The 20mm Anamorphic has a similar diameter but is quite a bit shorter than the 40mm. The diameter is 80mm (3.1″), as mentioned, and while Sirui doesn’t give a length measurement, I measure it at right over 90mm (3.54″). That’s a full 30mm shorter than the 40mm, and helps to explain the over 100g lighter weight (499g/17.6 oz).

The manual focus ring is geared and has very light damping. It has a linear focus throw of 360°, so major focus changes won’t come quickly, but you will have greater accuracy for smaller throws.

At the rear of the lens you’ll find a USB-C port that allows for quick and easy firmware updates.

I’ve previously done Sirui firmware updates, and the process was a simple drag and drop of the firmware file into the folder that will pop up once the lens is attached to a computer.

You’ll also find a weathersealing gasket located there, and I suspect there is further weather sealing as well.

The lens barrel is made of metal (aluminum alloy), and it has a nice, anodized black satin finish. Overall I would call it a nice looking lens even if I do find the badging/writing a little overwrought.

Minimum focus distance 40cm, so you can’t get particularly close to subjects and the resulting magnification level isn’t super high. It isn’t difficult to get inside that minimum focus distance if you aren’t careful. Here’s a frame from as close as I could to a wall decoration, and you can see the magnification is not high.

I would say that the overall handling and feature set of the lens is enjoyable. It takes a lot of features that I’ve come to appreciate on stills lenses and has largely done a good job of transferring into a functional autofocusing cine lens.

The lens also comes with a nice package, including a nice zippered nylon case with a carrying strap. I would say that in general this lens is being handled like a premium lens but without a particularly premium price. The MSRP is $799, but an early bird price of just $639 is available here. That’s not a bad price for these genuinely useful lenses.

Autofocus

Sirui has equipped the 20mm Anamorphic with an STM or stepping motor. While I consider STM motors to be the lower tier of modern mirrorless AF motors (with Linear and Voice Coil motors in an upper tier), the truth of the matter is that there’s a pretty broad range of performance with STM motors. This one is fairly good, with overall quiet operation, fairly quick speed, and good confidence. Most of what I’ll show you in the review (other than photos of the lens) will be screenshots from video footage for obvious reasons.

I found that focus locked onto Nala well as I approached her with a camera, and stayed locked on as she stretched and rolled around in response.

Focus locked (ahem) onto the lock in the shot above, providing good and consistent focus there.

Focus speed in my tests is not at the “instant” level (few STM lenses are), but is fast enough that there is no apparent lag nor any visible steps. Focus confidence seemed good.

Focus noise is very low. As I’ve said, I don’t think this is really the kind of lens that people will use for stills, but AF wouldn’t be the hindrance to using the lens that way.

The more important tests are video centric, and I have all good news to report there.

Focus pulls were smooth and quick with no visible steps. There is a nice level of damping to the pulls which makes them feel smooth. Focus breathing is much lower than the 40mm, so this is a good lens to do pulls with.

My “hand test” where I alternately block the camera’s view of my face with my hand and then remove it went well, with nice, confident transitions that also had a nice level of damping.

More organic pulls within shots where I start with a foreground object and then pan towards a distant background look great, with a very smooth transition that is not abrupt or jarring at all.

It’s worth noting that if you have something like an Atamos Ninja, it will do live desqueeze so that you can both compose more naturally (seeing the end result) and also get footage that is arrives desqueezed so that you could eliminate an editing step or skip editing altogether. I’m showing the footage with the on screen information, but you can obviously just record high end footage as well.

I would say that both the shorter focal length and a slightly longer development cycle have allowed Sirui to produce a lens that focuses even better than the first lens in the series. The 20mm Anamorphic was an easy platform

Sirui 20mm Anamorphic Image Quality

If you are here as a regular reader with expectations of how this section will look, know that things are a little different when reviewing a cine lens. This section will be focused less on charts and more on what I encounter in real world use. Absolute sharpness is a little less critical in a cine lens, but things like chromatic aberrations are a bigger deal because they are much more difficult to correct.

First of all, however, I want to explore full frame coverage. Like the 40mm, the 20mm Anamorphic is being marketed as an S35 (APS-C) lens, but it seems to cover the frame image circle reasonably well (though not as well as the 40mm). Let’s take a look at an F5.6 stills shot take covering the whole full frame image circle. I’ve transformed the ratio to as close of a desqueezing as Lightroom allows, but other than that, the image on the right is uncorrected. One advantage for movie capture is that the natural 16:9 crop will eliminate a bit more of this vignette than what shows in the original 3:2 stills image.

On the right side I’ve maxed out Lightroom’s vignette correction, and we can see that in this extreme situation (snow is definitely one of the worst situations for showing vignette in the real world!) that vignette correction doesn’t do a perfect job, but the vignette is correctable. It isn’t the hard mechanical type vignette where no light has reached the sensor.

If we look at a crop from the edge, we can definitely see that image quality does drop off past the S35 crop area, but doesn’t disappear altogether. This matters because sometimes the edges are less important in certain cine shots, as the concentration of sharpness in the inner part of the image helps focus the eyes much like a vignette. I note this effect being pretty commonly used in a lot of cine work, and it is actually one of the typical attributes of anamorphic lenses generally.

That being said, I’m not as entranced with the idea of using this as a full frame option as I was with the 40mm, but in a pinch you could definitely get some wider shots, so long as you don’t mind doing some correction.

A similar edit to an APS-C shot shows that a lot of those issues are eliminated, and it looks cleaner in general. If you have enough room to shoot S35, you will definitely get cleaner footage.

There are two primary optical weaknesses of the 20mm Anamorphic: lateral style chromatic aberrations (fringing near the edge of the frame) and distortion.

I do see fringing in some real world shots, and it is a little more obvious when using the lens with full frame coverage because there is more in the image that has poorer optical correction. Here’s a look at a stills image that shows pronounced fringing before correction (left side) and what remains afterwards (right side).

Removing lateral CA is fairly easy for stills, so if this was a photo-centric lens, it wouldn’t be a huge problem. Removing CA is much more difficult in video work, but you also have the advantage that you are never examining corners at 100% like this, either. Still there was enough of this kind of fringing that I could see it in some shots, though it will become less obvious when you shoot S35 and there is less of the weak portions of the lens in the frame.

I have found that distortion is definitely an issue with Sirui’s wide angle cine lenses, and the 20mm Anamorphic has some issues here as well. Vertical lines near the edge of the frame will get bent, and again it is the most obvious when shooting full frame.

Shooting in S35 reduces that distortion by clipping off the most affected portion of the image. I mostly see distortion in movement shots when panning or moving past a vertical line right near the edge of the frame.

The distortion can be corrected, though it will often require the premium (not free) versions of editing software like Da Vinci Resolve, for example.

I found that footage from the 20mm Anamorphic could hold up to a lot of sharpening. I didn’t find footage naturally to be as sharp as what I would like, but felt like I could add a fair bit of sharpening with it falling apart.

With a wide angle lens like this there will be less potential for creating strongly defocused backgrounds (particularly since the maximum magnification at close distances is low). The quality of the bokeh is fairly neutral; it doesn’t stand out to be as either good or bad.

But shots without specular highlights look nice and clean, and the actual falloff from focus to defocus is pretty good.

This focal length/maximum aperture combination isn’t going to result in backgrounds being completely blurred away very often, but those of you familiar with cinematography probably already knew that.

Flare resistance is not bad. I tested the “natural streak” version of the lens, so, by design, it is going to give the streak effects often valued for cinematic shots. You can see that streak along the top of this shot along with some mild ghosting artifacts.

When stopped down you can see more of the sunburst effect along with a few slightly more pronounced ghosting effects, but they aren’t extreme.

Video footage generally looked good. Sirui’s optical glass isn’t my favorite, but the anamorphic footage looks very cinematic and works well (particularly if you’re grading it).

This isn’t priced like a Zeiss, and the optical glass doesn’t performance like Zeiss, but for those with more budget constraints who want to produce cinematic content, the Sirui Autofocus 1.33 Anamorphic 20mm T1.8 works pretty well.

Conclusion

I was excited when Sirui shared the news of this lens with me. I found the 40mm to be a tool that my team and I will get some use out of, and a 20mm lens is arguably even more useful because of the focal length. The Sirui Anamorphic 20mm T1.8 as a wide angle lens comes with a few more optical flaws (more chromatic aberrations and distortion), though it also seems to be the better lens in terms of flare resistance.

It’s not quite as useful for use on full frame sensors, but good enough that you can definitely grab some shots in a pinch. The frame below is unedited, showing that in some situations the heavier vignette and even additional fringing isn’t a deal breaker.

The Sirui Autofocus 1.33x Anamorphic 20mm T1.8 joins a very, very short list of anamorphic lenses that also have autofocus, but I won’t be surprised to see this segment grow. Samyang has approached it by the releasing an anamorphic adapter for their V-AF series of lenses, and I suspect other lensmakers will dip their toes in this space if these Sirui lenses prove popular. In the meantime, the Sirui 20mm Anamorphic is a fun place to start. It’s time to start creating!

Pros:

  • Nice looking lens with nice build
  • Smaller and lighter than the 40mm
  • Includes nice case
  • USB-C port for firmware updates
  • Very feature rich
  • Weather sealed
  • Declickable aperture
  • Custom button
  • Autofocus motor is quiet and fast
  • Low focus breathing
  • Decent flare resistance
  • Does cover the full frame image circle reasonably well
  • Affordable price

Cons:

  • Some lateral fringing issues
  • Some barrel distortion
  • Sirui optical glass isn’t amazing

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Sirui AF 1.33 Anamorphic 20mm T1.8 here during Kickstarter period

After Kickstarter, purchase @ Sirui Store (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

____________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sirui AF 1.33 Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 @ Sirui Store (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

___________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a7RV @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Camera Canada | Sony Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

__________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a6600 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony a6400 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui Autofocus Anamorphic 20mm T1.8, Sirui, Anamorphic, 20mm, T1.8, Sirui Autofocus Anamorphic Review, 1.33x, 1.33x Anamorphic, Sirui 40mm Review, Anamorphic 20mm T1.8 Review, T1.8, Review, 40mm, Sony alpha 1, Sony a7RV, Wireless, Review, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Autofocus 1.33x Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 Review

Dustin Abbott

January 30th, 2025

Sirui began their lensmaking journey with cine lenses, and, in particular, anamorphic lenses, and only later branched out to more standard autofocus lenses like the Sniper Series (APS-C) and more recently the Aurora full frame line. Perhaps it was inevitable for the two different lens lines to collide as they have in what is a world’s first – an autofocusing compact anamorphic lens. This is a lens that sports traditional gearing designs for cine work, but also borrows some of the autofocus features of their new Aurora lenses. So much of modern camera design is hybrid, splitting photography and video features mostly equally. Sirui is clearly hoping to capitalize on that trend…but have they pulled it off? You can find out my full thoughts by watching the video review below…or reading on.

https://youtu.be/QL6BSg7ip9E

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a review sample of this lens. As always, this is a completely independent review. *The tests and most of the photos that I share as a part of my review cycle have been done with my Sony a7RV or Sony Alpha 1 cameras.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Let’s dive a little more into the specifics of the lens.

  • This is an S35 (APS-C) lens, though it seems to cover the full frame image circle on my Sony bodies.
  • It is a 40mm lens, which is a focal length that is growing in popularity (it actually measures the equivalent of 42mm on full frame due to different ratio).
  • Switch to the 1.5x S35 crop, and you have a full frame equivalent of 60mm.
  • The anamorphic “squeeze” is a constant 1.33x, or a 2.35:1 ratio when shooting 16:9 (you will have some black bars on top and bottom and a wider cinematic look after desqueezing).
  • The T-stop of the lens is T1.8, which means that it is moderately bright and can create a fairly shallow depth of field.
  • Lens mount options include Sony E-mount (tested here), Nikon Z, Fuji X, and M43
  • The aperture and focus rings are geared with standard 360° throw rotation for the focus ring.
  • MSRP will be $799 USD.
  • You can choose between two different versions of the lens, including a blue streak/flare version (tested here) and a natural warm streak version

I’m interested in seeing if Sirui views this lens as a one-off or perhaps an experiment to see if there is a market for this type of lens. Typically they have assigned series names to all of their lenses (mostly utilizing celestial themes like Aurora, Saturn, Venus, etc…), but this lens arrives without any series brand attached to it, relying on the 1.33x Anamorphic label to identify it on the top.

Unlike the Samyang V-AF series of hybrid cine/stills lenses, this lens makes less sense as a photography lens because of the anamorphic ratio. The raw images out of the camera will have a weird stretched look to them.

It is possible to edit that file into the appropriate ratio, but it will require something like Photoshop where you can free transform.

I would only use this lens for standard photography as a last resort, so while this lens is capable of taking stills (just like any cine lens), it really should be treated as a pure cine lens, which is how I’ll handle this review.

40mm Anamorphic Build and Handling

As noted in the intro, I feel like the 40mm Anamorphic takes a number of design cues from the Aurora. This includes the feature set, the fonts, and the general finish of the lens, though the cine design of the lens is apparent from the geared design of the aperture and focus rings.

As with the Aurora lenses, the fonts on the side are bolder than most lenses. This is like the “large print” edition of lenses.

The Sirui badge on the right side and the click | declick button look pretty much identical to the Aurora lineup.

This is a fairly feature rich lens. It has a robust approach to aperture control, including a manual aperture ring that can be controlled with clicks (at one third stop detents) or clickless by changing the position of the switch on the right side of the lens.

You also have the option of switching into A (automatic) mode if you prefer to control aperture from within the camera. This isn’t an iris lock, but there is a nice long detent in between F22 (minimum aperture) and A mode that should keep you from accidentally straying in either direction.

The aperture iris itself is very unique, with a very strongly defined hexagonal shape wide open.

There are 11 aperture blades, and when you stop down the aperture done the shape of specular highlights will become a more typical (for cine) oval shape.

On the left side of the barrel there is a Function button that can be programmed to a wide range of functions from within the camera along with an AF | MF switch.

The front face is more clean and simple. I always like when there is lens information on the front of a lens.

You can see that the front filter thread is a common 77mm size. The front of the lens is a standard 80mm diameter to accommodate a matte box.

The lens itself moderately sized. They call it a compact lens, but it’s nothing like, say, the Samyang V-AF 40mm T1.9 in size. The weight is moderate 614g (21.6 oz). The diameter is 80mm (3.1″), as mentioned, and while Sirui doesn’t give a length measurement, I measure it at right over 120mm (4.72″).

The manual focus ring is geared and has very light damping. It has a linear focus throw of 360°, so major focus changes won’t come quickly, but you will have greater accuracy for smaller throws.

At the rear of the lens you’ll find a USB-C port that allows for quick and easy firmware updates.

I actually did a firmware update already (which helped stabilize some AF), and the process was a simple drag and drop into the folder that will pop up once the lens is attached to a computer.

You’ll also find a weathersealing gasket located there, and I suspect there is further weather sealing as well.

The lens barrel is made of metal (aluminum alloy), and it has a nice, anodized black satin finish. Overall I would call it a nice looking lens even if I do find the badging/writing a little overwrought.

Minimum focus distance isn’t great (60cm, or right under 2 feet), and the resulting magnification level isn’t super high. It isn’t difficult to get inside that minimum focus distance if you aren’t careful. Here’s as close as I could get to these Christmas decorations before moving past MFD.

I would say that the overall handling and feature set of the lens is enjoyable. It takes a lot of features that I’ve come to appreciate on stills lenses and has largely done a good job of transferring into a functional autofocusing cine lens.

The lens also comes with a nice package, including a nice zippered nylon case with a carrying strap. I would say that in general this lens is being handled like a premium lens but without a particularly premium price. The MSRP is $799, but an early bird price of just $639 is available here. That’s not bad for a lens that does something we haven’t seen before.

Autofocus

Sirui has equipped the 40mm Anamorphic with an STM or stepping motor. While I consider STM motors to be the lower tier of modern mirrorless AF motors (with Linear and Voice Coil motors in an upper tier), the truth of the matter is that there’s a pretty broad range of performance with STM motors. This one is fairly good, with overall quiet operation, fairly quick speed, and good confidence (particularly after a recent firmware update.) Most of what I’ll show you in the review (other than photos of the lens) will be screenshots from video footage for obvious reasons.

We were able to get good and stable tracking of faces even when shooting through glass to capture a holiday scene.

Locking focus on an animal subject was also no problem:

For the most part focus also seemed to be pretty solid when tracking a dog running towards the camera:

Focus noise is very low. I heard a very slight buzz during intentional focus pulls from close to distant, but picked up no ordinary focus noise.

Focus pulls were smooth and quick with no visible steps. There is a nice level of damping to the pulls which makes them feel smooth. Focus breathing isn’t high, but it is noticeable, which is a bit disappointing for a cine lens like this. This makes big focus pulls feel a little more abrupt than I would prefer when going from one face to another.

Initially I saw a little bit of hunting in my “hand test” where I alternately block the view of my face with my hand and then remove it to test the confidence and speed of moving from one subject to another. That was solved via a firmware update, however, leaving me with a nice result afterwards.

The bottom line is that this is an infinitely easier lens to use to get run and gun footage, however. I’ve previously mostly had to work off a tripod when shooting anamorphic unless it is a matter of prefocusing and moving to keep proper focus, so I can see a lot of potential for using this lens and potentially others to follow.

Sirui Anamorphic 40mm Image Quality

The Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 has an optical design of 16 elements in 12 groups, which includes some exotic elements like a aspherical element along with 5 cylindrical lenses.

There is no published MTF chart, as cine lenses tend to be a bit less about overall sharpness and more about the general look of the footage.

First of all, however, I want to explore full frame coverage. While the Sirui 1.33x Anamorphic is being marketed as an S35, it seems to cover the frame image circle pretty well. Let’s take a stills shot take covering the whole full frame image circle.

There are no corrections here, but you can see that the full image circle is being covered with just a bit of vignette in the corners. This shot is at F5.6, yes, which will reduce some vignette naturally. This shot at F2.8 and with bright, snowy corners shows a bit heavier vignetting.

But once you desqueeze that shot, it doesn’t look too bad. Add a little vignette correction, and the resulting shot looks fairly good.

Obviously using S35 instead will eliminate any vignette issues, but I do like the fact that I feel like I have two separate framing options when using the Anamorphic 40mm on a full frame camera (I used it on both a Sony Alpha 1 and a Sony a7RV).

What’s more, the lens does seem to be resolving those full frame corners. At F5.6, I see a tiny bit of softness in the extreme corner, but a bigger problem with Lateral chromatic aberrations (LaCA). Fortunately the latter is fairly easily corrected (at least for stills) as you can see in the right side comparison below.

Removing CA is much more difficult in video work, but you also have the advantage that you are never examining corners at 100% like this, either.

I didn’t notice much real world issue with fringing in footage. You’ll see a little green fringing around window frames in some shots if you’re looking for it, but no more than you will regularly see in professionally produced shows and movies.

I’ll also note that distortion (unlike the Sirui Saturn 35mm Anamorphic I reviewed) is well controlled. I didn’t see any need to correct lines on it:

Sharpness is not biting sharp, but it is good enough even at F1.8 that footage looks very compelling (watch the short holiday film included in the video review. Most of that was shot at F1.8).

Bokeh is a little complicated. You’ll see from the shot above that the aperture has a very distinctive shape at F1.8. I don’t love the look wide open with specular highlights, as I’m much more about round “bokeh balls” than other geometric shapes. I find that specular highlights can look a little harsh at times, too.

But shots without specular highlights look nice and clean, and the actual falloff from focus to defocus is pretty good.

More complex backgrounds look fairly good at close distances…

…and they don’t look bad a little further away, either:

This focal length/maximum aperture combination isn’t going to result in backgrounds being completely blurred away very often, but those of you familiar with cinematography probably already knew that.

Flare resistance is only okay. I tested the “blue streak” version of the lens, so, by design, it is going to give the streak effects often valued for cinematic shots. At bigger apertures there is less definition to some of the ghosting artifacts, but they are there.

Stopping down will increase the clarity of those ghosting artifacts, however.

But I didn’t see blooming around windows, and the flare wasn’t too bad with the sun right out of frame, either.

Video footage generally looked good. Sirui’s optical glass isn’t my favorite, but the anamorphic footage looks very cinematic and works well (particularly if you’re grading it).

This isn’t priced like a Zeiss, and the optical glass doesn’t performance like Zeiss, but for those with more budget constraints who want to produce cinematic content, the Sirui Autofocus 1.33 Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 works pretty well.

Conclusion

The Sirui Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 checks a lot of boxes, particularly for those who don’t have a massive pile of equipment for doing focus follow or stabilized capture. This is a lens that can do the focus follow for you, and because it has electronics, it will even notify your camera what the proper focal length is for in camera image stabilization. That makes it perhaps the easiest true cinema lens yet for grabbing run and gun footage. The current style is dynamic shots that have some natural movement and aren’t shot from dollies anyway, and that really suits what this lens can do.

A lot of the footage for this review was shot by a nephew of mine (from Ansley Creative), and it was just run and gun footage shot over a few hours without any prior experience with the lens. He’s got a great eye, but this also speaks to the ease of use for this particular lens.

This is a lens that hasn’t really been done before, but somehow I suspect that the Sirui Autofocus 1.33x Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 won’t be the last of its kind. It just makes too much sense in an era of hybrid cameras that can produce amazing footage. The ability to shoot the letterbox look makes everything look more cinematic, and the 1.33x constant squeeze is fairly close to perfect for Cinemascope. And, at a reasonable price, the new Sirui lens is the kind of cine tool that pretty much anyone can use (so long as you are willing to do some post work!).

Pros:

  • Nice looking lens with nice build
  • Smaller and lighter than many competitors
  • Includes nice case
  • USB-C port for firmware updates
  • Very feature rich
  • Weather sealed
  • Declickable aperture
  • Custom button
  • Autofocus motor is quiet and moderately fast
  • Low distortion
  • Fringing is reasonably low
  • Vignette isn’t really an issue
  • Covers the full frame image circle nearly perfectly despite being an S35 lens
  • Affordable price

Cons:

  • Some lateral fringing issues
  • Sirui optical glass isn’t amazing

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Sirui AF 1.33 Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 @ Sirui Store (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

___________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a7RV @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Camera Canada | Sony Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

__________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a6600 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony a6400 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui Autofocus Anamorphic 40mm T1.8, Sirui, Anamorphic, 40mm, T1.8, Sirui Autofocus Anamorphic Review, 1.33x, 1.33x Anamorphic, Sirui 40mm Review, Anamorphic 40mm T1.8 Review, T1.8, Review, Sony alpha 1, Sony a7RV, Wireless, Review, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Aurora vs Sigma DN 85mm F1.4

Dustin Abbott

January 3rd, 2025

Sirui’s new Aurora series of full frame lenses has kicked off with the well received Aurora 85mm F1.4. I was interested in doing some direct comparisons with existing options.  The most logical comparison is the Samyang AF 85mm F1.4 Series II lens, but since I don’t have that one on hand, I’m doing a comparison to what has become my standard in this class – the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN | ART. You can find out my full thoughts by watching the video review below…or reading on.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a review sample of this lens. As always, this is a completely independent review. *The tests and most of the photos that I share as a part of my review cycle have been done with my Sony a7RV or Sony Alpha 1 cameras.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Aurora Reviews: Video Review | Text Review

Sigma Reviews: Video Review | Text Review


Similarities

  • Same focal length and aperture
  • Mostly similar feature set (click, declick, function, AF | MF)
  • Both weather sealed
  • Both come with lens hood and case
  • Same rated magnification (0.12x)

Reasons to Choose Sigma:

  1. Extra feature – iris lock
  2. Higher contrast
  3. Sharper
  4. Faster autofocus
  5. Better up close performance (>magnification, contrast)
  6. Richer color
  7. Less fringing
  8. Better centering
  9. Winner if you like a higher contrast, more deeply saturated result.

Reasons to Choose Sirui

  1. Price | MSRP $599 vs 1199 | Current $499 vs 949
  2. Weight | 540g vs 625g
  3. 15 rounded blades vs 11
  4. Smaller filter threads 67mm vs 77mm
  5. Faster video focus pulls
  6. Comes with two filters (if you buy from Sirui)
  7. Lower distortion and vignette
  8. Rounder specular highlights wide open
  9. Winner if you like a lower contrast, more cinematic looking result (almost looks like Cinetone is on).

Conclusion

The Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 is a lot of lens for the money.  I personally prefer the results from the Sigma, but I could live with the Sirui.  I still think the Sigma strikes the best balance between high end performance and price, but the fact that it costs twice as much as the Sirui could be a serious factor for people.

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 @ Sirui (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

Purchase the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN ART @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

___________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a7RV @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Camera Canada | Sony Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

__________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a6600 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony a6400 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui Aurora F1.4 GM II, Aurora, Sirui, F1.4, 85mm, Sigma, DN, Sigma 85mm F1.4, ART, DG, Comparison, Versus, VS, Full Frame, Review, Sony Alpha 1, Sony a7RV, Review, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 AF Gallery

Dustin Abbott

December 6th, 2024

Just a few years ago, I had never reviewed a Sirui lens. I had reviewed a few tripods from the company, but I didn’t think of them as a lensmaker. They then approached me about covering a few of their cine lenses, and while that isn’t my forte, I agreed to do so out of some interest in the unique materials they were using in their lens design (carbon fiber, in this case). Since that point I’ve reviewed about a dozen lenses from them, including cine lenses, their Nightwalker series, an anamorphic lens, and all five lenses in their Sniper autofocus series. But I’ve never been more excited to do a Sirui review than the one I’m doing today, for a number of reasons. First of all, this is their first full frame autofocus lens, and I would presume that the Aurora 85mm F1.4 is the first in a new series of Aurora lenses. Secondly, while Sirui has always utilized some really cool materials in their designs (they know how to make a unique lens!), the Aurora series if the first time they’ve really kicked up the feature set, with the Aurora 85mm sporting a set of features that would compete with Sigma or even a first party lens. Thirdly, they’ve managed to make a full frame 85mm F1.4 lens that is smaller and lighter than what anyone else has done. Finally, I was a bit slow getting my review copy, so a few reviews are already out, and I found that I really, really liked the look of the rendering from the lens. Add to that the fact that Sirui is discounting the already inexpensive price of $600 down to $500 for the holidays…and throwing in a few bonus filters, and they’ve definitely got my attention. Did they pull off the value 85mm on Sony, Nikon, and Fuji? You can find out my full thoughts by watching the video review, reading the text review, or just enjoying the photos below.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a review sample of this lens. As always, this is a completely independent review. *The tests and most of the photos that I share as a part of my review cycle have been done with my Sony a7RV or Sony Alpha 1 cameras.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

One other area that I was interested in was being able to evaluate Sirui’s autofocus on a platform other than Fuji, which is where I’ve reviewed the Sniper series. Fuji’s autofocus is quite a bit behind that of other major brands like Sony, Canon, or Nikon, so I feel like my impression of Sirui’s autofocus has been held back a bit by the limitations of the camera. I’m doing this review on Sony, where no such limitations exist, and it will give me a more accurate view of the “state of play” with Sirui’s autofocus.

I’ll give Sirui high marks for presentation. There’s a clever little tab made of material that allows the box to be easily opened, and inside they packed the lens in a zippered and padded nylon case (like Sigma’s lenses), which actually adds real protection value, unlike, say, a Canon L series drawstring pouch. The lens is shrinkwrapped inside to help it to be perfectly sealed during shipment. I’m not a big “unboxing” kind of reviewer, but I was impressed as I unboxed the Aurora 85mm.

It’s great to see another 85mm F1.4 option on the market, particularly one that does have a number of nice strengths. It’s probably not going to dethrone my Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN for me personally, but I’ll also note that it costs half as much.

This is a very nice full frame portrait lens for $500. Check out the photos to see if it checks the boxes for you.

Images of the Aurora 85mm F1.4

Images Taken with the 85 Aurora

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 @ Sirui (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

___________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a7RV @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Camera Canada | Sony Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

__________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a6600 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony a6400 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui, Aurora, 85mm, F1.4, Sirui Aurora Review, Sirui 85mm Review, Aurora 85mm F1.4 Review, f/1.4, Review, Sony alpha 1, Sony a7RV, Wireless, Review, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 Review

Dustin Abbott

December 6th, 2024

Just a few years ago, I had never reviewed a Sirui lens. I had reviewed a few tripods from the company, but I didn’t think of them as a lensmaker. They then approached me about covering a few of their cine lenses, and while that isn’t my forte, I agreed to do so out of some interest in the unique materials they were using in their lens design (carbon fiber, in this case). Since that point I’ve reviewed about a dozen lenses from them, including cine lenses, their Nightwalker series, an anamorphic lens, and all five lenses in their Sniper autofocus series. But I’ve never been more excited to do a Sirui review than the one I’m doing today, for a number of reasons. First of all, this is their first full frame autofocus lens, and I would presume that the Aurora 85mm F1.4 is the first in a new series of Aurora lenses. Secondly, while Sirui has always utilized some really cool materials in their designs (they know how to make a unique lens!), the Aurora series if the first time they’ve really kicked up the feature set, with the Aurora 85mm sporting a set of features that would compete with Sigma or even a first party lens. Thirdly, they’ve managed to make a full frame 85mm F1.4 lens that is smaller and lighter than what anyone else has done. Finally, I was a bit slow getting my review copy, so a few reviews are already out, and I found that I really, really liked the look of the rendering from the lens. Add to that the fact that Sirui is discounting the already inexpensive price of $600 down to $500 for the holidays…and throwing in a few bonus filters, and they’ve definitely got my attention. Did they pull off the value 85mm on Sony, Nikon, and Fuji? You can find out my full thoughts by watching the video review below…or reading on.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px | X

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a review sample of this lens. As always, this is a completely independent review. *The tests and most of the photos that I share as a part of my review cycle have been done with my Sony a7RV or Sony Alpha 1 cameras.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

One other area that I was interested in was being able to evaluate Sirui’s autofocus on a platform other than Fuji, which is where I’ve reviewed the Sniper series. Fuji’s autofocus is quite a bit behind that of other major brands like Sony, Canon, or Nikon, so I feel like my impression of Sirui’s autofocus has been held back a bit by the limitations of the camera. I’m doing this review on Sony, where no such limitations exist, and it will give me a more accurate view of the “state of play” with Sirui’s autofocus.

I’ll give Sirui high marks for presentation. There’s a clever little tab made of material that allows the box to be easily opened, and inside they packed the lens in a zippered and padded nylon case (like Sigma’s lenses), which actually adds real protection value, unlike, say, a Canon L series drawstring pouch. The lens is shrinkwrapped inside to help it to be perfectly sealed during shipment. I’m not a big “unboxing” kind of reviewer, but I was impressed as I unboxed the Aurora 85mm.

It’s great to see another 85mm F1.4 option on the market, particularly one that does have a number of nice strengths. It’s probably not going to dethrone my Simga 85mm F1.4 DN for me personally, but I’ll also note that it costs half as much.

This is a very nice full frame portrait lens for $500…so let’s dive in and get the details.

Aurora 85mm Build and Handling

As noted in the intro, the Aurora series is a step up for Sirui in build quality and feature set. In some ways, however, the design language of the Aurora series is more stereotypical than their typical recent designs. Thus far the only color scheme seems to be black, so no white or silver. The overall appearance is nicely clean though with bolder fonts and bigger writing than most lenses. They want you to understand that this is a full frame lens, for example. How do I know that? Because they wrote it right on the barrel.

The fonts on the side, too, are quite bold. This is like the “large print” edition of lenses.

The Sirui badge on the right side of the barrel is probably the most subtle thing here.

The front face is more clean and simple. I always like when there is lens information on the front of a lens.

The lens itself is definitely on the small side for an 85mm F1.4. Not as small as the Sony FE 85mm F1.8, but definitely smaller and lighter than any of the F1.4 options save the Samyang Series II (which I reviewed here). The lens is 80.3 (3.2″) in diameter x 102 mm (4″) in length. It manages to get by with a 67mm front filter thread compared to the 77mm of the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN or the 72mm of the Samyang AF 85mm F1.4 II. It weighs 540g (1.4lb), which is slightly more than the 509g of the Samyang but less than the 625g of the Sigma. You can see that while the two lenses are similar in length, the Sigma lens is definitely wider in diameter.

The included lens hood (pictured above) is fairly plain. It is a cheaper feeling plastic (relative to the more robust aluminum alloy housing of the lens) that is distinguished mostly by a ribbed grip ring. It bayonets on a little tighter (the tolerances could be a little better here) but at least won’t be jarred free.

This is a fairly feature rich lens. It has a robust approach to aperture control, including a manual aperture ring that can be controlled with clicks (at one third stop detents) or clickless by changing the position of the switch on the right side of the lens.

You also have the option of switching into A (automatic) mode if you prefer to control aperture from within the camera. This isn’t an iris lock, but there is a nice long detent in between F16 and A mode that should keep you from accidentally straying in either direction.

The aperture iris itself is beautiful, with 15 rounded blades, which is well more than any of the competitors.

On the left side of the barrel there is a Function button that can be programmed to a wide range of functions from within the camera along with an AF | MF switch.

The manual focus ring has a nice feel to it overall. The damping is good, and focus smooths well without any apparent lag between input on the ring and the actual focus action. The active focus area will be automatically magnified if you have that setting enabled.

At the rear of the lens you’ll find a USB-C port that allows for quick and easy firmware updates.

You’ll also find a weathersealing gasket located there, and Sirui adds that there is a fluorine coating on the front element. There seems to be some other seals as well. Sirui actually used the word “waterproof” in their marketing, but I’m not aware of any lens actually being waterproof. Weathersealed is probably a better term, meaning that you can use it when it is raining, but don’t drop it in a pool or the ocean and expect all to be well!

Right now Sirui is including two filters as a bonus. One is UV protection filter, which I personally don’t use but some photographers swear by.

The second is more interesting to me, as it is a “Black Mist” filter. This gives you a little more of a glow to an image, a slightly more dreamy look that can be interesting in certain situations. Here’s a quick comparison of a scene with and without the filter. Note that it affects not only the subject but also the bokeh, too.

It’s a nice bonus on a portrait oriented lens, and we’ll come back to that in the image quality section.

The lens barrel is made of metal (aluminum alloy), and it has a nice, anodized black satin finish. Overall I would call it a nice looking lens even if I do find the badging/writing a little overwrought.

85mm lenses are rarely known for great levels of magnification, and that’s true here. Minimum focus distance is 85cm, which is pretty much dead on with what the Sigma and Samyang allow. That will give maximum magnification figure of right at 0.12x, which is obviously very average.

While the Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 isn’t precisely the smallest and lightest 85mm F1.4 lens out there, it is very close, and unlike the Samyang, it gives you a metal body and more features, which feels like a nice tradeoff for the additional 31g of weight. Overall I’m happy about what we have here. I love to see when companies “level up” in their lens design.

Stills Autofocus

Sirui has equipped the Aurora 85mm with an STM or stepping motor. While I consider STM motors to be the lower tier of modern mirrorless AF motors (with Linear and Voice Coil motors in an upper tier), the truth of the matter is that there’s a pretty broad range of performance with STM motors. The Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN also has an STM motor, for example, and it costs twice as much. Obviously the Sirui won’t be able to compete with the Sony 85mm F1.4 GM II, which has incredibly fast autofocus thanks to having two XD Linear motors, and those are the largest of their kind that Sony has made to this point. If your plans for an 85mm prime include capturing sports action, you’ll probably want to stick with something like the Sony or, if you’re shooting Nikon, perhaps consider the Z 85mm F1.8 S instead. But for most people in most situations, the autofocus performance on the Aurora 85mm is going to work just fine.

You can see from the shots above that the lens delivered nicely accurate results on either my Sony a7RV or my Alpha 1, with good precision on any kind of trackable subject even if the subject (like Ferrari here) was in profile.

Focus is very accurate on the eye itself, not anything else.

There is almost no noise to be heard even if I put my ear next to the lens barrel. There is the slightest buzz from the motor, but so quiet as to be nearly undetectable. Focus speed is good in most situations, too, though I did notice a little lag when going from a very close to a very distant subject. I would say that in most ordinary situations focus speed will be sufficient. It’s nowhere near as fast as the Sony 85mm F1.4 GM II, but probably only a hair slower than the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN.

I used the Aurora 85mm to record a birthday celebration for my assistant, Craig, and I got well focused results throughout.

I shot a series of portraits with the Aurora 85mm, and it proved very capable of accurate focus in that setting, whether I was shooting through branches:

Shooting at a closer distance:

…or shooting from further away.

Focus was also good for holiday type celebrations.

Focus for general purpose subjects was just good, delivering good accuracy with no drama.

As with most third party lenses, if your goal is tracking fast action, you might want to go with a first party lens, but for most people in most situations, autofocus for stills was pretty great.

Video AF

On the video front I found mostly good results. Focus pulls were smooth and quick with no visible steps. Focus breathing is fairly obvious, but not unusually so for an 85mm lens.

The Aurora 85mm did fine with my “hand test” as well, where I alternately block the view to my face with my hand and then remove it. Focus transitioned nicely from my hand to my face every time with no lag or misses.

Video footage generally looked good. The Aurora has a different look to the optical glass than competing lenses, including lower contrast and a different color signature. If you like it, you like it, but it isn’t quite like other full frame 85mm F1.4 lenses.

I also had fairly good results with video clips where I slowly moved the camera to force change from one subject to another at varying depths of field. Focus transitions were fairly well damped, and overall autofocus feels pretty capable.

Aurora 85mm F1.4 Image Quality Breakdown

The Aurora 85mm has an optical design of 14 elements in 9 groups, which includes some exotic elements like high refractive elements, extra low dispersion elements, and a aspherical element.

The MTF chart shows a fairly consistent performance across the frame with a dip right past midframe, a correction after than, and than a drop right in the very corners. The stopped down performance is almost flat on the sagittal plane, but the tangential plane shows a big dip, speaking to a bit less contrast.

My optical tests are on the 61MP a7RV, which is currently the most demanding resolution point for a full frame camera. I suspect that my testing results will be a little more punishing than a few of the reviews I’ve seen on lower resolution platforms, as you can see from the blue lines in the MTF chart above that the lens looks great on lower resolution points and a little weaker on higher resolution platforms.

There’s one other clue in the MTF chart that may help you to understand my results. Their MTF chargts were developed at 3.4 meters, which is a little over 11 feet. That’s a bit further than standard. The distance to my test chart, for example, would have been more like 2 meters. This is relevant because I really felt like this was a lens that is optimized for portrait distances. I felt like the lens was less impressive at close focus distances, like here at roughly minimum focus distance (F1.4):

…or at infinity/landscape distances (here at F2.8):

But put it in that sweet spot of 8-20 feet (2.5-5 meters) and it is very sharp even at F1.4:

You may have noticed the real strength of the lens in my first and third examples above. This lens has gorgeous rendering and bokeh. It isn’t the sharpest 85mm out there, but it compensates by having really gorgeous bokeh rendering. And, if you are shooting either in A) the optimized shooting distance or B) on a lower resolution camera, you will also get really great sharpness and contrast as well. This doesn’t surprise me, though, as I felt like this was also the relative strengths and weaknesses of the Sniper series as well.

The Aurora 85mm shows some light color fringing before and after the plane of focus (LoCA, or Longitudinal Chromatic Aberrations), though nothing excessive in my standard tests. You can see some fringing on my chart, but nothing too bad.

One of the key areas that I see fringing is in the imprinting on lenses and cameras, and this only Pentax combination of my Dad’s often will show major fringing if this is an area a lens struggles with. The Aurora 85mm does surprisingly good in this test even at F1.4.

I didn’t see any fringing around the bright specular highlights here (bokeh balls) either.

But this shot at distance was a different story. I see fringing around bare branches, around the geese on the water, and on a few other textures. It’s as if the colors are not quite properly focusing together, and the result is lost contrast and definition on the textures.

This style of fringing is called lateral chromatic aberrations (LaCA), and after what I saw in some real world shots, I was unsurprised to see it pretty strongly on my test chart as well.

Reducing the color fringing isn’t tough (the “Remove Chromatic Aberration” button on your favorite editing software should take care of that without problem), but what you won’t see restored is the lost detail in your images. That makes this a slightly underwhelming lens for landscapes. In many ways the Aurora 85mm F1.4 is the optical polar opposite of the recent Sony 85mm F1.4 GM II. That lens has some of the best microcontrast that I’ve ever seen, able to resolve amazing detail at both close and distance (some of my landscape images at F1.4 amazed me on that lens). But I was bit underwhelmed by the overall rendering and quality of the bokeh. The Aurora is the opposite. I’m completely underwhelmed by the fine detail rendering in many situations, but absolutely love the overall rendering of the bokeh from lens.

There’s a case to be made for both approaches, but if you’re making the case for the Aurora’s approach, it is that clients and viewers will rarely see the pixel peeping results, but they will always see the big picture rendering results.

The Aurora 85mm is a bit like the Sigma 85mm F1.4 DN in that there is a lot more pincushion distortion than expected. It’s as if both companies left some uncorrected distortion as a engineering trick to reduce the size of the lens. The Sirui isn’t as bad as the Sigma, however, as I used a -7 to correct the nicely linear pincushion distortion and only a +38 to correct the vignette (I needed to max out the vignette slider with the Sigma).

A bit of pincushion distortion can be flattering to portrait subjects, but this is probably excessive. You’ll want to correct at least some of it, though you can probably get away with not correcting the vignette.

Unfortunately the Aurora 85mm does not seem to be getting in-camera correction support. I pulled the JPEG file of the chart test above off my second card and it looked just like the RAW file.

So how about resolution and contrast? My tests have been done on a 61MP Sony a7RV, and crops are typically shown at 200% magnification. Here’s the test chart:

Here are F1.4 crops at roughly 200% from across the frame (center, mid-frame, and lower right corner).

I see mostly good detail across most of the frame (a bit of a drop in the corners, as predicted), but contrast is unexceptional. This is mirrors my findings in real world shots, too, though again the contrast results are better in the “sweet spot” of 2.5-5 meters (8-20 feet).

Stopping down even to F1.8 produces more contrast, particularly in the black levels.

You can see that in this real world example comparing F1.4 and F2 as well.

This is one of those lenses that offers you some choice in how you want things rendered. It’s a nice option at F1.4, as it is still sharp enough for portrait work, but still has a flattering quality to the rendering.

For portrait work I felt that there was plenty of sharpness. Even a fairly deep crop at F1.4 shows nice detail.

You can see that there is a very noticeable bump in sharpness and contrast at F2.8:

From 2.8 to F4 is an even bigger jump, and you can see that now even the corners look impressively sharp.

Peak performance in terms of consistency will be from F4 to F8, where sharpness is most consistent for landscape style work (even if that isn’t the lens’ greatest forte.)

Diffraction will start to soften the image after that, with a mild amount at F11 but a more obvious amount by F16:

But the absolute strength of this lens is in the overall rendering. Images just look really fantastic, with enough sharpness and contrast to be compelling, but it is all complimented by very soft, very creamy bokeh.

Geometry is pretty decent, with some geometric deformation near the edges of the frame, but overall the impression is of big, soft bokeh circles.

There is a bit of swirly busyness in those specular highlights, however, which is probably the biggest negative about the bokeh.

I found the backgrounds nice and creamy in a wide variety of situations, however.

This image has a lot in the transition zone, but it still looks pretty good.

Even the foreground bokeh is nice, which is really important for when you want to use out of focus elements to create natural frames for your subjects.

Flare resistance is mostly good. I had good results where the sun was very brightly right out of frame. You can’t really tell it from this image, but this scene was flooded with window light from a bright, directional sun.

This wide open F1.4 shot was shot into very bright sun around this tree, and while you can see some localized veiling at the epicenter of the sun, contrast has held up well in the image.

Stopping down to F11 reduced the veiling but adding just a little ghosting spot.

With the sun right out of frame and at a certain angle, you will get a glowing veil effect, which fortunately is extremely artistic. Here’s a freeze frame from a video clip:

I’ve added that exact effect to a LOT of images in post because I love the warm glow effect.

The Aurora 85mm is a pretty easy lens to get nice looking images with.

I’m also partial to the rendering from the Samyang AF 85mm F1.4 II, leaving us with two pretty great options. Looking back at my review results, I would argue that the Samyang is a hair sharper, but I think the Sirui has nicer bokeh. If you’d like to see more image samples, check out the image gallery here.

Conclusion

The Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 is an interesting step forward for Sirui, as it covers a lot of new territory. It moves into covering the full frame sensor, adds weather sealing, more features, and even ups the included accessories to include filters and a case. Doing all of this at the current price of $499 USD is impressive. And it seems like this lens is getting a lot of glowing reviews from those in the target audience – portrait photographers. The optics are optimized for portrait zones, and the gorgeous rendering/bokeh helps make images really look great. There are sharper options if you are just looking for pure sharpness for landscapes or general purpose, but if your priority is the look of images and having great bokeh, then the Aurora 85mm checks a lot of boxes.

It doesn’t hurt that this becomes the least expensive full frame 85mm F1.4 option on Sony and Nikon, and also offers a more feature rich lens than competitors on Fuji.

Sirui is clearly upping their game and moving into a more mainstream market with the Aurora series. There is perhaps the least amount of competition on the Nikon Z space, but here on a Sony there are a lot of alternatives. Some of them are sharper, but none of them are cheaper, and I’m not sure that any have quite as nice of rendering, so if that matters to you, the Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 is a winner. It’s a lot of lens for $500!

Pros:

  • Nice looking lens with nice build
  • Smaller and lighter than many competitors
  • Includes nice case and filters
  • USB-C port for firmware updates
  • Good manual focus ring and experience
  • Very feature rich
  • Weather sealed
  • Declickable aperture
  • Custom button
  • Autofocus motor is quiet and moderately fast
  • Good sharpness and contrast at portrait distances
  • Beautiful bokeh
  • Flare resistance fairly good
  • Great price to performance ratio

Cons:

  • Some lateral fringing issues
  • Pincushion distortion
  • Not super sharp at landscape distances
  • Lower contrast than competing lenses

_________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Purchase the Sirui Aurora 85mm F1.4 @ Sirui (use code DustinA5 for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

___________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a7RV @ B&H Photo | AdoramaAmazon | Camera Canada | Sony Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

__________________________________________________________________

Purchase the Sony a6600 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Purchase the Sony a6400 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

_________________________________________________________________

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui, Aurora, 85mm, F1.4, Sirui Aurora Review, Sirui 85mm Review, Aurora 85mm F1.4 Review, f/1.4, Review, Sony alpha 1, Sony a7RV, Wireless, Review, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, let the light in, weathersealing, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 Review

Dustin Abbott

July 12th, 2024

Sirui launched their “Sniper” series of autofocus lenses in late 2023. I’ve done an overview of the series here. The Sniper Series was initially made up of 3 APS-C specific lenses – a 23mm F1.2, 33mm F1.2, and 56mm F1.2 lens, but they have now expanded the series to include both a wider angle option (Sniper 16mm F1.2) and a longer telephoto option (Sniper 75mm F1.2). It is these latter two that I am currently reviewing, and today’s review focuses on the telephoto option – the Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 AF lens. These can be purchased individually for $349 USD each (though various discounts will provide a little fluctuation in pricing). These lenses will be available in Fuji X-mount (reviewed here), Sony E-mount, and Nikon Z mount configurations, though in all mounts they are designed to cover the APS-C and not the full frame image circle. Find out by watching my video review below…or just reading on.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px   

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a set of review samples of the lenses.   As always, this is a completely independent review.  All opinions and conclusions are my own. I’m doing this review on a 40MP Fujifilm X-H2 camera.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Here’s a quick way to access my reviews of each lens in the series:

I’m doing this review on Fuji X-mount since that is what Sirui had available to send me. In many ways this is jumping right into the fire, as there is no platform more optically demanding than the 40MP sensor on my Fujifilm X-H2. This is the equivalent of over 90MP on full frame, a resolution point that is currently 30+MP higher than what is even available on full frame. That creates an extremely demanding optical test that will push this new series to the limits. Is this 75mm F1.2 Sniper lens up to the challenge? As with the other lenses, that answer really depends on your priorities and expectations as a photographer, though I will say that I think that the Sniper 75mm is the best of the bunch optically. It does face very stiff competition from the excellent Viltrox Pro AF 75mm F1.2 (my review here), though the Viltrox is bigger, heavier, and more expensive.

For that size, however, you get more features (aperture ring, AF/MF switch), weather sealing, and it is definitely sharper. But this new Sniper 75mm is no slouch optically, and while it isn’t as transcendently sharp as the Viltrox at F1.2, it helps compensate by both a very useful amount of sharpness along with gorgeous bokeh.

This is definitely the “bokeh monster” of the Sniper series, capable of crushing backgrounds and delivering beautiful subject isolation.

75mm is the least traditional of the focal lengths in the Sniper series. Once you apply the 1.5x crop factor of the APS-C cameras that these lenses are designed for (whether Fuji, Sony, or Nikon), the 16, 23, 35, and 56mm become the full frame equivalents of 24, 35, 50, and 85mm – the most common prime focal lengths you could ask for. 75mm is a much less conventional 112.5mm full frame equivalent, and while that isn’t as flexible a focal length as some of these others, it a really great portrait focal length because you can shoot full length and still have the background blurred out. Viltrox’s Pro AF 75mm F1.2 has proven very popular for that reason.

All of these Sniper lenses have sported an F1.2 maximum aperture. That’s an obvious advantage for the F1.2 in two ways: 1) when shooting in low light conditions that large aperture can suck in more light 2) the depth of field will shallower at F1.2 than F1.4, allowing for larger, softer bokeh highlights and a more blurred out background. The fact that the Sirui Nightwalker 75mm T1.2 exists (my video review here) tells me that the light transmission for the lens is excellent, as the T-stop actually matches the F-stop (fairly rare, in my experience). This is a very bright lens, and that’s going to be useful in a lot of situations. It has no problem when the light gets dim.

The Sniper series has come in three different finish option: a black/grey finish with carbon fiber accents (the lenses I’m testing come in this finish), a white finish, and a silver finish. Each is available for the three different mounts that lens is sold for. These photos cover the three older lenses as I’m reviewing the 16mm and 75mm lenses before public release.

It is great to see Sirui forging their own design path, and I’ve been impressed across the three different lineups that I’ve tested (Sniper, Night Walker, and Saturn). So let’s take a closer look at this 75mm F1.2 lens from Sirui.

Sirui Sniper 75mm Build and Handling

The original Sniper lenses all shared a common outer shell and exterior dimensions though with a slight weight variation due to the larger optical elements in some. There’s a little more variation in the new 16mm and 75mm F1.2 designs, however, as would be expected with these slightly more extreme focal lengths. This Sniper 16mm is the lightest of the series (smallest glass elements), weighing in at 375g (13.2 oz) on my scale. The 16mm and 75mm Sniper lenses share a common length (94mm or 3.7″), but you can see that the 75mm is considerably wider than the 16mm.

I measure the 75mm at nearly 75mm (2.95″), with the 16mm being a slimmer 70mm (2.75″). The 75mm is the heaviest of the group at 466g (16.1 oz), which is unsurprising as it has easily the most glass inside. The 16mm, 23mm, 33mm, and 56mm Sniper lenses all share a common 58mm front filter thread, but the filter threads on the 75mm grow to 67mm to accommodate the wider diameter of the lens.

The weight will very slightly vary according to lens and mount. The X-mount that I’m testing is actually the lightest (by a few grams), due to the X-mount being the smallest of the three in diameter. Nikon’s Z-mount is the largest in diameter, with Sony E-mount in between.

So how does the 75 x 94mm and 466g of the Sniper 75mm F1.2 compares to the Viltrox Pro AF 75mm F1.2? The Viltrox is 87 x 101 mm (3.4 x 4″) and weighs 670g (23.6oz). That makes the Sirui a whopping 200+ grams lighter, which is definitely significant. The Sniper 75mm is just 20g heavier than the Fujinon XF 56mm F1.2 WR (my review here) despite the significantly longer focal length of the Sirui. While the early Sniper lenses were heavier than some of their counterparts, this 75mm is sitting in a nice position when it comes to the size and weight of the lens.

The look of the Sniper lenses is unique. There’s not much here in terms of features, but the lenses do have an upscale look with a variety of textures and finishes. I’m reviewing the lenses labeled as being “black”, but black (at least in the typical lens sense) is not the vibe I get off these lenses. There are two metal sections (one near the lens mount and another in the middle of the lens) that has a traditional anodized satin black finish, but in between there is a section of genuine carbon fiber that looks very cool. Carbon fiber is a more upscale material and it definitely sets these lenses apart.

There are two badges in this section. One is a plate with the Sirui banding in raised metal lettering. The second is on the left side, and there is a another smaller badge that says AF and APS-C. Interestingly the word “Sniper” appears nowhere on the lens.

There are no switches on the lens barrel nor an aperture ring. That’s more noticeable here on Fuji, where aperture rings are fairly standard. Both of the F1.2 lenses that I’ve mentioned have both an aperture ring and weather sealing, so the Sirui is at a serious disadvantage in those areas, though, to be fair, it is between $200 and $600 cheaper than its main competitors.

The Sniper 75mm has a great profile to it on camera, with a nice, squat look that is a nice match to my larger X-H2 body.

The manual focus ring has a diamond pattern akin to Canon’s control rings rather than a typical ribbed finish. It’s one more area where the lenses maintain their own unique look.

The manual focus rings move smoothly and the weight is fairly light. Not so light that you can’t accurately focus, but a bit lighter than what I personally prefer. Sirui states that the focus throw is 360°, so plenty of room for precision.

After the focus ring is a blue accent ring that is nearly turquoise in color. Once again it is little different than other lens that I’ve tested, and it works. The final section at the front of the lens has a titanium colored anodized metal finish, so less than half of the lens surface is actually purely black. Each lens color has some unique ingredient: black = carbon fiber, silver = aluminum alloy, white = ceramic baked paint.

The included lens hoods is nothing special. It is made of plastic and doesn’t feel as premium at the rest of the lens. It doesn’t bayonet on quite as precisely as I would prefer, though it does lock into place tightly. I do appreciate the ribbed section in the hood which gives a little more grip.

It’s worth noting that both the front pinch cap along with the rear cap are quite low profile. The front cap is just a few millimeters thick, and the rear cap too feels slimmer than usual. These little details stood out to me as nothing about the lenses felt generic or “by-the-numbers”. Sirui is doing their own thing here, and I like the attention to detail.

At the rear of the lens we have a metal lens mount complete with the appropriate electronic contacts; aperture will be controlled from the camera. There is a USB-C port there that will allow for future firmware updates. That’s a really important move by Sirui, as they are new to autofocus design. The ability to update the focus algorithms in their lenses will help them to focus better in the future and also allows the lenses to be futureproof.

The aperture iris is made up of a higher-than-average 11 rounded blades. That’s a great choice in a lens with an F1.2 aperture, as it helps assure that the aperture iris stays circular as the lens is stopped down. It also looks really gorgeous in a lens like this that has so much glass to look through in the front.

The minimum focus distances for the Sniper 75mm is fairly high at 70cm. Sirui has not listed the maximum magnification, but it is definitely the highest in the group. I would estimate it in the 0.12x range.

It’s not particularly close, but the magnification can still be useful, and the huge maximum aperture allows for a deep blur of the background.

There are some pros and cons for the design and handling. On the positive side, the lenses look and feel great. There are some premium materials being used in the design and the attention to detail is excellent, and, in this case, the Sniper 75mm is smaller and lighter than the directly competing lens. On the negative side, there are no real features on the lenses outside of the USB-C port for firmware updates.

Autofocus Performance

The Sirui Sniper lenses are all equipped with STM (stepping) focus motors. There is a certain amount of autofocus performance that is camera and camera system specific, so I’ll try to distinguish between the lens performance and the system performance as much as possible. My experience is that third party lenses focus better on Sony and Nikon than they do on Fuji, and that’s largely because Fuji’s autofocus systems in their cameras are not quite as sophisticated as equivalent Sony or Nikon cameras.

That being said, autofocus speed is about average for a modern STM motor on Fuji. The thrust in this AF motor seems a little more impressive than some of the lenses in the series, so I found that AF speed was perhaps better than average for the Sniper lenses despite the focus motor having to push the larger glass elements in this lens. When doing my focus speed tests with the Sniper 75mm from close to distance, I found that focus wasn’t quite instantaneous, but neither was it slow. And in real world shooting I found that focus speed was fast enough that I never really thought about it. This isn’t going to be a lens for shooting sports, but none of these F1.2 lenses on Fuji are.

The actual focus motor makes only a light whirring, but there is more noise caused by the the sound of the aperture blades opening and closing. This happens even when the aperture is set at F1.2, as the aperture blades close partway in between focus on Fuji (for some reason). This happens with all lenses, but the aperture blades on the Sniper lenses are noisier than average, and that does draw your attention to them. It unfortunately makes autofocus feel less sophisticated than it actually is.

Focus accuracy was good. I was able to shoot through layers of the foreground and accurately focus on the lock above.

I could shoot from roughly 2 meters (six feet) away and focus easily locked on these growing plants.

Focus was also good with the lens stopped down, and it produced very nice looking landscape shots.

When I moved around with Eye AF engaged, focus tracked accurately and the green box stayed locked on the “eye” of my little test statue.

I was less satisfied when I had a moving target like Nala moving towards me. Even though eye AF grabbed her eye, it seemed like images tended to be backfocused.

So other than being a little noisy in focus, I actually had no issue with the lens for stills. Like other lenses in the series, autofocus isn’t fast enough to track action, but it does seem to be accurate for more still subjects.

The state of autofocus on Fuji for video remains pretty abysmal relative to other platforms. Add a third party lens from company that has been making autofocus lenses for less than a year, and you’ve got a recipe for a bit of frustration. Focus pulls were quite slow with very obvious steps. The focus pull felt it came in 3-4 stages rather than one smooth arc. Focus also did a bit of settling before a final lock.

My hand test (where I alternately block and then unblock the camera’s view of my face with my hand) was particularly frustrating. The lens didn’t really want to focus on either my face or my hand at first (it acted as if I hadn’t come into the frame), and by the time it eventually decided to focus on me, focus transitions were so slow and non-reactive that I rarely got a decent cycle of focus from my hand to my eye or vice versa.

On a positive note, focus breathing is fairly well controlled.

If you rarely shoot video (or don’t really need autofocus during video recording), then the Sniper 75mm will work fine. It’s not a great choice for video work, however. The frustrating thing is that there doesn’t seem to be many alternatives on Fuji that are much better. I suspect this lens will function much better for video work on either Sony or Nikon from my experience on those platforms.

Sirui Sniper 75mm Image Quality

The Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 has an optical design of 13 elements in 9 groups. All of the Sniper lenses have had more of what I call a “classic” sharpness profile, in that they behave like some older large aperture lenses. They are somewhat dreamy (low contrast) wide open and then sharpen up to higher contrast and detail at smaller apertures. The 33mm and 56mm Sniper lenses took this to an extreme, and I wasn’t really a fan of them, but the 16mm and, in particular, this 75mm find a much nicer balance. While it is true that the extreme resolution of the 40MP Fuji APS-C sensor tends to make a lot of lenses look softer than they are in any other application, I feel like the Sniper 75mm is able to handle those demands reasonably well. It isn’t as bitingly sharp and high contrast at F1.2 as the Viltrox, but it does produce enough contrast and detail at F1.2 to be useful. Pair that with gorgeous bokeh and you’ve got a lens that I think will make a lot of people happy.

I like the 16mm and 75mm better than the early lenses in the series because they have more sharpness potential when stopped down…even on the very demanding sensor of my X-H2. When stopped down it delivers high detail images that look great.

Our optical deep dive starts with a look at vignette and distortion, an area where the Sniper lenses have held up quite well. The 75mm is no exception with no distortion there to correct.

Vignette is also well controlled for an F1.2 lens, requiring only a +45 (about 1 1/2 stops) to correct. This is an area of advantage over competing lenses.

The first telephoto in the series (56mm F1.2) was terrible for fringing, but the Sniper 75mm is much better. There is very little longitudinal chromatic aberrations (LoCA_ here.

You can see the advantage of this in this shot of white raspberry blossoms in a high contrast setting. There is very little fringing in this F1.4 shot despite this being prime conditions to seem them.

Lateral chromatic aberrations near the edge of the frame are fairly well controlled. I see some very minor fringing in the transitions from black to white here, but nothing significant.

The Sniper 75mm is holding up MUCH better in these tests than the 56mm did.

So how about resolution? The 40MP Fuji X-Trans sensor tends to make all but the very sharpest of lenses look a little soft under the microscope of my tests. I examine results at a 200% magnification, and that’s a lot to ask of any lens. Here’s a look at the test chart:

And here is a look at F1.2 crops from the center, then mid-frame, and then extreme lower right corner:

The crops reveal that contrast is fairly good even at F1.2 in the center of the frame, and the corners stand out to me as being quite good as well. That’s born out in real world results (particularly outside of close focus range), as the detail even in the corners at F1.2 looks good even on such a high resolution body.

Even at landscape distances, however, I think the sharpness results are quite good.

There is a minor uptick in contrast even at F1.4 along with slightly better detail. Here’s a look at the midframe at 200% magnification.

You’ll see even more improvement from F1.4 to F2:

By F4 to F8, you’ll find sharpness that reaches all across the frame, even to the corners.

Landscape shots in this range will show great detail and contrast all across the frame.

By F11 you will see some softening due to the effect of diffraction, with more rapid deterioration by F16.

The standout quality from the Sniper 75mm, however, is its bokeh, which is pretty fantastic. If you combine the minimum focus distance with F1.2, you’ll end up with a near complete dissolving of the background and gorgeous creaminess.

Add more complex backgrounds and the lens still thrives.

Move back a little further and even close down the the lens a bit, and I still like what I see.

Even this shot of a very complex scene and with the lens stopped down to F2 looks great:

Flare resistance is fairly good for a large aperture telephoto lens. It’s not free of flare artifacts, but the ghosting is minimal. There’s a bit more when stopped down, but not bad.

I was able to test for coma, and found that while there is some minor distorting of star points near the edge of the frame, this is actually a decent lens to use for capturing the stars. No fringing on star points, low amounts of vignette, and obviously the ability to suck in massive amounts of light with that very bright aperture.

All told, this is really a very nice lens optically. The Viltrox 75mm F1.2 is sharper, but the bokeh from the Sniper 75mm may be even nicer.

This is the first of the Sniper lenses that I feel completely positive about in terms of its optics. It is sharp enough to not embarrass itself even on the very high resolution of the Fuji’s 40MP APS-C sensor and has some of the nicest bokeh I’ve seen from any lens on Fuji. This is a very nice lens optically for the price tag of just $350 USD, and should make for a gorgeous portrait lens. You can check out the image gallery to see more photos and see if the rendering from the lens suits you.

Conclusion

The Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 AF lens is a welcome addition to the Sniper series. While the focal length is less conventional, the Sniper 75mm more than makes up for it through its beautiful rendering.

Autofocus isn’t great for action or big video pulls, but it worked fine for the majority of my photography subjects.

The optical performance, however, makes this lens a great “bang-for-the buck” value, capable of producing gorgeous images with good color, contrast, detail, and lovely bokeh.

So if you’re sweet spot for a telephoto falls somewhere between Fuji’s 56mm F1.2 and 90mm F2, the Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 might just be the lens for you.

Pros:

  • Unique design that uses premium materials
  • Bright F1.2 aperture
  • Ability to upgrade firmware through USB-C port
  • Smaller and lighter than Viltrox 75mm F1.2
  • Good focus accuracy for stills
  • No distortion
  • Low vignette
  • Good control of aberrations
  • Good sharpness even at 40MP
  • Gorgeous bokeh and rendering
  • Good coma performance
  • Optically matched to other Sniper lenses
  • Well priced

Cons:

  • Aperture iris clacks a lot during focus
  • No aperture ring or weather sealing
  • Focus isn’t fast enough for action
  • Video focus isn’t great

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Early bird discounted pricing: https://sirui.kckb.me/dabbott

Purchase the Sirui Sniper Lenses @ Sirui (use code DustinA for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

Purchase the Fujifilm X-H2 @ B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-T5 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Find it Used at KEH 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-S20 @ B&H Photo | Adorama  | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

  Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch  

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui, Sniper, Sirui Sniper, Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2, 75mm, 23mm, 33mm 56mm, 16mm, F1.2, STM, Carbon Fiber, Review, Fuji X, Sony E, Review, Telephoto, Action, Tracking, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, Sony a6700, Sony a6600, Fujifilm X-T5, Fujifilm X-H2, let the light in, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 Gallery

Dustin Abbott

July 12th, 2024

Sirui launched their “Sniper” series of autofocus lenses in late 2023. I’ve done an overview of the series here. The Sniper Series was initially made up of 3 APS-C specific lenses – a 23mm F1.2, 33mm F1.2, and 56mm F1.2 lens, but they have now expanded the series to include both a wider angle option (Sniper 16mm F1.2) and a longer telephoto option (Sniper 75mm F1.2). It is these latter two that I am currently reviewing, and today’s review focuses on the telephoto option – the Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2 AF lens. These can be purchased individually for $349 USD each (though various discounts will provide a little fluctuation in pricing). These lenses will be available in Fuji X-mount (reviewed here), Sony E-mount, and Nikon Z mount configurations, though in all mounts they are designed to cover the APS-C and not the full frame image circle. Find out by watching my video review below, reading my text review here, or just by enjoying the photos below.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px   

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a set of review samples of the lenses.   As always, this is a completely independent review.  All opinions and conclusions are my own. I’m doing this review on a 40MP Fujifilm X-H2 camera.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Here’s a quick way to access my reviews of each lens in the series:

I’m doing this review on Fuji X-mount since that is what Sirui had available to send me. In many ways this is jumping right into the fire, as there is no platform more optically demanding than the 40MP sensor on my Fujifilm X-H2. This is the equivalent of over 90MP on full frame, a resolution point that is currently 30+MP higher than what is even available on full frame. That creates an extremely demanding optical test that will push this new series to the limits. Is this 75mm F1.2 Sniper lens up to the challenge? As with the other lenses, that answer really depends on your priorities and expectations as a photographer, though I will say that I think that the Sniper 75mm is the best of the bunch optically. It does face very stiff competition from the excellent Viltrox Pro AF 75mm F1.2 (my review here), though the Viltrox is bigger, heavier, and more expensive.

For that size, however, you get more features (aperture ring, AF/MF switch), weather sealing, and it is definitely sharper. But this new Sniper 75mm is no slouch optically, and while it isn’t as transcendently sharp as the Viltrox at F1.2, it helps compensate by both a very useful amount of sharpness along with gorgeous bokeh.

This is definitely the “bokeh monster” of the Sniper series, capable of crushing backgrounds and delivering beautiful subject isolation.

75mm is the least traditional of the focal lengths in the Sniper series. Once you apply the 1.5x crop factor of the APS-C cameras that these lenses are designed for (whether Fuji, Sony, or Nikon), the 16, 23, 35, and 56mm become the full frame equivalents of 24, 35, 50, and 85mm – the most common prime focal lengths you could ask for. 75mm is a much less conventional 112.5mm full frame equivalent, and while that isn’t as flexible a focal length as some of these others, it a really great portrait focal length because you can shoot full length and still have the background blurred out. Viltrox’s Pro AF 75mm F1.2 has proven very popular for that reason.

All of these Sniper lenses have sported an F1.2 maximum aperture. That’s an obvious advantage for the F1.2 in two ways: 1) when shooting in low light conditions that large aperture can suck in more light 2) the depth of field will shallower at F1.2 than F1.4, allowing for larger, softer bokeh highlights and a more blurred out background. The fact that the Sirui Nightwalker 75mm T1.2 exists (my video review here) tells me that the light transmission for the lens is excellent, as the T-stop actually matches the F-stop (fairly rare, in my experience). This is a very bright lens, and that’s going to be useful in a lot of situations. It has no problem when the light gets dim.

The Sniper series has come in three different finish option: a black/grey finish with carbon fiber accents (the lenses I’m testing come in this finish), a white finish, and a silver finish. Each is available for the three different mounts that lens is sold for. These photos cover the three older lenses as I’m reviewing the 16mm and 75mm lenses before public release.

It is great to see Sirui forging their own design path, and I’ve been impressed across the three different lineups that I’ve tested (Sniper, Night Walker, and Saturn). So let’s take a closer look at this 75mm F1.2 lens from Sirui.

Photos of the Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2

Images taken with the Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Early bird discounted pricing: https://sirui.kckb.me/dabbott

Purchase the Sirui Sniper Lenses @ Sirui (use code DustinA for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

Purchase the Fujifilm X-H2 @ B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-T5 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Find it Used at KEH 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-S20 @ B&H Photo | Adorama  | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

  Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch  

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui, Sniper, Sirui Sniper, Sirui Sniper 75mm F1.2, 75mm, 23mm, 33mm 56mm, 16mm, F1.2, STM, Carbon Fiber, Review, Fuji X, Sony E, Review, Telephoto, Action, Tracking, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, Sony a6700, Sony a6600, Fujifilm X-T5, Fujifilm X-H2, let the light in, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 X-mount Review

Dustin Abbott

June 27th, 2024

It is always interesting to see new lensmakers entering the market. Sirui started with cine (video) lenses (all manual – no autofocus or electronics), but they are now releasing their first autofocus lenses – called the “Sniper” series – and I’ve done an overview of the series here. The Sniper Series was initially made up of 3 APS-C specific lenses – a 23mm F1.2, 33mm F1.2, and 56mm F1.2 lens, but they have now expanded the series to include both a wider angle option (Sniper 16mm F1.2) and a longer telephoto option (Sniper 75mm F1.2). It is these latter two that I am currently reviewing, and today’s review focuses on the wide angle option – the Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 AF lens. These can be purchased individually for $349 USD each (though various discounts will provide a little fluctuation in pricing). These lenses will be available in Fuji X-mount (reviewed here), Sony E-mount, and Nikon Z mount configurations, though in all mounts they are designed to cover the APS-C and not the full frame image circle. Find out by watching my video review below…or just reading on.

Follow Me @ YouTube | Patreon |  Instagram | Facebook | DA Merchandise | Flickr | 500px   

Thanks to Sirui for sending me a set of review samples of the lenses.   As always, this is a completely independent review.  All opinions and conclusions are my own. I’m doing this review on a 40MP Fujifilm X-H2 camera.

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

Here’s a quick way to access my reviews of each lens in the series:

I’m doing this review on Fuji X-mount since that is what Sirui had available to send me. In many ways this is jumping right into the fire, as there is no platform more optically demanding than the 40MP sensor on my Fujifilm X-H2. This is the equivalent of over 90MP on full frame, a resolution point that is currently 30+MP higher than what is even available on full frame. That creates an extremely demanding optical test that will push this new series to the limits. Is this 16mm F1.2 Sniper lens up to the challenge? As with the other lenses, that answer really depends on your priorities and expectations as a photographer, though I will say that I think these two newest Sniper lenses are optically the best of the bunch. It is very rare to get such a bright aperture on a wide angle lens like this, with competing lenses having (at most) a less bright F1.4 aperture. Though the wide angle of the view dictates that depth of field is still not going to be particularly shallow, this does allow you to play with focal points a bit. In this shot, for example, I first focused on the barn and left the foreground trees out of focus:

In this second shot I focused on the foliage in the foreground, leaving the barn slightly out of focus.

In neither case is the amount of blur strong, but it at least allows for some creativity that you don’t always get with a wide angle lens. Getting closer to your subject and shooting at F1.2 does allow for some pretty nice bokeh for a wide angle lens (bokeh has definitely been a strength for this series!)

16mm is obviously a popular wide angle focal length on APS-C, as once you apply the 1.5x crop factor of the camera you mount it on (whether Fuji, Sony, or Nikon), you have a full frame equivalent focal length of 24mm. The Sniper 16mm has an advantage over many competitors due to having a maximum aperture of F1.2, which is about a half stop faster/brighter than F1.4. For example, my X-H2 metered at 1/90th second at F1.2, but 1/60th of a second at F1.4 with the Sniper 16mm F1.2 mounted. That’s an obvious advantage for the F1.2 in two ways: 1) when shooting in low light conditions that large aperture can suck in more light 2) the depth of field will shallower at F1.2 than F1.4, allowing for larger, softer bokeh highlights and a more blurred out background. The fact that the Sirui Nightwalker 16mm T1.2 exists (my video review here) tells me that the light transmission for the lens is excellent, as the T-stop actually matches the F-stop (fairly rare, in my experience). This is a very bright lens, and that’s going to be useful in a lot of situations.

The Sniper series has come in three different finish option: a black/grey finish with carbon fiber accents (the lenses I’m testing come in this finish), a white finish, and a silver finish. Each is available for the three different mounts that lens is sold for. These photos cover the three older lenses as I’m reviewing the 16mm and 75mm lenses before public release.

It is great to see Sirui forging their own design path, and I’ve been impressed across the three different lineups that I’ve tested (Sniper, Night Walker, and Saturn). So let’s take a closer look at this 16mm F1.2 lens from Sirui.

Sirui Sniper 16mm Build and Handling

The original Sniper lenses all shared a common outer shell and exterior dimensions though with a slight weight variation due to the larger optical elements in some. There’s a little more variation in the new 16mm and 75mm F1.2 designs, however, as would be expected with these slightly more extreme focal lengths. This Sniper 16mm is the lightest of the series (smallest glass elements), weighing in at 375g (13.2 oz) on my scale. The 16mm and 75mm Sniper lenses share a common length (94mm or 3.7″), but you can see that the 75mm is considerably wider than the 16mm.

I measure the 75mm at nearly 75mm (2.95″), with the 16mm being a slimmer 70mm (2.75″). The 75mm is the heaviest of the group at 466g (16.1 oz), which is unsurprising as it has easily the most glass inside. The 16mm, 23mm, 33mm, and 56mm Sniper lenses all share a common 58mm front filter thread, but the filter threads on the 75mm grow to 67mm to accommodate the wider diameter of the lens.

The weight will very slightly vary according to lens and mount. The X-mount that I’m testing is actually the lightest (by a few grams), due to the X-mount being the smallest of the three in diameter. Nikon’s Z-mount is the largest in diameter, with Sony E-mount in between.

So how does the 70 x 94mm and 386g of the Sniper 16mm F1.2 compare to the F1.4 competition from Fuji and Sigma? The Fuji 16mm F1.4 WR is a bit smaller (73.4 x 73 mm – wider but shorter) and has an identical 375g weight. The Sigma 16mm F1.4 is both bigger (72.2 x 92.6 mm) and heavier (405g), so the Sniper 16mm is right where it should be in size and weight, particularly considering it is a bit brighter than either of these lenses.

As noted, the look of the Sniper lenses is unique. There’s not much here in terms of features, but the lenses do have an upscale look with a variety of textures and finishes. I’m reviewing the lenses labeled as being “black”, but black (at least in the typical lens sense) is not the vibe I get off these lenses. There are two metal sections (one near the lens mount and another in the middle of the lens) that has a traditional anodized satin black finish, but in between there is a section of genuine carbon fiber that looks very cool. Carbon fiber is a more upscale material and it definitely sets these lenses apart.

There are two badges in this section. One is a plate with the Sirui banding in raised metal lettering.

The second is on the left side, and there is a another smaller badge that says AF and APS-C. Interestingly the word “Sniper” appears nowhere on the lens.

There are no switches on the lens barrel nor an aperture ring. That’s more noticeable here on Fuji, where aperture rings are fairly standard. The Fuji 16mm options (F1.4 and F2.8) both have aperture rings (and weather sealing), though the Sigma does not. Prices range from $399 (Fuji 16mm F2.8) to a whopping $999 (Fuji 16mm F1.4). The Sigma 16mm F1.4 DN is going to be the closest to a direct competitor, costing a little more ($449 USD) but have a more established reputation for performance (my review of the Sigma on E-mount can be found here).

If the Sniper lenses are not set apart by features, then Sirui has attempted to distinguish them by style instead. That middle anodized metal section includes an interesting projection over the carbon fiber section that has the lens designation there, including the focal length and maximum aperture value. This section is important if you own multiple of the Sniper lenses, since they all look the same.

Next comes a manual focus ring with a diamond pattern akin to Canon’s control rings rather than a typical ribbed finish. It’s one more area where the lenses maintain their own unique look.

The manual focus rings move smoothly and the weight is fairly light. Not so light that you can’t accurately focus, but a bit lighter than what I personally prefer. There is no obvious stepping when manually focusing, though I do find (as per usual on Fuji!) that large manual focus changes require a number of rotations. This is particularly true if you are trying to focus towards minimum focus; I counted 6 full rotations to get from 1 meter to minimum focus.

After the focus ring is a blue accent ring that is nearly turquoise in color. Once again it is little different than other lens that I’ve tested, and it works. The final section at the front of the lens has a titanium colored anodized metal finish, so less than half of the lens surface is actually purely black. Each lens color has some unique ingredient: black = carbon fiber, silver = aluminum alloy, white = ceramic baked paint.

A look at the front of the lens shows the 58mm filter threads (in metal), along with a front façade that has the lens designation and the filter size on the opposite side.

The included lens hoods is nothing special. It is made of plastic and doesn’t feel as premium at the rest of the lens. It is petal shaped and flares out away from the lens to prevent vignetting, though this does make it a bit wider for storage when reversed. I do appreciate the ribbed section in the hood which gives a little more grip.

It’s worth noting that both the front pinch cap along with the rear cap are quite low profile. The front cap is just a few millimeters thick, and the rear cap too feels slimmer than usual. These little details stood out to me as nothing about the lenses felt generic or “by-the-numbers”. Sirui is doing their own thing here, and I like the attention to detail.

At the rear of the lens we have a metal lens mount complete with the appropriate electronic contacts; aperture will be controlled from the camera. There is a USB-C port there that will allow for future firmware updates. That’s a really important move by Sirui, as they are new to autofocus design. The ability to update the focus algorithms in their lenses will help them to focus better in the future and also allows the lenses to be futureproof.

The aperture iris is made up of a higher-than-average 11 rounded blades. That’s a great choice in a lens with an F1.2 aperture, as it helps assure that the aperture iris stays circular as the lens is stopped down.

The minimum focus distances for the Sniper 16mm is fair high at 30cm. Sirui has not listed the maximum magnification, but it looks to be in the sub 0.10x range. Here’s a look at the 16mm’s maximum magnification.

The large maximum aperture will allow you still blur out backgrounds, but that’s not because you are particularly close to your subject!

There is no weather sealing gasket on the Sirui Sniper lenses or internal seals. These are not weather resistant lenses.

There are some pros and cons for the design and handling. On the positive side, the lenses look and feel great. There are some premium materials being used in the design and the attention to detail is excellent. On the negative side, there are no real features on the lenses outside of the USB-C port for firmware updates. But also worth considering is that the lenses have a larger maximum aperture than competing lenses while also tending to be less expensive.

Autofocus Performance

The Sirui Sniper lenses are all equipped with STM (stepping) focus motors. There is a certain amount of autofocus performance that is camera and camera system specific, so I’ll try to distinguish between the lens performance and the system performance as much as possible. My experience is that third party lenses focus better on Sony and Nikon than they do on Fuji, and that’s largely because Fuji’s autofocus systems in their cameras are not quite as sophisticated as equivalent Sony or Nikon cameras.

That being said, autofocus speed is a slightly below average for a modern STM motor on Fuji. When doing my focus speed tests with the Sniper 16mm from close to distance, I found that I could see my subject coming into focus rather than just instantly being in focus. When I went outdoors, focus speed picked up, though it still isn’t the instant focus I see with the better modern lenses. There is light clicking sound that I noticed during my focus tests, and it is caused by the the sound of the aperture blades opening and closing. This happens even when the aperture is wide open, as the aperture blades close partway in between focus on Fuji (for some reason). This happens with all lenses, but the aperture blades on the Sniper lenses are really noisy. If I keep the shutter held halfway down in the AF-C mode and move focus around, I hear only a light whirring with my ear near the lens barrel, but if I take my finger on and off the shutter button, there’s a lot of clacking from the aperture blades. It unfortunately makes autofocus feel less sophisticated than it actually is.

Outside of that annoyance, focus is actually pretty good. Wider angle lenses like this have much larger depth of field, so typical focus changes come fairly fast. I also had good focus accuracy as well, even when shooting at F1.2 where depth of field is more shallow (like above).

Equally important to me with a wide angle lens is that it focus well at smaller apertures, as some lenses will pulse a bit when there are many focus possibilities. The Sniper 16mm focused well in these situations.

When I moved around with Eye AF engaged, focus tracked accurately and the green box stayed locked on the “eye” of my little test statue.

So other than being a little noisy in focus, I actually had no issue with the lens for stills. Like other lenses in the series, autofocus isn’t fast, but it does seem to be accurate for stills/photography.

The state of autofocus on Fuji for video remains pretty abysmal relative to other platforms. Add a third party lens from company that has been doing autofocus for less than a year, and you’ve got a recipe for a bit of frustration. Focus pulls were a little more reactive than some of the previous Sniper lenses, though there were still some visible steps and pulses along the way. Focus did a bit of settling before a final lock. The microphone also picked up some faint clicks and whirs during the focus action.

My hand test (where I alternately block and then unblock the camera’s view of my face with my hand) was also frustrating. The lens is not reactive, so there’s a bit of a pause before focus transitions start after the hand is added or removed, and often focus had just not arrived at the destination before it needed to start moving again…even though I was moving slower and more deliberately than usual.

On a positive note, focus breathing is fairly well controlled.

If you rarely shoot video (or don’t really need autofocus during video recording), then the Sniper 16mm will work fine. Just know it isn’t the most sophisticated out there.

Sirui Sniper 16mm Image Quality

The Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 has an interesting optical design of 14 elements in 5 groups. Typically the ratio of elements to groups is much closer. Like most of the other lenses in the series, the Sniper 16mm behaves a lot like classic lenses with very large apertures. It is somewhat dreamy (low contrast) wide open and then sharpens up to higher contrast and detail at smaller apertures. This F1.2 image does what I want in terms of creating a more shallow depth of field that hints at the path beyond, but if you look at it critically there isn’t a lot of contrast in the main leaves.

I like the 16mm better than some lenses in the series because I do feel like it has more sharpness potential when stopped down…even on the very demanding sensor of my X-H2. When stopped down it delivers high detail images that look great.

Our optical deep dive starts with a look at vignette and distortion, an area where the Sniper lenses have held up quite well. The 16mm is no exception and is actually a standout in a wide angle prime for essentially having no distortion to speak of.

Vignette is about average for this type of lens, requiring about a +70 correct for (a little over two stops). There is a correct profile available that deals with these automatically. Images look nice and bright with the profile.

The original trio of Sniper lenses struggled with fringing – longitudinal chromatic aberrations – but the Sniper 16mm does just fine in this regard.

Lateral chromatic aberrations near the edge of the frame are also very well controlled. There is almost no fringing in the transitions from black and white.

This a big part of the reason why this 16mm has more sharpness potential than the first three lenses from the series that I reviewed.

So how about resolution? The 40MP Fuji X-Trans sensor tends to make all but the very sharpest of lenses look a little soft under the microscope of my tests. I examine results at a 200% magnification, and that’s a lot to ask of any lens. Here’s a look at the test chart:

And here is a look at F1.2 crops from the center, then mid-frame, and then extreme lower right corner:

The crops reveal that contrast is not high at F1.2 (there’s almost like a “film” over the results), but also that resolution is fairly consistent across the frame.

It is possible to shoot landscape images at F1.2 if you don’t pixel peep.

The difference with the 16mm vs the 23mm, 33mm, and 56mm, is that the 16mm sharpens up much faster. Look at how much sharper and high contrast the results are at F2 (100% magnification):

The corners will really sharpen up by F5.6, :

Landscape images shine from F5.6 to F8.

By F11 you will see some softening due to the effect of diffraction, with a rapid deterioration by F16.

The bokeh here is somewhat better than most 16mm lenses. There is a bit of outlining in some situations, but overall it looks pretty good for a wide angle lens.

Things are a little busier if you back up a bit.

If you want creamy bokeh, consider other lenses in the series. The bokeh here is good for a wide angle lens, but the other lenses in the series all have softer bokeh.

The aperture iris produces nice looking sunstar/sunbursts. I particularly like it when shooting through things (like branches) and allowing the sunburst to pop through.

If I allow a bigger amount of light through, there’s more flaring.

Expect to see a bit more ghosting if there is nothing blocking the sun, but nothing too bad.

This is a fairly decent lens for shooting the night sky with. There is some coma at high magnification (as you’ll see below), but it is also very bright at F1.2 and allows you to keep the ISO down for cleaner results.

None of these Sniper lenses have been world beaters optically, but the 16mm F1.2 is one of the better lenses in the series. It is sharp enough when stopped down to cover the very high resolution of the Fuji’s 40MP APS-C sensor, and doesn’t really embarrass itself in any area. Getting an autofocus wide angle prime with an F1.2 aperture is rare, period, but getting one for just $350 USD is unprecedented. You can check out the image gallery to see more photos and see if the rendering from the lens suits you.

Conclusion

The Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 AF lens is a welcome addition to the Sniper series. It is a great focal length, is extremely bright, and is still moderate enough in size that it is easy to bring along. When you stop it down it is very sharp, and doesn’t have a lot of extra optical flaws.

The Sniper 16mm is a little less sharp than the Sigma 16mm F1.4 DN, but it also controls aberrations better and has lower distortion

The Sirui Sniper 16mm F1.2 might be the perfect lens for you if you often shoot in lower light conditions aren’t really a pixel peeper anyway, though the Sniper 16mm is fairly sharp. It’s also cheaper than any of the main competitors at 16mm, and that’s always going to be an attractive quality.

Pros:

  • Unique design that uses premium materials
  • Bright F1.2 aperture
  • Ability to upgrade firmware through USB-C port
  • Good focus accuracy for stills
  • Low distortion
  • Good control of aberrations
  • Nice bokeh and rendering
  • Optically matched to other Sniper lenses
  • Well priced

Cons:

  • Aperture iris clacks a lot during focus
  • No aperture ring
  • Low maximum magnification
  • Video focus isn’t great

__________________________________________________________________________________________________

GEAR USED:

Early bird discounted pricing: https://sirui.kckb.me/dabbott

Purchase the Sirui Sniper Lenses @ Sirui (use code DustinA for 5% off) | B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany

Purchase the Fujifilm X-H2 @ B&H Photo | Adorama | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-T5 @ B&H Photo | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Find it Used at KEH 

Purchase the Fujifilm X-S20 @ B&H Photo | Adorama  | Amazon | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Amazon Germany | Ebay 

Want to support this channel? Use these affiliate links to shop at: B&H Photo | Amazon | Adorama | Camera Canada | Amazon Canada | Amazon UK | Ebay | Make a donation via Paypal

  Buy DA Merchandise https://bit.ly/TWIMerch  

B&H Logo

Keywords: Sirui, Sniper, Sirui Sniper, 16mm, 23mm, 33mm 56mm, 75mm, F1.2, STM, Carbon Fiber, Review, Fuji X, Sony E, Review, Telephoto, Action, Tracking, Hands On, Dustin Abbott, Real World, Comparison, Sharpness, Bokeh, Flare Resistance, Autofocus, Image Quality, Sample Images, Video, Photography, Sony a6700, Sony a6600, Fujifilm X-T5, Fujifilm X-H2, let the light in, #letthelightin, DA

DISCLAIMER: This article and description contains affiliate links, which means that if you click on one of the product links, I’ll receive a small commission. As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.